Fox News is FAILING post-Tucker Carlson
Cutting Tucker Carlson has not been good for Fox News’ business.
MSNBC has just beaten Fox in total viewers and in the 25-to-54 age demographic, which never happened when Tucker was there.
MSNBC scored 1.46 million total day viewers and 179,000 viewers within the age demographic, while Fox News came in second with 1.28 million total day viewers and 136,00 within the age demographic.
“Are you kidding me, for Fox News? This is really bad,” Pat Gray of "Pat Gray Unleashed" comments.
Fox News has claimed that Tucker Carlson’s new Twitter show has violated his contract, but Keith Malinak and Gray believe Tucker probably hasn’t actually done anything wrong.
“That’s social media, you’re telling me what I can and can’t do on my own personal social media?” Malinak says.
“I think that’s why he’s defying him,” Gray responds, “and saying ‘Screw you, I’m gonna keep doing it.’”
Tucker’s lawyer, Harmeet Dhillon, has also said that Tucker will not be silenced by the far left or Fox News.
“Fox News has been doing this crap for a long time,” Gray says.
Gray and Malinak believe that unlike Tucker, Fox News has never actually been interested in bringing its viewers the truth.
“When’s the last time you saw a news report critical of the vaccine? Oh that’s right, there hasn’t been one,” Malinak adds, “because they bankroll that network.”
According to Gray, the Saudis owned a 10% interest in Fox and had serious influence on the network.
“That wasn’t that long ago,” he says.
Want more from Pat Gray?
To enjoy more of Pat's biting analysis and signature wit as he restores common sense to a senseless world, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.
Wuhan lab agreement with UTMB allows 'secret files' to be deleted at request
The Chinese lab at the center of the disputed lab-leak origins theory for COVID-19 had an agreement with a U.S. lab in Texas giving both parties the right to ask their partner to destroy all records of their work, according to a memorandum obtained by the non-profit watchdog group U.S. Right to Know.
The Wuhan Institute of Virology and the Galveston National Laboratory at the University of Texas Medical Branch signed a memorandum of understanding in 2017 that states either lab can ask the other to return or "destroy" any "secret files, materials and equipment."
Both of these labs study the world's most dangerous pathogens, and they have worked together since 2013, making their collaboration formal in 2018. Researchers at UTMB have received federal funding from the National Institutes of Health to conduct bio-safety training with their partners in Wuhan, who operate under the state-run Chinese Academy of Sciences. The objective of the partnership was to promote research cooperation between the U.S. and China to control infectious diseases and protect "laboratory safety and global health security," according to the memo.
The document states that either party "is entitled to ask the other to destroy and/or return the secret files, materials and equipment without any backups."
This confidentiality clause extends to any communications, documents, data, or equipment resulting from the two labs' collaboration and is retained after the agreement's five year term ends in October 2022.
“All cooperation … shall be treated as confidential information by the parties,” the memo states.
SCOOP from @emilyakopp : "The Wuhan Institute of Virology has the right to ask a partnering lab in the U.S. to destroy all records of their work, according to a legal document obtained by @USRightToKnow" full discussion w/ @briebriejoy & @KimIversenShow : https://youtu.be/A45vKmCzzaI\u00a0pic.twitter.com/1xQtH0ktnD— Rising (@Rising) 1650468657
Experts that spoke to USRTK said the agreement contains broad language that should raise red flags, given that the Chinese government has obstructed international investigations into the COVID-19 pandemic's origins and the Wuhan lab has previously been accused of deleting viral sequences from a NIH database that could shed a light on where the virus came from.
“The clause is quite frankly explosive,” said Reuben Guttman, a partner at Guttman, Buschner & Brooks PLLC who specializes in whistleblower cases. “Anytime I see a public entity, I would be very concerned about destroying records.”
Guttman said that as a public university, the UTMB lab faces high standards for record-keeping under state and federal laws.
“You can’t just willy nilly say, ‘well, you know, the Chinese can tell us when to destroy a document.’ It doesn’t work like that,” he said. “There has to be a whole protocol.”
Legal experts interviewed by the Houston Chronicle agreed that records of the university's collaboration with the Wuhan lab would be subject to record-keeping laws and that the university should not be able to delete them because of a contractual agreement.
“You can’t contract away obligations under a statute,” Austin attorney Bill Aleshire, a specialist in public record laws, told the newspaper. "Those are public records and … Galveston can’t destroy records that are part of a publicly funded document. And Wuhan sure as hell can’t ask Galveston to destroy its records.”
In a statement, UTMB spokesman Chris Smith Gonzalez told the Chronicle that the university "has not been asked to destroy any documents nor would UTMB follow through with such a request.”
“As a government-funded entity, UTMB complies with all applicable public information law obligations, including the preservation of all documentation of its research and findings,“ he said.
The university added that it does not plan to renew the agreement with the Wuhan lab.
The language of the agreement with the Galveston lab raises questions about the Wuhan Institute of Virology's commitment to transparency and potential willingness to delete data on the orders of Chinese Communist Party authorities.
Chinese government officials removed genetic data from 22,000 virus samples from an internet database in September 2019 and has since refused to turn over data, frustrating scientists and U.S. intelligence officials investigating the origins of the pandemic. In June 2021, an American scientist named Dr. Jesse Bloom published research that showed early COVID-19 virus samples from the Wuhan seafood market — where the first major outbreak of the virus was reported — were not fully representative of the viruses actually present in Wuhan at the time. Scientists said that Bloom's work suggested COVID-19 had been spreading in Wuhan earlier than Chinese officials claimed and called for greater transparency from China.
Bloom also discovered that the Chinese scientists had asked an NIH database to remove viral sequences from its database and that the government complied with their request. NIH later confirmed this to the Telegraph.
Dr. Zhengli Shi, the lead researcher at the Wuhan lab, has previously denied accusations from Western bio-security experts that her lab deleted records relevant to the origins of COVID-19.
“Even if we gave them all the records, they would still say we have hidden something or we have destroyed the evidence,” she told MIT Technology Review in an interview, calling the accusations "baseless and appalling."
Scientists are divided on the origins of COVID-19, with most believing that the virus naturally evolved, although a lab-leak origin has not been ruled out. The Chinese government's lack of transparency is obstructing the truth.
YouTube Suspends Popular News Channel Simply For Playing Clip Of Donald Trump Denying Election Results
YouTube temporarily suspends The Hill's channel
YouTube has temporarily suspended The Hill's channel — according to Robby Soave, who is both a co-host on The Hill's "Rising" program and a senior editor at Reason, The Hill's YouTube account has been suspended for seven days.
"Last night, we learned that YouTube had suspended The Hill's entire account for the next seven days, preventing us from publishing new videos. The reason was election misinformation, stemming from two previous videos. The first video in question, which was not aired as part of Rising, was raw footage of Trump's speech at the Conservative Political Action Conference on February 26, during which he made false claims about the election," Soave wrote.
Soave indicated that the other video at issue was a segment from "Rising" that aired clips of former President Donald Trump being interviewed by Fox News host Laura Ingraham, including a part where Trump claimed that there had been a "rigged election."
Our Hill colleagues also posted a raw video of Trump's speech to CPAC, without comment or rebuttal. We know the 2020 election was neither stolen nor rigged and look forward to returning to our channel soon. We appreciate your support!— Rising (@Rising) 1646339695
While Soave and co-host Ryan Grim did not seek to rebut Trump's claim, Soave wrote that, "No one who has watched Rising, read my work at Reason, or read Grim's work at The Intercept, could possibly come away with the impression that either of us thinks the 2020 election was rigged. We have criticized that false claim, both on the show and in our respective publications."
YouTube's policies prohibit "Content that advances false claims that widespread fraud, errors, or glitches changed the outcome of select past national elections, after final election results are officially certified."
"We may allow content that violates the election integrity policy noted on this page if the content includes additional context in the video, audio, title, or description," YouTube also notes.
"I understood that the platform would punish content creators who made false statements about the election. I had no idea that YouTube would punish news channels for reporting the news," Soave wrote.
'This isn't such a crazy conspiracy theory after all': Journalist concedes 'loony' Glenn Beck is RIGHT about the Great Reset
Kim Iversen, journalist, YouTuber, and host of "The Kim Iversen Show," reacted to Glenn Beck's appearance last week on "Tucker Carlson Tonight" by conceding that, while the subject of Beck's new book, "The Great Reset: Joe Biden and the Rise of Twenty-First-Century Fascism" might at first sound "a little bit loony," closer analysis confirms "this isn't such a crazy conspiracy theory after all."
"Glenn Beck was on Tucker Carlson's show last week touting what has been called a right-wing conspiracy theory and discussing his new book, 'The Great Reset: Joe Biden and the Rise of Twenty-First-Century Fascism'," began Iverson on The Hill's "Rising."
"Well, maybe that all sounds a little bit loony — and believe me, I do think Glenn Beck tends to be a loon," she quipped. "But, maybe this isn't such a crazy conspiracy theory after all. And after seeing everything we've seen with the governments enacting all sorts of authoritarian controls and many other conspiracy theories coming true, maybe there's something to be concerned about. So, what is the Great Reset? The name even sounds conspiratorial, but believe it or not, it's a real thing."
Iverson went on to explain exactly who is behind the Great Reset, what their agenda entails, how they are using the COVID-19 pandemic to "to rebuild society in a way the global elites see best fit."
"You'll own nothing and you will be happy: That's what they're saying," Iverson explained. "And with inflation sky high and no signs of it slowing down, they might be right. We are on our way to becoming a nation of renters, but don't worry it's nothing to fear ... don't worry, everything is being done under the premise that this is all ... being done for our own good, the benefit of a collective society, and we will be happy," she added sarcastically.
Iverson concluded by asking, "Who thinks it's a good idea that a bunch of corporate millionaire and billionaires and world leaders are getting together and coming up with what's best for we the little people? I mean, who thinks that that's a really good idea? And who thinks that they are going to be doing it for our benefit? But, of course they're going to frame it like 'Oh, this is good for you. You're going to rent. You'll own nothing and you'll be happy. Don't worry about it' ... When you look at the actual list of partners with the World Economic Forum, they control everything. They control media. They control health. They control business. They control everything, and so then it does become, how do we people fight against that?"
Watch the video clip below to hear Kim Iverson break it down and don' t miss tonight's special episode of "GlennTV" at 9:30ET on BlazeTV’s YouTube channel.
Want more from Glenn Beck?
To enjoy more of Glenn’s masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.