Tom Cotton spends 9 minutes embarrassing CNN anchor as she pushes false JD Vance accusation, Russian interference narrative



Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) bested CNN anchor Dana Bash on Sunday, using his nine-minute interview to undermine her narratives and poke holes in her questions.

Russian interference

Last week, the Justice Department unveiled an indictment against two Russian nationals on allegations of a "conspiracy to violate the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA) and conspiracy to commit money laundering."

The story was used as yet more evidence of Russian interference in the election, a narrative that Bash regurgitated.

'If that police officer hadn't been there, if Kamala Harris had gotten her way, many more students and teachers might have been killed.'

In response, Cotton not only explained why the narrative isn't true, but he drew attention to a more obvious and serious example of election interference.

"People should not knowingly take money from the government of Russia or Iran or China or any other adversarial nation to try to influence the election," Cotton began. "But I also think it's fair to say that a few memes or videos in the vast sea of political commentary is not going to make much of a difference in this election, nor has it in past elections as well.

"What did make a difference in the last election is the lies about Hunter Biden's laptop that more than four dozen former intelligence officials lied about in the middle of that campaign," he continued.

"And most networks, including this one, bought that lie hook, line, and sinker," Cotton pointed out. "That did make a difference in the election."

JD Vance quote

Later in the interview, Bash repeated a debunked accusation made against Republican vice presidential candidate JD Vance.

Last week, Vance was accused of saying nonchalantly that school shootings are a "fact of life" in America when, in reality, he was mourning such incidents. The framing appears to have originated with a social media post from the Associated Press, a post the outlet later deleted. The Harris campaign and Democrats immediately repeated the false framing to smear Vance.

"Do you accept that school shootings like this are just a way of life now?" Bash asked.

"No, absolutely not. And JD Vance doesn't either. He said that he doesn't want them to be a fact of life," Cotton fired back. "And this week, the Associated Press got caught distorting that quote from him, so bad that they had to retract it."

The Arkansas senator then demonstrated how Harris' policy preferences will exact real-world outcomes.

"Here's what we also know about that shooting, even as we're still gathering all the facts: It wasn't as bad as it might have been because there was a police officer on the school premises that was able to neutralize the shooter," Cotton explained.

"Kamala Harris wants to take police officers out of schools. She said it in the past. That's her position," he pointed out. "If that police officer hadn't been there, if Kamala Harris had gotten her way, many more students and teachers might have been killed."

Cheney's endorsement

At the beginning of the interview, Bash tried to magnify the significance of former Vice President Dick Cheney's endorsement of Vice President Kamala Harris, describing it as "really remarkable" while suggesting that it is bad for Donald Trump.

But Cotton wasn't buying the narrative.

"In the end, endorsements are not going to make the difference in this race. What's going to make the difference is their records," he told Bash.

Cotton later explained, "Some of this is probably that Donald Trump beat his daughter [Liz Cheney] in her last election by 39 points.

"I think most Americans are going to look at this race and compare the records they have. Again, it's a very unusual race when you have a president who served in office, who brought good times to America, and you have Kamala Harris, a San Francisco liberal, who has brought to America exactly what you see in San Francisco as well," he added.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

After Using ‘Russia’ Lies To Meddle In 2016 And 2020, Agencies Dust Off Playbook For 2024

Intelligence agencies used false claims of Russian interference to spy on the Trump campaign in 2016 and to shut down the Hunter Biden laptop story in 2020.

Hillary Clinton resurrects fears about Russian election interference ahead of possible Democratic loss in 2024



Failed presidential candidate Hillary Clinton appears eager to pre-emptively frame a Republican victory in the 2024 election as the result of Russian meddling.

The 75-year-old Democrat appeared in a Sunday episode of Jen Psaki's MSNBC show, where she once again intimated that the 2016 election was decided by Slavic specters contra the American people, claiming, "the Russians have proved themselves to be quite adept at interfering, and if [Russian President Vladimir Putin] has a chance, he'll do it again."

Clinton suggested months ahead of her landslide 2016 loss that the Democratic National Committee leak, which revealed an organizational effort to ice out her then-rival Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), had been the work Russian intelligence services. The ostensible success of the contested claim that Russians had a hand in her post-leak embarrassment eventually gave way to a broader Russian interference narrative that ultimately hamstrung former President Donald Trump throughout his four years in office.

Contrary to Clinton's claims and those gleefully advanced by the liberal media, the reports painstakingly produced by special counsels Robert Mueller and John Durham revealed there was no substantive evidence of Russian collusion.

Subsequent analysis revealed that to the extent there was foreign interference, it was likely inconsequential — not including the foreign-sourced Steele dossier collected for the Clinton campaign, which Democrats used to great effect. For instance, the Washington Post, whose journalists were awarded for peddling the discredited "Russia hoax" narrative, admitted that so-called Russian trolls "had no measurable impact in changing minds or influencing voter behavior" ahead of the 2016 presidential election.

The facts have not, however, chastened Clinton or her allies in the liberal media.

In the wake of an ABC News/Washington Post poll indicating that Trump leads President Joe Biden by 10 points in a possible head-to-head race, Psaki told Clinton on the Sunday episode of her show that Putin "has intervened in our election in the past. It's not something, as you experienced firsthand, it's not something that we talk about a lot. Do you fear that that is something that could be happening for 2024, and do you think we should be talking about it more?"

Clinton responded, "I think we should be talking about it more because I don't think that despite all the, you know, deniers there's any doubt he interfered in our election or that he has interfered in many ways in the internal affairs of other countries, funding political parties, funding political candidates, buying off government officials in different places."

"That is his opus [sic], you know his opus [sic] operandi in the sense that he hates democracy. He particularly hates the West and he especially hates us," continued Clinton. "Part of the challenge is to continue to explain to the American public that, you know, the kind of leader Putin is — this authoritarian dictator who literally kills his opposition, kills journalists, poisons people who disagree with him, invades other country, interferes with our election. That is part of the alternative we have to reject in this election."

Beyond rehashing debunked Russiagate themes, Clinton suggested that the choice in the 2024 election is not between Democrats and Republicans but rather between Democrats and "a kind of creeping fascism."

— (@)

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

The DOJ’s Election Interference Is Worse Than Anything The Russians Ever Did

If we learned anything since 2016, it’s that Democrats are gravely concerned about interference in U.S. elections — unless they’re the ones doing it. Thursday’s announcement that President Joe Biden’s Department of Justice is reportedly planning to indict Donald Trump has garnered squeals of excitement from Democrats and their legacy media sycophants, who for years […]

Meet The Partisans Who Wove The Censorship Complex’s Vast And Tangled Web

While federal funding is not solely responsible for the rapid expansion of the Censorship Complex, it is the most troubling because our government is using our money to censor our speech.

Fake News Board (Commonly Known As Pulitzer Prize) Defends Award To 2018 Russia Hoaxers

The Pulitzer Prize Board defended its 2018 award to a team of New York Times reporters who exacerbated the Russia hoax.

New Director Of National Intelligence: Congress Illegally Leaks Classified Intel So Much I’m Cutting Them Off

An increasing number of leaks by Congress for 'political purposes' have motivated him to change to only giving limited or written briefings for those 'who are entitled to it.'