10 Dead People Jim Acosta Should Interview Next

Jim Acosta managed to do the impossible this week. The disgraced former CNN host got some of the most deranged liberal psychopaths (BlueSky users) to agree with Donald Trump. They seem to have finally realized that Acosta is "a major sleazebag" and "one of the worst and most dishonest reporters in journalistic history," as Trump so eloquently stated earlier this year when Acosta "quit" his job to start his own #Resistance program on Substack.

The post 10 Dead People Jim Acosta Should Interview Next appeared first on .

Democrats created this court monster — now it’s eating them



The Supreme Court’s recent ruling greenlighting mass layoffs at the Department of Education sends a clear message: The courts no longer belong to the Democrats.

For decades, Democrats relied on judges to impose policies they couldn’t pass through Congress. But that strategy has collapsed. With a conservative majority now on the bench, the judicial workaround has given way to constitutional limits — and the left is losing.

Every time Democrats sue to block Trump’s orders, they hand him another opportunity — and this court is more than ready to lock in conservative victories for a generation.

In the final week of its 2024-2025 term, the high court:

  • Curbed federal courts’ ability to issue sweeping nationwide injunctions.
  • Affirmed the right of parents to opt their children out of school lessons that violate their religious beliefs.
  • Allowed South Carolina to deny Planned Parenthood Medicaid funding for non-abortion services.
  • Approved mass layoffs across the government — at least temporarily.

In high-stakes emergency cases, Trump keeps winning — notching victories in nearly all 18 Supreme Court petitions. That includes greenlights to deport migrants to third countries and enforce the transgender military ban.

Short-term gains, long-term pains

Democrats thought they could run out the clock with courtroom delay tactics. Instead, they handed Trump a fast pass to the one branch he dominates.

Only one branch of government speaks with a single, constitutionally defined voice — the executive. And right now, that voice belongs to the president, no matter how loudly the deep state screams.

Unlike the executive, Congress isn’t built for speed. It’s a fractured, slow-moving body by design — hundreds of voices split by region, party, and ego. The judiciary can splinter, too, with power scattered across lower courts nationwide.

But the Supreme Court? That’s a different story.

With a 6-3 conservative majority, Trump holds a 2-to-1 advantage. Imagine if Republicans had that kind of dominance in Congress.

Trump wouldn’t be scraping by with a razor-thin 220-212 majority in the House. His agenda would cruise through. In the Senate, forget the 60-vote filibuster firewall — Trump’s bills would pass outright.

Reconciliation wouldn’t be a high-wire act. It would be routine. No more watching the Senate parliamentarian gut key provisions from his One Big Beautiful Bill Act.

Granted, the Supreme Court can’t launch policy offensives like Congress or the White House. It waits for cases to land.

But thanks to Democrats, those cases keep coming. Every time they sue to block Trump’s executive orders, they hand him another opportunity — and this court is more than ready to lock in conservative victories for a generation.

Dems’ Achilles’ heel

For decades, Democrats treated the courts as a shortcut to power. When they couldn’t pass laws, they let judges do the work. Roe v. Wade was the crown jewel — a sweeping federal abortion mandate they never could have gotten through Congress. Even Ruth Bader Ginsburg admitted the legal reasoning was flimsy.

They used the same playbook to expand the welfare state and rewrite social policy from the bench. Judicial activism became the norm, and both sides played the game. But Democrats played it harder — and now the rules are turning against them.

What once looked like a string of permanent victories has turned into a pipeline of defeats. Every lawsuit they file hands Trump’s Supreme Court another shot at affirming his agenda. Even when he technically loses, the rulings often leave behind a roadmap showing exactly how to win the next round.

RELATED: Supreme Court grants massive victory to Trump administration on cutting down Department of Education

Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

Democrats’ Supreme Court problem could get a lot worse. Justice Sonia Sotomayor, the court’s oldest liberal at 71, has Type 1 diabetes and a history of health problems. If she steps down during Trump’s term, he could lock in a 7-2 conservative majority.

And if either Clarence Thomas, 77, or Samuel Alito, 75, decides to retire, Trump could replace them with younger conservatives — extending the court’s rightward tilt for decades.

Securing a conservative legacy

Trump has every incentive to issue bold executive orders. Each lawsuit the left files creates another opening for the Court to back him — and turn temporary wins into permanent precedent.

By chasing headlines and placating the base with short-term court fights, Democrats are handing Trump the long game. Their decades of judicial overreach have backfired. The courts they once controlled now serve as Trump’s most powerful weapon.

A Supreme History

UCLA law professor Stuart Banner’s new book is simply the finest and most valuable book ever written about the U.S. Supreme Court, a work of such erudite breadth and interpretive sophistication that in a world governed by merit it would be a slam-dunk winner of an upcoming Pulitzer Prize. Yet in today’s deeply degraded media landscape, only one major publication—the Wall Street Journal—has seen fit to give it the review attention it so richly deserves.

The post A Supreme History appeared first on .

CNN Commentator Suggests Biden Give Harris A New Job That Would Make ‘Republicans Go Crazy’

'I don’t want Justice Sotomayor to be another Ruth Bader Ginsburg'

Leftists Accuse Gorsuch Of Caring Too Much About Normal People And Not Enough About Bureaucrats

The left's latest attack stems from Gorsuch's new book on the government going after regular Americans.

Not Content To Topple Monuments, The Left Erects Anti-Monuments

While a monument can bring a community together by its beauty and truth, an anti-monument divides a community through its ugliness and evil.

ProPublica Smear Of Justice Thomas Reveals A Partisan Double Standard For SCOTUS

Why is the left inventing a new recusal standard for Justice Thomas that didn’t apply to other justices, particularly to Ruth Bader Ginsburg?

Ruth Marcus’ Alito Attack Is Grossly Hypocritical Considering Her Endorsement Of Nina Totenberg’s Work

Ruth Marcus' selective outrage over Supreme Court justices and the media is emblematic of the rot in American journalism.

WATCH: Mike Lee Sounds Off On Ruth Bader Ginsburg's Mysterious $1 Million Award

The late Supreme Court justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg would have been in hot water for concealing the ultimate recipients of a $1 million prize she won from a liberal billionaire’s foundation in 2019, Senator Mike Lee (R., Utah) charged during a Senate Judiciary Committee meeting Thursday. "There is one allegation, it’s come to light fairly […]

The post WATCH: Mike Lee Sounds Off On Ruth Bader Ginsburg's Mysterious $1 Million Award appeared first on Washington Free Beacon.