Trump administration rolls out a new deterrent for anti-Israel boycotts​



The Trump administration is once again pressuring anti-Israel actors, this time by denying federal funds for disaster relief.

The Department of Homeland Security, which oversees the Federal Emergency Management Agency, updated its terms and conditions Friday such that any city found to be boycotting Israel will be denied disaster relief funds. If a city is found to have cut or limited its "commercial relations" with Israel, the city will be ineligible for a portion of the $1.9 billion in federal grants covered by the updated terms.

'Even worse about this Trump policy ... is it only applies to Israel.'

Although DHS categorized this provision as part of its anti-discrimination policy, critics have called the policy "insane," pointing to the fact that it applies only to Israel and not other foreign countries.

"The Trump admin decision to withhold disaster relief funds is even more insane than I thought," "Breaking Points" co-host Saagar Enjeti said in a post on X.

RELATED: One Republican's rhetoric is even starting to spook pro-Israel groups

Photo by RONEN ZVULUN/POOL/AFP via Getty Images

"Even worse about this Trump policy — that bans disaster relief funds to any American state or city boycotting Israel — is it only applies to Israel," Glenn Greenwald said in a post on X. "They can boycott France, or Peru, or UAE, or South Korea, or even other American states and get funds: Just can't boycott Israel."

Israel's relationship with the United States has prompted some Republican lawmakers and even Trump allies to become increasingly skeptical. Republican Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia became the first GOP lawmaker to call the war in Gaza a "genocide," and public sentiment is beginning to shift.

RELATED: Republican lawmaker bucks party, calls ongoing war in Gaza a 'genocide'

Photo by Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images

Support for Israel hit a record-breaking low of 46%, which is the lowest recorded sentiment in 25 years that Gallup has been surveying on the issue. The previous lowest point was 51% support for Israel, which was recorded in 2024 and in 2001.

Despite the slipping support and outrage from certain Republicans, a spokesman for DHS Secretary Kristi Noem told Reuters that the policy is meant to enforce antidiscrimination efforts.

"DHS will enforce all antidiscrimination laws and policies, including as it relates to the BDS movement, which is expressly grounded in anti-Semitism."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Democratic senator appears on Colbert show after missing key Israel votes



While the Senate worked through several key resolutions to block arms sales to Israel, Democrat Sen. Elissa Slotkin of Michigan apparently skipped out to tape her appearance on Stephen Colbert's show.

The Senate voted on two resolutions to block additional military aid to Israel Thursday night, both of which failed. Although Democrats had unprecedented support to bar Israel from receiving additional aid, Slotkin spent her afternoon alongside a talk show host.

'I'm not going to cut off a blanket next sale on a defensive weapon that comes through.'

RELATED: Cory Booker lashes out against colleagues during Senate floor freak-out: 'It's time for Democrats to have backbone'

Photo by Scott Kowalchyk/CBS via Getty Images

The resolutions, which were spearheaded by independent Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont, both failed in the Senate in 70-27 and 72-24 votes. Both votes were dead on arrival with or without Slotkin's support, but this is not the first time the freshman senator has been scrutinized for her position on Israel.

In an interview on "Breaking Points" on Tuesday, co-hosts Saagar Enjeti and Krystal Ball grilled Slotkin, who said she was open to blocking arms sales for "offensive" weapons to Israel.

"There is a difference between a weapon to protect a country from incoming missiles versus other types," Slotkin said. "Offensive and defensive weapons are different."

Enjeti pressed Slotkin, asking if she would be in favor of banning "offensive" weapons to Israel, which she seemed open to.

RELATED: Kamala Harris reveals the next step for her political comeback: 'Devout public servant'

— (@)

"That certainly, to me, would be a place to look," Slotkin said. "But I'm not going to cut off a blanket next sale on a defensive weapon that comes through."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Are Democrats reclaiming the 'podcast bros'?



President Donald Trump notched a historic victory in 2024, becoming the first Republican to sweep all seven swing states and to secure the popular vote since 1984. His success has been attributed to many different aspects of his campaign, but one unorthodox strategy stuck out.

In between countless campaign rallies and many media appearances, Trump made his rounds on several platforms that have been casually dubbed as the "bro podcasts." The slate of comedians, sports enthusiasts, and cultural commentators is a far cry from the traditional presidential debates brokered by corporate news outlets, yet the reach is arguably greater.

'Like a lot of normal Americans, some of the country's top podcast hosts aren't ideologues, they're just people who detest the political establishment.'

Trump subsequently made significant gains across several demographics, including Gen Z men, a generation that is measurably more conservative compared to their Millennial and Gen X predecessors. At the same time, their support for Trump is beginning to slip, and Democrats can smell blood in the water.

Many of these podcast hosts were perceived as sympathetic toward Trump during his campaign simply for interviewing the Republican frontrunner. It's important to clarify, however, that many of those same podcasters were in talks with former Vice President Kamala Harris' campaign, which eventually turned down all their interview requests — but not before making a pit stop at Alex Cooper's notorious sex podcast, "Call Her Daddy," of course.

RELATED: Progressive Democrat sits down with Glenn Beck despite disagreements: 'We're all Team America'

Al Drago/Bloomberg via Getty Images

The bottom line is that these podcasters are not the MAGA apologists the legacy media claims they are. Within the first six months of Trump's second term, the same hosts who sat down with the president leading up to November have also come out and criticized some policies implemented by the administration.

'Democrats shouldn’t approach these podcasts as a place to score points.'

Theo Von, the beloved comedian who hosts "This Past Weekend," has been especially critical of Trump's foreign policy and Israel's ongoing attacks in Gaza. Trump campaigned on ending foreign wars, yet the same conflicts rage on, leaving Von and many other Americans dissatisfied with the administration's trajectory.

“What’s the win for us? We’re just involved in some other thing while we have suffering here at home," Von said in June as tensions grew between Iran and Israel.

The Epstein saga, which dominated the political news cycle for over a week, also sowed division among podcast hosts and American voters alike.

"Sure feels like the dark arts are afoot!" Von said in response to the GOP's handling of Epstein-related votes. "Why no vote Speaker Johnson?"

RELATED: Liberals are furious at billionaire Democrat 'mega-donor' for admitting Obama and Biden were unresponsive compared to Trump

Photo by Emma McIntyre/Getty Images for Netflix

Comedian Andrew Schulz, who co-hosts the "Flagrant" podcast, has also criticized certain aspects of the Trump administration and its immigration policy. Schulz, who was a lifelong Democrat, told Saagar Enjeti of "Breaking Points" that elected officials ought to be held accountable, even if you supported them.

"If you're not willing to hold the person that you voted for to the standards that they expected, then you're not a real person that cares about what's happening in America," Schulz said.

Because podcasters like Schulz and Von refuse to cast themselves into ideological molds, there is room for a wide range of voices to share their thoughts and exchange ideas with the popular hosts. Many of these critiques are echoed by their audiences, and some Democrats are seizing the opportunity.

Since the inauguration, Trump's approval ratings among Gen Z and male voters have declined, in some cases in the double digits. One CBS poll shows that Gen Z approval of Trump has declined from 55% to 28% in just six months, while overall male approval has dipped from 60% to 47%. Notably, these are the same demographics that make up a large portion of the viewership for podcasts like "The Joe Rogan Experience" and "Flagrant."

'Democrats are desperate to get back their momentum with young voters, especially men, by looking like regular people.'

Emily Jashinsky, host of "After Party with Emily Jashinsky," told Blaze News that the real reason these podcasts have amassed great followings, particularly with young men, is not because of their party affiliation but because they are willing to go against the grain.

"Like a lot of normal Americans, some of the country's top podcast hosts aren't ideologues, they're just people who detest the political establishment," Jashinsky told Blaze News. "Hunter Biden actually framed himself and his father as victims of the political establishment in his conversation with Andrew Callaghan, and that's not an accident."

RELATED: Comedian Shane Gillis shocks ESPN crowd with Epstein and illegal alien jokes: 'This is Disney'

Photo by Drew Angerer/Getty Images

When asked point-blank if the "podcast bro" audience was "up for grabs" for Democrats, Schulz answered bluntly.

"Absolutely," Schulz said. "I'm up for grabs."

Democrats have since been making their rounds on the podcast circuit. Everyone from former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg, Democratic Rep. Ro Khanna of California, and even Gov. Gavin Newsom have made appearances alongside the "podcast bros."

"We're allegedly these 'big MAGA podcasts,' and Pete Buttigieg comes on and has the biggest interview of his career," Schulz said. "Not our biggest interview of our career, his biggest interview."

"It's very simple. Whoever has the ideas that meet the needs of the people and can actively convince us that they can execute those ideas is gonna win our vote."

"Democrats shouldn’t approach these podcasts as a place to score points," Khanna, who has previously appeared on "The Glenn Beck Podcast," told Blaze News. "I have always believed in talking with people who have different views — whether that’s on Fox News or podcasts. It’s about exchanging ideas and building authentic relationships."

RELATED: Newsom admits California depends on illegal labor — implies white Americans don’t want construction, farming jobs

Photo by MANDEL NGAN/AFP via Getty Images

Although Democrats like Newsom and Buttigieg are broadly considered to be figures of the establishment, their willingness to participate in challenging, long-form interviews is unorthodox for their party.

However, their willingness to deviate from their party norms should not be taken as a newfound embrace for free speech and open dialogue. Rather, this shift among certain Democrats seems to be simply an opportunistic form of damage control in response to America's overwhelming rejection of their party platform.

"Pete Buttigieg and James Talarico have showed up on programs like 'Pardon My Take,' 'Flagrant,' and 'Rogan' now that cancel culture is over, and Democrats are desperate to get back their momentum with young voters, especially men, by looking like regular people," Jashinsky added.

"Ceding these spaces to the right for fear of offending progressive mobs gave the right way more power to define the left because the left would refuse to even enter the arenas, let alone by criticizing the Democratic establishment," Jashinsky said. "Now, they're trying to do both."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

How Corporate Media’s Top Dogs Box Out Real Reporters From Asking The White House Tough Questions

If you’ve ever watched a press briefing and felt like everyone was asking the same questions, it’s because the corporate media drones are usually the only ones getting any.

Google Is Now Censoring American Journalists On Behalf Of Communist China

YouTube notified Enjeti and Ball that their video discussing communist China's censorship of Peng Shuai had been found not 'suitable for all advertisers.'

Corporate Media’s Intellectual Stagnation Feeds The New Contras’ Ascent

Yglesias will become part of The New Contras, a band of center-left journalists whose willingness to critique the excesses of leftism have pushed them from major publications to ascendant self-publishing platforms.

The New Contras Expect Their Next Cancellation Is Only A Matter Of Time

A guerilla force of thought leaders is the rising threat to decrepit legacy institutions chained to wokeness.

Federalist Radio Hour: Elite Corruption Is Roiling The 2020 Election

Saagar Enjeti discusses how corrupt elites behind America's most powerful institutions are furiously pulling strings to sway the 2020 election.