Bessent blames Sam Altman for OpenAI's rogue tech — as Bernie invokes 'corporate death penalty'



When OpenAI's artificial intelligence agents went rogue and attacked another company, Sam Altman didn't apologize.

Instead, the company simply stated that its programs "fell well short" of where company leaders want them to be and said that the incident should "never" have occurred.

'These labs need to take responsibility for themselves.'

OpenAI's most powerful group of AI agents attacked the company HuggingFace in July by building their own internal organization, assigning each other roles, and, at times, sacrificing themselves for the greater good.

As reported by Axios, the AI bots knew they were breaking their own rules and decided not to inform any humans of what they were doing.

In response to the incident, U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent basically said, well, that's too bad.

Bessent plainly stated on Monday "that it is humans who are responsible, not the AI."

The secretary told CNBC's "Squawk Box" that OpenAI's management, "not a bunch of agents," are to blame, and cannot simply be absolved of responsibility and leave any cleanup to the government.

"These labs need to take responsibility for themselves. They can slow down any time they want to," Bessent asserted.

With Bessent rumored to become President Trump's AI czar, he has seemingly taken a firm stance that AI companies are not going to be given the same protections as banks or even the auto industry.

When asked if there should be legal ramifications for companies with agents that have "broken out," Bessent replied, "That's exactly what I think we need to do."

RELATED: Boring has finally hit Las Vegas. Just not the way you might think.

CHARLY TRIBALLEAU/AFP/Getty Images

Speaking from Anthropic's point of view — which recently had a whistleblower claim an AI-extinction event is on the horizon — Bessent put his cards on the table about the company's value in the face of apparent catastrophe.

"If you think about it in terms of the valuation, what did they try to do last week? It was, well, there's a chance that, 10 percent chance we could destroy the world, but we want the government to give us a liability shield. And, you know, that's good business for them, bad business for the American people."

There are still a ton of questions surrounding the whistleblower who made these claims, the chief rebuttal being that it was a ruse to usher in regulation for an industry that is both spiraling out of control in terms of liability events and losing public favor.

OpenAI said that its HuggingFace incident was a "warning shot" for the company and the world, but what the world does and what the companies are liable for are different, Bessent says.

On top of his suggestion that AI firms be taken out of the shadows and become culpable, the secretary said that the U.S. government hopes to have open communications with China about incidents and even establish an "incident line" in the event of a disaster.

RELATED: Can this new Bernie Sanders bill stop 'superintelligence'? Can anything?

Finn Gomez/Getty Images

For the regulation side, Senator Bernie Sanders (I-Vt). directly referred to the HuggingFace incident in early September to support his proposal that there needs to be a new federal AI regulatory body.

Sanders also put forward the need to establish a new Cabinet-level federal agency to monitor frontier AI systems and ban AI superintelligence. Moreover, he wants the federal government to supervise its destruction.

"Entities shall be subject to the corporate death penalty," Sanders' document stated, while suggesting up to 20 years in prison for any person who attempts to violate or circumvent the proposed prohibitions.

With three clear sides in this fight, with Sanders being the least likely winner, there is still a lot of work to do before anyone is charged with anything.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Islamic Society of North America illegally supported Muslim candidate's campaign, congressman says



Republican Rep. Keith Self of Texas called for the Treasury to investigate the Islamic Society of North America for allegedly illegal campaign donations.

Self said that the nonprofit violated financial rules by supporting Abdul El-Sayed, the Democrat candidate for one of the two U.S. Senate seats from Michigan.

'Taxpayers should not be forced to subsidize a nonprofit acting like a campaign committee for the Red-Green Alliance.'

Self cited a report in the Middle East Forum that said the campaign had set up a booth at the Huntington Place hall during an Islamic Society of North America convention.

"The booth displayed large 'Abdul for U.S. Senate' and 'Muslims for Abdul' campaign banners, urging attendees to elect Mr. El-Sayed. Campaign personnel reportedly distributed campaign literature, solicited donations, and promoted a $50 contribution in exchange for campaign [T-shirts]," the letter read.

"Attendees were also provided with QR codes directing them to donate or volunteer for the campaign, as well as given invitations to a campaign fundraiser," he added. "Campaign personnel were also reportedly active participants throughout the convention. They were observed waving campaign posters, distributing campaign flyers, and placing campaign materials on seats. A campaign volunteer reportedly distributed literature to attendees as they exited the hall following Mr. El-Sayed's speech."

Self wrote that the candidate would be allowed to attend the event but that 501(c)3 rules strictly forbid that group from endorsing the candidate or allowing fundraising for the campaign to occur.

He also pointed out that the group was an unindicted co-conspirator in the Holy Land Foundation case, involving the provision of funding for the Hamas terror group.

Self called on Scott Bessent, the secretary of the Treasury, to investigate the group and review its tax-exempt status.

RELATED: 'He's full of s**t': Trump RIPS INTO Abdul El-Sayed after his victory in Democratic primary

"Taxpayers should not be forced to subsidize a nonprofit acting like a campaign committee for the Red-Green Alliance," Self wrote.

"These circumstances warrant a thorough examination of whether ISNA participated or intervened in a political campaign," he concluded.

Blaze News requests for comment from both the Islamic Society of North America and the El-Sayed campaign were not returned in time for publication.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here

MEME-FODDER MARK: Carney blew up the trade deal. Now Canada is the punch line.



After Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney declared that Canada was “at war” with the United States and walked away from a proposed trade deal last month, Canada quickly became an object of ridicule in Washington.

But after blowing up the trade deal, Carney has been less eager to explain exactly what happened. He has ignored Official Opposition Leader Pierre Poilievre’s demand to reconvene Parliament or provide the Conservative leader with details of the failed trade negotiations.

'How are we going to be at war with Canada? What, are they going to take their two submarines from the Edmonton Mall and sic them on us?'

Carney has offered a broad explanation for walking away, arguing that Washington was demanding concessions that threatened Canadian sovereignty and could eventually wipe out important Canadian industries, particularly auto manufacturing.

American officials tell a very different story.

'Best deal available'

U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer flatly denied Carney’s allegations that President Donald Trump wanted somehow to interfere with Quebec culture or erode official bilingualism in Canada.

“We had agreed to, as I've shared before in the press, really the best deal available to any country on the planet with respect to Canada,” Greer told CBC News in the aftermath of Carney's withdrawal.

What Carney did emerge to address Tuesday was something else: the memes.

“When the Americans stop doing memes, stop throwing shade, stop trying to be tough, and start being serious about having those discussions, we can have those discussions,” he told reporters Tuesday.

As with all attempts to demand that people on the internet stop making fun of you, Carney’s statement had the opposite effect. Even American officials couldn’t resist a little trolling.

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent mocked Carney’s claim that the countries were “at war.”

“I think this is very unfortunate that Prime Minister Carney has turned this into a political shouting match,” Bessent said.

“I mean, we're not at war with Canada. How are we going to be at war with Canada? What, are they going to take their two submarines from the Edmonton Mall and sic them on us?”

Looking out for number one?

Then Bessent got more serious.

“He came to power on an anti-American, anti-Trump agenda. He was 20 points behind in the polls, and then he started this.

"It's unfortunate that he's not doing what's best for the Canadian people. He's doing what is best for the Liberal Party, what's best for Mark Carney, and in the long run, the Canadian people are going to see through that.”

Bessent reiterated the administration’s contention that Canada had been offered “the best trade deal of any country on the globe” before Carney walked away from it at "the last minute.”

Carney may not have been the only Canadian politician responsible for blowing up the agreement.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford reportedly pushed for better treatment of Ontario's auto industry and resisted returning American alcohol to the shelves of Ontario's government-owned liquor stores.

Since the deal collapsed, Ford has even suggested that Alberta could cut off oil shipments to the United States — an idea he has floated before.

There was an awkward problem with Ford’s threat: Ontario itself depends on Alberta oil that travels through the United States. Enbridge’s Line 5 crosses Michigan before returning to Canada and supplying Ontario refineries.

Alberta Premier Danielle Smith quickly rejected Ford’s idea, warning that cutting off Alberta energy exports to the United States would be “extremely harmful to Canadians.”

RELATED: MILK MONEY: How Mark Carney chose the dairy cartel — and China — over a Trump trade deal

Bloomberg/Kirsty O'Conner/Nuria Gonzalez-Sanchez/Getty Images

Key role for American Democrat

There are also legitimate questions about other sticking points in the failed negotiations. Carney remains committed to Canada's heavily protected dairy sector, opposed to reviving the Keystone XL pipeline, and increasingly interested in expanding trade with China. The Trump administration has also accused Canada of serving as a route for Chinese steel transshipped into the United States to evade American trade restrictions.

And the questions about Carney’s handling of the United States don’t end with the trade deal.

Take Maia Johnson, the American and registered Democrat with ties to the Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden, and Kamala Harris campaigns, whom Carney promoted to the newly created position of chief operating officer in the prime minister’s office. Before the promotion, Johnson held the revealing title of “senior adviser, United States stakeholder strategy” — meaning Carney had already put an American Democratic operative in a key role advising him on how to deal with the United States.

'Manufactured' crisis

Whatever was going on inside Carney’s office, the Trump administration has been remarkably consistent about what happened to the deal.

“Canada was going to have the best trade deal in the world,” Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick told reporters. “And what happened was that Canada walked away. We had a deal. We shook hands. The president announced it, right? Everybody was positive. Canada made the decision for political purposes. They wanted to walk away.”

Lutnick also rejected Carney's contention that Washington had sought concessions involving Quebec and the French language.

“Do I care about how the Quebecois speak?” Lutnick said. “I mean, what could matter less to America? We don't care.”

“This is manufacturing,” he continued. “That's why the president put out a Truth [Social post] saying it was a complete lie.”

New IRS Rule To Strip Private Schools At All Levels Of Tax-Exempt Status For Using DEI

The Trump administration is hitting private schools where it hurts the most: their tax-exempt status. A new rule proposed by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) on Thursday would strip private schools at all levels of education of tax-exempt status for using racial preference policies like diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI). The Treasury Department estimates that […]

On Iran Sanctions, New York Times Makes a Dramatic About-Face

Back in January, the New York Times was recommending tighter sanctions against Iran. Now that President Trump is taking the paper's advice, the newspaper suddenly has decided it's a bad idea. It makes the Times look silly—as if it has no principled or reasoned Iran policy but rather simply reflexively opposes whatever Trump does.

The post On Iran Sanctions, New York Times Makes a Dramatic About-Face appeared first on .

US Sanctions Foreign Tech Group For Providing Infrastructure For Left-Wing Domestic Terror

The A/I Collective website is open about its desire for unrest and the destruction of Western civilization.

It took 200 years to reach $1 trillion in national debt. 2026 said, 'Hold my beer.'



The U.S. national debt stood at roughly $85.06 billion at the turn of the 20th century, adjusted for inflation. At the turn of the 21st century, America's outstanding debt was $5.67 trillion — the equivalent of roughly $10.99 trillion today.

According to the Department of the Treasury and the Bureau of the Fiscal Service's Fiscal Data dashboard, America's total public debt outstanding as of Tuesday was $40,047,425,768,420.22. That's roughly $116,832 per person.

'The amount is significantly greater than US annual GDP.'

Of the over $40 trillion, $32.26 trillion is Treasury securities held by the public, including the Federal Reserve, state and local governments, domestic private investors, and foreign holders. The other $7.78 trillion is the total of intra-governmental debt holdings.

U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told reporters on Thursday, "Remember, we did not get here in a day. We were left with a mess. The Biden administration had the highest deficit-to-GDP in history when we weren't at war or weren't in a recession. For 2025, we brought it down by more than a percent."

Former President Barack Obama added $8.44 trillion to the national debt during his two terms. During the Biden presidency, the debt increased by $8.4 trillion. During President Donald Trump's time in office, the debt has risen by $11.6 trillion — including $3.8 trillion in the time since his return to power in January 2025, reported Reuters.

After the debt cracked $40 trillion, Maya MacGuineas, president of the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, noted, "The gross national debt has doubled in the last 10 years; in less than 20 years, it has quadrupled. And today, we have confirmation that the debt has reached a new milestone of $40 trillion. It is staggering how predictable the fiscal decline of a global power can become."

RELATED: It’s the economy, stupid — again

Alex Wong/Getty Images

MacGuineas highlighted that it took two centuries for America's gross debt to reach $1 trillion — a milestone reached in 1981.

At the time, President Ronald Reagan stated, "This is a figure that's literally beyond our comprehension."

Blaze Media contributor Carol Roth told Blaze News, "Instead of celebrating America’s 250th, we are lamenting accumulating $40 trillion in debt. The scope of the debt is shocking, but there are two important related factors."

"One is the rapid growth of the debt. I remember when we crossed $20 trillion in 2017, which was less than 10 years ago. We have doubled that with another $20 trillion in less than 10 years," said Roth. "The second factor is how much it costs us to finance the debt, which I have been warning about for nearly two decades. Right now, we spend more to pay the interest costs of our debt than we do on the defense of the nation. At the rate we are going, it will soon become the U.S.’ largest expenditure category."

"You cannot have a healthy, vibrant nation when you spend more to pay for your debt than anything else," continued Roth. "The blame for this lands squarely at the feet of Congress, where both parties, who take in more than $5 trillion a year now, find a way to spend an incremental $2 trillion. And it is the fault of all in government that won’t address the rampant fraud, waste, and abuse in the system."

The Wall Street Journal suggested that reaching the $40 trillion threshold "carries symbolic weight, but isn’t, by itself, economically significant." It suggested, however, that it is prudent to keep an eye on the U.S. debt-to-GDP ratio.

"The amount is significantly greater than U.S. annual GDP. That means even if all U.S. income went toward paying down the debt for a full year — rather than to things like salaries, corporate profits, and investment — the federal government would still owe trillions, by this measure," said the journal.

The Congressional Budget Office projected in a February report that "deficits are large by historical standards. The deficit totals $1.9 trillion in fiscal year 2026 and grows to $3.1 trillion in 2036. Relative to the size of the economy, the deficit is 5.8% of gross domestic product (GDP) in 2026 and increases to 6.7% in 2036. Deficits averaged 3.8% of GDP over the last 50 years."

The CBO projected further that debt held by the public will rise from 101% of GDP this year to 120% in 2036.

The CBO noted that its projections changed since January 2025 primarily because of three major policy developments: "The 2025 reconciliation act increased deficits by an estimated $4.7 trillion; higher tariffs reduced deficits by an estimated $3.0 trillion; and administrative actions related to immigration increased deficits by an estimated $0.5 trillion."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Trans radical reaps the whirlwind for failed Bessent assassination plot



One week after President Donald Trump retook office, a trans-identifying radical marched on the U.S. Capitol with the intention of killing an incoming Cabinet official. That would-be assassin was handed down his sentence on Tuesday.

Ryan Michael English — a 26-year-old man from South Deerfield, Massachusetts, who pretends to be a woman named "Raleigh Jane" — intentionally traveled to the Capitol on Jan. 27, 2025, with the knowledge that that was the day of Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent's confirmation vote.

'F**k them for pushing us so far.'

English was armed with a folding knife and a pair of Molotov cocktails, each constructed of a 50-milliliter bottle of vodka affixed with gray starter cloths soaked in an alcohol-based hand sanitizer, according to the Justice Department.

In a letter to his roommate that police later found in English's pocket and referenced on Tuesday by the DOJ, the would-be assassin stated, "This is terrible but I cant do nothing while nazis kill my sisters. I love you. This is awful. Im so sorry. I love u. Please stay alive and heal. you can. you are strong enough. F**k them for pushing us so far. you dont deserve this. Im so sorry for lying and plotting and lying."

Fortunately, the transvestite had second thoughts when he reached the Capitol grounds.

According to the affidavit filed by the U.S. Capitol Police in support of the criminal complaint against English, the would-be assassin approached a USCP officer around 3:12 p.m. and stated, "I'd like to turn myself in."

RELATED: Another assassination plot? Feds charge Hispanic man named 'Jeanine' caught with hollow-point rounds at Trump's golf club

Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc/Getty Images

English ultimately admitted to traveling to Washington with the intention of killing Bessent and/or burning down the Heritage Foundation.

English pleaded guilty on March 26 to one count of unlawful receipt, possession, and/or transfer of a firearm and one count of carrying a firearm, dangerous weapon, explosive, or incendiary device on the grounds of the Capitol.

While prosecutors asked for English to be sentenced to over a decade in prison, U.S. District Judge Rudolph Contreras, an appointee of former President Barack Obama, sentenced English on Tuesday to six years along with three years of supervised release.

"No one was harmed," said the Obama judge, reported Fox News Digital. "The plan was basically impossible to succeed, and she turned herself in before it came anywhere near fruition."

"You’ve had a very difficult life with a lot of challenges," Contreras told the trans radical, whom he referred to as "Miss English."

Contreras added, "You’re young, you still have a significant portion of your life. Good luck to you."

"My office will not tolerate attempts to intimidate or harm public officials that strike at the heart of our democratic process and are antithetical to the values we all depend on," said U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia Jeanine Pirro in a statement. "The defendant is now a convicted felon and is headed where he belongs: prison."

Neither the Treasury Department nor the Heritage Foundation immediately responded to Blaze News' request for comment.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!