How To Get Conservative Judges To Do Conservative Things
Here's why the 6-3 conservative Supreme Court keeps flaking out.
The New York Times on Wednesday issued a rather jaw-dropping X post after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that Virginia can purge noncitizens from its voter rolls.
The Times' post noted that the high court was "siding with Republicans who said it was to prevent noncitizens from voting."
'NYT simps for "only a little bit of illegal voting."'
Then came the post's last sentence: "Studies show that noncitizens voting is very rare."
It would appear those final eight words raised the ire — and eyebrows — of more than a few observers.
You know, on the level of that infamous video of a burning building amid a nighttime riot in Kenosha, Wisconsin, during the summer of 2020 as CNN's video caption read, "Fiery but mostly peaceful protests after police shooting."
Or when ABC News anchor Martha Raddatz earlier this month downplayed the crisis of Venezuelan gangs in Colorado by insisting to Republican vice presidential nominee JD Vance that gang takeovers in Aurora have been "limited to a handful of apartment complexes ... a handful of problems."
So according to the Times, is it OK to keep noncitizens on voting rolls ... because they rarely vote anyway?
As you might expect, many commenters took exception to the "paper of record." Here are a few examples:
Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!