Our churches are sitting ducks. Here's how to fight back.



This week, millions of Americans will celebrate the blood-bought freedoms our forefathers secured for us with fireworks, family, and cookouts.

That declaration, signed by 56 men, was not just a recounting of grievances or an important political declaration. It was a document of war. These men were ready to defend their God-given freedoms with steel and shot. Among the signers of the Declaration of Independence was John Witherspoon, a Presbyterian minister. While he was the only pastor who signed the document, the war for independence that followed was supported by clergy in nearly every colony. They brought the spiritual munitions necessary to justify their congregants' and country’s fight against the British crown.

Many churches celebrate the religious liberty enumerated in the First Amendment, but few champion the Second.

This right of self-governance and self-defense was not a novel theological concept. It was baked into Protestant political thought. And it was out of this Protestant heritage that America was born.

However, this type of preaching and instruction seems muted in our day. As Americans’ Second Amendment rights remain besieged in various states and jurisdictions, many pulpits remain silent about the threats their congregants face.

Even more pressing for many churches, though, is the threat posed by those who wish to do the church harm, often while armed.

Why every church needs a security team

Every church needs a security team.

In an ideal world, the only weapons needed on a Sunday morning would be the sword of the Spirit and the shield of faith. Our children could run freely through the sanctuary without a single parent wondering if a madman might walk in. Evil would be rare and dealt with swiftly by just rulers who have been appointed to punish the evildoer. In such a world, peace would be the norm, not the exception.

In a merely less-than-ideal world, where threats exist, we would at least hope the civil magistrate would protect churches as sacred gathering spaces. The state would prioritize security for these vital institutions that shape the moral and social health of the nation. And we’d expect the state to make it easier — not harder — for congregations to defend themselves.

But that’s not the world we live in either.

We live in a world where churches are being actively targeted by would-be killers and where politicians pass laws that make congregants sitting ducks. We live in a world where police departments are understaffed, underpaid, and overtasked. And we live in a world where insurance companies and government bureaucracies penalize churches for taking common-sense steps to protect their people.

Recently, a man attempted to carry out a mass shooting at CrossPointe Community Church in Wayne, Michigan. Thankfully, it was thwarted before tragedy struck. A deacon of the church heroically struck the assailant with his pickup truck, slowing the attacker’s approach. Then, a trained member of the church security team engaged the shooter and fatally shot him before he could enter the sanctuary. But the mere fact that it got that close, yet again, should shake pastors and church leaders out of their slumber.

This is not a one-off case. It is the reality that many churches face in a civilization unraveling.

RELATED: Church security team member recalls moment when 'evil came to our door'

  WoodyUpstate/Getty Images Plus

And yet when churches take steps to prepare — by forming volunteer security teams, for example — they are often punished by insurers. Many insurance companies raise a church’s premiums by up to 20% if the church has an organized security presence, unless those volunteers undergo professional training that can cost several thousand dollars per person. For small or midsize congregations, this burden is often too high.

Hiring off-duty police officers, meanwhile, can cost $60 to $75 an hour. That may be manageable for a megachurch with a multimillion-dollar budget. But for the average congregation trying to keep the lights on and fund ministry, $30,000 annually for armed security simply isn’t feasible.

It’s not just private institutions or police departments creating barriers. The state is becoming a direct obstacle.

In 2024, Colorado passed Senate Bill 24‑131, which declared churches and other religious buildings to be “sensitive spaces.” Under this law, concealed carry would have been forbidden on church property unless the church explicitly issues a written exemption for each individual. This was ultimately rescinded by the state. But in places like Boulder County, where leftist officials refused to grant the necessary permissions, the exemption requirement remains in place.

In practice, that means churches that want their congregants to carry cannot do so by law.

Colorado is not unique. Similar legislation exists in California, New York, Illinois, and other blue states. The trend is clear: Disarm peaceful citizens and disempower local churches from protecting their congregations.

This means churches are stuck in a legal and financial bind. On one hand, they are increasingly likely to be targeted by insane individuals seeking death or driven by ideological hatred. On the other hand, they are punished for taking even modest steps toward preparedness.

So what is the church to do?

First, we must stop pretending that spiritual and physical safety are mutually exclusive.

Some well-meaning pastors resist forming security teams or speaking of the importance of self-defense because they believe it’s a distraction from the gospel. But loving your neighbor includes defending your neighbor. Good shepherds guard the flock not only from false teachers but from wolves of every kind.

In fact, it seems that we are in a day when advertising that the church has a security team would be an attraction, not a deterrent, to would-be churchgoers.

Scripture does not pit spiritual vigilance against physical readiness. Nehemiah, when rebuilding Jerusalem’s walls, stationed men with swords in one hand and tools in the other. Jesus Himself instructed His disciples to buy a sword (Luke 22:36), not so they could go on the offensive, but so they would be prepared.

RELATED: Meek, not weak: The era of Christian loserdom is over

  pamela_d_mcadams/iStock/Getty Images Plus

Second, churches must form well-organized volunteer teams. These don’t need to be tactical operators. They need to be faithful, dependable men vetted, trained, and alert. Veterans, off-duty officers, and responsible gun owners are often already sitting in the pews. Pastors or deacons should identify these men, invest in their development, and establish protocols for emergencies.

Third, churches should not be ashamed to advocate for their rights. As our forefathers understood, there is no biblical reason to surrender the ability to protect one’s people. Just as churches fight for religious liberty, we should also contend for self-defense and security. This includes contacting lawmakers, organizing with other local churches, and resisting unconstitutional laws through legal means.

Many churches celebrate the religious liberty enumerated in the First Amendment, but few champion the Second.

Finally, we must honor the men who already serve. Every week, there are faithful men who sit near the exits, who watch the doors, who glance sideways when a stranger walks in with a backpack, and who make quiet mental notes while others sing hymns. These men aren’t paranoid. They’re protective. They are answering the call to keep watch while others worship in peace.

It’s time for every church to acknowledge reality and act with courage. Our congregations should be places of peace, but not because we are blind to danger. Rather, they should be places of peace because good men stand ready at the gates.

We may live in a fallen world, but that doesn’t mean we must be foolish in it. God does not bless the naive. Churches have a unique calling to shepherd the souls of mankind in the truth of the Lord Jesus Christ.

But that immaterial calling does not stay immaterial. It manifests itself in the material realm. Good shepherds will not just look after the state of the souls of the congregation but also the health of their bodies.

To ignore the physical threat is to misunderstand the Incarnation itself. Christ did not come to redeem disembodied spirits but whole persons, flesh and blood. His ministry was not merely spiritual but deeply material: feeding the hungry, healing the sick, driving out demons, laying down His physical life for His sheep. Likewise, our churches must reflect His care for the whole person.

We prepare the soul with preaching. We guard the body with vigilance. Both are acts of love.

Report: Senate Parliamentarian Nixes Language Eliminating Suppressor Tax

[rebelmouse-proxy-image https://thefederalist.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Screenshot-2025-06-24-at-12.16.35 PM-e1750785638600-1200x675.png crop_info="%7B%22image%22%3A%20%22https%3A//thefederalist.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Screenshot-2025-06-24-at-12.16.35%5Cu202fPM-e1750785638600-1200x675.png%22%7D" expand=1]Sixty senators, however, could overrule the chair if he sides with the parliamentarian.

A gun in the hand is worth more than ‘never again’



Let’s face the truth. Being Jewish is a marvelous way of life, but it is also a very dangerous one. Jews need to wake up to the fact that there are imminent threats to their safety seemingly everywhere now in our country: in their homes, workplaces, synagogues, community centers, schools, and wherever else they happen to be.

FBI hate crime statistics against Jews are now at the highest they have been in decades. Just in the past several weeks, there have been two high-profile anti-Semitic attacks in America: the murder of two Israeli embassy staffers outside the Capital Jewish Museum on May 21 and the Molotov cocktail attacks against Jews at a pro-Israel event in Boulder, Colorado, on June 1.

Jewish gun ownership isn’t a luxury. It’s a necessity. Don’t wait. Do it now.

But the truth is, these incidents are not unusual. They are becoming all too common. Anti-Semites from both the radical left and radical right are out for Jewish blood. Their violent, unhinged anger is not going away any time soon.

It is also chilling how many Americans, especially in the younger generations, believe that violence is justified in the name of their political ideals. This is evidenced, for example, by the astonishingly high percentage of younger Americans who sympathize with Luigi Mangione in the murder of a health care executive.

Although Mangione’s case has nothing to do with Jews, it’s indicative of what people think are reasonable forms of activism. Increasingly, people believe that killing innocents is justified and normal.

The fact is, plenty of radicals blame “the Jews” for whatever they happen to be angry about that day — whether it’s the conflicts in the Middle East, America’s economic support for Ukraine, capitalism, globalism, woke ideology, high prices, or whatever else. Both sides have their reasons for wanting to see Jews dead.

Now that we recognize just how precarious Jewish lives have become, American Jews have two solutions going forward. The first is to rely on government to protect us. How is that working out, though? While many attacks are foiled by law enforcement, plenty still slip through the cracks. Unless we’re prepared to turn America into a full-on Orwellian surveillance state that watches everyone’s every move and strips basic freedoms from all, dangerous people will always slip through.

The second solution is more reasonable: Jews must become more self-reliant. That means becoming armed.

Unfortunately, American Jews are among the groups least likely to own guns. According to a survey from the American Jewish Committee, Jewish gun ownership is around 10%. Compare that to roughly 32% for the general population, according to Pew. And the AJC also found that 70% of Jews support strict gun control laws.

The irony is maddening. Jews face greater threats than most, yet they oppose the very means of self-defense they need most. This needs to change.

RELATED: Now more than ever, Jews must learn to shoot

  Mike Stocker/South Florida Sun Sentinel/Tribune News Service via Getty Images

Jewish Americans need to buy guns, seek firearms training, and carry legally. Synagogues and community centers should sponsor training workshops and allow lawful carry on premises. They should also build neighborhood watch teams and community security groups.

Most American Jews live in the three most virulently anti-gun states: New York, New Jersey, and California. They need to support state-level reforms to restore the God-given right to self-defense as America’s founders intended.

Two things stand in the way. The first is hoplophobia — irrational fear of guns. Many Jews treat firearms as inherently evil simply because bad people use them. They need to understand good people use them, too.

The second obstacle is uncertainty. For those unfamiliar with gun culture, it can be daunting. But help is easy to find. NRA-certified instructors are available across the country. The NRA website has a full directory. And several excellent Jewish gun-rights organizations already exist — including Cherev Gidon in the Catskills and Magen Am in Los Angeles.

Jewish gun ownership isn’t a luxury. It’s a necessity. Don’t wait. Do it now. Your life, your family, and your community may depend on it.

Every Church Needs A Security Plan Fortified By The Second Amendment

Until Jesus comes back, churches should anticipate the persistence of crime, tragedy, and death and arm themselves accordingly.

Gun-rights 'grifter'? Activist accused of exploiting 2A supporters for profit



"Arrogant." "Dishonest." "A plague upon our state's gun owners."

Aaron Dorr, the face of more than a dozen interconnected gun-rights groups across the country, has inspired some harsh descriptors from influential gun enthusiasts who theoretically should be on his side. But according to these critics, Dorr is actually a bully with few legislative accomplishments to his name, prompting some to claim he is a grifter who capitalizes on the good-faith donations of hardworking, trusting gun owners for his own gain.

Blaze News spoke with current and former political leaders and a podcaster in Wyoming as well as a gun-rights activist in Illinois, who all told us the same story: Aaron Dorr and his organizations do the gun rights movement much harm and very little good.

Who is Aaron Dorr?

According to his eponymous website, Aaron Dorr is "a political activist with almost 20 years of experience fighting for the Second Amendment in state legislatures" across the U.S., including in Illinois, Iowa, Missouri, Ohio, New York, North Carolina, and Wyoming.

Wyoming state Sen. Larry Hicks (R-Baggs), who has been in the state Senate for 15 years, recalled that Dorr and his group Wyoming Gun Owners — or WYGO for short — "just kind of come out of the blue" and demanded that Republican legislators in the already gun-friendly state follow their lead.

"They were going around, trying to recruit people and teach them how to do confrontational politics, how to get in people's face and intimidate them," Hicks explained to Blaze News.

Hicks said that some "tremendously weak" lawmakers caved to Dorr and WYGO, unable to withstand the "intimidation tactics" and eager for the campaign contributions WYGO could send their way.

'WYGO members scored a lot of wins tonight, but nothing gave me more pleasure than watching our members piss on your political grave.'

Other Republicans like Hicks found the approach off-putting and became instantly wary of Dorr and WYGO. Their lack of cooperation prompted Dorr and his "sycophants" to characterize these politicians as spineless, unprincipled RINOs — Republicans in name only, Hicks explained.

An exchange between WYGO and a then-Wyoming lawmaker in the comments section of a 2019 WYGO Facebook post seems to confirm Hicks' assessment. Though the lawmaker initiated a civil discussion in response to a video from Dorr, WYGO shot back with insults, calling the lawmaker an "ignorant," "back-stabbing" traitor who has "never stood tall for gun owners."

Dorr does not just verbally attack legislators he considers adversarial. He often threatens to support their challenger in an upcoming primary.

One Wyoming politician who may have fallen victim to a primary campaign from Dorr and WYGO is former state Rep. Mark Jennings (R-Sheridan). According to Vote Smart, the National Rifle Association gave Jennings a 92% rating in 2024, and he was endorsed for re-election by Gun Owners of America that year as well, his campaign Facebook page showed.

RELATED: Good guy with a gun blows away suspect who shot 2 during downtown fight, ran off

  Composite screenshot of photos from Mark Jennings WY State Representative House District 30 Facebook page. Used with permission.

Jennings worked with Dorr when he was first elected in 2014 and even partnered with him to pass a Stand Your Ground law as recently as 2018. However, Jennings said he ran afoul of Dorr after putting forth in the Wyoming House a Second Amendment Preservation Act-type bill, commonly referred to as a SAPA bill, that Dorr had not endorsed.

According to Jennings, Dorr later cornered him in a hallway, enraged that Jennings had not first asked his "permission" to run the SAPA bill.

"You shouldn't have run that bill in this last session," Jennings recalled Dorr saying. "It's not my bill, and you didn't get permission, and we're not going to put up with that kind of nonsense."

"Dorr had made it very clear with foul language and threats that he was going to see to it that I was not going to remain in office," Jennings added.

Dorr seemed to make good on that promise. When Jennings made a run for a state Senate seat last year, WYGO supported Jennings' primary opponent, state Rep. Barry Crago, who ended up winning both the primary and the general election.

Sen. Hicks, a friend of Jennings, claimed WYGO and Dorr played a key role in torpedoing Jennings' chances. "They absolutely targeted him because he wouldn't buckle down and just toe their line," Hicks told Blaze News. "And he stood up to them."

The night the results of the primary were announced last August, Dorr apparently sent Jennings a scathing text message celebrating Jennings' loss and making overt reference to their differences over the SAPA bill.

"I told you, two years ago, if you f**ked around with SAPA and with WYGO you would be held accountable. Tonight, I kept that promise," Dorr wrote, according to a screenshot sent to Blaze News.

"WYGO members scored a lot of wins tonight, but nothing gave me more pleasure than watching our members piss on your political grave," he added. "Enjoy your free time in January."

RELATED: Trump state, Biden agenda: Wyoming gets played by green grifters

  Screenshot sent to Blaze News

In an email to Blaze News, Aaron Dorr described Jennings as "a RINO State Representative." Dorr also bragged that Jennings "lost his primary election last year in Wyoming after we exposed his pathetic record on gun rights."

"Most organizations are too afraid to call out anti-gun Republicans, which is why they are never attacked and why freedom so often dies, even in 'red' state legislatures," Dorr continued. "We're not afraid to call them out, which is why we're loved by our members and have been attacked by the left and the media through hundreds of phony 'investigative stories' in a coordinated effort to silence us."

Because a relative of Rep. Jennings works for Mercury Radio Arts — a production company created by Blaze Media co-founder Glenn Beck and that produces podcasts for Blaze Media — Dorr also took direct aim at Blaze News in his email, claiming we had deliberately withheld a "conflict of interest" from him in our initial phone conversation and that our investigation into his activism was a mere pretense "to settle a personal score for a colleague."

"I had high hopes that we could engage in a productive conversation about the Dorr Brothers and our proud advocacy on behalf of gun owners in state legislatures all over the country. There is a lot to talk about," he wrote. "[But] you are not interested in the truth."

"Sad stuff coming from a media company like TheBlaze, which has traditionally enjoyed a strong reputation amongst gun owners."

'No compromise,' no matter what

According to its website, WYGO wants "to expand the Second Amendment for our members, not to protect the careers of politicians in Cheyenne!" Its affiliated groups in Iowa and Missouri make a similar statement. However, most of the affiliated groups bill themselves as absolutists, claiming to be the only "No-Compromise gun rights organization" in their respective states, which include Alabama, Illinois, and New York.

While a "no compromise" pledge from a well-connected group may compel Republicans in red states like Alabama to remain committed to the right to bear arms, that approach in deep-blue states like Illinois and New York is more puzzling. As John Boch of Guns Save Life in Illinois told Blaze News, support for gun control far outweighs the support for gun rights in the Illinois state capital.

"Frankly, we could have 100 lobbyists in Springfield," Boch said. "We could have 1,000. And when it comes to the gun issue, we don't have the votes to stop anything. It's just the sad reality of life on the ground here."

'They want it to fail so that they can raise money. They can say, "See how bad these legislators are?"'

Blaze News was curious to know why Dorr's groups would demand a hardline, "no compromise" stance from pro-2A politicians in Democrat strongholds since doing so makes any progress on the issue even less likely than it already is. Dorr did not respond to our question on the subject, but the others who spoke with Blaze News claimed that Dorr is more interested in stirring up public emotions about gun legislation, both good and bad, rather than helping to pass or defeat it.

Former state Rep. Mark Jennings said Dorr takes this same approach even in Wyoming, the state with perhaps the highest per capita rate of gun ownership in America.

"They don't really want it to pass," Jennings said, referring to a SAPA bill. "They want it to fail so that they can raise money. They can say, 'See how bad these legislators are?'"

RELATED: Catholic craft brewers take a stand for gun ownership

— (@)  
 

Jennings, Hicks, and David Iverson, host of the "Cowboy State Politics" podcast, all noted that though Second Amendment Protection Act bills might seem attractive to gun enthusiasts, some such measures can create major problems, especially for law enforcement. For example, a failed version of SAPA that Dorr and WYGO once promoted in Wyoming would have eliminated qualified immunity protections for cops, all three men told Blaze News. As a result, police departments from around the state firmly opposed it, rendering it practically dead on arrival in Cheyenne.

"It's got no hope of passing," Iverson told Blaze News, "but [Dorrs and WYGO] do it anyway because they can raise money off of it."

'They're just siphoning off money from well-meaning gun owners who don't know any better.'

Jennings recalled an instance in which Dorr and then-Wyoming state Sen. Anthony Bouchard (R), who founded WYGO, were invited to testify about a SAPA bill in front of a legislative committee but refused, ostensibly so they could later blast the committee members for shutting them out.

"[The committee chair] asks them to testify on this SAPA bill. They literally refuse," Jennings said. "She actually asks them point blank: 'I've asked you three times. Is there anyone else that wants to testify?' They don't do it, and then five minutes later in the hallway, they're on their podcast or they're filming their stuff, saying, 'This was just a kangaroo court.'"

In reply to questions about his legislative victories, Dorr told Blaze News:

Over the last 17 years, we’re proud to have passed Constitutional Carry, Stand-Your-Ground law, the Second Amendment Preservation Act, a ban on 'Red Flag’ laws and more. We’re equally proud of the gun control bills we’ve defeated (especially those filed by anti-gun RINOs) and our massive Circuit Court victories in cases like Wyoming Gun Owners v Gray. But the list of anti-gun incumbents removed from office by our members through our educational efforts at election time — a list numbering well over 100 — may be our biggest achievement.

Despite making contact with Sen. Bouchard on multiple occasions and leaving several messages, Blaze News never received a comment from him.

'Professional grifters'

All of the sources who spoke with Blaze News said that Aaron Dorr uses high-profile activism — which has since spread to other issues, including the pro-life movement and COVID-related government tyranny — as a massive fundraising scheme.

"When you look at their organization nationwide, you get a pretty good picture of really what the main purpose behind their organization is is raising money for themselves under the guise of Second Amendment advocacy," Iverson said.

Jennings made similar comments. "That's how they do business," he explained. "They put it out there that everybody's beating up on them. 'Please send money.'"

"They're professional grifters," Jennings added. "There's no question."

"They found a way to get people to send them money, with all of their rhetoric and their lies," added Sen. Hicks.

'You're being lied to.'

John Boch of Guns Save Life said he had heard about Dorr and his groups' "shenanigans in other states where they fundraise the heck out of everything and don't really do anything." However, those "shenanigans" hit closer to home after Boch obtained a four-page fundraising letter from WYGO-affiliate Illinois Firearms Association, signed by Dorr, asking recipients to make a donation to help "mobilize as many gun owners as possible" against a gun-control bill in Illinois pushed by Democrats.

"I think they're just siphoning off money from well-meaning gun owners who don't know any better," Boch explained.

RELATED: Illinois Democrats beloved by teachers' unions target homeschooling families, religious schools

  Screenshot given to Blaze News

"Just out of the blue, they rolled into Illinois," Boch claimed. "And here they are, sending out these letters. And they send out the same letter every month, every 30 days."

After doing some investigating, Boch learned that the address for Illinois Firearms Association listed on the letter is actually a private mailbox inside a UPS store in Peoria. Boch doubts that Dorr and his associates in Illinois Firearms Association have made strong connections with any Illinois state lawmakers.

"I've never seen anything of them actually being in Springfield," Boch said. "I'm going to say it didn't happen, but nobody's ever told me that they've seen them in person in Springfield."

Blaze News heard similar stories that Dorr rarely visits the states whose lawmakers he claims to lobby on behalf of gun owners. In fact, Iowa state Rep. Matt Windschitl (R-Harrison), a strong gun-rights proponent, took to the floor of the chamber in 2017 and excoriated Dorr and other leaders of Iowa Gun Owners, yet another WYGO-affiliated group, for failing to attend legislative sessions when a major gun-rights bill was under consideration.

"Where are they?" Windschitl railed. "Why aren't they registered on this bill? Why did they not even come to a subcommittee to give their opinion on what we're trying to advance? Where are they? Where have they been?"

"They're not even registered on this bill," he continued, "and yet they've already gone out, taking credit for it."

"You're being lied to."

Even though Dorr fails to show up in Des Moines at key moments for gun owners, he still heavily fundraises in the state, Windschitl warned.

"If you're sending this guy money, I'm asking you to stop."

Windschitl did not respond to a request for comment from Blaze News, and Dorr did not reply to our question regarding the grifting allegations.

A sketchy bottom line

Despite these aggressive fundraising efforts, Dorr appears to receive little money from his bevy of organizations. Tax filings reveal that Dorr logs very few working hours for them and earns almost no salary from them.

Iowa Gun Owners appears to be the lone exception. The 2022 tax filing for the group, the most recent filing available, claimed that Dorr worked 35 hours per week that year and was compensated $60,000.

'AT ROCK BOTTOM COST!'

Christopher Dorr, believed to be one of Aaron's brothers, is named in tax filings as the executive director of Ohio Gun Owners. A Chris Dorr is likewise identified as the executive director of the Pennsylvania Firearms Coalition. In 2022, Chris Dorr reportedly worked 40 hours per week at and collected $72,000 from each group. If so, he put in a total of 80 hours per week that year and took home less than $150,000 as a result.

Notably, the Dorr-affiliated Missouri Firearms Coalition is not listed as a tax-exempt organization in the IRS database, even though Aaron Dorr lists Missouri as his home state on his personal website.

RELATED: Harris not only threatened to storm the homes of legal gun owners — she supported a handgun ban

  Photo by Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images

Just because their nonprofits do not always pay the Dorrs well, however, does not mean they are not profiting off their activism.

Aaron Dorr and some of his brothers, including Chris, also run Midwest Freedom Enterprises, a private company that purports to provide "gun rights and grassroots conservatism all across America ... AT ROCK BOTTOM COST!" According to a 2020 exposé on the Dorrs from NPR, Rep. Windschitl of Iowa openly suggested that Midwest Freedom is actually the main source of their income, not the gun nonprofits:

If you look at their 990s, not only in Iowa, but in the other states, they all claim that they're working 80 — 60 to 80 hours a week and getting no salary. The only way that they could be paying themselves is through their Midwest Freedom Enterprises LLC. They've got to be funneling money into that through the donations they're bringing in and then somehow driving a salary out of that. And from my understanding of tax code, federal tax code, that's a violation of 501(c)(4) nonprofit status.

Some sources who spoke with Blaze News likewise speculated that the Dorrs may be cashing in through Midwest Freedom. However, Iverson of "Cowboy State Politics" also emphasized that even with all their fundraising operations and the Midwest Freedom business, the Dorrs do not seem to be doing anything illegal — just untoward.

"I honestly think that what they're doing is legal to the letter of the law," Iverson opined. "It's just not entirely ethical."

Dorr did not respond to Blaze News' questions about Midwest Freedom or the tax filings from his nonprofits.

'Exploit a lot of people and take a lot of money'

Cognizant that activists who agree on the substance of an issue may disagree vehemently on the best ways to advocate for it, Blaze News asked the critics whether they viewed Aaron Dorr as an effective lobbyist for gun rights, even if his methods do not suit their personal taste.

Boch of Illinois gave the most succinct reply: "Hell no."

When attempting to list Dorr's "redeeming qualities," Sen. Hicks could come up with only one: "lying." "I hate to speak ... bad about anybody, so I will just stop with that," he said.

'If it's not a perfect bill, they're going to be adamantly opposed to it, and they're going to crucify anybody that supports it.'

David Iverson of "Cowboy State Politics," by contrast, did sincerely identify some positive contributions the Dorrs have made to the gun-rights movement. "They have been successful in getting some people that truly are not conservatives, that are against the Second Amendment kicked out of office," he told Blaze News. "There's been a couple of cases where they've gotten rid of, or they've really helped to get rid of, some pretty bad guys."

Additionally, Iverson confirmed that Aaron Dorr did visit Cheyenne to advocate for "no gun-free zones" on at least one occasion.

Other than that, the men had nothing to say in favor of Aaron Dorr or the Dorr family.

"They are one of these people, if it's not a perfect bill, they're going to be adamantly opposed to it, and they're going to crucify anybody that supports it," Boch claimed.

"When you look at the sum total of what they do," Iverson concluded, "they exploit a lot of people and take a lot of money from them."

"And really, they don't produce a whole heck of a lot."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

The Republican Party won’t be saved by excuses



Texas conservatives have long trusted the Republican Party to stand firm on core values: secure borders, parental rights, the Second Amendment, and limited government. We’ve delivered them power in Austin. But too many GOP lawmakers now serve corporate donors and media elites — not the grassroots conservatives who put them in office.

Texas may be a red state, but the last legislative session told a different story. Thirty-six Republican state lawmakers joined Democrats on critical votes that gutted conservative priorities. They campaign as fighters and govern as cowards — folding at the first whiff of media pressure or lobbyist resistance. That’s not leadership. That’s betrayal.

When Texas Republicans falter, they don’t just fail their state — they fail the country.

Governor Greg Abbott’s Operation Lone Star generates headlines, but the border remains wide open. Despite the efforts of the Trump administration, cartels continue to move drugs and people freely across Texas soil. Ranchers continue to live in fear. Families bury loved ones lost to fentanyl. Texans demand action, but Austin delivers press releases.

Yes, regardless of the federal government’s efforts — and the Trump administration is certainly a refreshing change from Joe Biden —Texas has the constitutional authority to act. Where’s the declaration of invasion? Where’s the full mobilization? Leadership doesn’t mean deploying troops for photo ops. It means taking responsibility and enforcing the law.

It isn’t ‘culture war nonsense’

Parents across Texas want transparency. They want to know what their kids are learning, reading, and hearing in school — especially on issues of sex and gender. Some lawmakers have stepped up. Too many haven’t. They call it “culture war nonsense” while siding with school boards and bureaucrats who treat parents as threats.

Legislators who can’t stop minors from receiving irreversible medical procedures without parental consent don’t belong in conservative office. That’s not compromise. That’s surrender.

Don’t dismiss the Second Amendment

After every shooting, moderate Republicans float “reasonable restrictions.” But the Constitution doesn’t hedge. It says “shall not be infringed.”

Texans don’t want red-flag laws. They want their rights respected. When figures like Rep. Dan Crenshaw entertain policies that chip away at due process, they don’t look pragmatic. They look weak. If you won’t defend gun rights without apology, step aside.

Meme bills and muzzled dissent

Texas Republicans now flirt with speech regulation. One bill would have required registration for anonymous political memes — all in the name of fighting “disinformation.” That’s not governance. That’s control.

Conservatives believe in protecting anonymous speech because we remember what it’s for: dissent. Critique. Satire. These aren’t bugs in the system — they’re essential features. If Austin lawmakers wants to mirror D.C.'s, voters will start treating them the same way.

Contempt for the base

The real issue isn’t just policy. It’s culture. The GOP establishment in Austin feels more at home with lobbyists than with the voters who knock doors and fund their campaigns. Primary challengers get dismissed as “fringe,” even as the grassroots base grows louder — and angrier.

RELATED: Red state, blue ballot: Dems use direct democracy to flip states

 Photo by Ben Sklar/Getty Images

Calls for term limits are rising. The appetite for bold reform is real. If Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) can deliver conservative wins in Florida, why can’t Texas? Why are we still making excuses?

This isn’t just about Texas

Texas shapes the national Republican Party. It drives presidential races and defines what the GOP stands for. When Texas Republicans falter, they don’t just fail their state — they fail the country.

As state Rep. Brian Harrison has shown, the last legislative session exposed serious cracks in the GOP foundation. Conservatives must respond: organize locally, show up at the Capitol, primary the cowards. An “R” isn’t a free pass. If you govern like a Democrat, expect to be treated like one.

Secure the border. Empower parents. Protect the Second Amendment. Defend free speech. Or get out of the way.

Texas doesn’t need more Republicans. It needs better ones.

SCOTUS Rejects Second Amendment Challenges To Maryland AR-15 Ban, Rhode Island Magazine Cap

[rebelmouse-proxy-image https://thefederalist.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Screenshot-2025-06-02-at-10.29.52 AM-e1748878266146-1200x675.png crop_info="%7B%22image%22%3A%20%22https%3A//thefederalist.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Screenshot-2025-06-02-at-10.29.52%5Cu202fAM-e1748878266146-1200x675.png%22%7D" expand=1]‘Our Constitution allows the American people — not the government — to decide which weapons are useful for self defense,’ Thomas dissented.