Democrats Want Americans To Believe We’ve Made No Voting Rights Advances Since 1965
'The claim that there’s a wave of voter suppression in the country that requires expansion of the Voting Rights Act [of 1965] is simply false.'
Nancy Abudu is a leftist lawyer who has supervised and strategized litigation at the Southern Poverty Law Center since 2019. She was nominated by President Joe Biden for a seat on the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit and is poised to soon be confirmed.
Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) blasted the Southern Poverty Law Center and Abudu in a scathing opinion piece this week, suggesting that the corruption and terror-links of the former have sufficiently compromised the latter, thereby disqualifying her from a role on the court.
Abudu did not win U.S. Senate approval in the prior Congress, which saw the Senate Judiciary Committee deadlocked. However, now with a Democratic majority and Abudu renominated, Reuters reported she stands a chance of success. She was reported to the full Senate after an 11-10 committee vote on Feb. 9.
Cruz, who serves on the committee, reckons her advancement would be ill-advised.
In his Wednesday piece for RealClearPolitics, Cruz paired two SPLC lawyers presently in the news: "Thomas Webb Jurgens, a suspected Antifa terrorist arrested and charged for his involvement in a violent riot against the police in Atlanta, Ga., and Nancy Abudu, the SPLC’s director for strategic litigation, whose job involves overseeing all of the SPLC’s legal work – including its special litigation related to 'hate groups.'"
TheBlaze previously reported that Jurgens, 28, was rounded up last month with other violent extremists caught throwing Molotov cocktails, fireworks, rocks, and bricks at a police training facility in Atlanta.
In making a case against Abudu's confirmation, Cruz first made a case against the organization of which she is a major member.
Cruz noted that most organizations would "at a minimum" have suspended an employee accused of domestic terrorism, as in the case of Jurgens. Not so with the SPLC, said Cruz, which "not only has the SPLC allowed him to retain his position, it has failed to condemn the horrific violence."
Following Jurgens' arrest, the SPLC — for which Abudu serves as strategic litigation director — suggested that the arrests of Molotov-throwing trespassers and other extremists "are part of ongoing state repression and violence against racial and environmental justice protesters, who are fighting to defend their communities from the harms of militarized policing and environmental degradation. Each of these instances, including the many protesters charged with domestic terrorism, make clear that law enforcement views movement activists as enemies of the state."
Cruz wrote, "[S]uch egregious and violence-inducing actions are par for the course when it comes to the SPLC, which has a long track record of smearing its political opponents and putting them in harm’s way."
The senator noted that at least twice, the SPLC had inspired political violence.
A terrorist named Floyd Lee Corkins attempted to massacre conservatives at the headquarters of the Family Research Council in 2012. Corkins acknowledged that the shooting was inspired by the SPLC, which had previously labeled the conservative organization a hate group.
Confessed Terrorist Floyd Corkins Admits to Using SPLC Target List youtu.be
Cruz also referenced the 2017 assassination attempt on then-U.S. House Majority Whip Steve Scalise and other Republican lawmakers by James T. Hodgkinson. Six were shot, two critically. According to the Washington Examiner, the shooter was a fan of the SPLC, which had long claimed Scalise must go.
Despite having already possibly directed violence against conservatives in 2012 and Republicans in 2017, Cruz noted that Abudu's SPLC curated "a list of Republican candidates who SPLC said held 'open white supremacist, nativist, anti-LGBT or antigovernment' views. This list included myself, as well as my colleagues Josh Hawley and Marsha Blackburn."
Cruz underscored that while the SPLC is particularly antipathetic to Republicans, its haphazard aim has caught others in the crosshairs, including human rights advocate Ayaan Hirsi Ali and Muslim reformer Maajid Nawaz.
Nawaz told the Atlantic, "They put a target on my head. The kind of work that I do, if you tell the wrong kind of Muslims that I’m an extremist, then that means I’m an target. ... These people are putting me on what I believe is a hit list."
Fox News Digital reported that the SPLC ultimately had to pay out $3.37 million in a defamation suit and issue an apology to Nawaz.
Extra to creating potential hit lists for mentally unstable leftists and Islamists, Cruz noted that the SPLC is rife with internal corruption, referencing past accusations of racism, sexism, and sexual harassment within the organization.
While Abudu is not the SPLC and the SPLC's organizational faults cannot be singularly attributed to Abudu, Cruz noted the judicial nominee is not willing to distance herself from the SPLC's corruption and incendiary rhetoric.
"Shockingly, when questioned by the Senate Judiciary Committee on which I serve, Abudu repeatedly refused to condemn the SPLC’s violence-inspiring rhetoric," wrote Cruz. "Instead, she repeatedly said how proud she is to work for an organization that has been discredited by investigative journalists and commentators from across the political spectrum for years and what even progressives have dubbed 'everything that’s wrong with liberalism.'"
Abudu can be seen dodging Cruz's questions last April here:
'So You're Going To Refuse To Answer That?': Ted Cruz Presses Biden Nom On SPLC Work youtu.be
Abudu told the Senate Judiciary Committee in 2022 that "as the Director for Strategic Litigation, I have taken on significant managerial responsibilities, including overseeing all of the organization's legal programmatic work which, in addition to voting rights, includes immigrants' rights, criminal justice reform, children's rights, LGBTQ rights, and special litigation related to hate groups."
Accordingly, Abudu help the SPLC fight its cultural war in addition to helping it fight its legal battles.
Cruz implored his colleagues to consider "the message it would send to the people we represent should we confirm someone from such a corrupt organization to the federal bench," especially in light of "its entanglement with racism and sexual harassment, and its campaign of hate and domestic terrorism."
Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!
President Joe Biden released his budget request for fiscal 2024 on Thursday, prompting Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) to conclude that socialists, not the accident-prone octogenarian, are running the White House.
Cruz told Fox News' Sean Hannity, "The sad truth is the socialists are in charge of the White House. Joe Biden certainly isn't."
The people Biden has surrounded himself with "have a very simple approach to everything: They want to spend money they don’t have, [and] they want to raise taxes on you," added the senator.
"They've unleashed record inflation," continued Cruz. "This budget that Biden put out would create a $50 trillion national debt, and their view is they can just keep printing money and unleashing inflation and keep borrowing money from China. It’s wildly irresponsible."
As of March 10, the total federal debt was $31.459 trillion, which breaks down to over $94,000 per citizen.
Despite Biden's claims that his proposal was fiscally responsible, Maya MacGuineas, president of the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget advocacy group, said, "When it comes to fixing the debt, this is by no means an award-winning budget."
The $6.8 trillion proposal — which the White House claimed will ultimately reduce the deficit by $3 trillion over a 10-year period — was touted by Shalanda Young, the director of the Office of Management and Budget, as the "start of a healthy dialogue." However, it appears Biden is speaking a different language than many Americans.
Whereas fentanyl, the drug killing tens of thousands of Americans every year, was mentioned only twice in the 182-page budget, equity was invoked 63 times and queer was mentioned seven times, reported Fox News Digital.
The fight to curb the flow of fentanyl did not appear to benefit from an equitable distribution of the administration's care.
While Biden would pour more money into programs for foreign nationals in the U.S. illegally as well as other migrants, he proposed spending only $40 million to combat fentanyl trafficking.
Equity, which is to say equal outcomes, similarly did not hold when it came to balancing border security with benefits for foreign nationals. Biden's budget would allot $7.3 billion for refugees but fund only an additional 350 border patrol agents to tackle the unprecedented stream of criminal noncitizens crossing U.S. borders, reported the Daily Mail.
"You know what is not in this budget?" Cruz asked Hannity. "Funds to secure our southern border. They want to fund 87,000 IRS agents, but they don’t have funds for significant numbers of new border patrol agents. They don’t have funds for significant numbers of DEA agents to stop the fentanyl crisis that led to over 100,000 overdoses that happened last year on Biden’s watch."
"This is a tax and spend budget," continued the senator. "They’ve got $5.5 trillion in new taxes in this budget. That includes taxes directly on energy. So, remember all of the Democrats who said they wanted the gas prices low? They were lying."
The administration's "extreme and really dangerous" priorities revealed in the bill "tell you who they are," said Cruz, who noted that where the Democrat president is concerned, concerns over inflation, opioid deaths, and border security take a backseat to so-called environmental justice, transsexuals, and climate alarmism.
Rep. Chip Roy (R-Texas) appeared to agree with Cruz, stating that Biden's "budget makes his priorities clear. His administration is at war with the American people’s freedom and prosperity. ... We need to shrink Washington and grow America. His budget would do the opposite."
Cruz underscored that this "political document" had "zero-point-zero percent chance of being enacted into law.
Upon unveiling his plan on Thursday, Biden said, "I want to make it clear I'm ready to meet with the speaker anytime, tomorrow, if he has his budget. Lay it down, tell me what you want to do. I'll show you what I want to do, see what we can agree on."
Republican House Speaker Kevin McCarthy said, "Biden's budget is a reckless proposal doubling down on the same Far Left spending policies that have led to record inflation and our current debt crisis."
House Republicans have in mind $150 billion in cuts to non-defense discretionary programs, such as foreign aid, and $25 billion from the Department of Education, reported Reuters. These cuts would reportedly save $1.5 trillion over the next decade.
Members of the House Freedom Caucus proposed Friday that Congress cap overall discretionary spending at fiscal 2022 levels for 10 years, allowing for 1 percent growth per year, reported the Hill.
Additionally, they called to end Biden's allegedly unconstitutional student loan forgiveness; rescind unspent COVID-19 and Inflation Reduction Act funds; loosen domestic energy production regulations; and trim additional statist spoils.
In the budget, the White House notes it also seeks: to restore the full Child Tax Credit; a billionaire minimum tax; increases to the corporate tax rate; and the provision of national paid leave. Some efforts appear to have also been made to satisfy bipartisan desires to better compete with China and flood Ukraine with additional support.
None— (@)
Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) announced his support for Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk's viral social media post calling for America to immediately increase its domestic energy source output.
Musk on Friday took to Twitter to speak out about the necessity of increasing domestic oil and gas output to combat the dramatically surging energy prices under the Biden administration and as Russia continues to invade Ukraine.
Musk wrote, "Hate to say it, but we need to increase oil & gas output immediately. Extraordinary times demand extraordinary measures. Obviously, this would negatively affect Tesla, but sustainable energy solutions simply cannot react instantaneously to make up for Russian oil & gas exports.”
At the time of this reporting, Musk's tweet has been liked more than 197,000 times.
Obviously, this would negatively affect Tesla, but sustainable energy solutions simply cannot react instantaneously to make up for Russian oil & gas exports.— Elon Musk (@Elon Musk) 1646441339
Cruz took to Twitter on Saturday to support Musk’s statement, saying, “Couldn’t agree more! Unleash American energy NOW!”
"Couldn't agree more! Unleash American energy NOW!" he tweeted.
Couldn't agree more! Unleash American energy NOW!https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1499907549746937860\u00a0\u2026— Ted Cruz (@Ted Cruz) 1646487978
Cruz on Friday issued a statement regarding the Energy Freedom Act, which would effectively release the U.S. from reliance on foreign energy sources.
“I’m introducing the Energy Freedom Act to reverse Biden’s actions so we can restore American energy independence," he said in a statement on the proposed legislation. "This bill won’t cost taxpayers a dime, but it will provide the United States billions in revenue in the coming years by expediting permitting, leasing, safe new pipelines, and exports, and providing much needed regulatory certainty. It would create new jobs, lower energy costs, and because modern energy production in the United States is far cleaner than in any other country’s by every measure, it would help the environment."
He added, "The Energy Freedom Act would put a stop to the Biden administration’s sabotage of the American energy industry, and Congress should take it up without delay.”
Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) joined the "Glenn Beck Radio Program" to explain how mail-in ballots are typically disqualified during recounts at a far higher rate than in-person, Election Day ballots, and why this is "good news" for President Donald Trump's legal battle over the election.
"One of the things that gives the greatest cause for optimism is, this election ... there's a pretty marked disparity in terms of how the votes were distributed. On Election Day, with in-person voting, Donald Trump won a significant majority of the votes cast on in-person voting on Election Day. Of mail-in voting, Joe Biden won a significant majority of the votes cast early on mail-in voting," Cruz explained.
"Now, here's the good news: If you look historically to recounts, if you look historically to election litigation, the votes cast in person on Election Day tend to stand. It's sort of hard to screw that up. Those votes are generally legal, and they're not set aside. Mail-in votes historically have a much higher rate of rejection … when they're examined, there are a whole series of legal requirements that vary state by state, but mail-in votes consistently have a higher rate of rejection, which suggests that as these votes begin being examined and subjected to scrutiny, that you're going to see Joe Biden's vote tallies go down. That's a good thing," he added. "The challenge is, for President Trump to prevail, he's got to run the table. He's got to win, not just in one state but in several states. That makes it a lot harder to prevail in the litigation. I hope that he does so, but it is a real challenge and we shouldn't try to convince ourselves otherwise."
Watch the video clip below to catch more of the conversation:
To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.
Subscribe to BlazeTV today with our BEST DEAL EVER for $30 off with promo code GLENN.
The Senate Judiciary Committee was set to vote on subpoenas to compel Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey and Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg to testify on alleged censorship and bias across their platforms. But that all changed when Republican committee members "expressed reservation about the maneuver," Politico reports.
Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), who chairs Judiciary's Subcommittee on the Constitution, was definitely not one of the committee members with cold feet. On the radio program Tuesday, he told Glenn Beck that he's fighting "vociferously" to ensure Dorsey and others testify before the November 3rd election.
"Jack Dorsey and Mark Zuckerberg are both going to testify. They're are going to testify in person. They're going to testify before Election Day. That's what I think should happen," Cruz said. "That's what I'm fighting vociferously to happen. Right now, the companies are negotiating with the chairman's office to discuss terms to come voluntarily. I don't give a damn whether they come voluntarily or under subpoena. They need to testify in person and answer questions for the American people about why they are trying to steal this election, to suppress the free speech, and to censor the press."
The subpoenas would require Big Tech leaders to testify on the alleged "suppression and/or censorship" of two consecutive blockbuster stories from the New York Post. The first story was about emails that allegedly came from Hunter Biden's computer which are currently being investigated by the FBI, and the second was based on additional emails that allegedly showed communist China directly offering millions of dollars to then-Vice President Joe Biden.
"Big Tech stepped in, and they've done something they've never done before," Cruz explained. "We know that Big Tech has been censoring individual conservatives, trying to suppress conservative speech. But the step they took here is, they blocked if any individual user tried to share either of the New York Post stories, [they] were blocked ... Sharing a news story, from a major media outlet is part of democracy, part of free speech. And not only that, they blocked the New York Post itself. Right now, today, the New York Post is not being allowed to post its own damn stories on corruption. This is ridiculous. It's a threshold that's never been crossed before, of Silicon Valley oligarchs declaring the authority to determine what the press is allowed to report, and who is allowed to see it."
Watch the video below to catch more of the conversation:
To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.
Ted Cruz EXPOSES Biden Nominee for Celebrating Cop Killers in BRUTAL Takedown