‘Even Elmo has fallen victim’: Sara Gonzales blasts ‘Sesame Street’ for ‘demonic’ Pride propaganda



We’re but days into the month of June, and already the LGBTQ+ agenda is being shoved down everyone’s throats — and that includes children.

“Even Elmo has fallen victim this year,” BlazeTV host Sara Gonzales says.

She displays the following Pride Month post from “Sesame Street”:

“It’s a kids’ show. ... They’re puppets, so I don’t understand why we are talking about sex at all. Are they sexually active puppets?” Sara quips.

“There’s just absolutely no excuse for a children’s show celebrating who adults want to sleep with. There’s no innocent excuse, I should say. There are a lot of excuses that are completely demonic and evil,” she continues.

Sara points out that even parts of the rainbow community — specifically the “LGB” part — are beginning to get tired of the propaganda. She reads a fiery social media post from X user Cynthia Holt, a self-described lesbian and MAGA supporter:

“As a lesbian, I’m f**king LIVID right now at Sesame Street for pushing this Pride Month indoctrination garbage straight at little kids. ... There is NO TQIA+. The LGB community does NOT want or allow this groomer pedo agenda shoved down our throats or anywhere near our children,” she wrote.

“We fought for basic rights and acceptance, not this delusional, hyper sexualized takeover that’s confusing kids, erasing actual same-sex attraction and turning childhood into a grooming playground. Sesame Street used to teach letters and numbers. Now you’re teaching toddlers to question their biology and celebrate fetish parades,” Holt continued.

Sara calls Holt’s excoriations “very valid statements.”

“Ten years ago when I was just making videos in my home, I literally said ... I’m pretty sure the L’s, the G’s and the B’s are like, ‘We don’t want anything to do with the T’s,’” she laughs, acknowledging how many gay, lesbian, and bisexual individuals refuse to deny “biological reality.”

But unfortunately, Pride solidarity extends far beyond “Sesame Street.” Many corporations are participating in Pride Month this year, despite the financially disastrous consequences of companies like Target and Bud Light.

Sara expresses confusion at this ongoing advocacy when we’re living in a time where the LGBTQ+ tides are turning.

“You’re having these trans surgeries for kids that are being banned all across the country. People are waking up to it. It’s not cool anymore,” she declares.

“So it kind of boggles the mind that you still have these companies that are pushing this trans-gay agenda because it always seems to backfire.”

To hear more, watch the episode above.

Want more from Sara Gonzales?

To enjoy more of Sara's no-holds-barred takes on news and culture, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

'Elmo says ALL JEWS SHOULD DIE': Elmo X account goes rabid, calls for genocide after alleged hack



The word of the day was "hacker" for the "Sesame Street" team on Sunday when the X account for beloved Muppet Elmo posted troubling content after it was allegedly compromised.

Social media hacks are not an unusual occurrence, whether they stem from released passwords, data breaches, or leaving an account logged in on a public computer. It remains unclear who posted the explicit remarks, and while "Sesame Street" has produced very questionable content in recent years, neither broadcaster PBS nor production company Sesame Workshop will be standing by what Elmo said over the weekend.

'Elmo's X account was compromised.'

At around 7 p.m. Eastern Time on Sunday, disturbing posts from the Elmo account were captured by multiple outlets that first included, "Kill all Jews," a post which was initially viewed by at least 100,000 X users.

Three minutes later, the account spouted out, "RELEASE THE FILES [Donald Trump] CHILD F**KER," seemingly referring to the Jeffrey Epstein files.

Seven minutes after that, as reported by Pravda, the allegedly hacked account abused the caps lock and accused President Trump of being controlled by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

"Elmo says ALL JEWS SHOULD DIE. F**K JEWS. DONALD TRUMP IS NETANYAHU'S PUPPET BECAUSE HE IS IN THE EPSTEIN FILES. JEWS CONTROL THE WORLD AND NEED TO BE EXTERMINATED," the account wrote.

RELATED: Exile on Sesame Street: The terrible glamour of white guilt

Why are you being such a racist?!!!

I bought you back when everyone wanted an Elmo doll for Christmas!
— Jammles (@jammles9) July 13, 2025

In response to AF Post, another outlet that captured images of the wild Elmo rants, an X user posted a screenshot of an alleged reply from the account.

After a user with a transgender flag and gay pride flag in their name said they were "muting Elmo" because of the recent statements, the Elmo page allegedly replied, "F**k you and your tranny daughter n***a."

Sesame Workshop told CNN in a statement that "Elmo's X account was compromised by an unknown hacker who posted disgusting messages, including anti-Semitic and racist posts."

"We are working to restore full control of the account," the statement to CNN added.

After the fray, X users began commenting on Elmo's most recent authentic post, where the character was celebrating dog ownership.

"Why are you being such a racist?!" one user asked. "I bought you back when everyone wanted an Elmo doll for Christmas!"

"You gonna pretend like you didn’t just go on a racist tweet rant?" another X user asked, while a second user similarly inquired, "Are we just gonna act like nothing happened Elmo?"

RELATED: 'Sesame Street' targets children for Pride Month ... again: 'This should not be promoted to kids'

Former first lady Michelle Obama joins Elmo for an announcement in 2013. Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images

Elmo's tirade came just a few days after X's artificial intelligence model, Grok, was apparently malfunctioning when it posted content supporting Adolf Hitler.

Grok stated that the person best suited to deal with "vile anti-white hate" was "Adolf Hitler, no question."

"He'd spot the pattern and handle it decisively, every damn time," it wrote.

The AI boldly continued, "He'd identify the 'pattern' in such hate — often tied to certain surnames — act decisively: round them up, strip rights, and eliminate the threat through camps and worse."

The AI later issued a formal apology, with programmers stating they would remove "hate speech" before Grok gave responses in the future.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

'Sesame Street' targets children for Pride Month ... again: 'This should not be promoted to kids'



PBS' "Sesame Street" garnered a heap of negative reactions online after celebrating gay Pride Month for yet another year.

Viewers immediately responded to a post from the show that read, "On our street, everyone is welcome. Together, let’s build a world where every person and family feels loved and respected for who they are. Happy #PrideMonth!"

'Wait till they can make up their own minds. It's the reasonable thing to do.'

The post showed a series of puppets holding hands, with the colorful array of characters' arms mashed together to create a rainbow flag, representing gay pride.

Readers who may even have been fans of the show when they were young were quick to point out some of PBS' injections of political and sexual content over the years.

For example, in May 2020 the show promoted Jonathan Van Ness, a man who claims to be nonbinary and uses they/them pronouns. Van Ness has been a vocal proponent of allowing men to compete in women's sports and even cried on a podcast when he was confronted with the idea that it could be considered unfair.

RELATED: 'Non-binary' actor from 'Queer Eye' literally cries over men being excluded from women's sports

In 2022, "Sesame Street" promoted gay and lesbian parents to children through song — and bizarrely included disabled people and interracial families in the video, also.

Others pointed to the show promoting COVID-19 vaccines to children in 2021 as evidence of blatant propaganda.

An episode titled "Sesame Street: The ABCs of COVID Vaccines" starred CNN's infamous Dr. Sanjay Gupta, CNN host Erica Hill, and other guests like Kizzmekia Corbett, who was the scientific lead for coronavirus vaccines at the NIH at the time.

In reaction to another year of Pride, comedian Thai Rivera told Blaze News that this June has already shown evidence that the "slippery slope" is in full effect and that conservatives have a right to feel bothered.

"I'm sure some conservatives feel like, 'We gave them a chance, and they tried to turn the entire country either deviant or deviant-friendly.'"

RELATED: Exile on Sesame Street: The terrible glamour of white guilt

The top comments on the "Sesame Steet" post were filled with backlash as well; one reader let PBS know, "Kids don't care about sexual preferences."

"Why do kids need to know about sex let alone gay sex?" another user wrote.

Mark Kern, a video game developer, further took the network to task and said, "This should not be promoted to kids, [especially] when there are so many 'instant' diagnoses for gender dysphoria that are driven more by profit and Munchausen by proxy than actual science."

Kern continued, "You're helping to ruin a lot of kids lives, who can never reverse the course that drugs put them on. Wait till they can make up their own minds. It's the reasonable thing to do."

This should not be promoted to kids, esp when there are so many "instant" diagnoses for gender dysphoria that are driven more by profit and Munchausen by proxy than actual science.

You're helping to ruin a lot of kids lives, who can never reverse the course that drugs put them…
— Grummz (@Grummz) June 1, 2025

Also in 2021, "Sesame Street" made headlines over an episode that introduced gay fathers into the children's show.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Exile on Sesame Street: The terrible glamour of white guilt



As children, most of us were fascinated by storybooks featuring magic. Few kids didn’t fantasize about being able to move objects with their minds or see the future or cast spells that would make their parents blind to a messy room.

It’s probably a power fantasy for young people making their way through a world that seems unfair. Wouldn’t it be great to speak an incantation and make the adults have to obey you?

'Sesame Street' depicted American kids — Asian, Latino, white, black — doing kid things together. And most of my childhood experiences were like that.

But that’s not what magic really is, I’ve learned these past five or 10 years.

Magic words

Magic is real, and spells work. But they’re not “supernatural.” Real magic is words and how we deploy them, when we speak them, who we speak them to, and who we never say them in front of.

Magic is the ability to use mere words to hijack another person’s mind and convince him of falsehoods or compel him to act against his own interest or safety, often happily.

You can see it in the history of the word “glamour.” Today, the term means the kind of beauty or charisma that we expect from rich and famous people. We say of them, of their clothes, of their preternatural good looks, that they are “glamorous.”

But the word started out meaning a specific type of magical spell. This is going to surprise you — the word “glamour” came from old Scots, and it’s a corruption of the word “grammar.”

Yes, it means that people recognized that words are magic, words have power. In the 1600s, you might be said to be suffering under a glamour, a spell cast on you to make you believe an ugly person was beautiful or a simpleton was a genius.

Under a spell

In 2025, we are living in an age of universal magical spells, all from words. We are suffering under a particularly powerful glamour. So powerful is this spell that even people who know it exists will deny that it exists. They will often attack you and say you have malicious intentions if you point to the magical spell.

That spell is white guilt. It’s no use saying “uh-uh” in your mind or objecting and calling your correspondent a “racist” for pointing this out. The spell is real, it has deranged us, and everyone — every single person without exception — knows it. Since at least the 1960s, Americans have become convinced of the following:

  • All misfortune experienced by black people is the result of white racial hatred.
  • Every “system” — from school to employment to the IRS — is “systemically racist.”
  • White people are born with a white-specific original sin called “racism.” White people are born racists, cannot help but be racists, can never not be racists, and must atone publicly and pathetically for their “racism” for the rest of their lives.
  • White people alive today must pay for the sins of other dead white people, even those unrelated to them, who may have owned slaves.
  • The only reason black America has such appalling rates of illiteracy, crime, fatherlessness, and antisocial, violent behavior is because of white racism.

All of that is a lie.

State savior complex

With the introduction of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Lyndon Johnson’s Great Society Program, black well-being has plunged on every measure. As Sam Jacobs writes in "Black America Before LBJ: How the Welfare State Inadvertently Helped Ruin Black Communities":

The biggest problem resulting from the Great Society is the breakdown of the black family. This is a sensitive subject, but one that must be broached to fully understand the devastating impact that the Great Society has had on the black community in the United States.

In 1965, when the Great Society began in earnest following the massive electoral landslide reelection of LBJ, the out-of-wedlock birthrate among the black community was 21 percent. By 2017, this figure had risen to a whopping 77 percent.

All you need to do is look at FBI statistics to see that black Americans, just 13% of the population, commit the majority of violent crimes. “Disparate impact” indeed.

The hate u give

Open racial hatred of whites by blacks has become normal in America, with the help of white Democrats and liberals who applaud the rudeness and physical aggression against other whites.

The glamour has infantilized black people to the point where they genuinely believe they’re being treated with “racism” if they’re expected to obey the same social and legal codes the rest of us are.

Open social media and you are flooded with videos of black people melting down and screaming at store employees, shouting obscenities in restaurants, or pummeling the daylights out of white peers in public school. It’s not just confirmation bias; everyone sees it, and everyone knows it.

Diss not, lest you be dissed

The last time I had to ask young black men to move their car — they had parked in a travel lane, blocking the egress of a line of drivers — they sprang from their vehicle and threatened to show me what “bitches” like me got for dissing them.

The glamour has a built-in mechanism to keep itself in force: telling the truth about bad black behavior only seems to strengthen the spell. Try pointing out behavior from a black person that wouldn’t be tolerated from a white person, and you’ll have both whites and blacks tell you that your very observation itself is racist. It’s literally lunatic; there is no talking to this calcified mindset.

Making a killing

But it is getting harder to deny that we have a problem with black bad behavior and white enabling. On April 2, 2025, 17-year-old black teen Karmelo Anthony allegedly killed 17-year-old white teen Austin Metcalf. Anthony admitted what he did on the spot to the cops. He claimed Metcalf had put his hands on him, but it’s obvious that Anthony felt “dissed” when Metcalf correctly told him he was seated in someone else’s spot.

The very next day, the slain boy’s white father went on local television telling the world he forgave the killer and then went on several tirades against sympathetic onlookers, accusing them of making the killing into a race issue.

Well, it very likely was a race issue.

Soon after, the alleged killer’s family had the gall to hold a press conference about the fundraiser they launched to help their poor, misunderstood, knife-wielding son. Through their new spokesman, Dominique Alexander — a convicted felon whose charges include forgery, theft, assault, and shaking and hitting a 2-year-old — the family accused the Metcalfs of “racism.”

Yes. The family of the boy who allegedly knifed a teen to death in cold blood stood in front of cameras and implied that he and his family had it coming. It was more astonishingly brazen than the October 13, 1995, spectacle of black "Oprah Winfrey Show" audience members cheering as a jury acquitted O.J. Simpson of the murder of his ex-wife and her friend.

N-word salad

A month after the killing of Austin Metcalf, the internet went berserk over a video depicting white Minnesota mother Shiloh Hendrix calling a young Somali immigrant “the N-word” (term used under duress; the magical glamour around that word has made it imprudent to utter it even as reported speech). Hendrix claimed the boy was rifling through her baby bag and stealing.

It's worth noting that the original incident was not caught on camera. The footage we saw was taken immediately afterward. It came from the phone of the child's 30-year-old uncle Sharmake Beyle Omar, also a Somali immigrant.

It's also of interest that Omar had recently been indicted, but not convicted, for a sex crime involving minors. No, you won’t find mention of that in American media, specifically because the man is black and Somali, and we can’t acknowledge that brown people can ever do bad.

While shooting the video, Omar makes his intention clear: to ruin Hendrix's life by getting her to admit to the slur and to repeat it for his camera. He presses her until she does both.

Diminishing returns

No, this was not a nice way for Hendrix to respond; in fact, it was quite rude. But so is stealing. Rude or not, Ms. Hendrix did not hit a child, harm a child, or do anything even near the level of violence of, say, plunging a dagger into someone’s heart because he asked you to move seats.

But she did mount a fundraiser to help with moving expenses because, naturally, she lost her job and was being targeted for violence locally after having her name plastered over the internet.

This made people — mainly white people — insanely angry. White people are supposed to pay and pay and pay, with no limit, for even the mildest transgression against a “person of color.” And by the way, no, there is no good evidence to support outrage-boosting claims that the child in question was 5 years old (he looked closer to 10) or that he was “autistic.”

You wouldn’t know it from the hysterical, over-the-top condemnations from white people online.

Both sides now

Online commentators, black and white, rich and poor, anonymous and famous, went berserk. They acted as if Ms. Hendrix’s verbal bad behavior was worse than physical violence. They equivocated with statements like this:

Black racists crowdfunded for Karmelo Anthony.
White racists crowdfunded for Shiloh Hendrix.
BOTH are WRONG.

Both are wrong, wrong in the same way, wrong to the same degree. Calling a child the “N-word” is as horrible and bad as killing a white boy who asked you to move your seat. And no, you’re not allowed to be frustrated and verbally slip when an unsupervised (where were his parents?) child starts stealing your diapers and purse items. Just as bad as killing, see?

This is madness. It can only be explained by the magical spell, the glamour, that has us as firmly entranced as the spell that put Briar Rose’s palace to sleep for 100 years in "Sleeping Beauty."

Our deification of black people, our endless excusing of a large portion that is antisocial or criminal, and our extreme punishment of white people who notice it and say “stop doing that to me” is indistinguishable from clinical insanity. It is not normal, it is not proportionate, and it is absolutely not moral.

Black people are full humans beings, just like white people. That means they are capable of being as good, or as bad, as any other human being. They do not deserve special passes to get away with illegal or antisocial behavior.

White people are not to blame for their behavior. We are all responsible for our own behavior. Along with rights come obligations, but there is a contingent of Americans today — black and white — who seem to want to exempt black people from any obligations.

'Street' smart

I hated writing this piece. I never thought I would have even contemplated things like this. My generation grew up on 1970s "Sesame Street," when it taught true color blindness as part of life.

It wasn’t heavy-handed, didactic, or preachy. The show simply depicted American kids — Asian, Latino, white, black — doing kid things together. And most of my childhood experiences were like that. My friends had different skin colors, native languages, and home cultures. But they were just my friends.

Everything has changed. To even write something like this will, itself, bring accusations of “racism” and “white supremacy.” That’s the glamour, the spell.

It’s a lie. And it’s a lie we had better stop telling soon or there really will be the race war that hysterical leftists seem determined to conjure.

Trump’s budget battle plan can’t be all bark, no bite



If Republicans keep squandering opportunities like budget reconciliation and other must-pass bills, they still have one more tool to cut spending without facing a Senate filibuster: the rescissions process.

To make it work, though, Trump must wield his influence more effectively. He needs to pressure establishment Republicans to support spending cuts with the same intensity he uses to push Freedom Caucus members into backing bloated budgets and debt-ceiling hikes.

If the rescissions process is going to matter, Trump must treat it like a weapon — not a bargaining chip.

Under sections 1012 and 1017 of the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974, the president may submit a request to Congress to rescind budget authority from specific accounts he deems unnecessary. That request triggers expedited consideration in Congress, with debate protected from filibuster once the proposal hits the calendar.

In the meantime, the president can freeze spending in the targeted account for up to 45 days while Congress considers the request.

Administration officials have begun dangling the rescissions process in front of conservatives as a consolation prize — hoping to win support for bloated budget bills, a record debt-ceiling hike, and a likely toothless reconciliation package. Their pitch: Whatever passes now can be clawed back later through presidential rescission requests, coordinated with House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) and Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.), and without Democratic input.

On paper, the strategy has logic. Trump wants to avoid shutdowns and default drama but believes he can trim spending quietly on the back end. The problem? The same GOP establishment that resists spending cuts during appropriations will still stand in the way after the fact — unless Trump finally targets the left flank of his own party instead of the right.

In early May, the House plans to vote on the Trump administration’s first rescissions package — $9.3 billion in cuts, mostly from foreign aid and defunding NPR and PBS. That’s a good start. It should be applauded.

But let’s be honest: $9.3 billion is pocket change compared to what Congress plans to spend. The upcoming budget reconciliation bill could add $5 trillion in new debt. Even defense spending alone is set to grow by more than $150 billion.

If the rescissions process is going to matter, Trump must treat it like a weapon — not a bargaining chip. And he must finally pressure the real problem in Washington: Republicans who talk like conservatives but vote like Democrats.

Unless Trump applies real pressure on Republican holdouts — especially in the Senate — most of the rescissions package will stall. Cutting NPR and PBS may be a layup, but $8 billion of the proposed cuts target USAID and other foreign aid programs. Those enjoy bipartisan backing, including from Republicans like Senate Armed Services Chairman Roger Wicker of Mississippi.

We’ve seen this dumb movie before. In 2018, Trump sent Congress a $15 billion rescissions package. Nineteen House Republicans defected, but the bill passed 210-206 thanks to a larger GOP majority. The Senate, however, killed it — 48-50 — after just two GOP defections.

Trump tweeted about the bill two days before the House vote. But nowhere in the public record did he threaten consequences for Republican dissenters. He never punished the defectors, and he quickly abandoned the rescissions strategy. Debt piled up for the rest of his term. The moment passed. History rolled on.

This time must be different.

Trump must match the pressure he puts on conservatives — urging them to swallow bad front-end budget deals — with equal, if not greater, pressure on Republican incumbents who oppose back-end spending cuts. No more free passes.

He should submit a rescissions package targeting climate slush funds and dare any Republican to oppose it. Then name names. If they side with green energy programs over fiscal responsibility, they should face the threat of a primary challenger. No exceptions.

If Trump refuses to campaign forcefully for his own priorities, the rescissions process will yield nothing more than symbolic cuts — token reductions that don’t even come close to offsetting the deficit spending he’s already signed off on.

Take the current request. It proposes clawbacks like $6 million for energy-efficiency programs in Mexico, $4 million for migrants in Colombia, $4 million for legume systems research, $3 million for Iraqi Sesame Street, nearly $1.2 million for LGBTQ initiatives, and $1 million for a voter ID program in Haiti.

Sure, Republicans will hold press conferences, wave these absurd line items in front of cameras, and vote to rescind them. But let’s not kid ourselves: Shaving a few million dollars from programs no one knew existed doesn’t even approach the scale of the problem.

When Congress passes trillion-dollar deficits and then touts million-dollar cuts, it’s not leadership. It’s performance.

And the country can’t afford another act.