Elmo-Wielding Hakeem Jeffries Hits House Floor Attempting To Stop GOP From Scraping PBS Funding
'Legislation that targets Elmo and Big Bird'
PBS' "Sesame Street" garnered a heap of negative reactions online after celebrating gay Pride Month for yet another year.
Viewers immediately responded to a post from the show that read, "On our street, everyone is welcome. Together, let’s build a world where every person and family feels loved and respected for who they are. Happy #PrideMonth!"
'Wait till they can make up their own minds. It's the reasonable thing to do.'
The post showed a series of puppets holding hands, with the colorful array of characters' arms mashed together to create a rainbow flag, representing gay pride.
Readers who may even have been fans of the show when they were young were quick to point out some of PBS' injections of political and sexual content over the years.
For example, in May 2020 the show promoted Jonathan Van Ness, a man who claims to be nonbinary and uses they/them pronouns. Van Ness has been a vocal proponent of allowing men to compete in women's sports and even cried on a podcast when he was confronted with the idea that it could be considered unfair.
RELATED: 'Non-binary' actor from 'Queer Eye' literally cries over men being excluded from women's sports
In 2022, "Sesame Street" promoted gay and lesbian parents to children through song — and bizarrely included disabled people and interracial families in the video, also.
Others pointed to the show promoting COVID-19 vaccines to children in 2021 as evidence of blatant propaganda.
An episode titled "Sesame Street: The ABCs of COVID Vaccines" starred CNN's infamous Dr. Sanjay Gupta, CNN host Erica Hill, and other guests like Kizzmekia Corbett, who was the scientific lead for coronavirus vaccines at the NIH at the time.
In reaction to another year of Pride, comedian Thai Rivera told Blaze News that this June has already shown evidence that the "slippery slope" is in full effect and that conservatives have a right to feel bothered.
"I'm sure some conservatives feel like, 'We gave them a chance, and they tried to turn the entire country either deviant or deviant-friendly.'"
RELATED: Exile on Sesame Street: The terrible glamour of white guilt
The top comments on the "Sesame Steet" post were filled with backlash as well; one reader let PBS know, "Kids don't care about sexual preferences."
"Why do kids need to know about sex let alone gay sex?" another user wrote.
Mark Kern, a video game developer, further took the network to task and said, "This should not be promoted to kids, [especially] when there are so many 'instant' diagnoses for gender dysphoria that are driven more by profit and Munchausen by proxy than actual science."
Kern continued, "You're helping to ruin a lot of kids lives, who can never reverse the course that drugs put them on. Wait till they can make up their own minds. It's the reasonable thing to do."
This should not be promoted to kids, esp when there are so many "instant" diagnoses for gender dysphoria that are driven more by profit and Munchausen by proxy than actual science.
You're helping to ruin a lot of kids lives, who can never reverse the course that drugs put them…
— Grummz (@Grummz) June 1, 2025
Also in 2021, "Sesame Street" made headlines over an episode that introduced gay fathers into the children's show.
Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!
As children, most of us were fascinated by storybooks featuring magic. Few kids didn’t fantasize about being able to move objects with their minds or see the future or cast spells that would make their parents blind to a messy room.
It’s probably a power fantasy for young people making their way through a world that seems unfair. Wouldn’t it be great to speak an incantation and make the adults have to obey you?
'Sesame Street' depicted American kids — Asian, Latino, white, black — doing kid things together. And most of my childhood experiences were like that.
But that’s not what magic really is, I’ve learned these past five or 10 years.
Magic is real, and spells work. But they’re not “supernatural.” Real magic is words and how we deploy them, when we speak them, who we speak them to, and who we never say them in front of.
Magic is the ability to use mere words to hijack another person’s mind and convince him of falsehoods or compel him to act against his own interest or safety, often happily.
You can see it in the history of the word “glamour.” Today, the term means the kind of beauty or charisma that we expect from rich and famous people. We say of them, of their clothes, of their preternatural good looks, that they are “glamorous.”
But the word started out meaning a specific type of magical spell. This is going to surprise you — the word “glamour” came from old Scots, and it’s a corruption of the word “grammar.”
Yes, it means that people recognized that words are magic, words have power. In the 1600s, you might be said to be suffering under a glamour, a spell cast on you to make you believe an ugly person was beautiful or a simpleton was a genius.
In 2025, we are living in an age of universal magical spells, all from words. We are suffering under a particularly powerful glamour. So powerful is this spell that even people who know it exists will deny that it exists. They will often attack you and say you have malicious intentions if you point to the magical spell.
That spell is white guilt. It’s no use saying “uh-uh” in your mind or objecting and calling your correspondent a “racist” for pointing this out. The spell is real, it has deranged us, and everyone — every single person without exception — knows it. Since at least the 1960s, Americans have become convinced of the following:
All of that is a lie.
With the introduction of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Lyndon Johnson’s Great Society Program, black well-being has plunged on every measure. As Sam Jacobs writes in "Black America Before LBJ: How the Welfare State Inadvertently Helped Ruin Black Communities":
The biggest problem resulting from the Great Society is the breakdown of the black family. This is a sensitive subject, but one that must be broached to fully understand the devastating impact that the Great Society has had on the black community in the United States.
In 1965, when the Great Society began in earnest following the massive electoral landslide reelection of LBJ, the out-of-wedlock birthrate among the black community was 21 percent. By 2017, this figure had risen to a whopping 77 percent.
All you need to do is look at FBI statistics to see that black Americans, just 13% of the population, commit the majority of violent crimes. “Disparate impact” indeed.
Open racial hatred of whites by blacks has become normal in America, with the help of white Democrats and liberals who applaud the rudeness and physical aggression against other whites.
The glamour has infantilized black people to the point where they genuinely believe they’re being treated with “racism” if they’re expected to obey the same social and legal codes the rest of us are.
Open social media and you are flooded with videos of black people melting down and screaming at store employees, shouting obscenities in restaurants, or pummeling the daylights out of white peers in public school. It’s not just confirmation bias; everyone sees it, and everyone knows it.
The last time I had to ask young black men to move their car — they had parked in a travel lane, blocking the egress of a line of drivers — they sprang from their vehicle and threatened to show me what “bitches” like me got for dissing them.
The glamour has a built-in mechanism to keep itself in force: telling the truth about bad black behavior only seems to strengthen the spell. Try pointing out behavior from a black person that wouldn’t be tolerated from a white person, and you’ll have both whites and blacks tell you that your very observation itself is racist. It’s literally lunatic; there is no talking to this calcified mindset.
But it is getting harder to deny that we have a problem with black bad behavior and white enabling. On April 2, 2025, 17-year-old black teen Karmelo Anthony allegedly killed 17-year-old white teen Austin Metcalf. Anthony admitted what he did on the spot to the cops. He claimed Metcalf had put his hands on him, but it’s obvious that Anthony felt “dissed” when Metcalf correctly told him he was seated in someone else’s spot.
The very next day, the slain boy’s white father went on local television telling the world he forgave the killer and then went on several tirades against sympathetic onlookers, accusing them of making the killing into a race issue.
Well, it very likely was a race issue.
Soon after, the alleged killer’s family had the gall to hold a press conference about the fundraiser they launched to help their poor, misunderstood, knife-wielding son. Through their new spokesman, Dominique Alexander — a convicted felon whose charges include forgery, theft, assault, and shaking and hitting a 2-year-old — the family accused the Metcalfs of “racism.”
Yes. The family of the boy who allegedly knifed a teen to death in cold blood stood in front of cameras and implied that he and his family had it coming. It was more astonishingly brazen than the October 13, 1995, spectacle of black "Oprah Winfrey Show" audience members cheering as a jury acquitted O.J. Simpson of the murder of his ex-wife and her friend.
A month after the killing of Austin Metcalf, the internet went berserk over a video depicting white Minnesota mother Shiloh Hendrix calling a young Somali immigrant “the N-word” (term used under duress; the magical glamour around that word has made it imprudent to utter it even as reported speech). Hendrix claimed the boy was rifling through her baby bag and stealing.
It's worth noting that the original incident was not caught on camera. The footage we saw was taken immediately afterward. It came from the phone of the child's 30-year-old uncle Sharmake Beyle Omar, also a Somali immigrant.
It's also of interest that Omar had recently been indicted, but not convicted, for a sex crime involving minors. No, you won’t find mention of that in American media, specifically because the man is black and Somali, and we can’t acknowledge that brown people can ever do bad.
While shooting the video, Omar makes his intention clear: to ruin Hendrix's life by getting her to admit to the slur and to repeat it for his camera. He presses her until she does both.
No, this was not a nice way for Hendrix to respond; in fact, it was quite rude. But so is stealing. Rude or not, Ms. Hendrix did not hit a child, harm a child, or do anything even near the level of violence of, say, plunging a dagger into someone’s heart because he asked you to move seats.
But she did mount a fundraiser to help with moving expenses because, naturally, she lost her job and was being targeted for violence locally after having her name plastered over the internet.
This made people — mainly white people — insanely angry. White people are supposed to pay and pay and pay, with no limit, for even the mildest transgression against a “person of color.” And by the way, no, there is no good evidence to support outrage-boosting claims that the child in question was 5 years old (he looked closer to 10) or that he was “autistic.”
You wouldn’t know it from the hysterical, over-the-top condemnations from white people online.
Online commentators, black and white, rich and poor, anonymous and famous, went berserk. They acted as if Ms. Hendrix’s verbal bad behavior was worse than physical violence. They equivocated with statements like this:
Black racists crowdfunded for Karmelo Anthony.
White racists crowdfunded for Shiloh Hendrix.
BOTH are WRONG.
Both are wrong, wrong in the same way, wrong to the same degree. Calling a child the “N-word” is as horrible and bad as killing a white boy who asked you to move your seat. And no, you’re not allowed to be frustrated and verbally slip when an unsupervised (where were his parents?) child starts stealing your diapers and purse items. Just as bad as killing, see?
This is madness. It can only be explained by the magical spell, the glamour, that has us as firmly entranced as the spell that put Briar Rose’s palace to sleep for 100 years in "Sleeping Beauty."
Our deification of black people, our endless excusing of a large portion that is antisocial or criminal, and our extreme punishment of white people who notice it and say “stop doing that to me” is indistinguishable from clinical insanity. It is not normal, it is not proportionate, and it is absolutely not moral.
Black people are full humans beings, just like white people. That means they are capable of being as good, or as bad, as any other human being. They do not deserve special passes to get away with illegal or antisocial behavior.
White people are not to blame for their behavior. We are all responsible for our own behavior. Along with rights come obligations, but there is a contingent of Americans today — black and white — who seem to want to exempt black people from any obligations.
I hated writing this piece. I never thought I would have even contemplated things like this. My generation grew up on 1970s "Sesame Street," when it taught true color blindness as part of life.
It wasn’t heavy-handed, didactic, or preachy. The show simply depicted American kids — Asian, Latino, white, black — doing kid things together. And most of my childhood experiences were like that. My friends had different skin colors, native languages, and home cultures. But they were just my friends.
Everything has changed. To even write something like this will, itself, bring accusations of “racism” and “white supremacy.” That’s the glamour, the spell.
It’s a lie. And it’s a lie we had better stop telling soon or there really will be the race war that hysterical leftists seem determined to conjure.
If Republicans keep squandering opportunities like budget reconciliation and other must-pass bills, they still have one more tool to cut spending without facing a Senate filibuster: the rescissions process.
To make it work, though, Trump must wield his influence more effectively. He needs to pressure establishment Republicans to support spending cuts with the same intensity he uses to push Freedom Caucus members into backing bloated budgets and debt-ceiling hikes.
If the rescissions process is going to matter, Trump must treat it like a weapon — not a bargaining chip.
Under sections 1012 and 1017 of the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974, the president may submit a request to Congress to rescind budget authority from specific accounts he deems unnecessary. That request triggers expedited consideration in Congress, with debate protected from filibuster once the proposal hits the calendar.
In the meantime, the president can freeze spending in the targeted account for up to 45 days while Congress considers the request.
Administration officials have begun dangling the rescissions process in front of conservatives as a consolation prize — hoping to win support for bloated budget bills, a record debt-ceiling hike, and a likely toothless reconciliation package. Their pitch: Whatever passes now can be clawed back later through presidential rescission requests, coordinated with House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) and Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.), and without Democratic input.
On paper, the strategy has logic. Trump wants to avoid shutdowns and default drama but believes he can trim spending quietly on the back end. The problem? The same GOP establishment that resists spending cuts during appropriations will still stand in the way after the fact — unless Trump finally targets the left flank of his own party instead of the right.
In early May, the House plans to vote on the Trump administration’s first rescissions package — $9.3 billion in cuts, mostly from foreign aid and defunding NPR and PBS. That’s a good start. It should be applauded.
But let’s be honest: $9.3 billion is pocket change compared to what Congress plans to spend. The upcoming budget reconciliation bill could add $5 trillion in new debt. Even defense spending alone is set to grow by more than $150 billion.
If the rescissions process is going to matter, Trump must treat it like a weapon — not a bargaining chip. And he must finally pressure the real problem in Washington: Republicans who talk like conservatives but vote like Democrats.
Unless Trump applies real pressure on Republican holdouts — especially in the Senate — most of the rescissions package will stall. Cutting NPR and PBS may be a layup, but $8 billion of the proposed cuts target USAID and other foreign aid programs. Those enjoy bipartisan backing, including from Republicans like Senate Armed Services Chairman Roger Wicker of Mississippi.
We’ve seen this dumb movie before. In 2018, Trump sent Congress a $15 billion rescissions package. Nineteen House Republicans defected, but the bill passed 210-206 thanks to a larger GOP majority. The Senate, however, killed it — 48-50 — after just two GOP defections.
Trump tweeted about the bill two days before the House vote. But nowhere in the public record did he threaten consequences for Republican dissenters. He never punished the defectors, and he quickly abandoned the rescissions strategy. Debt piled up for the rest of his term. The moment passed. History rolled on.
This time must be different.
Trump must match the pressure he puts on conservatives — urging them to swallow bad front-end budget deals — with equal, if not greater, pressure on Republican incumbents who oppose back-end spending cuts. No more free passes.
He should submit a rescissions package targeting climate slush funds and dare any Republican to oppose it. Then name names. If they side with green energy programs over fiscal responsibility, they should face the threat of a primary challenger. No exceptions.
If Trump refuses to campaign forcefully for his own priorities, the rescissions process will yield nothing more than symbolic cuts — token reductions that don’t even come close to offsetting the deficit spending he’s already signed off on.
Take the current request. It proposes clawbacks like $6 million for energy-efficiency programs in Mexico, $4 million for migrants in Colombia, $4 million for legume systems research, $3 million for Iraqi Sesame Street, nearly $1.2 million for LGBTQ initiatives, and $1 million for a voter ID program in Haiti.
Sure, Republicans will hold press conferences, wave these absurd line items in front of cameras, and vote to rescind them. But let’s not kid ourselves: Shaving a few million dollars from programs no one knew existed doesn’t even approach the scale of the problem.
When Congress passes trillion-dollar deficits and then touts million-dollar cuts, it’s not leadership. It’s performance.
And the country can’t afford another act.
LGBTQ Pride Month kicked off on Saturday. To celebrate the entire month dedicated to the members of the LGBTQ community, organizations and brands shared LGBTQ Pride posts on social media. There were several controversial social media posts that struck a nerve, including ones by government agencies and Sesame Street.
— (@)
The official Sesame Street social media account posted: "Happy #PrideMonth from Sesame Street! Today and every day, we celebrate and uplift the LGBTQIA+ members of our community. Together, let’s build a world where every person and family feels loved and welcomed for who they are."
There were hundreds of responses countering the Sesame Street account promoting LGBTQ to small children.
Novelist Frank J. Fleming: "Perhaps I’m old-fashioned, but I’m not really sure preschoolers need to know and celebrate variant sexual lusts."
Babylon Bee CEO Seth Dillon: "The target audience for Sesame Street is children between the ages of 2 and 5."
— (@)
The Department of Defense wrote: "Pride Month is a time to come together to honor the contributions of LGBTQ+ service members. We are committed to ensuring and promoting an atmosphere of dignity and respect for all civilian and military personnel."
U.S. Air Force veteran Buzz Patterson: "I want you mfer’s to be the military again. I want the best generals (we don’t have them) and a joint force that fights with lethality. I DON’T want this s**t! I’ve earned the right to say that. Focus!"
An X user: "Two major wars going on, instability everywhere, and this is your focus."
Another user: "Your account is a disgrace to our country. Delete it."
Another X user: "You guys spend more time honoring the alphabet crew than you do honoring veterans. What a shame."
— (@)
The National Weather Service stated: "Let us Reflect, Empower and Unite together this Pride Month as we celebrate the diversity of the NWS family! Their skills and perspectives allow us to meet our mission of protecting a diverse nation."
After getting slammed in the replies, the National Weather Service began hiding dozens of replies.
The weather agency said, "As a reminder, the NWS has established posting policies and reserves the right to hide postings that are inconsistent with them. It is our policy to hide any post/reply that violates the items below."
— (@)
The official Veterans Affairs X social media account said: "This Pride Month — and every day — VA openly and proudly recognizes the more than one million LGBTQ+ Veterans that have served this nation. We thank each and every one of them — and every person who has donned the uniform — for their service and sacrifice."
Numerous commentators noted that June is Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Awareness Month.
— (@)
President Joe Biden's White House declared: "Happy Pride Month! This month and every month, our Administration celebrates the extraordinary courage of LGBTQI+ people and proudly stands with them in the fight for equality, justice, and inclusion."
Last June, Biden hosted the largest-ever White House LGBTQ Pride celebration in history to celebrate "America’s LGBTQ families."
On Friday, President Biden proclaimed June 2024 to be "Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer, and Intersex Pride Month."
"I call upon the people of the United States to recognize the achievements of the LGBTQI+ community, to celebrate the great diversity of the American people, and to wave their flags of pride high," Biden declared.
Biden continued, "To the entire LGBTQI+ community — and especially transgender children — please know that your President and my entire Administration have your back. We see you for who you are: made in the image of God and deserving of dignity, respect, and support."
However, Biden had a much different opinion in 2008.
Biden was asked if he supported gay marriage during the 2008 vice presidential debate and he replied, "No. Barack Obama nor I support redefining from a civil side what constitutes marriage. We do not support that."
Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!
A post on the X account for the widely-beloved "Sesame Street" character Cookie Monster drew responses from the White House and several Democratic lawmakers. The post lamented shrinkflation, the term used to refer to businesses shrinking the size of their products without decreasing the price.
"Me hate shrinkflation! Me cookies are getting smaller," the Cookie Monster post declared. "Guess me going to have to eat double da cookies!" another post added.
— (@)
President Joe Biden has previously called for companies to stop engaging in shrinkflation, describing the practice as a "rip off."
The White House X account responded to the Cookie Monster post by tweeting, "C is for consumers getting ripped off. President Biden is calling on companies to put a stop to shrinkflation."
— (@)
"Total corporate jagoff move to rip off Cookie Monster," Democratic Rep. Chris Deluzio of Pennsylvania tweeted.
"We hate it too, Cookie Monster. And it's not just cookies! Greedy corporations are making lots of things smaller without cutting prices. We're working to stop them — no one should be getting richer off smaller cookies!" Democratic Sen. Chris Van Hollen of Maryland declared.
"Me too, Cookie Monster. Big corporations shrink the size of their products without shrinking their prices, all to pay for CEO bonuses. People in my state of Ohio are fed up — they should get all the cookie they pay for," Democratic Sen. Sherrod Brown of Ohio declared.
Democratic Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts responded, "@SenBobCasey and I have a bill for that."
This is not the only time the Biden administration has responded to a "Sesame Street" character on X this year. In late January, Biden's @POTUS X account retweeted a post from the Elmo account.
— (@)
Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!
President Joe Biden's @POTUS X account responded to a post from the account for the "Sesame Street" character Elmo.
The Tuesday tweet from the president's account came after a prior post on the Elmo account went viral. On Monday, the red monster's social media account posed a seemingly innocuous question, "Elmo is just checking in! How is everybody doing?"
But that question triggered a torrent of replies, with the post amassing more than 167 million views so far, appearing to become something of a phenomenon.
"The world is burning, Elmo. No amount of tickles can fix this," the Not the Bee account quipped in response to Elmo's question.
"America is struggling, Elmo. We need Trump back!" Brigitte Gabriel tweeted.
"Elmo, my man, you been to the grocery store lately? I don't know if you drive, but you filled up a gas tank? Stop gas lighting us. You know it's real out here," someone else wrote.
— (@)
Then, on Tuesday, the Elmo account tweeted, "Wow! Elmo is glad he asked! Elmo learned that it is important to ask a friend how they are doing. Elmo will check in again soon, friends! Elmo loves you." The post also included the hashtag "#EmotionalWellBeing."
Biden's @POTUS account responded to that post, writing, "I know how hard it is some days to sweep the clouds away and get to sunnier days. Our friend Elmo is right: We have to be there for each other, offer our help to a neighbor in need, and above all else, ask for help when we need it. Even though it's hard, you're never alone."
— (@)
Unsurprisingly, the post swiftly earned backlash.
"To the staffer or intern who wrote this... Do you need help?" Rudy Giuliani tweeted.
"Shut up and close the border," Ben Deeter declared.
"U.S. service members are being killed overseas. There’s an invasion at our border. Americans are struggling to make ends meet. And our president is tweeting at Elmo….you really can’t make this up," Courtney Holland wrote.
— (@)
Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!
Sesame Street, a long-running children's show that has been enjoyed by kids for generations, is actively promoting the LGBT movement by celebrating so-called Pride Month on social media.
"On our Street, we celebrate inclusion, belonging, and freedom of authentic self-expression. Happy #PrideMonth to all the people in our neighborhoods!" the Sesame Street Twitter account tweeted while sharing a cartoon graphic featuring a Pride flag.
\u201cOn our Street, we celebrate inclusion, belonging, and freedom of authentic self-expression. Happy #PrideMonth to all the people in our neighborhoods! \u2764\ufe0f\ud83e\udde1\ud83d\udc9b\ud83d\udc9a\ud83d\udc99\ud83d\udc9c\ud83d\udc97\ud83e\udd0d\ud83e\udd0e\ud83d\udda4\u201d— Sesame Street (@Sesame Street) 1686578402
The post earned pushback on social media.
"Groomer Street," Libs of TikTok replied.
"Amazing that @sesamestreet thinks the sexual preferences of adults is appropriate content for 3 year olds," Mary Talley Bowden tweeted.
Sesame Street had already been promoting the LGBT agenda earlier this month.
"Today and everyday, we celebrate and uplift the LGBTQIA+ members of our community. From our family to yours, happy #PrideMonth!" another tweet declared.
\u201cToday and everyday, we celebrate and uplift the LGBTQIA+ members of our community. From our family to yours, happy #PrideMonth! \ud83c\udff3\ufe0f\u200d\ud83c\udf08\u201d— Sesame Street (@Sesame Street) 1686173547
"This #PrideMonth, let's celebrate diversity and unity and spread love and acceptance. Together, we can make the world a kinder place for all," another tweet said.
The widely beloved character Elmo proclaimed "happy pride!" in a video after Ariana DeBose spoke about celebrating "LGBTQIA+ family, friends, and communities." The tweet featuring the video states, "Everyone is always welcome on Sesame Street. Let’s celebrate LGBTQIA+ people in our communities this Pride and every day! Happy #PrideMonth!"
\u201cEveryone is always welcome on Sesame Street. Let\u2019s celebrate LGBTQIA+ people in our communities this Pride and every day! Happy #PrideMonth! #ArianaDeBose \ud83c\udff3\ufe0f\u200d\ud83c\udf08\u201d— Sesame Street (@Sesame Street) 1685632249
Seseame Street has been promoting the LGBT agenda for some time.
For instance, a tweet in 2020 declared, "On our street, we accept all, we love all, and we respect all. Happy #PrideMonth!"
\u201cOn our street, we accept all, we love all, and we respect all. Happy #PrideMonth!\u201d— Sesame Street (@Sesame Street) 1591906627
Sesame Street has also featured the concept of a family with two gay dads.
Sesame Street features gay dads www.youtube.com
Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!
Sesame Place is now enrolling all of its employees in anti-bias programs in light of both a recent lawsuit filed against the park alleging racial discrimination and a similar accusation levied by one mother who claims a costumed performed snubbed her child.
Sesame Place is a SeaWorld Entertainment theme park based on the children's show "Sesame Street," with locations in Philadelphia and San Diego. On August 9, the Philadelphia park announced "a series of initiatives as part of an expansion of its commitment to diversity, equity, and inclusion." Among the initiatives is a "racial equity assessment" and "the development and implementation of an anti-bias training and education program."
By the end of September, the park will require all employees to participate in an education program that will allegedly "address bias, promote inclusion, prevent discriminations" and more.
The programs will be overseen by a handful of so-called experts including Debo P. Adegbile, the chair of Anti-Discrimination Practice at WilmerHale LLP (nominated to run the U.S. Department of Justice's Division of Civil Rights by former President Barack Obama, but not confirmed), and the former head of the Louisville Urban League, Sadiqa Reynolds (who called everyone who voted for former President Donald Trump "racist").
Fox 29 indicated that these initiatives are largely in response to a $25 million lawsuit brought against the park's parent company SeaWorld by a Maryland family on July 24.
The lawsuit claims that Quinton Burns' daughter Kennedi was discriminated against during a Father's Day meet and greet. Malcom Ruff, an attorney for the family, invited other individuals with similar grievances to come forward.
This lawsuit comes weeks after a woman named Jodi Brown alleged on Instagram that a costumed park employee withheld a sign of affection from her daughter and her niece on the basis of the girls' race.
Brown posted a video on Instagram on July 16 in which a Sesame Place employee dressed up as the Sesame Street character "Rosita" appears to snub two little girls. Brown wrote "This had me hot ... THIS DISGUSTING person blatantly told our kids NO then proceeded to hug the little white girl next to us!"
The park responded with a release noting that the "performer portraying the Rosita character has confirmed that the 'no' hand gesture seen several times in the video was not directed to any specific person, rather it was a response to multiple requests from someone in the crowd who asked Rosita to hold their child for a photo which is not permitted."
The Rosita performer was, according to Sesame Place, "devastated about the misunderstanding."
Brown's attorney B'Ivory LaMarr said the family wants the performer fired.
In addition to offering the family three apologies for the employee's adherence to its rules, the park is said to have invited Brown and her family to a special meet and greet.