Bloody pig masks and live spiders: The disturbing secret war eBay waged on critics



What began as criticism of eBay's business practices spiraled into one of the most bizarre corporate harassment scandals of our time, which ended in David and Ina Steiner receiving millions from the online marketplace.

And harassment may be putting it lightly — as they were sent live cockroaches, spiders, fly larvae, a bloody pig mask, and a book on dealing with the death of a spouse.

The couple’s online newsletter, EcommerceBytes, reports on eBay as well as other internet marketplaces and angered eBay executives enough for them to begin cyberstalking the pair.

“They apparently were saying bad things about eBay," BlazeTV co-host Jeff Fisher explains on “Pat Gray Unleashed.”

"And that pissed eBay off, including the CEO of the company,” BlazeTV host Pat Gray says.


They also sent porno magazines and listed the couples' home on Craigslist as a “nightly destination for singles, couples, and swingers.”

“They sent porn magazines on purpose to their neighbors just to embarrass David,” Gray comments.

“And don’t forget, they put a GPS tracker on their car,” Fisher says.

The couple opened a civil lawsuit against the former eBay executives in 2021, which was finally settled this year on July 27.

The payout was a whopping $55.7 million.

“That’s nice,” Gray says. “OK, that takes a little bit of the edge off all of it.”

Want more from Pat Gray?

To enjoy more of Pat's biting analysis and signature wit as he restores common sense to a senseless world, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Federal judge shuts down Trump's 'anti-weaponization fund' settlement in scathing ruling



A federal judge issued a sharp rebuke against the Trump administration over the settlement that was intended to establish the anti-weaponization fund.

U.S. District Judge Kathleen Williams said Monday that President Donald Trump had committed self-dealing when he sued the Internal Revenue Service for leaking his tax files and reached a settlement with the agency.

'The facts before this Court demonstrate there was never adverseness between the Parties; there was never a case or controversy.'

Williams said the case "was brought for an improper purpose — to gain the imprimatur of judicial legitimacy for a 'settlement' that had no viable basis in law or fact" in her 56-page ruling.

That settlement was reached in May 2026 after the president agreed to drop his $10 billion lawsuit against the IRS. It set up a $1.776 billion fund that critics said the president would use to benefit and enrich his supporters and political allies.

"In sum, the facts before this Court demonstrate there was never adverseness between the Parties; there was never a case or controversy; and there was never a question as to who would prevail," Williams continued.

She accused Trump of "improperly" employing the lawsuit "to justify a particular award in this matter — access to taxpayer funds and exemption from audits and other investigations — which was accomplished by leveraging control over Defendants."

Williams similarly excoriated the Department of Justice for "abdicating its responsibility to zealously defend the interests of the United States" by agreeing to the settlement.

She also pointed to the $1.776 billion figure as evidence that the settlement amount had more to do with branding than it did a "deliberate and thoughtful" account of damages.

A spokesperson for the president's legal team released a statement about the ruling.

"The IRS wrongly allowed a rogue, politically motivated employee to leak private and confidential information about President Trump, his family, and the Trump Organization to the New York Times, ProPublica, and other left-wing news outlets, which was then illegally released to millions of people," the statement reads. "President Trump continues to hold those who wrong America and Americans accountable."

RELATED: Clinton judge brazenly gives White House ultimatum over Trump's anti-weaponization fund

The ruling is likely to worsen the chances of Attorney General Todd Blanche being approved by the U.S. Senate. He is scheduled to appear at the congressional hearing Thursday.

Williams was appointed by former President Barack Obama.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Florida man sues Waffle House after ad for strawberry shortcake waffle apparently proves too tempting to look away



An 84-year-old Bartow, Florida, man is suing Waffle House after he says a window advertisement for the chain's limited-edition strawberry shortcake waffle proved more powerful than his own legs.

Edward Bowlds was crossing the parking lot with his wife on April 17, 2025, when the promo display caught his eye. While his attention stayed locked on the waffle, his feet found an "abnormally high" curb with no paint or markings to warn him it was coming — and down he went, the lawsuit filed earlier this year claimed.

It would be 'disingenuous for Waffle House to suggest that Mr. Bowlds should have been watching where he was walking,' letter claims.

The lawsuit doesn't hold back on the marketing critique, either. The ad was, according to the lawsuit, sized and placed specifically to grab the attention of customers who had already parked — a strawberry-frosted trap, apparently, for anyone weak enough to glance at it.

A pre-lawsuit demand letter put it more bluntly: It would be "disingenuous for Waffle House to suggest that Mr. Bowlds should have been watching where he was walking when it was Waffle House who distracted his attention away from where he was walking."

RELATED: America has culture — just ask the World Cup fans discovering Waffle House

Nicole Craine/Bloomberg/Getty Images

The fall allegedly left Bowlds with a fractured nose and a torn rotator cuff, and his attorney says the injuries have taken a real toll — he is largely confined to a recliner now and can't help his wife with groceries or yard work like he used to, the letter claimed.

Bowlds and his wife reportedly sought a $300,000 settlement before filing suit. Waffle House declined, and now a jury will get to decide just how irresistible a picture of a waffle can legally be.

Waffle House did not immediately respond to a request for comment from Blaze News.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Federal Judge Temporarily Blocks Trump’s Anti-Weaponization Fund

'to ensure that no funds are irreversibly disbursed'

California’s Political Commissars Surrender To Elon Musk’s Lawyers

'The Commission agrees that it may not consider irrelevant factors in performing its function and specifically agrees that it will not take into account the perceived political beliefs, political speech, or labor practices of SpaceX or its officers.'

While Congress Sits On Election Integrity Bill, Trump Admin Takes Action On Noncitizen Voting

With states unable to verify citizenship under the current system, the Trump administration is trying to help states ensure clean voter rolls.

CBS News Parent Paramount To Pay $16 Million To Settle Trump 60 Minutes Lawsuit

The settlement over CBS News' cheap fake with Kamala Harris it the latest win for the president against Trump-hating corporate media,

Chicago Public Schools Pays $2.6M For Allegedly Forcing Students To Participate In Hindu Ritual

Kaya Hudgins, now 22, testified in a deposition that she was told participation in a 'Quiet Time' of Transcendental Meditation was mandatory.

National Park Service Sued For Choosing Wealthy Environmentalists Over Small Farmers

Congress has opened an investigation into a settlement between NPS and environmental groups that booted ranchers from California land.

Corrupt Corporate Media Indignant Over ABC Defamation Settlement With Trump

Smug accomplice media players apparently believe that defaming their hated political enemy doesn’t constitute defamation.