Biden Signs Executive Order To Sanction Israeli Settlers In The West Bank

'[E]xtremist settler violence...has reached intolerable levels'

This Truthsgiving, I'm thankful for European settlement



Cranks come out of the woodwork ahead of every holiday to tell the masses they're celebrating the wrong thing or wrong to celebrate anything at all. Cynical liberal publications dutifully spin off the cranks' latest insights, which are inevitably just old envies and prejudices repackaged for new audiences.

We're told Christopher Columbus is genocidal; the Fourth of July is a celebration fit only for jingos, sexists, and racists; Christmas is environmentally ruinous; and Father's and Mother's Days are hurtfully exclusionary to the reality-averse. Thanksgiving enjoys no exemption.

In its ritual exhibition of late-November ingratitude, the Nation ran a two-stage article by failed Democratic congressional candidate Chase Iron Eyes and Sioux chef Sean Sherman explaining why Americans should either "decolonize" Thanksgiving or replace it with "Truthsgiving."

It is critical to decolonize the day, Sherman suggested, because Thanksgiving's roots are "intertwined with colonial aggression." His preferred decolonized substitute apparently has blessed roots that managed to grow for millennia without absorbing blood from the intertribal wars, slavery, and human sacrifice the Americas were home to prior to European settlement.

According to Sherman, decolonization "means centering the Indigenous perspective and challenging the colonial narratives around the holiday (and every other day on the calendar)." It also apparently means "resisting the dominance of colonial influences."

A decolonized Thanksgiving is apparently one where we racialize our gratitude, resist the urge to give thanks for the myriad gifts handed down to us from settlers from Britain and Europe, and adopt a "clearer lens" to see that anything capable of inspiring pride in post-17th-century America isn't worth celebrating.

Iron Eyes underscored in his argument for canceling Thanksgiving that we can be thankful so long as we're thankful to the right people. "Give thanks to the Native nations who created the world that we inherit today," he wrote.

Iron Eyes' talk of inheritance and Sherman's call for selective remembrance prompted me to think about the world we actually inherit this Truthsgiving and those to whom we owe a tremendous debt of gratitude but are now asked to discount.

More than for property rights, the free market, and the wheel, this Truthsgiving I'd like to express my gratitude to the decentered settlers for their gift of the written word and a functional alphabet, which enable cranks to air their grievances but also preserve Indian languages and traditions for the benefit of future generations.

I am thankful for the settlers' science — the European origin of which the late sociologist Rodney Stark noted was the result of Abrahamic peoples' belief in a rational God whose creation was likewise rational and therefore replete with discernible truth — which has extended Indian and European lives alike and provided us with dominion over a wilderness once worshipped.

I am thankful for the salvific faith settlers brought over to the New World, which not only affirms human beings' inviolable dignity, the eternal love of God, and the promise of life after death but has informed the culture, customs, and ethic that have helped make America the envy of the world.

I am thankful for the imported rule of law, which spares us all from the tyranny of chieftains and the impulses of the mad mob.

I am also thankful for a society prototyped overseas that is so accommodating and tolerant as to put up, year after year, with blood libels and putdowns from its many beneficiaries.

Iron Eyes concluded his argument with, "Let's tell a different story by dropping the lie of Thanksgiving and begin a Truthsgiving."

Instead, let's drop the lie that European settlement wasn't, at least in the long run, an absolute blessing and acknowledge that the imperfect cast of characters responsible for the society we've inherited don't need our condemnation or praise but rather our understanding and thanks.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Conservative university student wins $80k settlement due to 1st Amendment violation



A Christian conservative student named Maggie Dejong has just won an $80,000 settlement against her former school for violating her First Amendment rights.

Dejong had received no-contact orders from three students — essentially restraining orders — that applied to on and off campus. Dejong routinely participated in classroom discussions and offered a conservative viewpoint.

The three students who acquired the no-contact orders were reportedly upset by Dejong’s social media posts on abortion and the police. They were also upset that she had defended Kyle Rittenhouse and denounced critical race theory.

Their list of grievances goes on, as Dejong would wear a pro-police hat in class. They demanded she remove it, as it was a symbol of “oppression.”

“Are our students really in such echo chambers that they can’t even tolerate hearing conservative views anymore?” Lauren Chen asks.

“You should not be so triggered when you hear a conservative viewpoint that you immediately have to run to your administration to get them to protect your feelings,” she adds.

Chen also finds it odd that her social media posts were a point of contention for these three students.

“Stop following her on social media. It’s not like she’s, you know, writing pro-Kyle Rittenhouse defenses and shoving them under their doors at night.”

While the story is clearly ridiculous, the school complied with the students' complaints and told Dejong she was not allowed to talk to these students at all. This meant she would not be allowed to speak up in class if those students were there.

“Conservatives who are listening to this, don’t forget that so many of these institutions, they are still receiving your money,” Chen says, continuing, “They won’t allow your viewpoints to be expressed in their hallowed halls, but they’ll happily take your dollars.”


Want more from Lauren Chen?

To enjoy more of Lauren’s pro-liberty, pro-logic, and pro-market commentary on social and political issues, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Taxpayers forced to pay for alleged federal government negligence that led to mass killing at Texas church in 2017



The Justice Department announced Wednesday that it has agreed to pay nearly $145 million in settlements related to the Sutherland Springs mass shooting in 2017, which left 26 dead and another 22 injured.

Victims and families of the victims argued the U.S. Air Force was partially responsible for the mass killing because Air Force officials failed — on six separate occasions, it was later revealed — to report critical information about the killer's history of violence and criminal convictions to the FBI's background check system. Had the proper reports been made, the killer would not have been able to purchase the firearms used in the massacre.

In 2021, U.S. District Court Judge Xavier Rodriguez agreed and ruled the government was "60 percent responsible" for the massacre. Last February, he awarded $230 million in damages. The government appealed the ruling in January.

What did the DOJ say?

The agency did not explain why it suddenly decided to settle the case after appealing it just months ago.

In a statement, the DOJ said the "agreement in principle" settles all claims for $144.5 million. The agreement "has been approved," but is still waiting on several other legal approvals before it can be finalized.

"No words or amount of money can diminish the immense tragedy of the mass shooting in Sutherland Springs," said Associate Attorney General Vanita Gupta. "Today’s announcement brings the litigation to a close, ending a painful chapter for the victims of this unthinkable crime.

What did the plaintiffs say?

Jamal Alsaffar, the lead attorney representing the plaintiffs, urged the Justice Department to finalize quickly the settlement.

"The Sutherland Springs families are heroes. The country owes them a debt of gratitude. They have gone through so much pain and loss in the most horrific way. But despite that, these families fought for justice, endured and won two trials against the federal government, and made this country safer as a result," the lawyer said.

"But the settlement is not final. Attorney General Garland’s office still must approve it, and we urge his Justice Department to act quickly to bring some closure to these families. It's the least they deserve," Alsaffar added.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

NM Dem gov's campaign pays at least $62K in settlement to ex-staffer who says she grabbed his crotch: report



The 2018 gubernatorial campaign of New Mexico Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham (D) has paid at least $62,500 to a former aide who says the governor grabbed his crotch — and the ex-staffer could get more, according to a report.

What are the details?

The Albuquerque Journal reported Monday that documents show Lujan Grisham's campaign has made four payments of $12,500 "as part of a settlement" with former campaign spokesman James Hallinan, who accused the governor of "pouring a bottle of water on his crotch and then grabbing his crotch through his clothes as she laughed, an incident he said took place in front of other campaign staffers."

The outlet noted that Hallinan made the claims in late 2019, roughly a year after he left the campaign. The former ex-staffer says he was talked out of reporting the incident by the campaign manager, Dominic Gabello, who now serves as a senior adviser in the governor's office.

Current campaign spokesman Jared Leopold told the newspaper that Gov. Lujan Grisham, Gabello, and the campaign organization itself "strenuously deny that there is any merit or truth to Mr. Hallinan's claims, including his claims about difficulty finding or keeping work after the campaign."

Leopold added, "They reached a settlement in order to avoid the continuing distraction and significant expense of possible litigation and allow them to concentrate on working for the people of New Mexico during this pandemic."

Fox News reported that Hallinan claims Lujan Grisham assaulted him while at the home of state Rep. Deborah Armstrong (D), whose office also denies the incident occurred. The governor's spokeswoman, Nora Myers Sackett, said of the ordeal, "We're a rambunctious bunch. I think they were playing around with water."

But Hallinan's attorney confirmed to the outlet that things had been settled on the matter, telling them in a statement, "Governor Lujan Grisham and Mr. Hallinan have resolved any differences or issues to their satisfaction. I am not able to provide any further information."

Sackett declined to tell the Associated Press whether further payment is still due to Hallinan.

Records: New Mexico governor settles harassment allegation www.youtube.com

Anything else?

In reaction to the news, the Republican Governor's Association called Lujan Grisham's settlement "a $62,500 crotch grab."

"After years of vehement denial, Governor Lujan Grisham's now revealed sexual harassment settlement certainly raises questions of why she tried to discredit her alleged victim," association spokesman Will Reinert told the Santa Fe New Mexican in an email. "Where there is smoke there is usually fire, and Lujan Grisham just wrote a check for $62,500 worth of kindling."