Tetris CEO admits to purposely hiring more women — says women are 'overqualified,' while men are 'winging it'



Tetris CEO Maya Rogers defended the use of diversity, equity, and inclusion programs as a force for good in order to diversify workplaces.

Rogers is the daughter of Henk Rogers, the video game developer who first secured the rights to distribute Tetris to gaming console companies.

'There needs to be something that is almost enforced to make sure that there are enough women in the industry.'

In an interview with Games Industry, Rogers said that people don't believe she runs the Tetris company when she tells them.

"They see a youngish-looking female, and they don't believe you, or they don't think that you run Tetris, or whatever," she told the outlet. "But I guess it's never really fazed me."

After saying that the industry should not be dominated by men, Rogers made strange claims about the difference between male and female applicants. Despite saying "of course" she has faced sexism in her industry, the CEO went on to say that men are trying to get jobs by "winging it," while women are "overqualified."

"Men show up to the table, and they're kind of winging it, right? Guys are really good at winging it. ... Women show up overqualified because they're like, 'Oh my gosh, am I good enough for the job?'"

Rogers added, "We've got to put ourselves out there, and be OK to be vulnerable."

Games Industry cited Rogers as having "made a point of increasing the number of women working at the Tetris Company" as well.

Rogers explained, "When my father was running the business, it was more male. And now we have a lot of women, and it's great. We're doing amazing things. Girls can do it all."

The 47-year-old then championed DEI programs and said there needs to be assurances to get women into the gaming industry.

RELATED: Gen Z gets the freedom to voice chat with strangers — and they can't handle it

Photo by Rick Kern/FilmMagic

"That in itself in America today is a thing that's being questioned," she said about DEI programs. "But I think that was so important to have, because it did change how many people of diversity, [of] different backgrounds, were allowed in the workplace."

More directly, Rogers said, "There needs to be something that is almost enforced to make sure that there are enough women in the industry," and women in powerful positions need to "be out there, being vocal, [and] inspiring people to fight for their rights."

To further her point, the CEO said that women are still battling for change, before claiming that women "came together" to fight "for their rights," which she believes still needs to happen.

RELATED: Why Palmer Luckey's Chromatic blew my mind

Photo by Daniel Boczarski/Getty Images

Overall, the idea of a male-dominated gaming industry did not seem to sit will with Rogers, who said, "It shouldn't be that way," and, "Women need to be given a chance."

"There's so many women playing games, and we're still having mostly men designing games," she concluded. "That doesn't make any sense at all."

In 2020, CNBC cited a study by the International Game Developers Association that showed 71% of video game developers in the world are male. In 2022, a report for U.S. gaming developers by the Gamer said that 76% of developers in the United States were male.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Why leftism attracts the sad and depressed — and keeps them that way



By now, the trope of the “sad leftist” has become so popular that it’s essentially a meme. Multiple studies show leftists are, on average, far less happy than conservatives. That aligns with the experience of many who observe self-professed leftists exhibiting more anxiety, gloom, and hostility than others.

It’s not difficult to understand why. If your main news sources tell you the president is a fascist, half of your countrymen are bigots, and the world is about to end due to climate change, you’re bound to feel — and vote — blue. Yet, even in Democratic administrations, leftists never seemed content.

People latch onto progressive narratives because they offer someone to blame. That brings short-term relief, but it quickly fades.

This suggests the root of their discontent isn’t merely political messaging but something deeper. Rather, the ideas implicit in leftism seem antithetical to a happy life and human flourishing — even if well-intended. Leftists push for diversity, equity, and inclusion in place of meritocracy, support a more powerful state to implement those ideals, advocate open borders to globalize them, and demand wealth redistribution to fund them. In the sanitized and euphemistic language they often prefer, leftists are about fairness, progress, and kindness.

Sad people lean left

Nate Silver recently weighed in on the happiness gap between conservatives and progressives. His take? People might have it backward. It’s not that leftism makes people sad but that sad people gravitate toward leftism: “People become liberals because they’re struggling or oppressed themselves and therefore favor change and a larger role for government.”

If this is true, it still doesn’t explain why leftism is correlated with sadness and why it offers no remedy. Conservatives, for their part, offer a diagnosis and a cure: Leftism is foolish and destructive — so stop being a leftist. That’s the gist of Ben Shapiro’s infamous line, “Facts don’t care about your feelings.”

While clever and catchy, this oversimplifies the problem. People who ascribe to liberal or leftist causes don’t merely do so because they prioritize feelings over facts. Yes, some are true believers, but most are reacting to powerful cultural pressures and personal struggles. These feed destructive habits that, in turn, make them more susceptible to leftist propaganda.

After all, the narratives that comprise leftist propaganda are easy to understand and adopt since they lay the blame of all society’s ills on someone else. People are poor because rich people exploit them; people of color are marginalized because white people are racists; queer people are depressed because straight people don’t accept them; third world countries are dysfunctional because Americans and Europeans meddled in their affairs too much or too little; and leftists are unpopular because Trump and other conservative populists are effective con men.

The media’s vicious cycle

These narratives not only offer paltry short-term solace — they breed resentment. Instead of directing their efforts to personal improvement, leftists are encouraged to push their anger outward — sometimes through direct violence (vandalism, looting, even political violence) and sometimes indirectly by cheering on those who perpetrate it. In this way, left-wing media weaponizes its audience.

Nevertheless, the principle motivation behind leftist propaganda is not necessarily weaponization. It’s monetization. Beyond adopting leftist narratives and positions, audiences need to continue consuming leftist media and become addicted to it.

RELATED: Breaking the ‘spell of woke possession’: Why America is choosing tradition

Karolina Grabowska/Pexels

As Georgetown professor and computer scientist Cal Newport explains in his book “Digital Minimalism: Choosing a Focused Life in a Noisy World,” society has now entered the era of the “attention economy,” where media companies do everything in their power to hold people’s attention — for forever. In conjunction with tech companies, these outlets turn otherwise healthy people into helpless junkies enslaved to the apps on their smartphones.

Like any addiction, this one feeds a destructive cycle. People latch onto progressive narratives because they offer someone to blame. That brings short-term relief, but it quickly fades. The need for comfort drives them to consume even more leftist content, which distorts their view of the world and fuels resentment. Anxiety deepens. Misery spreads.

As their emotional state deteriorates, they seek comfort in even more content. Eventually, this behavior sabotages their ability to function. They become dependent on the very content that made them feel worse in the first place. Many even join the performance, filming themselves crying, ranting, and broadcasting their despair for clicks.

Meanwhile, the titans of the attention economy grow wealthier and more powerful. They refine their algorithms, suppress dissent, and tighten their grip. The last thing they want is for their users to wake up — to take Newport’s advice, unplug, and rediscover meaning in the real world. They might just find happiness. And stop drifting left.

Model a different life

This presents an opportunity for conservatives hoping to transform the culture. The answer isn’t just a matter of advocating time-tested ideas but of modeling the habits that reinforce these ideas. Rather than view leftists as incorrigible scoundrels and idiots who refuse to open their eyes, conservatives should see them as unfortunate people who have been seduced, reduced, and enslaved by powerful corporate and government interests.

This means that conservatives should do more than offer political arguments — we must pull them away from the vicious cycle through modeling a better life. Leftists (and many on the online right, for that matter) must be reminded that being perpetually online and endlessly scrolling is a recipe for sadness. In contrast, church, family, friends, and meaningful work are what empower people. They are what make us human — and happy.

Once the cycle is broken — and the leftist has regained some control over himself — the case for conservatism becomes much easier. If Nate Silver is right that sad people gravitate to the left, then it’s only logical to assume happy people should be attracted to the right. Conservatives should cherish those values and habits that make them, on average, happier and more fulfilled. It’s time to stop drinking leftist tears and help them out of their malaise.

Juliet & Romeo Flop Shows Audiences Are Tired Of The Girlboss Trope

[rebelmouse-proxy-image https://thefederalist.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Screenshot-2025-05-29-at-1.19.52 PM-1200x675.png crop_info="%7B%22image%22%3A%20%22https%3A//thefederalist.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Screenshot-2025-05-29-at-1.19.52%5Cu202fPM-1200x675.png%22%7D" expand=1]Hollywood’s feminist, victim narrative no longer sells tickets or makes headlines.

NBA champion Antoine Walker asks why the WNBA doesn't have any male ex-players covering their sport: 'Is there a problem?'



NBA great and champion Antoine Walker sparked a debate by seemingly pointing out hypocrisy in the WNBA.

Walker won an NBA title in 2006 with the Miami Heat and was a fan-favorite for his three-point shooting and charisma.

Taking to his X account, Walker posed a simple question that the WNBA and its supporters are likely not ready to answer:

"Can somebody explain why there aren’t any ex nba players covering WNBA ? but there are ex women basketball players covering the NBA?" Walker asked.

— (@)

While it is unclear if Walker was referring to any announcers in particular, the assumed premise behind his question is that the NBA is at a point where it is expected to incorporate female players into the mix for commentary and analysis, but there is no expectation for the women's league to incorporate male former players.

The fans agreed, as the most popular reply to Walker told the former star to expect to be attacked for "asking a genuine question."

"Is there a problem?" Walker replied.

"Great question, but you'll never get a[n] honest answer to it," one YouTuber chimed in.

Other fans blamed the culture around the WNBA, with one calling it a "disaster waiting to happen," unless the male analyst was the "most politically-correct [and] soft commentator of all-times."

— (@)

Podcaster Dre Baldwin tried to offer blunt honesty and said, "talking about the WNBA, when you played in the NBA, is a step backwards. Talking about the NBA, when you played in the WNBA, is a step up."

Meanwhile, one reader asked if any former NBA stars were "man enough" to take on such a role and said they were "probably too scared of what other men think."

At least four former WNBA players are easily recognizable for their roles as NBA commentators and analysts, including: Lisa Leslie, Chiney Ogwumike, Rebekkah Brunson, and Candace Parker.

Stephen Bardo is seemingly the only ex-NBA player with a similar role in the WNBA — he is a color analyst for the Chicago Sky. However, Bardo is a relative unknown from the NBA and played just 33 games over three seasons, most of which (23) were in the 1993 campaign.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

The Trump Administration Just Canceled Cancel Culture

With Donald Trump’s inauguration and the launch of Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency, the stage has been set for a reversal.

Joy Behar roasted for saying Karoline Leavitt got WH press secretary job 'because according to Donald Trump she's a 10'



Left-wing co-host of "The View" Joy Behar — rarely one to put the brakes on her mouth — is getting bludgeoned on social media after saying Karoline Leavitt got the nod for White House press secretary "because according to Donald Trump she's a 10."

Behar made the remark on Wednesday's program. You can check out a short clip of her mouth moving here.

Observers on X blasted Behar for her comment. Here are but a few of the reactions:

  • "Seems kinda sexist, 'Joy,'" one commenter said.
  • "Looks like someone is jelly of her hotness!" another user said. "Did Joy not listen to Karoline speak?! She speaks with authority! She kicked a$ up there at the podium!"
  • "No, because she is qualified, tough, and has a brain!" another commenter said. "Unlike Behar!"
  • "The comparison could not be more stark," another user said. "It's shocking that Joy Behar has a job."
  • "Good Lord, is that the best she’s got? Karoline was brilliant yesterday!" another commenter said.
  • "Another TDS female trashing other females ... shocker," another user said.
  • Then the truth bomb: "It’s not her fault. Republicans are just hotter."

What preceded Behar's remark?

Prior to Behar's remark, fellow left-wing co-host Whoopi Goldberg kicked things off: “I would like this young lady who — this is her first job — I would like her to do a little homework because she said something yesterday that really pissed me off ... she said, ‘There will be no wokeness here.’"

Goldberg then looked at the camera as if she were speaking directly to Leavitt: "Let me explain something to you. Because without that wokeness, you might not have that job. Because women were not invited to that table. Women were not invited to many tables in this nation."

Goldberg then became visibly angry as her voice rose, her mouth sneered, and her finger wagged: "The reason we fought and busted our behinds to make sure that you didn't have to worry about this. ... The wokeness was put into place for a reason. Because black people couldn't get into colleges. Because women could not get into the colleges they wanted to go to. ... It was a man's world, and we busted our asses to make sure that this was a person's world. So please, please stop using [wokeness] ... because you don't understand what you're saying."

With that, Behar stated that Leavitt has "probably been put in there because according to Donald Trump, she's a 10. You know that's what it is!"

Co-host Alyssa Farah Griffin jumped in to correct Goldberg by saying the White House press secretary position isn't Leavitt's first job and that she worked in the previous Trump administration. Leavitt, 27, is the youngest press secretary in history.

Trump's four press secretaries during his first term in the White House were Sean Spicer, now-Arkansas Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders, Stephanie Grisham, and Kayleigh McEnany.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Kamala Harris Was Created In A Lab To Annoy Men

It’s not men who are the problem here. The problem is Kamala Harris.

If Kamala Harris Loses The Election, It Won’t Mean The Country Is Sexist

Harris never has to cry sexism, the media does it for her.