Glenn TEARS APART media 'fact check' on NO MEAT report



Glenn Beck has once again offended the dystopian elites.

The outrage stemmed from his commentary on a report by the C40 Cities Climate Leadership Group, which outlined a plan for 2030 that involves limiting Americans' access to meat, dairy, clothing, private vehicles, and air travel.

The plan also identifies the 14 cities in America that plan to help you give up, as Glenn says, “meat, cars and freedom” by the year 2030.

The cities are: Austin, Boston, Chicago, Houston, Los Angeles, Miami, New Orleans, New York City, Philadelphia, Phoenix, Portland, San Francisco, Seattle, and Washington, D.C.

The C40 group has an “ambitious target” to achieve these goals, which are “zero kilograms of meat consumption by everyone in their town, zero kilograms of dairy consumption, three new clothing items per year, per person, zero private vehicles owned, and a populace that only gets one short haul return flight every three years,” Glenn says.

The report is titled “The Future of Urban Consumption in a 1.5 Celsius World.”

“You’d think that would be a major story, but it’s not. Because there’s another organization out there funded by the left called AFP Fact Check,” Glenn explains.

AFP Fact Check fact-checked one of Glenn’s videos, noting that “a video from Glenn Beck, an American conservative commentator, claims a proposal backed by the World Economic Forum would limit meat and dairy in smart cities by 2030.”

“This is false. The document cited as evidence is an independent climate analysis that makes no specific policy recommendation,” the fact-check continued.

Glenn notes that the actual fact-checker is a leftist.

“At this point, if an article or a monologue is fact-checked, that usually means there are some inconvenient facts in it. So, it’s no surprise that the fact-checker is the same guy who had to publicly apologize for botching a fact check with USA Today in 2021,” he says.

The evidence from the AFP Fact Check includes a paragraph from the original “Future of Urban Consumption in a 1.5 Degree Celsius World” report, which reads, “[T]his report does not advocate for the wholesale adoption of these more ambitious targets in C40 cities. Rather, they are included to provide a set of reference points that cities and other actors can reflect on when considering different emission reduction alternatives and long-term urban visions.”

“Now, if you poke around just a little closer,” Glenn says, “you realize that this paragraph is only included in the report for liability purposes. It performs one of the left’s favorite activities: manipulating the meaning of words as a way to avoid any kind of responsibility.”

Glenn knows why they want to avoid all responsibility.

“Because what they’re proposing is totalitarianism.”


Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn’s masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

Everything you NEED to know about the 'smart city' politicians across the nation are pushing



Take a moment to think back to your high school years. Chances are you probably read George Orwell’s chilling dystopian novel “1984,” which centered around a society dominated by mass media and stringent government surveillance. Fear was the iron fist that inspired obedience in the people.

For those who’ve forgotten how the novel ends or never read “1984,” the book’s ending can only be described as nauseating.

Justin Haskins, co-author of “Dark Future,” is concerned that the new smart cities politicians across the nation are touting are disturbingly similar to Orwell’s fictitious society that has long been considered evil and invasive.

Haskins tells Stu Burguiere that the advocates of smart cities will attempt “to sell you on lots of conveniences,” including better-maintained cities, improved affordability, reduced crime, etc.

And while all of those things certainly sound beneficial, there’s a dark side – a very dark side.

“The idea behind smart cities,” Haskins says, “is: ‘Let’s embed technology everywhere; let’s know what’s happening everywhere in the city, not just with cameras … but also with a variety of different sensors.”’

To lure people in, they’ll promise to “build in all kinds of privacy protections,” Haskins explains, adding, “but those privacy protections are subject to change whenever they want” and at their core are “not really privacy protection[s]” at all.

Of course smart city developers will assure people that as long as they’re not criminals, they have nothing to worry about, but is this something we're willing to blindly trust?

“The amount of data that’s being collected” in these smart cities, Haskins explains, “is so extreme” that in places like New York where they’ve already started experimenting with smart city technology, they can “literally [monitor] your use of the toilet” and tell you to “stop flushing” if the powers that be deem it necessary.

China has already fully embraced the smart city, and while its crime rate is certainly lower, the Chinese society is communist and ruled by fear, and “we don’t want that world,” Haskins says.

But it seems that whether we like it or not, that world is coming for us. To find out what the World Economic Forum has planned for cities across the globe, watch the full clip below.


Want more from Stu?

To enjoy more of Stu's lethal wit, wisdom, and mockery, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.