LA County Sheriff's Department sparks fury with 'offensive' Iran condolences over US bombings — deletes post after backlash



The Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department deleted and then apologized for a social media post where it expressed condolences for the "tragic" bombing of sites in Iran.

As Blaze News reported, the United States military bombed three nuclear sites in Iran on Saturday. President Donald Trump ordered a fleet of B-2 bombers to bomb Iran in a mission called Operation Midnight Hammer. Washington is betting that the strategic strikes will prevent Iran from developing a nuclear bomb and force Tehran to make peace with Israel.

'This is the stupidest thing I have seen in a long time.'

The Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department reacted to the news of the U.S. bombing by expressing condolences to Iranians.

"Our hearts go out to the victims and families impacted by the recent bombings in Iran," the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department wrote on the X social media platform on Saturday. "While this tragic event happened overseas, the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department is closely monitoring the situation alongside our local, state, and federal partners."

RELATED: Oil and stock markets have surprising reaction to Iranian attack on US bases

Image Source: Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department

According to screenshots shared on social media, the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department edited the post and removed the portion about the "victims and families impacted by the recent bombings in Iran."

Then, the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department deleted the post entirely.

The Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department then issued an apology for the "offensive and inappropriate social media post."

"We are issuing this statement to formally apologize for an offensive and inappropriate social media post recently posted on our Department social media platforms regarding the ongoing conflict in Iran," the sheriff's department stated in the apology post on Sunday. "This post was unacceptable, made in error, and does not reflect the views of Sheriff Robert G. Luna or the department."

"As a law enforcement agency, we do not comment on foreign policy or military matters," the statement reads. "Our mission remains solely focused on protecting public safety and serving our diverse communities."

"We fully recognize that the words and messages we share carry weight," the LASD stated. "As law enforcement professionals, we are entrusted with a position of public responsibility, and that trust demands that we communicate accurately."

"In this instance, we fell short of that expectation, and we are taking quick corrective action," the statement continued. "We are committed to learning from this failure and to prevent such incidents from occurring again."

The Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department said it had "launched an internal review" to determine how the social media post was created and published.

The department added that "steps are being taken to strengthen our social media oversight protocols and ensure that any future communications align with our department's standards of professionalism, respect, and accountability."

RELATED: FBI warns of ‘sleeper cells’ in America — why did they leak this NOW?

— (@)

The Los Angeles Sheriff's Department was lambasted online for the controversial post that was ultimately deleted.

Alejandro Villanueva – the 33rd sheriff of Los Angeles County who served from 2018 until 2022 – called for Sheriff Robert Luna to "apologize and resign."

David A. Clarke Jr. – retired sheriff of Milwaukee County – stated, "This is the stupidest thing I have seen in a long time. The LACSD is an embarrassment to law enforcement for issuing this. The Iranian people chant death to the Jews, death to Israel and death to America. They don’t deserve any condolences. They deserve what they got."

Stop Antisemitism – a self-described "grassroots watchdog organization dedicated to exposing groups and individuals that espouse incitement towards the Jewish people and state and engage in antisemitic behaviors" – responded by saying, "We sincerely hope your account was hacked. There were no victims in last night's successful targeting of Iran's nuclear sites."

A sheriff's department spokesperson told Fox News that he was not initially aware of the strange social media post showing empathy toward Iran.

RELATED: DHS warns of attacks stateside after Iran bombings, years of open borders

According to a 2021 report from the Migration Policy Institute, 36% of Iranian immigrants to the United States live in Los Angeles, 6% in Washington, D.C., and 5% in New York City and San Francisco.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Censorship Is Democrats’ Only Means Of Political Survival

Obama's embrace of censorship speaks to the desperation of a party that can't survive without uniform control of the information space.

JD Vance joined liberal Twitter knockoff Bluesky. Things went off the rails REALLY fast.



Vice President JD Vance is not exactly a shrinking violet. The Marine veteran who rose from relative poverty to become second in command of the world's greatest nation has a habit of seeking out fruitful confrontation.

At the Munich Security Conference in February, for instance, Vance told European officials to their faces that they were stepping toward tyranny and turning their backs on the values they once shared in common with the United States. Just weeks later, he bashed the U.K.'s censorship regime with leftist British Prime Minister Keir Starmer seated right next to him in the Oval Office.

While he has long participated in fiery exchanges with Democratic lawmakers and other antagonists, both in person and on Elon Musk's X, Vance evidently wanted to bring the conversation to leftists on their own turf.

The vice president created an account Wednesday on the liberal Twitter knockoff Bluesky. Things went off the rails pretty quickly.

Vance kicked off his Bluesky residency by writing, "Hello Bluesky, I've been told this app has become the place to go for common sense political discussion and analysis. So I'm thrilled to be here to engage with all of you."

'I might add that many of those scientists are receiving substantial resources from big pharma to push these medicines on kids.'

Accompanying his initial post was a screenshot of the Supreme Court's majority decision in United States v. Skrmetti, in which the court upheld Tennessee's ban on sex-change genital mutilations and sterilizing puberty blockers for minors — clearly a touchy subject for the Bluesky crowd.

RELATED: Sacrificing body parts and informed consent to the sex-change regime

Photo by Ethan Miller/Getty Images

Vance highlighted a portion of the decision in which Chief Justice John Roberts wrote, "There are several problems with appealing and deferring to the authority of the expert class. First, so-called experts have no license to countermand the 'wisdom, fairness, or logic of legislative choices.'"

Roberts noted further in the excerpt, "Contrary to the representations of the United States and the private plaintiffs, there is no medical consensus on how best to treat gender dysphoria in children. Third, notwithstanding the alleged experts' view that young children can provide informed consent to irreversible sex-transition treatments, whether such consent is possible is a question of medical ethics that States must decide for themselves."

Vance added in a follow-up message, "To that end, I found Justice Thomas's concurrence on medical care for transgender youth quite illuminating. He argues that many of our so-called 'experts' have used bad arguments and substandard science to push experimental therapies on our youth."

"I might add that many of those scientists are receiving substantial resources from big pharma to push these medicines on kids," continued Vance. "What do you think?"

— (@)

Regardless of whether Vance's intention was to troll the netizens of Bluesky, the result was the same.

Apoplectic leftists immediately piled into the comments various smears and accusations. Many threatened to report Vance in hopes of getting him banned for some perceived offense or another.

The attacks were, however, interrupted roughly 12 minutes after Vance's first post when the platform suspended him, according to Axios reporter Marc Caputo.

Leftists looking to vent were confronted with a message that read, "Not found. Account has been suspended."

RELATED: Runaway judges, rogue rulings — and JD Vance is having none of it

Photo by Kayla Bartkowski/Getty Images

Despite the appearance that Vance's account may have been suspended because of his politics or perhaps because he shared a court ruling that struck at the heart of the sex-change regime, Bluesky claimed in a statement obtained by Forbes, "Vice President Vance's account was briefly flagged by our automated systems that try to detect impersonation attempts, which have targeted public figures like him in the past."

"The account was quickly restored and verified so people can easily confirm its authenticity," continued the statement. "We welcome the Vice President to join the conversation on Bluesky."

As of Thursday morning, Vance's initial posts were buried in negative comments, although he had netted over 7,500 followers. According to the user tracker Clearsky, he had been blocked by over 81,000 users at the time of publication.

Blaze News reached out to the vice president's office for comment but did not immediately receive a response.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

X Sues New York For Demanding Social Media Data To Censor Speech

Social media company X sued New York to challenge a state law that requires social media companies to submit semi-annual reports about how they are suppressing certain kinds of speech to the New York attorney general. According to the lawsuit, provisions in the “Stop Hiding Hate Act” violate social media companies’ First Amendment rights and […]

NYT ‘Disinformation’ Experts Blame Online Conservatives, Not Rioters, For LA Riots

Rioters came too prepared — some with preprinted signs, some with safety masks — to believe they arrived without organization.

New Texas Law Targets Mass Screen Addiction Among Kids

Unless parents make a concerted effort to deal with the smartphone, the great majority of kids will never come close to reaching their full potential.

Netflix’s chilling new surveillance tools are watching YOU



There was a time, for a brief second, when Netflix felt like a genuine escape. No ads. No distractions. Just a moment of sacred silence before the next episode auto-played. YouTube, on the other hand, has always been the neighborhood hawker, jamming five-second countdowns and “skip” buttons between cat videos and clips of Candace Owens speaking with Harvey Weinstein. But Netflix? It felt different. Intentional. Entirely neutral.

Not any more.

We now know that YouTube, owned by Google (the company that famously deleted “don’t be evil” from its code of conduct), uses AI to analyze your viewing habits in real time. The company calls it Peak Points, a system that detects when you’re most emotionally invested. Not so it can recommend better content. No, it’s so YouTube can slice in an ad. A perfectly timed disruption — just as you’re crying, laughing, leaning in. Not after. During. Essentially, it’s manipulation dressed as optimization.

Soon you won’t be choosing shows. You’ll be chosen by them.

If Google pulling this stunt doesn’t surprise you, that’s because nothing Google does should surprise you. What should worry you, however, is Netflix quietly following suit, disguised beneath its polished UI and faux prestige. To be clear, this isn’t a case of algorithms nudging you toward rom-coms or action thrillers. This is full-blown behavioral harvesting, run out of what’s called “clean rooms," a fancy way of saying they’re still collecting everything, just behind closed doors. They promise it’s private. But they still track your habits, reactions, pauses, and clicks. They’re not watching you, they insist. Just everything you do.

Netflix’s ad-supported tier allows third-party data brokers — including Experian (more on this notorious credit score company in a minute) — to build a psychological profile on you. Your stress tells them what to sell. Your loneliness tells them when to sell it. Your late-night binge-watching isn’t just a pattern; it’s a profile. You think you’re relaxing, when in reality, you're participating in a lab study that you never signed up for. Not knowingly, anyway.

Netflix used to sell impressions. Now, however, it's selling intimacy — your intimacy. It's the kind of advertising that doesn’t feel like advertising because it’s been trained to mimic your tone, your mood, your hesitation. Mid-roll ads now talk back. Pause screens offer prompts and tailored suggestions based not on your genre preferences but on your emotional volatility.

Even rewinds are a metric now. Linger too long on one scene? It wasn’t just memorable — it was actionable. Every flicker of interest, every second you lean forward, becomes a flag for monetization. A signal to tweak the pitch, change the lighting, or modify the ad delivery window.

You’re not the customer any more. You’re the subject.

This is much more than targeted marketing. It is emotional extraction. Netflix and YouTube are conditioning you and your loved ones. The goal is no longer passive consumption. It’s emotive response mining. Once satisfied with getting your eyeballs, they now want what’s behind them.

And here’s the most worrying part: Their devious plan is working.

RELATED: Netflix shares blunt message to woke employees offended by its content: 'Netflix may not be the best place for you'

ROBERT SULLIVAN/AFP via Getty Images

You feel it when your pause screen suddenly knows you’re restless. You sense it when an ad knows you’re anxious. But you can’t prove it, because this isn’t surveillance as we used to know it. It’s ambient, implicit, and sanitized. Framed as “user experience.” But make no mistake, the living room has been compromised.

Netflix used to say, “See what’s next.” But increasingly, the real motto is “see what we see.” Every moment of attention, every flicker, flinch, or fast-forward, is a data point. Every glance is a gamble, wagered against your most vulnerable instincts.

Which brings us back to Experian. By partnering with the same data broker that helps banks deny loans, Netflix is making a statement. A troubling one.

Experian isn’t just some boring credit bureau. It’s one of the largest consumer data aggregators on the planet. It tracks what you buy, what you browse, where you live, how often you move, how many credit cards you have, what you watch, what you search, and what you owe. It then slices that information into little behavioral fragments to sell to advertisers, insurers, lenders, and now … to Netflix.

With 90 million U.S. users, Netflix has now integrated with a company whose entire business model revolves around profiling you — right down to your risk appetite, spending triggers, and likelihood of defaulting on a loan.

So while you're watching a true-crime documentary to unwind, Experian is in the back end, silently refining your “predictive segment.” Your favorite comedy special could now become a soft proxy for Experian to gauge how impulsive you are. That docuseries about minimalism? Great test case for your spending restraint. They don’t just want to know what you watch. They want to know what you’ll buy after. Or worse, what you’ll believe next.

RELATED: Upstart streamer Loor.TV is out to televise the conservative revolution

Loor.tv

The future isn’t one of generic binge-watching. It’s curated manipulation. Your partner just walked out? Cue romantic dramas … with targeted ads for dating apps. Watching a dystopian thriller? Insert ads for tech “solutions” to the very problems being dramatized.

Soon you won’t be choosing shows. You’ll be chosen by them. Not because they’re good, but because they serve a data-driven purpose. If you're a Netflix subscriber, perhaps it’s time to consider whether it still makes sense to continue funding the violation of your privacy.

State Department Protects Americans’ Speech By Restricting Visas For Foreign Censors

The Trump administration’s targeting of foreign censors marks a significant departure from a Biden administration that coordinated global speech restrictions.

Here are all the NFL teams that haven't virtue-signaled for Pride Month



Fewer than a third of NFL teams declined to show their support for Pride Month this year, meaning they did not post public celebratory images or statements on their social media accounts for Pride Month.

In addition, some NFL teams did post Pride celebrations this year despite not doing so in 2024, while only three new teams were added to the list of Pride noncompliance.

'Pride Month was always about catering to small demographics in American culture.'

In total, nine NFL teams did not post messages in support of gay pride in 2025, which represents a net zero change from the year before.

A list quickly circulated online Sunday, as June 1 is the official start of Pride Month; it indicated 12 teams did not participate this year. But just like the prior year, three teams quickly fell off that list — perhaps due to pressure or scheduling their posts for later.

RELATED: Here are all the NFL teams that haven't virtue-signaled for Pride Month (2024)

LA Rams cheerleaders attend the 2023 WeHo Pride Parade, June 4, 2023, in West Hollywood, California. Photo by Rodin Eckenroth/Getty Images

The following are the nine teams that had not posted Pride Month celebratory messages at the time of this story's publication:

  • Cincinnati Bengals
  • Cleveland Browns
  • Dallas Cowboys
  • Indianapolis Colts
  • Kansas City Chiefs
  • Las Vegas Raiders
  • New Orleans Saints
  • New York Jets
  • Tennessee Titans

The initial list circulating online from ML Football also included the Baltimore Ravens, Pittsburgh Steelers, and Seattle Seahawks. However, Blaze News found that each of those teams posted subsequent Pride celebrations, including the Steelers' post, which hit social media just as the list was going viral.

The Seahawks showed off their rainbow-themed logo hours later, while the Ravens posted a rendition of their logo the next day — June 2 — which celebrated race and transgenderism too.

The Atlanta Falcons, Denver Broncos, and the Steelers were part of the list of teams in 2024 that did not celebrate Pride Month, but all three changed their tune this year. The Falcons posted their message early on June 1, while the Broncos promoted a rainbow football field on their lunch break the same day.

This left six NFL teams (Bengals, Browns, Titans, Chiefs, Cowboys, Saints) who went against the woke grain for the second straight year and didn't promote Pride Month.

In addition, the Colts, Jets, and Raiders broke away from their pro-Pride Month programming from last year and did not give shout-outs to Pride Month this year.

RELATED: Ex-NFL star rejects league's 'wild' support for Pride Month: 'Football is none of these things'

Former Dallas Cowboys wide receiver Dez Bryant at MetLife Stadium on September 26, 2022, in East Rutherford, New Jersey. Photo by Elsa/Getty Images

Former Cowboys wide receiver Dez Bryant made his voice heard on the issue this year as teams rolled out their multicolored statements. Bryant responded to a post that included an NFL ad from 2021 which proudly declared that "football is gay" and "football is transgender," among other messages.

Bryant replied, "Football is gay. Football is queer. Football is transgender.. these are wild statements to make..excuse my silliness."

The former star added that he would "proudly" tell his sons that "football is none of these things" and later explained that in his view, the messaging was being shoved in fans' faces.

"It’s gay players in the NFL..but forcing it in people's faces..especially children..can send the wrong message," Bryant wrote. "Football is a real community, like the gay community. Imagine telling gays they have to advocate for straight people..they probably would have a problem."

— (@)

OutKick's Alejandro Avila told Blaze News that sports fans largely do not care to see their teams bring up such issues: "Pride Month was always about catering to small demographics in American culture."

Avila added to Blaze News that it would be in the NFL's best interest to wean itself off Pride celebrations and that the league seemed to be "not spotlighting it as heavily as before."

"That could still change," Avila also told Blaze News. "Plenty of big leagues like the NBA sacrificed viewership for progressivism. The NFL could very well go back to pandering."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!