EPA Emission Rules Threaten To Shut Down Power Grid For Millions
President Joe Biden's climate agenda is likely to deliver blackouts for millions, according to a North Dakota state assessment of EPA rules.
There have been massive wildfires burning in Canada since the beginning of June. There are currently 416 active fires in Canada – 215 of the wildfires are considered "out of control," according to the Canadian Interagency Forest Fire Center.
Thick smoke has blanketed the Northeast United States in a dense orange haze that has led to air quality warnings. Another issue from the smoke is that it significantly lowered solar power production by over 50% in the United States.
Solar farms powering New England were generating 56% less power during periods of maximum demand than they did the previous week, according to the region's grid operator.
ISO New England, the operator of the energy grid, said on Thursday, "In recent days, smoke from wildfires in Canada has traveled to New England, significantly lowering production from solar resources in the region compared to what ISO New England would expect absent the smoke.”
"The smoke has also lowered actual temperatures in New England compared to what weather models are forecasting," the statement read. "This leads to lower demand on the regional grid, as there is less need for things like air conditioning."
ISO New England concluded, "These two factors — decreased production from solar resources and decreased consumer demand due to lower temperatures — has made forecasting demand for grid electricity challenging."
Matt Kakley, a spokesperson for ISO-New England energy grid operator, told Bloomberg that the situation is "really unprecedented," adding, "We don’t have a lot of historical data to look back on. There is some learning in real time."
The reduced production did not result in any power outages, mainly because solar power is not a prominent source of electricity in the area.
Solar power accounts for approximately 3% of New England's electricity, compared to 52% from natural gas and 26% from nuclear.
Other states across the country also faced diminished solar power production because of the wildfire smoke from Canada.
PJM Interconnection LLC, which provides electricity to 13 states from Illinois to North Carolina, noted that there was roughly a 25% drop in solar energy production from the prior week.
Dan Lockwood, a spokesperson for the PJM Interconnection, said, "Smoky conditions throughout the RTO this week have caused a reduction in visibility, reducing solar, and keeping temperatures several degrees lower than usual."
New York energy grid manager New York ISO stated, "Based on data compiled by New York ISO forecasters, smoke from Canada wildfires that’s blocking sunlight resulted in a combined reduction in peak solar energy production of 1,466 MW for June 6-7, for a two-day total peak production of 4,405 MW."
Previous wildfires have also caused decreased solar power production in Australia.
Solar Analytics, a solar monitoring company, found that rooftop photovoltaic systems in the Australian cities of Sydney and Canberra saw solar power output "plummet by 15 – 45% on heavy smoke haze days."
Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!
A new study finds there could be unintended consequences of constructing massive solar farms in deserts around the world. The eye-opening research claims that huge solar farms, such as in the Sahara, could usher in environmental crises, including altering the climate and causing global warming.
The study was carried out by Zhengyao Lu, a researcher in Physical Geography at Lund University, and Benjamin Smith, director of research at the Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment at Western Sydney University. The results of their research were published in a Feb. 11 article in The Conversation.
Solar panels are darker colors such as black and blue to attract and absorb more heat, but they are usually much darker than the ground around the solar panel. The post cites an article that claims most solar panels are between 15% and 20% efficient in converting sunlight into usable energy. The researchers assert that the rest of the sunlight is returned to the surrounding environment as heat, "affecting the climate."
The article notes that in order to replace fossil fuels, solar farms would need to be enormous — covering thousands of square miles, according to this article. Solar farms of this magnitude potentially present environmental consequences, not just locally but globally.
Authors of a 2018 study say that climate models show that installing ample numbers of wind turbines would double precipitation in the Sahara desert, and solar panels would increase precipitation by 50%. The researchers came to this conclusion by determining that the solar panels and wind turbines would decrease the albedo on the land surface. Albedo is the fraction of light that is reflected by a body or surface.
From The Conversation:
The model revealed that when the size of the solar farm reaches 20% of the total area of the Sahara, it triggers a feedback loop. Heat emitted by the darker solar panels (compared to the highly reflective desert soil) creates a steep temperature difference between the land and the surrounding oceans that ultimately lowers surface air pressure and causes moist air to rise and condense into raindrops. With more monsoon rainfall, plants grow and the desert reflects less of the sun's energy, since vegetation absorbs light better than sand and soil. With more plants present, more water is evaporated, creating a more humid environment that causes vegetation to spread.
Turning the Sahara desert into a lush, green oasis could have climate ramifications around the planet, including affecting the atmosphere, the ocean, the land, changing entire ecosystems, altering precipitation in Amazon's rainforests, inducing droughts, and potentially triggering more tropical cyclones.
The good-intentioned effort to lower the world's temperature could potentially do the opposite and increase the planet's temperature, according to the researchers.
Covering 20% of the Sahara with solar farms raises local temperatures in the desert by 1.5°C according to our model. At 50% coverage, the temperature increase is 2.5°C. This warming is eventually spread around the globe by atmosphere and ocean movement, raising the world's average temperature by 0.16°C for 20% coverage, and 0.39°C for 50% coverage. The global temperature shift is not uniform though – the polar regions would warm more than the tropics, increasing sea ice loss in the Arctic. This could further accelerate warming, as melting sea ice exposes dark water which absorbs much more solar energy.
The authors conclude their article by stating renewable energy solutions "may help society transition from fossil energy, but Earth system studies like ours underscore the importance of considering the numerous coupled responses of the atmosphere, oceans and land surface when examining their benefits and risks."
Green Energy = World Peace?