Mike Rounds’ Defense Of FBI Corruption Is An Act Of Inexcusable Cowardice

Any Republican who doesn't 'have any complaints' about Chris Wray's weaponization of the FBI is undeserving of public office.

Kristi Noem Isn’t Courageous Enough To Be Trump’s Homeland Security Secretary

While Noem is certainly skilled at promoting herself, she doesn't have the courage required for this role.

The Good, Bad, And Ugly Of 2024’s Abortion Ballot Referendums

With most ballots tabulated in each state, the outcome of these referendums produced some wins and losses for America's pro-life movement.

Heartland states reject left's culture of death by voting down abortion



Voters in South Dakota, Nebraska, and Florida decisively chose to protect the lives of the unborn, voting against abortion measures, according to the latest election results.

This election cycle, so-called abortion "rights" were on the ballot in seven other states, including Maryland, Colorado, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, Arizona, and New York.

'Being pro-life is NOT a losing issue.'

South Dakota voters defeated Amendment G, which, if passed, would have legalized abortions in all situations in the first trimester of pregnancy. It, too, would have allowed the state to determine when to permit abortions during the second trimester but "only in ways that are reasonably related to the physical health of the pregnant woman." Abortions in the third trimester could have been legalized as well when "necessary, in the medical judgment of the woman's physician, to preserve the life and health of the pregnant woman."

After the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, South Dakota banned abortion except in situations in which it is necessary to preserve the mother's life.

Pro-life voters won in a landslide, rejecting Amendment G with a 19-point margin. All but four South Dakota counties voted against the measure.

This election cycle, Nebraska had two abortion-related measures on the ballot, including the "Right to Abortion Initiative" and the "Protect Women and Children" initiative.

The first measure, Measure 439, aimed to amend the state's constitution, enshrining the right to infanticide until viability or when deemed necessary to protect the mother's health. The second measure intended to amend the state's constitution to ban abortions after the first trimester, with exceptions for medical emergencies, sexual assault, and incest.

Nebraska voters rejected Measure 439, which sought to expand the legalization of abortion, and instead supported Measure 434, an initiative that enshrines the state's existing 12-week abortion ban.

According to the Associated Press' election results reporting, just over 51% of voters cast their ballots against the measure.

In Florida, voters defeated Amendment 4, which would have effectively legalized late-term abortions by amending the state's constitution, Blaze News previously reported. The measure required 60% approval to pass but received just 57.1% of the vote.

BlazeTV’s Liz Wheeler stated, “Amendment 4 in Florida which would’ve legalized abortion til the moment of birth has FAILED.”

“Praise the Lord,” she continued. “This is in [sic] incredible victory ... and also an incredible lesson for Republicans. Being pro-life is NOT a losing issue.”

President-elect Donald Trump secured victories in all three states where abortion measures were shot down.

While the pro-life movement had a few wins on Election Day, abortion amendments passed in several other states, including Arizona, Colorado, Maryland, Montana, and Nevada.

In Missouri, voters passed Amendment 3, which will create a constitutional right to abortion. However, it also will allow the legislature to regulate access to abortion past the first trimester.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Midwest Voters Side With Unborn Babies On State Ballot Measures

Voters in two Midwest states, Nebraska and South Dakota, defeated measures to expand abortion.

Report: Group Founded By Illinois’ Democrat Governor Drops $500K In South Dakota To Enshrine Abortion Into Law

A left-wing advocacy group founded by Illinois’ Democrat governor recently dumped half a million dollars into South Dakota to enshrine abortion into the state’s constitution, according to a new report. On Thursday, the left-wing South Dakota Searchlight revealed that the Chicago-based Think Big America donated $500,000 to Dakotans for Health, a pro-abortion group behind the […]

Unpopular Abortion Through Birth Could Become Legal In These 10 States Unless Voters Act Now

Despite multiple challenges, these radical ballot initiatives seeking to deceive voters have made it through certification to the Nov. 5 ballot.

South Dakota’s ‘Pro-Life’ Politicians Notoriously Silent On Extremist Abortion Amendment

South Dakota Republicans are keeping their lips sealed about the dangers posed by until-birth abortion Amendment G.

550,000 or more illegal aliens could receive amnesty under Biden-Harris admin’s executive order — states respond with lawsuit



The Biden-Harris administration's Department of Homeland Security recently announced the "Keeping Families Together" program, a mass amnesty process for at least 550,000 illegal aliens already residing in the United States.

The federal government claims that the new process demonstrates the Biden-Harris administration's "commitment to promoting family unity in the immigration system."

'Unlawfully creating a program that effectively provides a new pathway to citizenship.'

The program would allow some illegal aliens, including spouses and stepchildren of American citizens, to "request parole in place under existing statutory authority."

If granted parole in place, eligible illegal aliens will be allowed to remain in the U.S. while they request an adjustment of status.

According to a press release from the U.S. Customs and Immigration Services, the administration estimates that 500,000 illegal alien spouses and 50,000 illegal alien stepchildren of American citizens are eligible for the process.

Of the roughly half a million spouses of American citizens, on average, most have resided unlawfully in the U.S. 23 years, the department reported. To be eligible for the program, spouses must have lived in the country illegally since June 2014 and have been married to a citizen since June 2024.

Eligible stepchildren of American citizens must be under 21 years old and be unmarried. They must have been residing unlawfully in the U.S. since June 2024 and have an illegal alien parent who is married to a citizen.

Applicants cannot have a "disqualifying criminal history," which includes such offenses as murder, rape, crimes involving firearms or controlled substances, aggravated assault, child pornography or abuse, and domestic violence. Those convicted of other crimes can "overcome the presumption of ineligibility" by "demonstrating positive factors that can be considered in overcoming this presumption and showing that you warrant a favorable exercise of discretion."

Even illegal aliens currently facing removal proceedings may be eligible for the Biden-Harris administration's program.

"If you have a final unexecuted removal order, non-disqualifying criminal history, or other derogatory information in your case, you may provide additional documentation that you believe demonstrates your parole is warranted based on a significant public benefit or urgent humanitarian reasons, and that you merit a favorable exercise of discretion," USCIS said.

Critics have called the administration's executive order a mass amnesty program.

On Friday, a group of 16 Republican-led states filed a lawsuit in partnership with America First Legal against the federal government to stop the program. States attempting to block the effort include Texas, Idaho, Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Missouri, North Dakota, Ohio, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, and Wyoming.

The lawsuit argues that the administration's claims that the process would impact roughly 550,000 illegal aliens is "likely a significant underestimate," stating that the number could be approximately 1.3 million.

The states claim the program circumvented Congress and would "irreparably harm" their communities.

The complaint accuses the administration of "unlawfully creating a program that effectively provides a new pathway to citizenship for more than a million illegal aliens," according to AFL.

"The coalition also seeks a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction to stop the Biden-Harris Administration from proceeding with its plans to provide immediate executive amnesty," it added.

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton said, "Biden's new parole workaround unilaterally grants the opportunity for citizenship to unvetted aliens whose first act on American soil was to break our laws. This violates the Constitution and actively worsens the illegal immigration disaster that is hurting Texas and our country."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!