Troops in orbit? US dominance demands Space Force 'guardians,' ex-military brass claim



A group of former military officers says human Space Force missions could tilt the scales against America's enemies.

In a new report, the Mitchell Institute for Aerospace Studies advocated the integration of man in space as the next step required to gain a tactical edge.

'Astronaut guardians may be necessary to execute and secure missions that cannot be accomplished through remote operations.'

The Mitchell Institute calls itself an "independent, nonpartisan research organization" and consists of a plethora of retired military personnel. This includes a former Air Force brigadier general, general, and lieutenant general. Notably, the staff boasts retired Space Force Colonel Charles Galbreath, who serves as a director and senior resident fellow for space studies.

It was Galbreath who concluded the recent study that determined dynamic space operations with the Space Force will need to encompass orbital and terrestrial links, and establish space infrastructure in the future.

One of the most important areas of focus, Galbreath wrote, should be the need for crewed missions.

Labeling humans as the "most flexible system ever launched into space," the former Space Force colonel said that "guardians in space" may be essential for future operations.

RELATED: Why Mars is America’s next strategic imperative

— (@)

"Today, the Space Force does not have guardians operating in the space domain for military missions. However, as humanity’s interests in space go further from the Earth, astronaut guardians may be necessary to execute and secure missions that cannot be accomplished through remote operations," Galbreath wrote.

The adaptability of human decision-making could present "fundamental challenges" to enemy decision-making procedures, he argued. For example, adding humans into a spacecraft would "raise the threshold" of acceptable hostile actions from foreign governments.

"Harming an uncrewed satellite is one thing; harming a space station with military crew on it is a completely different risk calculus for an adversary to consider," Galbreath hypothesized.

RELATED: Comet or alien? NASA-led group ramping efforts to track mysterious city-size object in our solar system

As reported by Defense One, John Shaw, the former deputy leader of U.S. Space Command, recently appeared on a virtual event for the Mitchell Institute, where he expressed skepticism about putting troops in space in the immediate future.

"It's probably when we're projecting power across great distances, and it's probably so they can be closer to an intense command and control capability where you need humans in the decision-making," Shaw said.

Describing the placement of guardians in space as "inevitable," Galbreath said during the same event that it's going to take about 10 years to get the idea into practice due to the time it takes to develop the pipeline and training that would enable such a program.

"We can't wake up one day and say, ‘My gosh, we need guardians in space.' ... We needed to make that decision 10 years ago," Galbreath claimed.

According to the Mitchell report, there also exists a need for the Space Force to use alternate forms of propulsion, conduct in-space assembly, and create a supply chain for parts and infrastructure in order to fix satellites, for example.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

3I/ATLAS: Why are ‘scientists’ desperate to deny intelligent aliens could exist?



The Manhattan-size comet known as 3I/ATLAS that flew eerily close to the sun as well as several other planets has ignited a spirited debate surrounding the comet’s true meaning — with some pointing out that it could be an extraterrestrial spacecraft.

And Harvard’s renowned astrophysicist Avi Loeb is among them, proposing a 40% chance that alien technology hides inside the mysterious comet.

“Do you believe that, with what we’ve seen from 3I/ATLAS, that there is a chance that life form is on it, whether the life form is dead or alive?” BlazeTV contributor Jeff Fisher asks Loeb on “Pat Gray Unleashed.”


“It’s possible,” Loeb responds. “It’s possible that life was delivered to the solar system from outside. We just don’t know, you know, and scientists are very good at pretending to be the adults in the room saying, ‘You know, that’s what we think,’ but the point is, you know, nature is much more imaginative than we are.”

“And the best way to learn is to observe and study whatever nature delivers to our backyard. And the thing about a visitor from outside the solar system or that comes to our backyard is, you know, that it’s a new risk that nobody considered before,” he continues.

“And why is it, do you think, that other scientists are so reluctant to admit the possibility that this is alien tech or that there’s alien tech out there?” BlazeTV host Pat Gray asks. “I mean, it’s a massive universe, and certainly there’s life in it other than us.”

“Well, I think, first, they are quite arrogant in thinking that there is nothing as intelligent as we are, and that includes not only scientists but other people” Loeb responds.

“I think it’s arrogant to believe that because most of the stars, you know, formed before the sun by billions of years, and there are 100 billion stars. So just thinking that we are the smartest in the class of intelligent civilization is really arrogant. Makes no sense,” he continues.

“And, you know, one way to find them is not by waiting for a phone call like we did for 60 years waiting for a radio signal," he says. "Instead, let’s just check our backyard."

Want more from Pat Gray?

To enjoy more of Pat's biting analysis and signature wit as he restores common sense to a senseless world, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Comet or alien? NASA-led group ramping efforts to track mysterious city-size object in our solar system



An asteroid warning network has announced it will investigate a comet that allegedly has potential alien origins.

The comet, known as 3I/ATLAS, allegedly has peculiar traits that have not been seen in nature before. This theory is disputed, though.

'Never seen in comets before.'

A NASA coordinated group called the International Asteroid Warning Network has added 3I/ATLAS to its list of observation campaigns for November, stating that it will monitor the comet for two months, ending in late January.

Concurrently, a Harvard astrophysicist told the New York Post that the comet, in addition to being the size of Manhattan, has several unusual characteristics that defy common knowledge about the objects.

Avi Loeb told the Post the comet has what is referred to as an "anti-tail," which is a jet of particles that points toward the sun instead of away from it. It's also emitting a plume — gas and dust that erupts from the surface — that contains four grams of nickel per second. Allegedly existing without iron, Loeb said this was unheard of.

Loeb also claimed the object also has non-gravitational acceleration that will bring it close to Jupiter, Venus, and Mars, which is suspicious enough for him to claim that the comet could actually be an alien probe.

The comet also allegedly contains a toxic gas that is not seen naturally occurring on Earth.

RELATED: Freakout at the Final Frontier

Photo by MADS CLAUS RASMUSSEN/Ritzau Scanpix/AFP via Getty Images

The nickel compound nickel tetracarbonyl is apparently present in the comet. According to ScienceDirect, this gas is formed from the reaction of carbon monoxide with metallic nickel and is the primary cause of acute nickel toxicity. The gas is used in the process of obtaining "very pure nickel" but can cause "severe health effects" in humans.

Loeb said the process is only imaginable because it's used in industry and was "never seen in comets before."

At the same time, the Post cited a study that suggests that the compound could form naturally in a carbon monoxide-rich environment.

"The [nickel] emission is more centrally concentrated in the nucleus of the comet and favors hypotheses involving easily dissociated species such as metal carbonyls or metal-polycyclic-aromatic-hydrocarbon molecules," the study reads.

Loeb also said the object did not have a cometary tail, which "we usually see ... and in this case there was no evidence for such a tail."

RELATED: China 3-5 years from establishing 'exclusion zones' on the moon: Space policy advisor Greg Autry explains the new Cold War

Photo by Basri Marzuki/NurPhoto via Getty Images

Despite Loeb's alien warnings and the IAWN's plan for a lengthy observation period, the group states on its campaign page that the comet "poses no threat."

It does, however, present a "great opportunity for the IAWN community to perform an observing exercise due to its prolonged observability from Earth and high interest to the scientific community."

The group plans on holding a workshop on techniques to correctly measure the comet's astrometry, "a transformation without a change to a figure's shape or size, such as rotation or reflection."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Jim Lovell Overcame Extreme Adversity In ‘NASA’s Finest Hour’

For the past 55 years, Jim Lovell served as living proof of what man can accomplish when he puts his mind to it.

This 'Star Wars' vehicle is now real, and you don't need a license to fly one



Employees at aviation and aerospace company Volonaut have been watching a few too many movies. For the general population, though, that's a good thing.

While many young males were dreaming of light saber battles or flying through the wilderness on a speeder bike, Volonaut founder Tomasz Patan was thinking about how to build his own futuristic equipment.

On Wednesday, the company revealed it had created a real-world "Star Wars" method of transportation.

'No special effects, no CGI, no AI, pure engineering.'

While the Death Star may have been too big of a project, Volonaut's feat is still incredibly impressive, as the company revealed a real-life speeder bike, listed on their website as the Airbike, a "personal hoverbike of the future."

"Excited to share this raw flight footage including take-off and landing, all with real sound. No special effects, no CGI, no AI, pure engineering," Patan wrote on X.

The "fully functional real-world 'speeder bike'" was shown lifting off about 10 feet into the air before carrying its pilot across a dusty, vacant field.

Despite weighing 209 pounds and having an insane max speed of 63 mph (102 km/h), prospective pilots will not require a license to fly one of the Airbikes.

RELATED: Robo-billionaire Palmer Luckey brings the 'hype' train to American manufacturing

— (@)

According to the company, the Airbike is in compliance with FAA ultralight rules, which, according to the Experimental Aircraft Association, has a few pointed requirements.

In order to be compliant, the vehicle must be manned by a single occupant, can only be for sport or recreation, and must weigh less than 254 pounds if powered.

Other restrictions exist regarding the fuel capacity (5 gallons) and speed (55 knots or 63.2929 mph), which the Airbike abides by.

"Airbike flying motorbike is a breakthrough in personal air mobility," Volonaut wrote on its website. "The futuristic single occupant vehicle is a realization of a bold concept often portrayed in science-fiction movies."

While, according to the company's LinkedIn page, it seemingly has just one key figure, founder, and inventor — Patan — the inventor has been working for months bringing this project to light and dropped a "Star Wars" themed promo on May 4.

RELATED: How Jaguar's gender-bending rebrand is threatening its total collapse

— (@)

Dressed in full costume, a Volonaut pilot flew an Airbike through the woods, recreating a famous scene from "Star Wars: Return of the Jedi."

The stunning visuals did not garner nearly as much fanfare as the July release, which has now been seen by more than 3.9 million viewers on X.

The Airbike's flight time is unfortunately just 10 minutes, and it runs on a combination of diesel, biodiesel, Jet A-1 jet fuel, and kerosene. Its refuel time is listed at under one minute.

It should come as no surprise, though, that Patan is working on other futuristic vehicles. This includes an electric vertical take-off and landing machine, or eVTOL, which is a fancy term for a single-man mini-helicopter.

The eVTOL has more real-world application than the speeder bike, though, and is intended to assist first responders in mountain rescue operations.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Why Trimming NASA To Focus On The Lunar Space Race Is The Right Move

NASA has long suffered from shifting political winds, its mission rewritten every few years. This move gives NASA the right goals.

Ridicule Is The Final Frontier For The Ladies Of Blue Origin

Katy Perry, Lauren Sanchez and Gayle King, pretended to be astronauts and corporate media pretended their brief trek was news.

Actresses Olivia Munn and Olivia Wilde mock all-female trip to space: 'Is it historic that you guys are going on a ride?'



Actress Olivia Munn called out the recent all-female space crew for "gluttonous" spending after the celebrity-laden event was glorified as a landmark achievement for women.

An all-female celebrity crew went into what is technically considered space this week and was publicized as a benefit for "humankind."

The New Shepard program, launched by Blue Origin under Jeff Bezos, sent an all-women flight (NS-31) into what is generally considered the boundary between Earth and outer space. Crew members included singer Katy Perry, CBS host Gayle King, activist Amanda Nguyen, scientist Aisha Bowe, filmmaker Kerianne Flynn, and Bezos' fiancée, Lauren Sanchez, who was responsible for the crew's selection.

The publicity stunt was even heralded by former astronaut Mae Jemison, who claimed the mission was about expanding the perspective of who is involved in space travel. The 68-year-old also made sure to correct a CBS host's usage of the term "mankind" and reinforced the use of "humankind," further bringing a feminist angle to the trip.

'What are they gonna do up there that has made it better for us down here?'

The alleged feat did not impress everyone, though. Actress Olivia Munn went off on the participants for rubbing such an expensive trip in the face of average Americans.

"What are they doing?" Munn asked while co-hosting "Today With Jenna & Friends."

She continued: “I know this probably isn't the cool thing to say, but there are so many other things that are so important in the world right now."

"I know this is probably obnoxious, but like, it's so much money to go to space, and there's a lot of people who can't even afford eggs," Munn went on, again asking, "What's the point?"

"Is it historic that you guys are going on a ride? I think it’s a bit gluttonous," she added. "What are they gonna do up there that has made it better for us down here?"

While Blue Origin once auctioned off a seat for $28 million, current estimates have such flights ranging between $150,000 and $450,000 per seat, according to People.

To make matters worse, there are currently a number of female astronauts — even some from Blue Origin trips — who are in space or have recently returned from a mission.

At the same time, actress Olivia Wilde took to her Instagram page to mock the trip with a picture of singer Perry kissing the ground upon her return, despite the flight taking only 11 minutes.

"Billion dollars bought some good memes I guess," Wilde wrote.

The self-driving rocket took the celebrities 62 miles above Earth to what is called the Karman line, known internationally as the official boundary of space. The crew experienced approximately four minutes of weightlessness.

Sanchez said that the crew members were going to go up to space to "spread what they felt in different ways."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Why The Girlboss Space Launch Was A Giant Step Back For Womankind

This supposed great boon for feminism was actually a bust.