How space travel became right-wing



Over the weekend, Elon Musk’s SpaceX launched its Starship with a Super Heavy rocket and successfully recovered the rocket’s first stage during an unmanned test flight. In a remarkable display of engineering, the first stage made a controlled descent to Earth and was secured back onto its launch platform by a mechanical arm. This achievement should have been an inspiring moment for all Americans. But many leftists took to social media to express outrage that a Trump supporter was responsible for the historic event.

As Republican vice presidential candidate JD Vance praised the technological triumph, commentators made bewildering statements, wondering how the dream of space travel had become culturally associated with Republicans. So-called progressives have built their political strategy around demonizing the very elements that make scientific progress possible. Now, they are shocked to find their opponents seen as champions of a brighter future.

Those who are willing to sacrifice and persevere will ultimately reach for the stars, escaping the stifling, suffocating, and resentful grip of leftism to realize their dreams.

When I was young, space exploration was viewed as an inevitable part of the near future. The United States had won the space race in the 1960s, and while astronauts had not landed on a celestial body for over a decade, shuttle missions were common. We were landing remote rovers on Mars, and most of us assumed that manned missions to the red planet were well within reach.

The dream of exploring the stars was also politically bipartisan. Republicans embraced the patriotism and pride attached to the achievement, while Democrats saw it as a step toward their “Star Trek”-inspired vision of a post-scarcity utopia.

As the United States solidified its position as the only global superpower, ironically, the drive to prove dominance through space exploration waned. NASA’s achievements became less impressive, and the agency clearly oversold many of its projections. Republicans began viewing the program as a bloated government expense in need of budget cuts, while Democrats saw an opportunity to redirect funding to their supporters here on Earth. NASA limped along with fewer launches and delayed major projects, and while science fiction remained part of popular culture, the idea of real-world space travel seemed to fade farther into the background.

Regardless of how one feels about Elon Musk, it’s hard not to see echoes of Ayn Rand’s “man of industry” in his struggle against a system that tries to keep him tethered to Earth. SpaceX has certainly benefited from government contracts, but it has also fought off stifling regulations and lawsuits while achieving something the government seemed incapable of. The leftists' outcry that SpaceX should be nationalized now that it has proven successful outside government control highlights the parasitic nature of the progressive regime they’ve created.

Musk may not fit the mold of a typical conservative, and it’s doubtful he ever sought to become a political figure, but his ambition is undeniable. He and many other leaders and entrepreneurs have realized that the dominant leftist regime will make their grand visions impossible. Progressives have embraced a politics driven by graft and spite. Their policies punish success and innovation while fostering a culture of envy and entitlement. Ambition is now labeled as dangerous, and prosperity is seen as something to be collectively plundered for political gain.

Democrats have transformed universities into centers of woke indoctrination, rejecting merit in favor of racial and sexual biases that favor their client classes. What began as an infection in the softer fields of the humanities has now spread to the hard sciences. Woke ideology has branded critical aspects of the scientific method as cultural imperialism and turned math into a symbol of white supremacy. Valuing the written word, prioritizing punctuality, emphasizing efficiency, and striving for perfection — traits essential to launching humans into space — are now labeled as forms of colonial oppression.

While I’ve always been a fan of science fiction and fascinated by space travel, I never fully grasped its significance as a social ambition. Earth is rife with unsolved problems, so why not focus our efforts here?

I’ve come to understand the role that boldness and greatness play in the health of a civilization. Western man, or “Faustian man,” as Oswald Spengler described him, has a deep need to discover and expand. In many ways, the United States was forged by its expansion and taming of the frontier. Without a new frontier to explore, Western societies seem to turn inward and consume themselves. Space, as the final frontier, calls us to greatness.

In the end, progressives are right about one thing: Their relentless attacks on merit, ambition, and achievement have made space exploration a domain of the right. Leftist ideology cannot tolerate the concept of great individuals or natural hierarchies, which is why it fails to reach for the achievements those people make possible.

We are all equal in value before God, but we are not equal in our abilities or accomplishments. Those who strive for greatness must embody the very traits Democrats have demonized. It is those who are willing to sacrifice and persevere who will ultimately reach for the stars, escaping the stifling, suffocating, and resentful grip of leftism to realize their dreams.

Elon Musk's Starship is ready for Mars, but who will ensure it’s a planet for humans?



In a recent post at X, Elon Musk issued a dire warning. Starship, the biggest vehicle in the SpaceX fleet, “will make life multiplanetary,” he wrote, “preserving life ... from extinction events on Earth, so long as it is not smothered by bureaucracy.”

“There is more government regulatory smothering every year. If this continues, all large projects in the United States will be illegal,” he wrote, pointing to California’s cursed high-speed rail boondoggle as a typical cautionary tale.

“The Department of Government Efficiency is the only path to extending life beyond Earth,” he concluded, referencing the would-be agency (bearing the not-so-coincidental acronym DOGE) Musk himself would lead in a second Trump administration with a mandate to slash Washington’s Borg-like mass of managers and bureaucrats.

It wouldn’t be the first time the road to hell was paved with good intentions. The more potent the tools, the more grandiose the intentions; and the more prideful they are, the harder they fall.

Musk’s message is a bright spot for many in an increasingly grim era. Today’s bureaucrats aren’t just stifling the major infrastructure and transportation projects that were the hallmark of America’s postwar golden age. They’re pinching off the lifeblood of American culture and commerce in a broader sense: enforcing speech codes, degrading and decreasing the food supply, inflating away savings, eroding the rule of law, and tightening the noose of social and financial surveillance. They’re becoming the only branch of government with the power to eclipse all the others.

Against the agenda to destroy family formation, childbirth, land ownership, home ownership, and physical and mental health, Musk has distinguished himself as conspicuously pro-natalist, pro-growth, and pro-freedom — all elements of what we’re led to imagine life on Mars would be like if Starship indeed starts ferrying pioneers to the Red Planet.

But with increasingly dystopian technology spreading far and wide and a huge share of technologists actively working toward building ultra-intelligent machines and planetary computers, it would be nice if an American rose to prominence with a clarion call to ensure that, if life is to spread beyond Earth, human life is not swiftly left behind and replaced by the kind of cyborg collective that epitomized villainy in the "Star Trek" universe, the kind that our home-world bureaucrats are themselves becoming.

It’s all too easy to see how the wide-eyed wonder coming out of many leading futurists about opening the stars to the light of consciousness could lead to Mars becoming ground zero for communist colonies of people who want nothing more than to merge with each other and their supersmart machines — not just mega-computers underground but drone swarms, nanobots, virtual demigods, and on and on. Our technologically hybrid age, wherein leading visionaries hope to fuse the worship of human imagination with that of machine memory into a universal New Age religion, has put Americans at shocking risk of being mutated into a hyper-powered version of the USSR’s “New Soviet Man” ideal — a posthuman superbeing at once master of, and servant of, his machines.

There’s also the "oops" factor to contend with. Mars colonists might show up devoted in theory to adding more red-blooded humans to the universe only to discover over time that they wound up naively or foolishly doing things that led to the conquest of the planet by intelligences unfriendly or disrespectful toward the continued dominance — or even existence — of “merely” human beings that are born, live, and die in the manner given to us from the beginning. It wouldn’t be the first time the road to hell was paved with good intentions. The more potent the tools, the more grandiose the intentions; and the more prideful they are, the harder they fall.

Some would argue that today's situation is so bad on Earth or in America that we have to blast out of the grip of the bureaucrats and figure the rest out later. Perhaps this is true, or at least understandable, even if debatable or simply wrong. But if so, while some of us are hard at work on the blasting, others really must concentrate on the lasting — bearing witness to the precious and sacred character of our given human being, and warning, in proper prophetic tradition, that the swiftest and surest way to lose that character is by turning our face from God.

NASA's DEI training under fire for linking 'objectivity' and 'individualism' to white supremacy



A diversity, equity, and inclusion training video posted online allegedly showed a NASA engineer expressing guilt over not being equally welcoming to all races.

The video begins with the supposed engineer discussing her desire to "create spaces where people can be all they want to be."

The woman then said she regretted not making her projects as inclusive as possible.

'All of these things can really limit the way we go about doing our work.'

"And in doing this work of examining my own intentions and my own actions and their impact, I can see that there's so much more that I could have done to make the projects I've led equally welcoming to black, indigenous, and people of color as the white people they have engaged."

"I feel a lot of shame and regret about that," the woman continued. "So I'm looking forward to today's event and to this whole series as steps in my personal and professional journey to make my work more anti-racist and therefore more effective in reaching my aspiration," she added.

The video then cuts to a slide in a lesson plan with the heading "white supremacy culture," which focuses on words and phrases such as "fear of open conflict," "objectivity," and even "individualism."

A person leading the discussion is heard saying how these terms are more important to white people and, as such, are a product of white supremacy.

"All of these things can really limit the way we go about doing our work, and they can really limit the way we are able to connect with communities that come from different cultural backgrounds that don't value these things the same way that white supremacy culture values them."

The date of the unearthed video, posted by Tenet Media, is unknown but reflects other lesson plans revealed by the Wall Street Journal in 2022.

The outlet pointed to NASA training regarding "allyship," which described the term "African American" as making black people feel excluded as if the word meant "other."

The lesson plan went on to claim that being "colorblind and gender-neutral" is limiting.

"Over the years, we have been taught to act as if we are colorblind and gender-neutral and that no differences exist between people. But these efforts actually limit us," the lesson claimed.

The slideshows were pointed out by an X user, who noted one of the training modules included a 45-minute session (requiring 50% attendance) regarding "unconscious bias & micro-messages" and "equity & privilege."

NASA is entrenched in some of the most extensive diversity training of any government entity. Each sector of NASA seems to have its own DEI mission statement on top of an exhausting amount of planning and resources.

NASA's Astrophysics Science Division, for example, published a breakdown of its demographics in 2022 to promote equity and inclusion.

The results showed that the majority of the division is still male (64%) and white (54.1%). The second-highest demographic is actually "foreign national" at 12.2%, while "Asian" was third-highest with 10.2% representation.

The space agency's dedication to diversity has, of course, not helped its latest mission on the Boeing spacecraft known as the Starliner. The vessel has been in space for about 12 weeks after what was supposed to be an eight-day mission.

After weeks of delaying announcements about how crew members might return home, NASA finally admitted that it will rely on SpaceX's Crew Dragon to bring them home no earlier than February 2025.

While crew members learned they would be spending at least an extra nine months in space, Boeing announced that its Starliner spacecraft would be returning to Earth in an uncrewed mission.

— (@)

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

A timeline of Trump's and Elon Musk's relationship



Many of the same people who hate Donald Trump also hate Elon Musk, who has himself allegedly faced threats to his life, writing, “Two people (separate occasions) have already tried to kill me in the past 8 months. They were arrested with guns about 20 mins drive from Tesla HQ in Texas.”

The relationship between Trump and Musk has been a complicated one. There are many facets to it: two political players willing to depart from the status quo, two rebellious cultural icons railing against liberal hegemony, two business moguls in charge of competing social media platforms, two wild men who angered the establishment, with a bull's-eye on their heads from the corporate media.

We were roughly an inch away from a hellish dystopia, unlike anything ever predicted. A successful assassination would have decisively ended American cohesion, the limits of what our nation can endure.

A brief timeline

In the days before the 2016 presidential election, Musk told CNBC, “I feel a bit stronger that [Trump] is not the right guy. He doesn’t seem to have the sort of character that reflects well on the United States.”

That December, Musk joined a Presidential Advisory Forum, where he offered advice about an array of political issues. His tone was markedly centrist.

— (@)

Musk still wasn’t political at that point.

The hatred of Trump grew and grew, especially among Hollywood elites. In May 2017, Kathy Griffin posed with a mock version of Donald Trump’s severed head.

In June 2017, following Trump’s announcement about withdrawing from the Paris agreement on climate change, Musk left the Presidential Advisory position.

— (@)

The media’s hostility toward Trump grew increasingly more violent in tone, like Paul Krugman's proclamation that “Donald Trump Is Trying to Kill You.”

Then came 2020. In January of that year, before life spun into utter chaos, Trump gave an interview to CNBC. In it, he praised Musk, calling him “one of our great geniuses," on the level of Thomas Edison. Then COVID hit. And that May, Trump came to Musk’s defense in a dispute about Tesla factory closures.

— (@)

Then: January 6, 2021.

Over the next year, the relationship again soured, with Trump announcing that he would launch a Twitter alternative.

In February 2022, Trump made his first post on Truth Social. That April, Musk said, “Truth Social (terrible name) exists because Twitter censored free speech,” adding that the platform should instead be called “Trumpet.”

In May, Musk floated the possibility of reinstating Trump’s Twitter account, describing the ban as a "morally bad decision" that was "foolish to the extreme.”

— (@)

At a rally in Anchorage, Alaska, in July 2022, Trump called Elon a “bulls**t artist” and questioned his ability to buy Twitter.

In response to a tweet from Breitbart News, Musk said that “it’s time for Trump to hang up his hat & sail into the sunset.”

About two months later, Musk bought Twitter for $44 billion. Trump said that he was “very happy” to see Musk at the helm of Twitter, adding that the company was now in “sane hands.”

In June 2022, Musk told Bloomberg that he was still undecided. Shortly after, he cozied up to Ron DeSantis.

August 8: the Mar-a-Lago raid. Then, in November 2022, X reinstated Trump’s Twitter account after nearly two years of suspension.

In May 2023, DeSantis finally announced his presidential bid, on Musk’s platform, as what was quickly labeled the Twitter Spaces meltdown.

The relationship has thawed markedly in the last year. In March 2024, Musk flew to Florida for a meeting with Trump, possibly concerning a contribution from the Space X founder.

In May, the Wall Street Journal described Trump's and Musk’s “growing alliance.” Around the same time, CNN announced that Musk has been getting “Trumpier.” The outlet's incredibly cynical take is that Musk is in need of a challenge, namely the accumulation of “political capital commensurate with his extravagant wealth.”

News also spread that Musk was floating an advisory role to Trump if he were to win. And, as CNN, whined, "Musk has made supporting right-wing causes — and extremism, in some situations — increasingly central to his identity.” Check out CNN's proof:

He has vocally opposed Covid-19 lockdowns and embraced anti-vaccine ideology. He has elevated conservative speech on X, the platform formerly known as Twitter that he purchased in 2022. And he has pushed racist conspiracy theories about immigration.

Musk has also obsessed over the “woke mind virus,” a term used by some conservatives to describe progressive causes. And he has explicitly called for Republican victories at the ballot box, warning of the country’s impending “doom” if a “red wave” does not materialize in November.

Following the conviction of Trump on 34 felony counts , Elon remarked that “great damage was done today to the public’s faith in the American legal system.” He added, “If a former President can be criminally convicted over such a trivial matter – motivated by politics, rather than justice – then anyone is at risk of a similar fate.”

Iron man

Then, on July 13, at a rally near Butler, Pennsylvania, a gunman fired eight rounds at Trump, barely missing a head shot.

We were roughly an inch away from a hellish dystopia, unlike anything ever predicted. A successful assassination would have decisively ended American cohesion, the limits of what our nation can endure.

Musk posted that picture, one of the greatest images ever captured, with his announcement on X, “I fully endorse President Trump and hope for his rapid recovery.” It became the most iconic tweet of the historic event. Later, Musk added: “Last time America had a candidate this tough was Theodore Roosevelt.”

The day before the rally, Musk made a hefty donation to the pro-Trump America PAC. Musk has decided to join Trump and a growing counter-elite. It’s impossible to know how this will shake out, but it’s clear that Musk has put his fortune and future in danger by breaking with Washington and Silicon Valley elites to chart his own path. Judging by past experience, it’s a mistake to bet against him.

Watch: Disaster strikes as Chinese space rocket aimed at rivaling Musk's Space X explodes into mountain after accidental launch



Viral video caught the moment that a Chinese space rocket crashed into a mountain shortly after an accidental launch on Sunday.

The Tianlong-3 ("Sky Dragon 3") rocket accidentally launched during what was supposed to be a ground test of the vessel's booster.

The two-stage Tianlong-3 is a partly reusable rocket under development by Space Pioneer – a rival of Elon Musk's Space X. The Tianlong-3 rocket is a competitor of SpaceX’s Falcon 9 spacecraft.

During the ground test, the Tianlong-3 space rocket unintentionally detached from the test bench at the launch pad due to a structural failure. The botched launch was intended to be a routine "static fire" of the rocket’s engine with the spacecraft remaining on the launch pad, according to reports.

Dramatic video shows the space rocket launch and then losing power and bending sideways seconds later. The rocket is seen on video falling from the sky in a horizontal motion. The rocket finally crashed back down to Earth and made a huge explosion in a mountain region near the city of Gongyi in central China's Henan Province, less than a mile away from the launch site.

"Due to the structural failure of the connection between the rocket body and the test platform, the first-stage rocket was separated from the launch pad,” Space Pioneer said in a statement. “After liftoff, the onboard computer was automatically shut down, and the rocket fell into the deep mountains 1.5 kilometers [0.9 miles] southwest of the test platform. The rocket body fell into the mountain and disintegrated."

Space Pioneer – a private Chinese business also known as Beijing Tianbing Technology founded in 2019 – reported that there were no injuries or casualties after an initial investigation, according to Reuters.

Space Pioneer noted that parts of the rocket were scattered within a "safe area," but did cause a fire in the area after the spacecraft exploded. The fire has since been extinguished.

Space Pioneer compares the performance of Tianlong-3 to SpaceX's Falcon 9.

The Tianlong-3 rocket stands at 230 feet high, and is capable of carrying up to 17 tons into orbit.

The Tianlong-3's maiden launch mission had been scheduled for July before Sunday’s accident.

Space Pioneer is a space company known for specializing in liquid-propellant rockets.

In April 2023, Space Pioneer successfully launched its Tianlong-2 rocket, making it China's first commercial launch operator to send a liquid carrier rocket into space and successfully enter orbit.

However, this is the second Chinese rocket failure in a week. Just days before the Toanlong-3's explosion, the Long March 2C rocket blew up into pieces shortly after launch and rained down debris on a popular region.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Staring at the sun: The eclipse, technology, and the Final Frontier




Staring at the Eclipse with Joe Pappalardo | Return: Tech by Blaze Media youtu.be

The memes about staring at the eclipse were misguided in their assumption: The temptation to stare at the apocalyptic burn would afflict plenty of us.

"I suspect the damage, the potential from the eclipse is kind of overblown,” he says, smiling a bit. “But now I'm not so sure. I'm still seeing spots."

Joe Pappalardo is undoubtedly my favorite science writer. He’s one of my favorite writers in general. As a magazine writer and contributing editor at Popular Mechanics, with bylines in National Geographic, TIME, Esquire, Texas Monthly, and the Smithsonian Magazine, he has given us a writing style that’s part Hemingway, part Kerouac, and part science-minded philosophy.

Joe has written about B-17 gunners, jungle spaceports, Western shootouts, and sunflowers. His book “Sunflowers: The Secret History” charts sunflowers' complicated, mind-blowing history.

Why is there a spaceport in a remote jungle of French Guiana? How will people die on Mars? How do we preserve the Declaration of Independence? Should we be terrified of drones? What was the Wild West like for lawmen and criminals? What would it be like to follow a solar eclipse in a Concorde jet? How bad are the battle scenes in the Star Wars sequel trilogy? Will there ever be a spiritual element of AI? How would it fully achieve original creation? Why did the CIA employ killer monks? Are North Korean nukes an actual threat? Will the future of space exploration depend on the egos of wealthy Big Tech giants? What roles did sunflowers play when the Nazis invaded the Soviet Union?

These are just some of the topics that Joe Pappalardo knows well.

So, I wanted to chat with him about the solar eclipse.

And, perfectly, this led us into the cosmos, climbing the stars and whatnot.

You can feel the joyful back-and-forth between wonder and doom throughout this interview. How lovely, a tug like this is, between progress and demolition.

The solar eclipse brought people together and created a sense of unity. "There's very few things that really do sort of unite everybody in an event like this."

Joe also describes a generational divide in embracing new ideas and disruptive technologies, with some people resisting change.

He chatted about the unique characteristics of an astronaut and the future of space travel, which may involve more diverse participants and commercial space flights. SpaceX has ambitious plans for the next couple of years, including launching Starship and landing the booster on the same launch pad.

As Giorgio Agamben put it, “Technology is in fact nothing other than a human action directed at a goal.”

His father influenced Joe's interest in space and science. They’re going to a launch at Starbase this week. We’ll check back with them when they finish their journey.

Elon Musk has become the largest shareholder of Twitter after purchasing a 9% stake in the company



Tesla CEO Elon Musk has become the largest individual shareholder of Twitter.

The iconic tech mogul purchased a 9% stake in Twitter, Inc. to become the company's largest shareholder after previously raising questions about the company's adherence and dedication to the principle of free speech.


Free speech is essential to a functioning democracy.\n\nDo you believe Twitter rigorously adheres to this principle?
— Elon Musk (@Elon Musk) 1648193692

Musk purchased 73.5 million shares valued at just under $3 billion, the Associated Press reported.

Musk’s ultimate aim with his newly obtained influence in the company is unclear, but in recent days he acknowledged that he was “giving serious thought” to building his own social media platform.

A regulatory report released after Musk’s purchase of the shares indicated that the billionaire’s investment is long-term and that he was looking to minimize his buying and shelling of shares.

In a note to investors, Dan Ives of Wedbush Securities said that he expects Musk’s considerable — albeit passive — stake in the company to be the first step in Musk acquiring more of the company so that he can exert his influence over it.

He said, “We would expect this passive stake as just the start of broader conversations with the Twitter board/management that could ultimately lead to an active stake and a potential more aggressive ownership role of Twitter.”

Aside from his purported dedication to free speech as a concept, Musk’s interest in Twitter could also be inspired by U.S. securities regulators restricting his ability to freely post his thoughts on Twitter.

In early March, Musk asked a federal judge to nullify a subpoena from SEC regulators and throw out a 2018 agreement that required Musk to have a third party prescreen his Tweets before posting them.

The Associated Press reported that Musk’s legal team is arguing that the SEC’s subpoena has “no basis in law” and that the SEC has used the court agreement “to trample on Mr. Musk’s First Amendment rights and to impose prior restraints on his speech.”

The SEC responded in a court motion arguing that it has the legal authority to subpoena Tesla and its leadership over Musk’s tweets.

Musk’s recent purchase of Twitter was celebrated among conservative figures online who have been highly critical of Twitter’s manipulative enforcement of its rules regarding speech.

Now that @ElonMusk is Twitter\u2019s largest shareholder, it\u2019s time to lift the political censorship.\n\nOh\u2026 and BRING BACK TRUMP!
— Lauren Boebert (@Lauren Boebert) 1649074221
Elon Musk and like-minded, free speech supporting billionaires buying a controlling stake in Twitter is the only plausible "market-based" solution to censorship on the platform
— Will Chamberlain (@Will Chamberlain) 1649078802


What if @elonmusk bought 9.2% in Twitter not to fix it, but rather to expose the insane ways the algorithm and activist employees have been manipulating us? (Shadowbans, de-bosting, reading our DM\u2019s, etc.)\n\nMaybe he can find out who at Twitter censored the Hunter Biden story?
— Dave Rubin (@Dave Rubin) 1649074298

Twitter’s stock surged by 20% before the market opened on Monday as news of Musk’s acquisition broke.

Musk’s venture into social media comes as Truth Social, a social media outlet created and pushed by former President Donald Trump, saw the exodus of its joint chiefs of technology and product development, per CNBC.