Flipping cars for ‘justice’ — then back to poli-sci class



Some images linger like bad philosophy. One such image: a masked individual standing triumphantly on a vandalized car, waving a giant Mexican flag, at a protest against mass deportations. It’s not a political cartoon. It’s the radical left’s icon. And it perfectly captures the confused moral universe behind the Los Angeles riots and the so-called “indigenous land” movement.

— (@)

As a professor at a secular university, I can assure you this isn’t fringe lunacy. It’s the tip of the philosophical iceberg. Beneath that smoldering car is a massive ideological structure that has been meticulously constructed over decades — paid for, ironically, by federal and state tax dollars.

These rioters don’t actually want to return the land. They want the luxury of moral superiority minus the inconvenience of coherent thought.

If it were possible, I’d love to survey the people flipping cars and heaving concrete blocks at police cruisers. I strongly suspect many of the ringleaders hold degrees in the liberal arts — more specifically, degrees in identity activism. You know the type: gender studies, black studies, Latinx studies, queer theory, or some intersectional combination thereof.

Don’t worry — they went to college

If you visit the department websites of these programs at any given university, you’ll often find “activist” listed as the No. 1 career path. No need to wonder what you can do with a $120,000 degree — you can become the ideological arsonist who trains the next generation to believe the United States is irredeemably Christian, unjust, and colonial — and maybe even get in some looting of the capitalist luxury stores.

So when you see a rioter in Los Angeles shouting on CNN about how the land was “stolen from Mexico,” just know: That’s the university curriculum talking. In one now-viral clip, a young woman (yes, I just assumed her gender) yells at a police officer, “As long as you feel OK with capitalism, racist, imperialist state.” Asked if she even knows what she’s saying, her reply is priceless: “Yes, b***h, I'm in college.”

Exactly.

These students have never been taught about the establishment of land ownership in world history or even the basic historical facts of the American Southwest. They don’t know that Mexico owned it for only 27 years, yet they think it is their ancestral homeland. If anything, Spain should be in the mix, asking for it back from Mexico.

And remember: We’re all paying for that education through state funding — drawn from taxes paid by ... wait for it ... capitalists. No gratitude. No irony. Just tuition-funded tantrums.

RELATED: The lie that launched a thousand riots

Carlin Stiehl / Los Angeles Times via Getty Images

A modest glance at history will remind you that the United States conquered large parts of Mexico in 1848. But here’s the twist: The U.S. didn’t just grab the land and walk away whistling. No, it gave back a substantial portion, paid Mexico $15 million (a princely sum at the time) for the remaining territory — including what is now California — and forgave the Mexican government’s outstanding debts.

But the student activists aren’t interested in political history. And they don’t really want to live in Mexico. Even if they did, Mexico's immigration laws are strict, its economy is difficult, and it most certainly doesn’t tolerate foreigners burning down public property in the name of “revolution against the government.”

Marxism underwritten by capitalists

These rioters don't actually want to return the land. They want the luxury of moral superiority minus the inconvenience of coherent thought. They want their air conditioning, DoorDash, TikTok, and virtue signaling ... on stolen land. Any one of them could sell the assets they acquired within the capitalist system and donate the proceeds to an indigenous cause. But they want to make other people do this with their money.

At their campus protests and university-sponsored events, they perform ritualized “land acknowledgments,” reciting that their college stands on “unceded indigenous territory,” as if confessing to a metaphysical sin. But the penance never includes selling their house and giving it to a tribe. And why?

Because the first tribes are lost to history — conquered by later tribes, who were themselves conquered, until eventually the Spanish brought law and order to warring tribes. The cycle of conquest is not new; it is one of the oldest stories in human civilization. What’s different now is the selective outrage.

Here lies the real problem: Modern activist ideology seeks to appeal to justice but lacks a standard by which to define it. This is why all of this activist nonsense we are paying gender studies professors to teach is so empty. It appeals to justice without any standard by which to adjudicate the question.

If the land was stolen, then: Who stole it? From whom? And what court now has jurisdiction?

Even if you could answer the first two — and in most cases, you can’t — the third is impossible under their belief system. If you begin playing “we were here firsties,” you have to go all the way back.

Theirs is a godless appeal to justice, and godless justice is just another word for mob rule. It is ultimately just mob rule stirred up by malcontents to motivate masses of discontents — which is why they are simply called Marxists. Not because they’ve read “Das Kapital” but because they’re looking for a framework that legitimizes their rage and offers power without accountability. And in Marx, they find a convenient excuse to tear down everything that came before — especially anything remotely Christian.

All of their disappointment in life is aimed at the outward object called “the United States.” No reflection on their own condition — just rage against the machine.

God has the last word

But for those who believe that God is the final judge, the phrase "Let God judge between us” is not a cliché. It’s a fearful thing. It means a moral order lies beyond human manipulation. It means that even if we don’t see civil justice now, true justice is ontological, everlasting, and inescapable.

Marxist rioters cannot make this appeal. They live in a world of only immanent causes and material grievances. No final judge and no moral standard above power awaits to hold their actions accountable — therefore, no peace. They rage because they must. Their rage is at existence itself. And when they finish one protest, they must invent another. Their revolution has no eschaton — only exhaustion.

So they flip over cars and set fires. Some loot — not just because they're angry at injustice or need a new pair of shoes, but because they have no vision of the good, only a fixation on the bad. And in seeking a purely material form of justice, they have lost their souls.

They complained about the one who supposedly stole land while forgetting about the one who can cast their soul into hell. The prospect of God’s justice should make all of us repent.

It is time to stop funding this madness. It is time to restore an education grounded in truth — not truth as a tool of power but truth that judges us all.

Until then, don’t be surprised when your car is flipped by someone with a $100,000 degree in “decolonial eco-poetics.” And don’t be shocked when they scream “justice!” without the ability to define what it is.

After all, they went to college.

Democratic Rep. Cori Bush declares on July 4th that it 'is a great day to demand Reparations Now'



Democratic Rep. Cori Bush of Missouri declared on Independence Day that it was a great time to call for reparations.

"The Declaration of Independence was written by enslavers and didn't recognize Black people as human. Today is a great day to demand Reparations Now," Bush tweeted on Tuesday.

Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton responded to the left-wing lawmaker's tweet by calling her an "anti-American extremist."

— (@)

"Ma'am, if you hate America so much - why don't you just leave? You are FREE to do so. And Delta is ready when you are," conservative radio host Todd Starnes tweeted.

Bush and other reparations advocates have pushed the "Reparations Now Resolution," which, among other elements, declares that the House "recognizes the responsibility of the Federal Government to provide reparations, in all necessary forms, including financial compensation, to rectify ongoing harms resulting from violations, by the Federal Government, of Black people’s human right to self-determination and freedom from discrimination, including with respect to housing, health, education, life, security of person, water and sanitation, and a healthy environment."

Democratic Rep. Jamaal Bowman tweeted on Tuesday, "This July 4th, we must remember that we stand on stolen land toiled by enslaved Africans and recommit ourselves to the fight for freedom, equality, & justice so that these ideals are accessible to everyone, not just a privileged few. We are not free until everyone is truly free."

Republican Sen. Marco Rubio of Florida claimed that those who view the country as an evil entity constructed on stolen land, and who take issue with the American flag, patriotic songs, and USA chants, are "nuts."

"Today we have many influential people who see America as an evil nation built on stolen land & who are offended by our [flag], patriotic songs & chants of USA," Rubio tweeted. "Please make sure your kids understand that those people may be rich,famous or have fancy degrees but they also happen to be nuts."

— (@)

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Episcopal church gives 'voluntary' reparations to Wisconsin indigenous tribes for stolen land: 'This is something we owe'



An Episcopal church in Wisconsin has paid a "voluntary tax" to Native American tribes in the state as part of a larger "land acknowledgement" movement within the greater Episcopal Church.

St. Dunstan's Episcopal Church in Madison, Wisconsin, has begun adding what it calls a "voluntary tax" to its annual budget in order to repatriate local indigenous tribes for the lands which the church now owns.

According to historical research conducted by members of the church, the land on which the church sits was once owned by the Ho-Chunk tribe. A statement posted on the church website claims that, through war, speculation, federal government seizure, and ultimately, private purchase, the church's lands were stolen from the Ho-Chunk people and that the Ho-Chunk were then "largely exterminated or pushed westwards" as a result.

In order to make amends for the stolen land, the church has added the tax, which has already yielded between $3,000 and $4,000 for the Wisconsin Inter-Tribal Repatriations Committee. According to reports, the donated amount represents 1% of the church's total budget for the year.

"We intentionally put it with our buildings and land expenses, with the other expenses related to owning our property," said the Rev. Miranda Hassett, rector of St. Dunstan’s.

"This isn't an outreach donation," she added, "because we also have outreach stuff in our budget. We have money we give away to organizations that are doing good in the community. This is different from that. This isn't from our charity or generosity. This is something we owe. That was important to me."

Rather than give the money to current members of the Ho-Chunk tribe, the church elected to donate it to the entire indigenous community within the state so that tribal leaders could appropriate the money as they saw fit. Representatives from St. Dunstan's reportedly handed the donation to the Committee in a purple envelope, a color which many Christians believe symbolizes repentance.

Hassett indicated that she hopes her church's donation will inspire other churches to do the same.

"[I]f this church does it, maybe other entities will follow suit," she suggested.

Back in July at its 80th General Convention, the Episcopal Church passed a resolution which encouraged its members to research their history to determine whether their congregation had ever benefitted from the mistreatment of Native Americans through ill-begotten land deals.

The people of St. Dunstan's — who, according to the website, claim to "affirm and celebrate the lives, marriages, and vocations of LGBTQ+ people" and who sometimes list their preferred pronouns on their church name tags — have determined that they have.

"St. Dunstan’s is mindful that we gather to worship on Ho-Chunk land, taken unjustly," the statement concludes. "We don’t know what it looks like to make peace with that history, but we wonder."

Rev. Hassett filmed a short video regarding the history of the St. Dunstan land. It was published on YouTube by the Wisconsin Council of Churches.

View that video below:


Rep. Cori Bush promptly torched after claiming 'black people still aren't free' to celebrate July 4: 'This land is stolen'



Freshman Rep. Cori Bush (D-Mo.), a member of the so-called "Squad" of far-left House Democrats, triggered a tsunami of backlash Sunday when she said Independence Day is not about celebrating freedom for all Americans.

What did Bush say?

According to Bush, America is a "stolen land," black people "aren't free," and when people declare that Independence Day is about celebrating freedom, they mean for white people only.

"When they say that the 4th of July is about American freedom, remember this: the freedom they're referring to is for white people. This land is stolen land and Black people still aren't free," Bush said.

When they say that the 4th of July is about American freedom, remember this: the freedom they're referring to is fo… https://t.co/PxxbUf75u1
— Cori Bush (@CoriBush) 1625413693.0

Bush routinely publicly espouses far-left progressive ideas. Just last month, Bush celebrated the passage of a bill that made Juneteenth a nation holiday by demanding reparations.

What was the reaction?

Bush's remarks drew predictably sharp criticism and prompt rebuke from every corner of the internet.

  • "Singlehandedly, @CoriBush has dishonored every Black person who ever fought for this nation, sprinkled a little Marxism into the mix, and lied about the history of America. Well done, Democrats. Well done," congressional candidate Buzz Patterson said.
  • "I'm black and I'm pretty free, always have been. As far as I can recall neither me nor my father were slaves. So I'll celebrate my freedom and this country that gave it to me," one person responded.
  • "Black people aren't free? Your district hasn't had a white representative in over 50 years. You, a black woman, went from being a nurse to being elected to one of the highest offices in the country. How much more freedom are you looking for?" one person pointed out.
  • "'I'm so oppressed' says the black congresswoman who makes $174,000 a year," one person mocked.
  • "You're an elected member of the United States House of Representatives. You're not only free, you're one of the privileged. Have some self awareness," Washington Examiner editor Jay Caruso said.
  • "If you believe this, the moral thing to do would be to leave for a more virtuous country where black people are free and the land wasn't stolen. Maybe there you'll be able to run for political office," commentator Allie Beth Stuckey said.
  • "How did you get elected in a white nation?" lawyer Harmeet Dhillon questioned.
  • "Call me crazy but I feel like if you weren't free you wouldn't be in congress," another person joked.
  • "America is so awesome even people who aren't free can get elected to the United States Congress! America F— Yeah!" radio host Erick Erickson said.
  • "If you said this in my ancestral country of india you would be torn to shreds, and would never be elected to their highest leglislativr (sic) body. Show some respect for the country that gave u the chance to be a congresswoman," another person said.
  • "Awful take, particularly from an elected official.The freedom this country provides is intended for everyone.That we have fallen far short of this ideal does not invalidate it; it just means we all need to work harder to make it true," one person suggested.

Bush has not yet responded to the criticism.