NYT Attacks Alito A Second Time Over Well-Known American Revolution Flag Flown At Private Residence

The Times continues to attack Alito over flags flown at his home in a blatant attempt to undermine and discredit the Supreme Court justice.

Conservative activist, a private citizen,​ hits back at Dem senators for alleged unconstitutional demands



Conservative judicial activist Leonard Leo spanked two Democratic senators on Tuesday for demanding information related to some of his personal relationships.

What is the background?

Two weeks ago, Sens. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) and Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.) sent Leo a letter requesting itemized lists of:

  • "[A]ll gifts, payments, and items of value exceeding $415 provided" that he provided to any Supreme Court justice or their family member,
  • "[A]ll transportation or lodging provided" that he provided to any Supreme Court justice or their family member, and
  • "[O]f any other instance in which you have lodged or traveled with any Justice of the Supreme Court or a member of the Justice’s family."

They also demanded to know about a 2008 fishing trip to Alaska that Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito attended. Underneath the letter were suggestions that Alito is guilty of ethics violations because he did not disclose the trip.

Alito has fiercely defended himself from those allegations.

How did Leo respond?

Responding through his lawyer, David B. Rivkin Jr., Leo essentially told Durbin and Whitehouse to pound sand.

"While we respect the Committee's oversight role, after reviewing your July 11 Letter, the nature of this investigation, and the circumstances surrounding your interest in Mr. Leo, we believe that your inquiry exceeds the limits placed by the Constitution on the Committee's investigative authority," Rivkin wrote in response on Tuesday.

Specifically, Rivkin asserted that Durbin and Whitehouse are infringing on Leo's First and Fifth Amendment rights.

"By selectively targeting Mr. Leo for investigation on a politically charged basis, while ignoring other potential sources of information on the asserted topic of interest who are similarly situated to Mr. Leo but have different political views that are more consistent with those of the Committee majority, your inquiry appears to be political retaliation against a private citizen in violation of the First Amendment," Rivkin explained.

"For similar reasons, your inquiry cannot be reconciled with the Equal Protection component of the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment," he added.

Rivkin went on to explain the "one-sided" nature of Durbin and Whitehouse's inquiry, noting they are concerned only with alleged ethical violations committed by justices appointed by Republican presidents. Allegations against Democrat-appointed justices, on the other hand, are "ignored," he argued.

What did Durbin and Whitehouse say?

The pair of senators maintained their suggestive allegations that Leo is connected to unethical behavior by Supreme Court justices.

They said, according to The Hill:

Mr. Leo turns up over and over again across a spectrum of questionable behavior: he developed the infamous Federalist Society list of Trump nominees; he was impresario of the Judicial Crisis Network’s anonymously funded ads; he’s in Harlan Crow’s painting of Justice Thomas’s holiday; he accompanied Justice Alito on his billionaire-funded Alaskan fishing adventure; he directed payments to Justice Thomas’ wife, and more.

"The American people are only seeing the tip of a very big iceberg, and the Judiciary Committee has the responsibility to look into it," they added.

To be sure, neither senator has offered proof of any wrongdoing committed by any Supreme Court justice. And, to Rivkin's point, they've said nothing about the court's left-leaning justices.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Democrats want to destroy the Supreme Court by packing it



The Democrats are trying to pack the Supreme Court, and Mark Levin is not amused.

“We have no choice,” he mocks, “we have to pack the Supreme Court. Biden has to issue executive orders like he’s making laws from the Oval Office.”

“We need to get rid of the filibuster rule,” he continues, “so we can ram through whatever we want to in the Senate. Then we have to add Puerto Rico and D.C. as states so we can have four more Democrats, so the Republicans can never win.”

Levin says the Democrats “hate the Constitution” before playing a clip of news anchor Chris Hayes, who doesn’t seem to understand what’s in the Constitution.

“These days,” Hayes begins, “it’s fair to ask who really is in charge in this country, because the momentous loss of the constitutional right to abortion, which has led to state abortion bans across the country –”

Levin cuts him off and ends the video.

“Okay, dummy,” he says, “the 'constitutional right to abortion' is not in the Constitution.”

Levin asks where the “long list of women who can’t get abortions who want or need abortions” are, because if there were a long list of them, networks like MSNBC would be airing it.

“If this is really the problem,” he says, “don’t you think night after night, day after day, that tricks like this and jerk networks like this and others, they would have a conga line of cases, they would put their names on their, on their screen, something like that. But they don’t.”

Levin believes these Constitution-ignorant leftists want to destroy not just the Constitution, but the Supreme Court.

And how do you destroy it?

“Turn it into the Democrat Party Marxist Politburo by packing the court,” he continues. “Well then, what’s the point of having a court?”


Want more from Mark Levin?

To enjoy more of "the Great One" — Mark Levin as you've never seen him before —subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.