Trump immunity case EXPLAINED: Alan Dershowitz's biggest takeaways



Yesterday, in a landmark decision, the Supreme Court determined in a 6-3 ruling that former presidents have broad immunity from prosecution for actions related to the core powers of their office.

This will send Trump’s case back to the lower courts where it will be determined whether or not his January 6 actions were official or unofficial.

How should we interpret this ruling, and what does it mean going forward? Glenn Beck, Stu Burguiere, and Alan Dershowitz discuss the case.

Trump Immunity Case EXPLAINED: Alan Dershowitz's Biggest Takeawaysyoutu.be

“I think it’s a win for the republic,” says Glenn.

Dershowitz agrees and adds that it’s likely a win for Donald Trump too, as “it probably means there won't be a trial before the election.”

However, “I think [the ruling] is going to be hard to implement in practice because everything the president does, he does as president. That's very hard to separate out private acts from public acts,” he explains.

Further, “There is no actual official process to figure out whether these are official acts or not, so this is a maze of legal rulings and challenges,” adds Stu.

And there’s another potential problem.

“It's going to be implemented by the lower courts, and the lower court of the District of Columbia [is] completely biased against Trump,” says Dershowitz, adding that “it may come back to the Supreme Court."

But Glenn has a prediction.

If “President Trump loses this election ... these cases will just disappear,” but “if [Trump] wins this election, they'll fight it tooth and nail, and they'll drag him all the way through.”

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn’s masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis, and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Supreme Court unanimously SHAMES leftists with Trump 14th Amendment ruling



Democrats and the mainstream media have spent the last few months trying to convince the American people that Colorado has every right to kick former president Donald Trump off the 2024 ballot.

But the Supreme Court isn’t having it.

The Court ruled 9-0 that Colorado can’t use Article 3 of the 14th Amendment to remove Trump from the ballot.

Glenn Beck and Stu Burguiere are pleased but note that the court may still have left Democrats an option.

“The only way this can be implemented is by legislation of Congress,” Stu explains. “They kind of leave it open as to what federal powers could be utilized there.”

In order to get Trump off the ballot, Congress would have to pass a law saying that he engaged in an insurrection and therefore should be removed.

“You can’t do that right now because the House belongs to the Republicans,” Glenn says, adding, “I wouldn’t rule anything out. A dog-faced alien could come down and take over the White House on January 7 and I would be like, 'Well, didn’t see it coming, but mhm, makes sense.'”

According to Stu, the Democrats have even more options.

“Let’s just say Donald Trump wins the presidential election and the Democrats hold the Senate and turn over the House. That new Congress takes seat on January 3, you’ll note a couple days before January 6,” Stu explains.

“And then, all they have to do is vote and say he was an agent of insurrection and therefore cannot be president of the United States,” Glenn agrees.


Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn’s masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis, and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

How the Supreme Court’s presidential immunity decision could change everything



Donald Trump is currently embroiled in four different criminal cases, one of which involves the question of presidential immunity.

On Wednesday this week, the Supreme Court agreed to hear Trump’s case regarding whether or not he has presidential immunity when it comes to his alleged efforts to overturn the 2020 election.

“I think this is good news,” says Glenn Beck. “Can Donald Trump be held now in a criminal case for his acts as president? The answer has always been no.”

“That should have been stopped by Congress or the Supreme Court … as an official act,” he explains.

According to Glenn, if the justices rule that a president can do “an official act and then be held in criminal court,” it will allow opponents “to prosecute any president that's running a second term.”

Further, such a ruling would “completely gut our president.”

The sitting president has full immunity as the chief executive, but in order to be imprisoned, “he would need to be impeached first and then removed from office,” explains Stu Burguiere, adding that this isn’t in the Constitution but has long been the “guideline.”

The SCOTUS hearing is set to take place in April, which at least would “slow down the Jack Smith trial on Donald Trump.”

“I think Donald Trump is in the best position he’s been in since all this started,” says Stu.

To hear more, watch the clip below.


Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn’s masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis, and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

How Democrats could plan their own January 6 'insurrection' if Trump wins



Democrats are notoriously lazier than conservatives, but not when it comes to keeping Donald Trump from becoming president again.

In a report from the Atlantic, Democrats are apparently weighing the option of “coming back with a vengeance” and refusing to certify a Trump win — ironically, on January 6, 2025.

“Isn’t that an insurrection?” Pat Gray asks. "Isn’t that what we’ve decided?”

“If there’s no law in Georgia, there’s no law in New York, no law in D.C., and they decide on January 6 to ‘come back with a vengeance’ — you know there will be demonstrations all over, and then they overturn the election,” Glenn Beck says, disturbed.

However, while the legal attacks on Trump have been relentless and from every angle, Stu Burguiere thinks it can actually affect the former president positively.

“I think it’s going to be cemented that a lot of this was just crazy political attacks, and that’s what Trump politically needs to convince people of, he needs to be able to get people over that line and think, ‘This actually was unfair,’” he explains.

Glenn agrees, especially considering the result lawsuits have had on other politicians.

“I’ve heard since Bill Clinton, that when you persecute somebody like this, and you’re unfair, and you use the court system to go after them, what happens with the black population, Pat?” he says.

“They’re sensitive to it,” Pat says, before Glenn agrees, “And they will rally around that person.”

To hear more, watch the clip below.


Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn’s masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis, and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Why the Supreme Court should STAY OUT of the Trump/January 6 debate



The effort to put Donald Trump behind bars is relentless — or as Mark Levin says, “Grotesque.”

And it’s only escalating.

The Supreme Court has now announced that it will hear an appeal that could have a big effect on the January 6-related case against him. But while this case has to do with charges of obstruction of an official proceeding, there’s another case that the Supreme Court could hear.

Special counsel Jack Smith is demanding the Supreme Court rule on Trump’s claim of executive immunity as soon as possible.

“These dimwits, they say, ‘Okay, we’ll consider your argument. Trumps’ lawyers, you have one week to respond, go,’” Levin tells Glenn Beck angrily.

“This guy, Jack Smith, the courts are bending over backwards to accommodate this guy. He wins every single motion, Trump loses every single motion in front of this radical Obama judge,” he continues.

One of Levin’s bigger concerns regarding the Supreme Court is John Roberts, who he says is a “huge problem.”

“John Roberts is like this guy Michael Luttig. They hate Trump. They’re Republicans, but you know, they’re proper Republicans. They don’t like the tweeting, you know? They don’t like the language,” Levin explains.

At the end of the day, Levin does not believe the Supreme Court should involve itself.

“The Supreme Court should not take this case up,” Levin says definitively. “They sure as hell don’t speak for 80 million people. And so the judiciary, I would argue, is doing severe damage to this country allowing incredible interference in this election process.”

John Roberts isn’t the only one on the Supreme Court Levin is worried about.

“You really have three tremendous constitutionalists, then you’ve got a couple of RINOs, and then we got the hardcore-left Democrats,” Levin tells Glenn.

At the end of the day, all the cases brought against Trump are being brought for a very specific reason.

“The problem with all this is this lower court judge and this prosecutor all know that they’re setting Donald Trump up for a conviction. So when he runs for office as president in the general election, the media and everyone else will keep calling him a convicted felon,” Levin says.


Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn’s masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis, and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.