'SNL' openly mocks gay surrogacy — what is happening?



Over the past decade, the once universally loved “Saturday Night Live” has become a clear propaganda tool of the left — consistently pushing left-wing issues while poking fun at the right.

However, that may be changing after one April 12 "SNL" skit shockingly mocked gay surrogacy.

The sketch took place at a chaotic dinner party where guests shared bizarre personal updates. One gay couple at the dinner party had a newborn baby, and the other guests then begin asking questions as to where and how they acquired a baby — even asking if they stole it.


The skit took it so far as to ask the gay couple how just the other night they were going to a gay rave called “Bulge Dungeon” when there was a baby on the way.

“There are two different ways to see this,” Allie Beth Stuckey of “Relatable” says. “Either you can see it as using comedy to normalize two men purchasing a baby, or you can see it as a big vibe shift that we are actually starting to mock and deride something that deserves our mockery and derision.”

“Because it is a legitimate question. How could two men, who do not have the genetic material nor the wombs to create and bear children, have a child?” Stuckey asks.

While Stuckey is skeptical that the skit was pointing out the gay couple’s purchase of a baby as a bad thing, she did think one line from the skit was a home run.

“That line about ‘last night you were talking about going to Bulge Dungeon and now you have a baby and we’re just wondering how to square that circle,’ that was a good one. That was the best line, because if you see a lot of these men who are purchasing children, you do have some questions, like, ‘Do you know the first thing about raising a child?’” Stuckey says.

“And so I appreciate that whatever the motive is, that we are in the mode right now of mocking something that is absolutely depraved and destructive,” she adds.

Want more from Allie Beth Stuckey?

To enjoy more of Allie’s upbeat and in-depth coverage of culture, news, and theology from a Christian, conservative perspective, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

'SNL' Mocks Gay Surrogacy. What Is Happening?! | Ep 1172
play icon

'SNL' Mocks Gay Surrogacy. What Is Happening?! | Ep 1172

Egg ‘donation’ centers prey on young women — and don’t disclose the dangers



If you’re a young woman who’s in a bit of a financial pinch, becoming an egg donor might seem like an easy, painless way to make some fast cash.

But the emotional and physical cost is much more than what these egg donation centers let on — so much so that the executive director of the Center for Bioethics, Kallie Fell, thinks these young women desperately need to steer clear.

“You have to start with thinking about what kinds of women are targeted to become egg sellers,” Fell tells Allie Beth Stuckey on “Relatable.” “These women are young, typically between 20 and 30 because those are our fertile years, that’s when we’re healthiest, our eggs are healthiest, our egg quality and quantity are the best,” Fell explains, calling the advertisements targeting these women “slick.”

“‘Free tanning sessions,’ ‘pay for spring break,’” Fell mimics. “Often, too, the advertisements will list a higher amount than what they’re often given, because a woman might answer an advertisement and say, ‘Oh, I saw an advertisement for X amount.’ But then she might find out that she’s not quite what they’re looking for.”


The women are also targeted for their empathy, as they believe they don’t need their eggs at that moment and would love to help out a family in need.

“Their altruistic intentions are exploited,” Fell says, and Stuckey couldn’t agree more.

“I mean, it sounds like the song ‘Fancy’ by Reba McIntyre. I mean, she’s talking about being a young prostitute because her mom is sending her out to help pay their bills. This is not sex, but it is selling your body for money, sometimes for desperation,” Stuckey says.

“And not just your body,” Fell says, “You’re not just putting your health at risk, but you are in essence, as an egg seller, sperm seller, you are giving away your future child that is your genetic material that will make a future child. And I think that young women don’t always think that through.”

“You are willing to give up your own child to someone else, and you have no idea how that child will be raised,” Stuckey agrees.

However, it’s not just the future of the child or the “slick” advertising targeting young women that bothers Stuckey and Fell — but the fact that the advertising does not include the known health risks to the young women they’re targeting.

“In nowhere on them do they include the known risks or even the statement that we don’t know what the risks are,” Fell explains, noting that she’s been speaking with an “egg seller” who’s trying to file a class-action lawsuit in Canada for the physical harm she experienced.

“She just talks to me about how she called the clinic with pains, complaints of shortness of breath, and other side effects, and instead of talking to a doctor, she talked to a coordinator who just reassured her that it was normal. She never actually saw a physician or a provider of medical care until she was sedated on the table, ready to collect her eggs,” she continues.

“These advertisements are very flowery, they use very cunning and slick language, and once they’re exploited for their eggs, they’re put on high doses of hormones and medications that have long-lasting side effects,” she says.

In a film for the Center of Bioethics and Culture, the stories of these women who were harmed are told — and they face everything from strokes to ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome to losing their own fertility.

“And those are just kind of immediate risks. We don’t know what happens to these women long-term, their risk for cancer later, or their children,” she adds.

Want more from Allie Beth Stuckey?

To enjoy more of Allie’s upbeat and in-depth coverage of culture, news, and theology from a Christian, conservative perspective, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Egg Donation Centers Are Exploiting College Girls & Military Wives | Guest: Kallie Fell | Ep 1171
play icon

Egg Donation Centers Are Exploiting College Girls & Military Wives | Guest: Kallie Fell | Ep 1171

‘The Handmaid’s Tale’ is back — and it’s more delusional than ever



The trailer for the sixth and final season of the left’s favorite show, “The Handmaid’s Tale,” has hit the mainstream — and of course it’s not hiding its true agenda in the slightest.

The show is based on “The Handmaid’s Tale,” a novel by Margaret Atwood, but the novel, which was written in the 1980s, doesn’t blame Christian conservatives for the dystopian setting. Rather, the plot simply involves women who are being forced into being surrogates for wealthier, infertile women.

Atwood herself has said that she was influenced by many different religions, including Islam, for her best-seller.

“Their argument, from what I understand,” Allie Beth Stuckey of “Relatable” says of the left, “is that the religious right, and really all Republicans, because Donald Trump is not the religious right, but they say that he’s co-opted Christianity to try to turn America into this Christian nationalist religious extremist dystopia where we are forced to give birth.”


The reason they believe this is because many Christians on the right are against killing babies in the womb.

However, Stuckey is well aware that their interpretation is delusional, to say the least.

“Something that is really happening in the United States right now is a widespread billion-dollar surrogacy industry that thrives in the United States, which is the Wild West of reproductive technology when it comes to the creation and cryopreservation of embryos, the farming of eggs, the procurement of sperm,” she explains.

“One of the most disturbing aspects of the reproductive industry in the United States is surrogacy,” she continues. “When we’re talking about a surrogate, it is typically the creation of a child using the DNA of two individuals which are complete strangers creating these embryos and then transferring these embryos into a surrogate who is not the biological mother, is not related to the child at all, and this carrier, this surrogate, carries the child until birth.”

“Very often these are premature births because they are high-risk pregnancies. They were not naturally conceived; this baby doesn’t share DNA with the carrier,” she adds.

In many births of babies carried by a surrogate, they take the baby away immediately to ensure that the baby doesn’t bond with the mother, who was the only home the baby has known for the first nine months.

“They’ve just gone through something really big, really dramatic, really traumatic, and they need that bond. But in surrogacy situations, that skin-to-skin opportunity is taken away, that bonding experience necessary for the health of the child is taken away to prevent that bond,” Stuckey explains.

And it gets worse. In a 2023 study from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System, it was found that between 2014 and 2020, 32% of surrogacy pregnancies by American women were for buyers outside the United States. 42% of those buyers were men of Asian descent.

“We already know there’s an organ-harvesting black market that exists. We know that child sex trafficking exists. And surrogacy plays a part in all of that. Yet most people won’t say anything about this because they are scared of being called homophobic, because they know it is very often men using these services,” Stuckey says.

“This is ‘The Handmaid’s Tale,’” she adds.

Want more from Allie Beth Stuckey?

To enjoy more of Allie’s upbeat and in-depth coverage of culture, news, and theology from a Christian, conservative perspective, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Slaves on human egg farms: Why IVF and human trafficking go hand in hand



While IVF has been sold as a way to help couples simply struggling with fertility issues, the artificial process has proven to be a slippery, increasingly dystopian slope.

“According to the Daily Mail, around 100 women have been kept as slaves on a human egg farm located in the Eastern European country of Georgia, run by a Chinese criminal organization,” Allie Beth Stuckey of “Relatable” tells Katy Faust, author and founder of the children’s rights organization Them Before Us.

“These eggs are being sold all across the world. These women are being pumped with drugs, being strapped down, their eggs extracted — I’m sure without anesthesia — that’s a very painful process, and their eggs are being sold to willing buyers, probably at a pretty low price,” Stuckey continues.

“That is literally happening. That’s not a conspiracy theory,” she adds.


Faust notes that one of the women had to pay a certain amount to leave the farm, and when she was able to leave, she reported it for prostitution.

“What do we expect, right? When you want to make a lab-made baby, you need three things. You need sperm, you need egg, and you need womb. Sperm is very easy to get to, easy to access, that’s why it tends to be much more affordable. Eggs are much harder to get to. Women typically release one a month,” Faust says.

“So if you want to purchase a batch of eggs, women have to go through these medically risky processes of injecting themselves with hormones and then hyper-stimulating their ovaries and then laparoscopically extracting them,” she continues.

“And that is why human eggs are, by weight, one of the most expensive commodities on the planet. It’s very, very, hard to get to. And then the third part is the womb, and that is actually harder to get to,” she adds.

That’s why surrogacy and trafficking go hand in hand.

“There’s a high demand for wombs. Not as many people want to offer their wombs, and so you do have women that are being captured, coerced, trafficked into being surrogates or illegal surrogacy rings being run out of Cambodia, so that they can feed what is often a huge demand in China,” Faust says.

“There’s a huge demand for these specific female aspects of reproduction, and it stuns me because it’s like everything that women have to offer, every part of their body that is so special and distinct from men, there’s a market for that,” she adds.

Want more from Allie Beth Stuckey?

To enjoy more of Allie’s upbeat and in-depth coverage of culture, news, and theology from a Christian, conservative perspective, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

IVF Won’t MAGA

A giant government handout to an unaccountable and often evil industry is not the way to make America great again.

'Purposely created to be fatherless'? Elon Musk and Ashley St. Clair's 'love' child



Conservative influencer Ashley St. Clair dropped a serious bombshell on Valentine's Day, announcing on X that five months ago, she gave birth to Elon Musk’s baby.

In her post, St. Clair wrote, "Five months ago, I welcomed a new baby into the world. Elon Musk is the father. I have not previously disclosed this to protect our child's privacy and security, but in recent days it has become clear that tabloid media intends to do so, regardless of the harm it will cause."

"I intend to allow our child to grow up in a normal and safe environment. For that reason, I ask the media to honor our child's privacy, and refrain from invasive reporting," she continued.

St. Clair, who already had a child with another man, added the Latin phrase, "Alea iacta est," which means "The die is cast" to the top of the post.


There has been speculation regarding whether or not the child was born via natural childbirth or IVF, though no one — outside of Musk and St. Clair — is quite sure yet.

“Her influence, her following on X, has grown so much over the past few years, and maybe that’s all organic, maybe that has nothing to do with Elon Musk,” Allie Beth Stuckey of “Relatable” comments.

The situation has become even more interesting as Musk has refused to acknowledge the child publicly or apparently even communicate with St. Clair. Though, that hasn’t stopped conservatives on X from gushing in their congratulations to the new single mother of two.

Stuckey has her own thoughts on the matter.

“The true measure of a man is Christ, and it’s not conquering women. It’s not being a one-man show trying to repopulate the Earth. That’s not it. You are not God,” Stuckey says. “Of course, I really want the protection of this baby, and that’s really where my heart is.”

“I think about this helpless child in the midst of all of this, that I truly believe was purposely created to be fatherless,” Stuckey continues. “Knowing what I know about Elon Musk, what he’s said publicly and what I have heard privately, on really good authority, is that he is out to create as many children as possible.”

“He has offered to give his sperm to quite a few women so that they can use it via IVF to have children, simply because there should be more babies. And so, I don’t believe this was a mistake. I don’t believe that the richest, most powerful man in the world got caught up in the heat of the moment with a conservative commentator and said, ‘Whoops, I forgot a condom,’” she says.

“The intentional creation of a motherless or fatherless child is cruel, it is wrong, the baby is the victim of that,” she adds.

Want more from Allie Beth Stuckey?

To enjoy more of Allie’s upbeat and in-depth coverage of culture, news, and theology from a Christian, conservative perspective, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

The real ‘Handmaid’s Tale’: Why Lily Collins' surrogacy announcement was the bridge too far



Lily Collins' is the latest celebrity to announce the birth of a child via a surrogate — and the announcement has sparked yet another debate surrounding the ethics of the practice.

Allie Beth Stuckey of “Relatable” isn’t a fan of Collins' choice.

“How do we get to the point where we are now renting wombs and in some cases buying children via egg and sperm donation?” Stuckey asks, noting that criticizing surrogacy is often met with manipulation and emotional games.

“If you show compassion for the surrogate, if you show compassion for the baby who has just been torn away from the only body and smell and heartbeat that she knows, you are being hateful towards the parents who wanted to do this,” Stuckey says, adding, “Because in all of these, in all forms of reproductive technology, what is being prioritized more than the well-being of the child is the wish of the parent.”


While many women on the left have protested stricter abortion laws by dressing up in dystopian garb, Stuckey explains that those people are missing the point, as renting a womb via surrogacy is “actually akin to ‘The Handmaid’s Tale.’”

“For some reason, liberals love to dress up in their red robes and pretend that Margaret Atwood’s novel is about abortion, like allowing children who have been conceived to not be murdered and to be born. That’s not what it’s about. It is actually much closer to the surrogacy industry,” she says.

In “The Handmaid’s Tale,” rich women who struggle with infertility use lower-class women against their will to carry their children for them.

“I know people say, ‘Well, it’s voluntary, and so if everyone consents to it, what’s the big deal?’ There are a lot of things that people consent to that are morally wrong,” Stuckey says. “Many of them may say that they are consenting to what they do, that does not mean that offering your body for a price is moral.”

The argument doesn’t end at whether or not it’s morally wrong to financially incentivize a woman to loan out her body but rather whether or not it’s morally wrong to tear a baby from the only mother he or she has known for nine months.

“It is physiologically true that at the moment of birth, the child longs for the woman who has been carrying him or her,” Stuckey says, noting that it’s even more egregious in cases where it’s two men renting out another woman’s womb.

“In the case of two men, they’re actually purchasing the egg-seller, they’re purchasing a separate surrogate, they’re taking the baby away from the biological mother, they’re taking the baby away from the woman who carried that child, and they are intentionally raising a child who is motherless,” she explains.

“I mean, what a cruel, draconian, demonic, social experiment that we are forcing un-consenting children into in the name of ‘love is love’ and inclusion,” she adds.

Want more from Allie Beth Stuckey?

To enjoy more of Allie’s upbeat and in-depth coverage of culture, news, and theology from a Christian, conservative perspective, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Trump’s Executive Order Still Allows Foreigners To Buy U.S. Citizenship Via Surrogacy

Unless the order’s interpretation of the 14th Amendment addresses all forms of birth tourism, foreign nationals will continue to exploit U.S. citizenship.