Trump Needs A Massive Drone Fleet To Defend U.S. Interests And Deter Its Enemies

A core component of future strength will not be a dozen or even hundreds of drones ready for war. The future is hundreds of thousands.

A brutal wake-up call from America’s most powerful banker



Jamie Dimon, CEO of JPMorgan Chase — one of the most powerful financial institutions on earth — issued a warning the other day. But it wasn’t about interest rates, crypto, or monetary policy.

Speaking at the Reagan National Defense Forum in California, Dimon pivoted from economic talking points to something far more urgent: the fragile state of America’s physical preparedness.

We are living in a moment of stunning fragility — culturally, economically, and militarily. It means we can no longer afford to confuse digital distractions with real resilience.

“We shouldn’t be stockpiling Bitcoin,” Dimon said. “We should be stockpiling guns, tanks, planes, drones, and rare earths. We know we need to do it. It’s not a mystery.”

He cited internal Pentagon assessments showing that if war were to break out in the South China Sea, the United States has only enough precision-guided missiles for seven days of sustained conflict.

Seven days — that’s the gap between deterrence and desperation.

This wasn’t a forecast about inflation or a hedge against market volatility. It was a blunt assessment from a man whose words typically move markets.

“America is the global hegemon,” Dimon continued, “and the free world wants us to be strong.” But he warned that Americans have been lulled into “a false sense of security,” made complacent by years of peacetime prosperity, outsourcing, and digital convenience:

We need to build a permanent, long-term, realistic strategy for the future of America — economic growth, fiscal policy, industrial policy, foreign policy. We need to educate our citizens. We need to take control of our economic destiny.

This isn’t a partisan appeal — it’s a sobering wake-up call. Because our economy and military readiness are not separate issues. They are deeply intertwined.

Dimon isn’t alone in raising concerns. Former Google CEO Eric Schmidt has warned that China has already overtaken the U.S. in key defense technologies — hypersonic missiles, quantum computing, and artificial intelligence to mention a few. Retired military leaders continue to highlight our shrinking shipyards and dwindling defense manufacturing base.

Even the dollar, once assumed untouchable, is under pressure as BRICS nations work to undermine its global dominance. Dimon, notably, has said this effort could succeed if the U.S. continues down its current path.

So what does this all mean?

RELATED: Is Fort Knox still secure?

  mphillips007 via iStock/Getty Images

It means we are living in a moment of stunning fragility — culturally, economically, and militarily. It means we can no longer afford to confuse digital distractions with real resilience.

It means the future belongs to nations that understand something we’ve forgotten: Strength isn’t built on slogans or algorithms. It’s built on steel, energy, sovereignty, and trust.

And at the core of that trust is you, the citizen. Not the influencer. Not the bureaucrat. Not the lobbyist. At the core is the ordinary man or woman who understands that freedom, safety, and prosperity require more than passive consumption. They require courage, clarity, and conviction.

We need to stop assuming someone else will fix it. The next crisis — whether military, economic, or cyber — will not politely pause for our political dysfunction to sort itself out. It will demand leadership, unity, and grit.

And that begins with looking reality in the eye. We need to stop talking about things that don’t matter and cut to the chase: The U.S. is in a dangerously fragile position, and it’s time to rebuild and refortify — from the inside out.

Want more from Glenn Beck? Get Glenn's FREE email newsletter with his latest insights, top stories, show prep, and more delivered to your inbox.

Why tariffs are the key to America’s industrial comeback



On April 2, President Trump announced a sweeping policy of reciprocal tariffs aimed at severing America’s economic dependence on China. His goal: to reshore American industry and restore national self-sufficiency.

How can the United States defend its independence while relying on Chinese ships, machinery, and computers? It can’t.

Tariffs aren’t just about economics. They are a matter of national survival.

But time is short. Trump has just four years to prove that tariffs can bring back American manufacturing. The challenge is steep — but not unprecedented. Nations like South Korea and Japan have done it. So has the United States in earlier eras.

We can do it again. Here’s how.

Escaping the altar of globalism

Tariffs were never just about economics. They’re about self-suffiency.

A self-sufficient America doesn’t depend on foreign powers for its prosperity — or its defense. Political independence means nothing without economic independence. America’s founders learned that lesson the hard way: No industry, no nation.

The entire supply chain lives offshore. America doesn’t just import chips — it imports the ability to make them. That’s a massive strategic vulnerability.

During the Revolutionary War, British soldiers weren’t the only threat. British factories were just as dangerous. The colonies relied on British imports for everything from textiles to muskets. Without manufacturing, they had no means to wage war.

Victory only became possible when France began supplying the revolution, sending over 80,000 firearms. That lifeline turned the tide.

After the Revolution, George Washington wrote:

A free people ought not only to be armed, but ... their safety and interest require that they should promote such manufactories as tend to render them independent of others for essential, particularly military, supplies.

Washington’s first major legislative achievement was the Tariff Act of 1789. Two years later, Alexander Hamilton released his “Report on Manufactures,” a foundational blueprint for American industrial strategy. Hamilton didn’t view tariffs as mere taxes — he saw them as the engine for national development.

For nearly two centuries, America followed Hamilton’s lead. Under high tariffs, the nation prospered and industrialized. In fact, the U.S. maintained the highest average tariff rates in the 19th century. By 1870, America produced one-quarter of the world’s manufactured goods. By 1945, it produced half. The United States wasn’t just an economic powerhouse — it was the world’s factory.

That changed in the 1970s. Washington elites embraced globalism. The result?

  

America has run trade deficits every year since 1974. The cumulative total now exceeds $25 trillion in today’s dollars.

Meanwhile, American companies have poured $6.7 trillion into building factories, labs, and infrastructure overseas. And as if outsourcing weren’t bad enough, foreign governments and corporations have stolen nearly $10 trillion worth of American intellectual property and technology.

The consequences have been devastating.

Since the 1980s, more than 60,000 factories have moved overseas — to China, Mexico, and Europe. The result? The United States has lost over 5 million well-paying manufacturing jobs.

  

This industrial exodus didn’t just hollow out factories — it gutted middle-class bargaining power. Once employers gained the ability to offshore production, they no longer had to reward rising productivity with higher wages. That historic link — more output, more pay — was severed.

Today, American workers face a brutal equation: Take the deal on the table, or the job goes to China. The “race to the bottom” isn’t a slogan. It’s an economic policy — and it’s killing the American middle class.

  

Offshoring has crippled American industry, turning the United States into a nation dependent on foreign suppliers.

Technology offers the clearest example. In 2024, the U.S. imported $763 billion in advanced technology products. That includes a massive trade deficit in semiconductors, which power the brains of everything from fighter jets to toasters. If imports stopped, America would grind to a halt.

Worse, America doesn’t even make the machines needed to produce chips. Photolithography systems — critical to chip fabrication — come from the Netherlands. They’re shipped to Taiwan, where the chips are made and then sold back to the U.S.

The entire supply chain lives offshore. America doesn’t just import chips — it imports the ability to make them. That’s not just dependency. That’s a massive strategic vulnerability.

And the problem extends far beyond tech. The U.S. imports its steel, ball bearings, cars, and oceangoing ships. China now builds far more commercial vessels than the United States — by orders of magnitude.

How can America call itself a global power when it can no longer command the seas?

  

What happens if China stops shipping silicon chips to the U.S.? Or if it cuts off something as basic as shoes or light bulbs? No foreign power should hold that kind of leverage over the American people. And while China does, America isn’t truly free. No freer than a newborn clinging to a bottle. Dependence breeds servitude.

Make America self-sufficient again

Trump has precious little time to prove that reindustrializing America isn’t just a slogan — it’s possible. But he won’t get there with half-measures. “Reciprocal” tariffs? That’s a distraction. Pausing tariffs for 90 days to sweet-talk foreign leaders? That delays progress. Spooking the stock market with mixed signals? That sabotages momentum.

To succeed, Trump must start with one urgent move: establish high, stable tariffs — now, not later.

Tariffs must be high enough to make reshoring profitable. If it’s still cheaper to build factories in China or Vietnam and just pay a tariff, then the tariff becomes little more than a tax — raising revenue but doing nothing to bring industry home.

What’s the right rate? Time will tell, but Trump doesn’t have time. He should impose immediate overkill tariffs of 100% on day one to force the issue. Better to overshoot than fall short.

That figure may sound extreme, but consider this: Under the American System, the U.S. maintained average tariffs above 30% — without forklifts, without container ships, and without globalized supply chains. In modern terms, we’d need to go higher just to match that level of protection.

South Korea industrialized with average tariffs near 40%. And the Koreans had key advantages — cheap labor and a weak currency. America has neither. Tariffs must bridge the gap.

Just as important: Tariffs must remain stable. No company will invest trillions to reindustrialize the U.S. if rates shift every two weeks. They’ll ride out the storm, often with help from foreign governments eager to keep their access to American consumers.

President Trump must pick a strong, flat tariff — and stick to it.

This is our last chance

Tariffs must also serve their purpose: reindustrialization. If they don’t advance that goal, they’re useless.

Start with raw materials. Industry needs them cheap. That means zero tariffs on inputs like rare earth minerals, iron, and oil. Energy independence doesn’t come from taxing fuel — it comes from unleashing it.

Next, skip tariffs on goods America can’t produce. We don’t grow coffee or bananas. So taxing them does nothing for American workers or factories. It’s a scam — a cash grab disguised as policy.

Tariff revenue should fund America’s comeback. Imports won’t vanish overnight, which means revenue will flow. Use it wisely.

Cut taxes for domestic manufacturers. Offer low-interest loans for large-scale industrial projects. American industry runs on capital — Washington should help supply it.

A more innovative use of tariff revenue? Help cover the down payments for large-scale industrial projects. American businesses often struggle to raise capital for major builds. This plan fixes that.

Secure the loans against the land, then recoup them with interest when the land sells. It’s a smart way to jump-start American reindustrialization and build capital fast.

But let’s be clear: Tariffs alone won’t save us.

Trump must work with Congress to slash taxes and regulations. America needs a business environment that rewards risk and investment, not one that punishes it.

That means rebuilding crumbling infrastructure — railways, ports, power grids, and fiber networks. It means unlocking cheap energy from coal, hydro, and next-gen nuclear.

This is the final chance to reindustrialize. Another decade of globalism will leave American industry too hollowed out to recover. Great Britain was once the workshop of the world. Now it’s a cautionary tale.

Trump must hold the line. Impose high, stable tariffs. Reshore the factories. And bring the American dream roaring back to life.

3 Ways China Could Strike Taiwan And What It Means For The U.S.

China’s got three ways to go at Taiwan: a patient choke, a lightning grab, or full chaos.

America’s technological horizon



What would happen if the supply of the world’s most advanced chips was suddenly cut off? Supply chains would be devastated, prices of goods would surge, and innovation would come to a screeching halt. This isn't science fiction; it's a potential reality with Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company at its center. Based in Taiwan, TSMC currently manufactures 92% of the world's most advanced chips, powering devices from smartphones to automobiles, from health care devices to military equipment. Geopolitically, it's not an exaggeration to say that TSMC is the single most important piece on the global chessboard. The question then becomes: What does this mean for America?

Believe it or not, America was once the leading nation in semiconductor manufacturing and technology up until the 1980s. Then, poor leadership led to a significant decline that resulted in, among other things, manufacturing being moved overseas. This hollowed out America's manufacturing capability. In short, we lost control of the semiconductor manufacturing life cycle to foreign nations. As a result, America has become dangerously dependent on others for what is undoubtedly one of the most critical technologies for any civilization. After 40 years, America has made a move to regain control of its own future.

In May of 2020, TSMC announced its intention to build and operate an advanced semiconductor fabrication facility in America, specifically in Phoenix, Arizona. As of early 2025, TSMC Arizona has begun volume production of its 4-nanometer chip technology in the first constructed fabrication building. Construction of the second fabrication building is well under way. Ultimately, six fabrication buildings will stand in the dry landscape of northern Phoenix. This more than $65 billion project is a massive win for America.

To understand the significance better, let's review the benefits related to the economy, technology, and national security. Starting with the economy, TSMC's investment is projected to generate thousands of direct manufacturing jobs, with estimates ranging from around 6,000 to 7,000. Additionally, it is expected to create tens of thousands more indirect jobs through construction and related industries. Moreover, establishing a major semiconductor manufacturing base in America can catalyze the development of a local supply chain, potentially enticing other technology companies and suppliers to establish operations in the vicinity, thereby fostering a thriving tech manufacturing ecosystem.

The technological and innovation benefits include regaining technological leadership, boosting research and development, and diversifying manufacturing. By manufacturing the most cutting-edge chips in America, the country can reclaim some of its lost ground in semiconductor technology, thereby elevating its standing in global tech innovation. With such close proximity between TSMC and other high-tech companies and research institutions, we can expect increased collaboration, which will likely boost innovation in American semiconductor technology. Perhaps most importantly, with TSMC building advanced chips domestically, supply chain disruptions that start elsewhere in the world can be mitigated or even unfelt.

Last but certainly not least is national security. By reducing reliance on overseas manufacturing for critical technology components, national security is enhanced by mitigating vulnerabilities stemming from Taiwan's geopolitical situation. If you didn't know, China and Taiwan have ongoing political disputes that, if escalated, would be devastating to the entire world, including China. Therefore, domestic production of advanced chips fortifies military technology capabilities, ensures that sensitive technologies are more securely managed, and affords America the luxury of not being so "hands-on" with the geopolitical goings-on between foreign nations.

TSMC's decision to invest heavily in semiconductor manufacturing in America isn't just about business; it's a strategic move with profound implications for economic prosperity, technological sovereignty, and national security. The establishment of these facilities in Arizona marks a significant step toward rekindling America's once-dominant role in the tech industry. The economic benefits are clear, with thousands of jobs and the potential for a vibrant tech ecosystem. Technologically, this move could catapult America back into the forefront of innovation, particularly in semiconductor technology. From a security perspective, it reduces the risks associated with geopolitical tensions, ensuring that the backbone of modern technology isn't held hostage by international disputes. As we move forward, the TSMC project in Arizona not only promises to reshape America’s manufacturing landscape but also reasserts America's commitment to being at the cutting edge of global technology. The future, powered by chips made in America, looks not only brighter but also more secure.

Red Flag Warning

Arkansas Republican senator Tom Cotton, now chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, has authored a slender book that punches so much above its modest weight as to make a reader envision some skinny teenager—and Cotton is reportedly 6’5"—taking down Muhammad Ali or, in this case, obese Chinese dictator Xi Jinping. His multigenerational Arkansas roots aside, […]

The post Red Flag Warning appeared first on .

How Biden’s Blank Check For Ukraine Disastrously Bounced

Americans were told that, with enough help, Ukraine could liberate all of its territory. It was a murderous lie.

Without tariffs, the US is defenseless in an economic war



The Second Amendment guarantees the right of citizens to bear arms. Many conservatives argue that this is the most important right. Why? Our other core rights — freedom of religion, speech, and assembly — are worthless if they cannot be defended. Firearms safeguard freedom.

Yet these same conservatives have viciously attacked President Trump’s recent 25% tariff on steel and aluminum imports, describing it as “political rent-seeking at its most brazen.” Some self-styled nonpartisan critics even claimed that Trump’s tariffs are an “unconstitutional power grab.”

America does not even manufacture the things it would need to use to manufacture more things.

These criticisms are not only unfounded; they are also completely backward. Why? The trade deficit is among the greatest — yet most ignored — threats to America’s freedom. America needs tariffs to eliminate the trade deficit and safeguard our national security.

A lovely bunch of coconuts

The trade deficit undermines America’s national security because of something called import dependency. Import dependency occurs when a country cannot sustain itself without imports. This often occurs when countries lack a specific natural resource.

For example, Iceland is too cold to grow coconuts and must buy coconuts from tropical islands. In this way, Iceland is import-dependent when it comes to coconuts. Import dependency may not sound important — coconuts are not vital to Iceland’s economy — but what if we replaced coconuts with oil? You can imagine that Icelandic winters would be much less hospitable without fuel.

Even less obvious is the threat posed by dependence on imported manufactured goods, like silicon chips. How could Iceland maintain a modern economy without access to computers? It could not. To make matters worse, it is obvious that whoever controlled the supply of computers into Iceland would wield enormous political leverage over the Icelandic people — do what we say or no computers for you!

The reality is that any country that depends on imports is vulnerable in this way. One of the best historical examples of the dangers of import dependence occurred during the American Revolution. Although this may come as a surprise, the American Revolution almost failed because the colonies could not manufacture enough cannons, firearms, and gunpowder to resist the British — our former supplier.

It was only when Britain’s European rivals, particularly the French and Dutch, started supplying the Continental Army that the tide turned. For example, France alone supplied the army with over 80,000 firearms, in addition to swords, knives, and uniforms. America depended upon British manufactured goods, and it was not until this economic dependence was broken that America could free herself from the imperial yoke.

President George Washington recognized this fact, writing that America would not be able to defend its freedoms unless the nation was “independent of others for essential, particularly military, supplies.” To this end, his first major piece of legislation was the Tariff Act of 1789, which raised taxes on imported manufactured goods.

One of the legislation’s key aims was to promote the development of America’s manufacturing industry. Even Thomas Jefferson — who initially supported free trade on principle — eventually agreed with Washington. In the wake of the War of 1812, Jefferson wrote:

Experience has taught me that manufactures are now as necessary to our independence as to our comfort: and if those who quote me as of a different opinion will keep pace with me in purchasing nothing foreign where an equivalent of domestic fabric can be obtained, without regard to difference of price [we would be well off] …

Both Washington and Jefferson realized that economics and politics are simply two sides of the same coin. Therefore, to safeguard America’s political independence, we must first maintain America’s economic independence.

My kingdom for a (Chinese-made) horse

The American colonies depended on European imports to wrestle our freedom from the British. Today, we depend on Chinese imports.

Consider that America no longer manufactures enough of the sorts of basic machinery necessary to make simple household items — never mind the sophisticated electrical components needed for computers and smartphones. In other words, even if we wanted to manufacture forks, we would probably need to buy the fork-making machinery from China.

This is made clear when we look at America’s production of machine tools. A machine tool is a piece of machinery that shapes its output by removing material by way of lathing, planning, drilling, milling, grinding, sawing, or pressing the output. Machine tools transform raw materials into something useful. They are the tools that make tools.

America used to be the leading manufacturer and global exporter of machine tools. Today, America imports of most its machine tools and only produces 7% of the world’s machine tools. For comparison, Italy produces 8%, while China makes 29%.

  

America imports over $500 billion worth of advanced technology products from China every year. Our industrial base has been hollowed out to the point where we could not maintain our economy without imported machine tools and semiconductors — never mind all the innocuous goods that we import like cutlery and baseball caps.

America is import-dependent upon China. This restrains America’s ability to act independently on the world stage and gives China leverage over America in any prospective military engagement.

What would happen if conflict erupted between America and China? Presumably, the United States would need to scale up its industrial production to build more weapons, vehicles, and computers. Just one problem: scaling up is just not possible — at least not immediately.

To manufacture more equipment, America would need to build more factories. But the United States imports almost all its industrial components and machine tools. That is, America does not even manufacture the things it would need to use to manufacture more things.

Worse yet, America’s workforce lacks the training and experience to manufacture critical goods. What would happen, for example, if China stopped selling microchips? Even if we assume that America has the tools to manufacture microchips — which we do not — we do not have the human capital to manufacture microchips on a large scale. Very few Americans know how to make microchips. For that matter, very few Americans have the skills to build the factories themselves.

If the United States were serious about national security, it would make reducing the trade deficit and restoring industrial self-sufficiency its top priority.

Schiff and Schumer's Bogus IG Scandal, Trump's Divergent Diplomacy, and the Pulitzer Board's Russiagate Retreat

Adam Schiff and Chuck Schumer have described Donald Trump's dismissal of 17 inspectors general as a "chilling purge" aimed at eliminating "accountability for malfeasance." Scott Walter and Sarah Lee of the Capital Research Center say it’s not just the fulfillment of a Trump campaign promise, but there’s no scandal in sight. 

The post Schiff and Schumer's Bogus IG Scandal, Trump's Divergent Diplomacy, and the Pulitzer Board's Russiagate Retreat appeared first on .