Florida teens' stupid 'social media stunt' earns them fittings for snazzy jail attire



Two Florida 18-year-old males were arrested after taking part in what Ocala Police called a "social media stunt" last weekend.

And what did our heroes do, exactly?

'You know what they say: They don’t arrest the smart ones. Somebody needs to take a lawnmower and a leaf blower to those haircuts though, good Lord.'

Well, police said Janek Szkaradek drove a lawnmower through a Target store on SW College Road on Saturday while Luke Charske recorded the hijinks on video.

Szkaradek's questionable driving skills resulted in a damaged door at the store.

If that weren't enough, Szkaradek the previous night used a leaf blower inside a Culver’s restaurant on SW College Road, police said.

Law enforcement officials weren't amused.

"These actions endangered people and caused property damage," police said. "They are crimes, not harmless videos. Think before you record — it’s not worth an arrest and a criminal charge."

Police said Szkaradek was charged with criminal mischief and disorderly conduct for the incident at Culver’s and disorderly conduct for the incident at Target. Police said Charske was charged as a principal to disorderly conduct for the incident at Target.

RELATED: Video: Florida motorist decides to drive in reverse for a while — and then comes face-to-face with deputies

Many commenters under the Ocala Police Department's Facebook entry about the lads' bad behavior were at once merciless and hilarious:

  • "You know what they say: They don’t arrest the smart ones," one commenter wrote. "Somebody needs to take a lawnmower and a leaf blower to those haircuts though, good Lord."
  • "Beavis & Butthead 2026 Edition," another user reacted.
  • "I’m surprised natural selection didn’t take them with the mower," another user observed.
  • "They ought to make them take the mower and blower and do everyone’s yard work!" another commenter declared.
  • "Congrats boys — now you have something to put on your resume," another user quipped.
  • "I want to know the brand name of the leaf blower. Left out that important detail," another commenter noted. "Mine hardly moves the leaves off my patio ... inquiring minds want to know."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Cracker Barrel Settles On The Ugliest, Most Soulless Logo You Can Imagine To Destroy Its Brand

Cracker Barrel seems determined to destroy its iconic brand with its new logo change.

The day Ulta tried to steal my job as a dad



Every parent braces for certain awkward but necessary conversations. The “birds and the bees” talk has long been the gold standard — a dreaded rite of passage. You put it off, swallow hard, and finally sit down to answer your kid’s questions without squirming too much. It’s uncomfortable, but it’s also sacred. That talk belongs to parents — not to culture, not to corporations, and certainly not to a marketing executive at Ulta Beauty.

But thanks to Ulta, I had a different conversation recently — one I never saw coming, and definitely not before we’d covered the birds and the bees.

It’s time to remind corporations: You may sell products, but you don’t get to sell souls — especially not our children’s.

I was watching news coverage of Ulta’s latest ad campaign when my preteen daughter walked into the room. She’s just developing an interest in makeup and skin care, so she stopped to watch. Excited interest turned to confusion.

“Daddy,” she asked, “why is that man in a dress?”

That moment was not in my parenting playbook. It didn’t come from a question at church, a talk with her mom, or an overheard comment from an older sibling. It came from a cosmetics company that used to focus on blush and lip gloss but now pushes gender ideology.

What made it worse was her age. My daughter is 10 — right on the edge of girlhood and young womanhood. As I look forward to teaching my sons to shave one day, my wife cherishes the bond of teaching our daughter to apply a little makeup like Mommy: a touch of lip gloss, a dab of blush. It’s about dignity, not performance. Self-care, not spectacle. Those moments have been quiet lessons in self-respect.

Then Ulta barged in with a campaign that turned that rite of passage into a political statement. The timing, the tone, and the topic were no longer mine to decide. That’s the heart of the issue.

The left mocks parents who warn they’re “coming for our kids.” But they’ve already arrived — and they’re bypassing us entirely.

Ulta is just the latest brand to treat womanhood as a marketing gimmick. The company has joined Bud Light, Target, and far too many others in pushing gender ideology not just as an option but as a virtue to be celebrated. Now it’s stunning and brave for a man to dress as a woman to sell eyeliner to our daughters.

For generations, makeup helped women embrace femininity, express beauty, and boost confidence. Ulta didn’t just hijack that tradition — it erased it. The company replaced women with men in costumes, turning the beauty aisle into a battleground for ideological performance art.

Worse, Ulta disrupted the slow, intentional process parents follow to teach their daughters about dignity, modesty, and authentic femininity. Being a woman is not a costume or an act — it’s inherent, worthy, and profoundly meaningful.

In our home, makeup is a subtle tool, not a mask. It’s meant to refine, not transform. I want my daughter to understand that true beauty starts within and that femininity is strong, graceful, and rooted in truth.

This isn’t about hating anyone or debating gender theory. It’s about parental autonomy — our God-given, biologically affirmed, and constitutionally protected right to decide when and how our children learn about adult topics. We expect to teach them about sex, life, and morality — not to have those lessons ambushed by a YouTube ad or a store display.

A decade ago, the hardest talk I expected was the birds and the bees — rooted in reality, biology, and responsibility. Now parents are forced to explain gender identity, cross-dressing, and surgery on minors before we’ve explained where babies come from. We’re no longer the gatekeepers of our children’s innocence — we’re cast as obstacles to their “authenticity.”

This isn’t progress. It’s cultural colonization.

RELATED: ‘Queer Eye’ star celebrates Ulta Beauty collab by making a mockery of women

Blaze News Illustration

And it’s everywhere — school curricula, library displays, streaming specials, toy aisles. Ten years ago, parents couldn’t imagine explaining “preferred pronouns” to a third-grader. Now, if we don’t, someone else will.

The woke mob cleverly rebranded indoctrination as inclusion. They tell us our kids need “exposure,” but they really mean submission. Refuse, and you risk social isolation, bullying, or being labeled a bigot — for believing men are men, women are women, and parents should shape their children’s moral formation.

I didn’t sign up for a cultural hostage situation. I signed up to be a dad — to shield my daughter’s innocence until she’s ready for the truth. These conversations are too important to be rushed by a marketing department chasing diversity quotas.

Ulta didn’t just sell mascara that day. Ulta sold out parents — and sold out women.

But here’s the unexpected part. After the awkwardness passed and the questions came, we talked about how some people struggle with who they are. We talked about a broken world and how people search for answers in the wrong places. We talked about compassion — not compromise. About loving people without lying to them. About truth delivered with grace.

Yes, Ulta forced a conversation I wasn’t ready to have. But it reminded me my daughter is watching — not just what I say, but how I say it. She’s watching me model manhood. She’s watching how I treat people, even those I disagree with. She’s watching how I protect her — and how I pray for the lost.

She deserves better than marketing masquerading as moral authority.

So does your daughter.

It’s time to remind corporations: You may sell products, but you don’t get to sell souls — especially not our children’s.

Christianity Must Control All Of Culture, Or It Won’t Control Any Of It

Christianity needs to hold the same monopoly that the left currently holds over our culture, or it will continue to lose.

Instead Of Boosting LGBT Agendas On Back To The Frontier, The Gaines Need To Go Back To The Bible

[rebelmouse-proxy-image https://thefederalist.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Screenshot-2025-07-14-at-11.12.44 AM-scaled-e1752510863298-1200x675.png crop_info="%7B%22image%22%3A%20%22https%3A//thefederalist.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Screenshot-2025-07-14-at-11.12.44%5Cu202fAM-scaled-e1752510863298-1200x675.png%22%7D" expand=1]In nine years, the Gaineses went from making traditional marriage the hill they die on to making it the hill they flippantly surrender.

'Earmarks of a Shakedown': Congressional Black Caucus Threatens To Boycott Target After Retail Giant Stops Funding Its Nonprofit Arm

The Congressional Black Caucus is boosting a boycott effort against retail giant Target for ending its DEI initiatives, a rollback that included the termination of a corporate sponsorship program that has been lucrative for the Caucus’s nonprofit arm.

The post 'Earmarks of a Shakedown': Congressional Black Caucus Threatens To Boycott Target After Retail Giant Stops Funding Its Nonprofit Arm appeared first on .

Lawsuit Aims To Prevent IRS From Targeting Conservative Groups Ever Again

When the IRS was exposed for targeting conservatives in 2013, the policies to blame remained in place, leaving the door open to more weaponization.

Humbled 'Pride': Target, Apple, and Disney among companies scaling back annual LGBTQ sale-a-bration



Some things just go together: President Trump and Diet Coke. Tom Cruise and death-defying stunts. Target and Pride Month.

Since launching its first campaign a decade ago, the big-box retailer has been one of the most eager participants in the annual weeks-long orgy of LGBTQ "representation," which finds free-spending, virtue-signaling brands sponsoring events, releasing collections of Pride-themed products, and festooning their logos with rainbows.

Many big corporate sponsors have either pulled out entirely, scaled back, or asked that their donations not be publicly disclosed.

Perhaps no company has gained more publicity from the summer same-sex sale-a-bration than Target. It's also attracted plenty of backlash, most notably a highly publicized consumer boycott two years ago.

But nothing could have prepared one Target shopper for what she encountered upon entering the store last week.

"Tuck-friendly" women's bathing suits? "Queer"-affirming children's apparel?

That's so 2023.

This year Target has gone viral for indulging in a decidedly more traditional (and, ironically, more "inclusive") display of pride: good, old-fashioned American patriotism.

Putting 'Pride' aside

"Walking into Target - instead of a giant "PRIDE" display as in the past, they have a USA section!! This is winning!" posted Wisconsin mother of four Katie Yonke on X Tuesday, emphasizing her enthusiasm with three American flag emojis.

While Yonke's post is anecdotal at best, it does reflect the company's newly low-key approach to Pride Month.

As one TikTok user pointed out, Target’s latest Pride collection now largely consists of a series of collectible bird figurines.

Social media silence

Other corporate behemoths are also downplaying their Pride involvement.

For evidence of this, one need look no farther than X. In addition to Target, Anheuser-Busch, IBM, XBox, Disney, Starbucks, Nike, Bank of America, Converse, World of Warcraft, and Call of Duty are among the brands that have not acknowledged Pride Month with changes to their profiles.

Perhaps even more telling is Google's silence on the matter. While recent regional "Google Doodles" have commemorated the 2025 Korean presidential election and Italy's Republic Day, nary a "love is love" sign is to be found on the search giant's homepage.

RELATED: 'Sesame Street' targets children for Pride Month ... again: 'This should not be promoted to kids'

Photo by: Nathan Congleton/NBC via Getty Images

Google has also removed Pride Month and several other “holidays” from the Google Calendar, calling the proliferation and maintenance of these moments of remembrance “unsustainable” for the Calendar team.

Apple is another major Pride booster avoiding the spotlight this year. Its collection consists only of an Apple Watch band and some accompanying wallpapers.

Donations on the down-low

Sponsorship of Pride events in cities like San Francisco, Columbus, and St. Louis has also taken a hit. Many big corporate sponsors have either pulled out entirely, scaled back, or asked that their donations not be publicly disclosed.

New York City Pride, the largest Pride event in the nation, has usually depended on a handful of “platinum” donors — high-profile brands like Garnier, Mastercard, Skyy Vodka, and Target who give at least $175,000 to event organizer Heritage of Pride. This year, all but one have decreased their commitments.

Donors such as Nissan, PepisCo, Comcast, and Diageo have also stepped away from Pride celebrations.

Beating around the Busch

Anheuser-Busch has backed out of events in Columbus and San Francisco, as well as its hometown of St. Louis.

The brewer's cold feet come as no surprise, considering the fallout from its disastrous Bud Light marketing campaign featuring transgender influencer Dylan Mulvaney in April 2023. The ensuing conservative boycott was devastating to the company; clearly, other companies paid close attention.

Re-engineered allyship

Pride goeth before a fall. Even those who reject such wisdom as outdated could have seen this coming, thanks to consulting firm Gravity Research's report from April.

The key takeaway from the report's survey of corporate leaders is that brands are increasingly publicity-shy when it comes to Pride Month. Rather than risk the backlash of abandoning it altogether, may have chosen to "re-engineer" their approach: “As polarization deepens, brands are favoring lower-profile, internally focused strategies that minimize public exposure while signaling commitment to employees.”

The report goes on to reveal some surprising statistics: “39% of companies plan to decrease overall engagement, and 41% report no change compared to previous years. No executive said they plan to increase Pride efforts overall.

Related: Rainbow rebellion: How Christians can take back what Pride Month stole

Martin Wahlborg/iStock/Getty Images Plus

The report also found that such companies were responding to pressure from three major groups: the Trump administration, conservative policymakers, and activists.

Gravity Research President Luke Hartig told CNN, “It’s clear that the administration and their supporters are driving the change. Companies are under increasing pressure not to engage and speak out on issues.”

Power of the pocketbook

In short, the highly effective boycotts levied against Anheuser-Busch and Target two years ago were just the beginning of more sweeping change, catalyzed by Trump 2.0's crusade against DEI policies.

Companies previously so quick to engage in trendy social causes are discovering that their activism comes with a price; controversy is far less appealing when it starts to affect the bottom line. They will no doubt pivot, as they always do, and live to sell another day.

Meanwhile, consumers on all sides have been reminded of their own immense power. No matter how much money is thrown at promoting a certain worldview, it's their dollars that get the final say.