Elon Musk's SpaceX’s Mechazilla triumph signals a new space-race era for America



The United States took a commanding space-race lead as Elon Musk took a richly deserved victory lap on the occasion of SpaceX’s latest stunning feat — its “Mechazilla” rocket-catcher nailing a perfect landing for its all-important Starship booster. It’s a thrilling return to form for America’s once-signature dominance in hardware and infrastructure on the grand scale.

But China, which has embarrassed American cities for decades with its swift and dazzling urban growth, might have a much different trick up its sleeve when contending with the Musk-led U.S. advantage outside the Earth’s orbit.

As our top exploits grow more spectacular, we must remember that pride comes before a fall, and the greater the pride, the harder the fall. Those ancient Christians knew that the only way to become God-like was through arduous spiritual athleticism.

After years of buzz surrounding the powers of so-called quantum computing, a powerful new approach capable of feats of calculation beyond those of ordinary supercomputers, Chinese researchers announced they’ve used the technology to hack “military-grade” encryption. While there’s no reason to panic — the difficulties of effectively weaponizing quantum decryption are serious — it’s still a serious wake-up call. You can’t get to space if your strongest encryption can’t protect your machines on the ground.

The colossal strides made by SpaceX have taken place thanks to pluck, hard work, and ingenuity but also because the United States government has a monumental national interest in achieving breakout generational aerospace dominance. It’s tough to see how any major digital power today could hope to demilitarize space, including orbit, and that means the U.S. is looking for a huge edge to offset what appears to be a growing gap in capabilities relative to China’s lead in drones and robotics at ultra-large scale.

So it’s understandable that Musk’s latest win would touch off a lot of high-fiving and wide-eyed wonder, mixed with a feeling of relief that Americans are still even capable of complex feats of engineering with huge national security implications.

But predictable excesses have burst forth, too. “Our Ancestors would see us as GODS!” rhapsodized XPrize founder Peter Diamandis. "What an incredible time to be alive. ... Next up on humanity’s godlike achievements ... healthy longevity.” I can’t imagine which of Diamandis’ ancestors would see him as a god — surely not the Greeks among the first of Earth’s Christians and very likely not even the ancient Greek pagans who had mastered retaining robust health and powerful musculature long into advanced age without the benefit of any computerized machines or modern scientists.

As our top exploits grow more spectacular, we must remember that pride comes before a fall, and the greater the pride, the harder the fall. Those ancient Christians knew that the only way to become God-like was through arduous spiritual athleticism along the narrow path toward union with the Lord; they would weep with loving pain for those of us today who believe achieving god status involves nothing more arduous than solving very difficult math problems.

Humility in greatness is always good, but it will come in mighty handy when we are forced to reckon with — to take just one example — a quantum hack of what’s supposed to be our “unsinkable” military-tier encryption. Great powers historically face even greater shocks, and one humiliating defeat can be enough to topple what until then had seemed indestructible. It’s long past time to make America both great and humble again.

Are scientists harvesting human embryos to power supercomputers?!



The idea of harvesting anything from a human being to power technology might make for a great dystopian novel or a science-fiction television show, but to apply such a concept to reality is surely crazy, right?

Well, yes, it is undoubtedly crazy. But it is happening.

“This is actually in practice and being used by the University of Michigan right now,” says Glenn Beck. “Environmentalists are worried about how we make enough power to be able to power AI.”

Their answer has come in the form of what is called an “organoid” — a simplified organ that is artificially grown in vitro.

Blaze Media editor at large and host of “Zero Hour” James Poulos, who did a deep dive into this harrowing subject in his recent article “Brace yourself: Making computers from human brains is the new environmentalism,” joins Glenn to unpack the deranged concept of “offering up human brains to run energy-starved supercomputers.”

“AI consumes a ton of electricity,” and “environmentalists have always hated nuclear power,” so “they’re turning to us to be the batteries,” Poulos explains.

Scientists in the field are taking “stem cells out of embryos or out of the lab (sometimes even out of tumors)” and “[turning] them into brain cells basically and [using] those as batteries to power what they're calling bioprocessors.”

This method is considered superior because it apparently requires “about a million times less power than a typical digital processor.”

The hype surrounding this dark concept, Poulos says, originates from “the same folks who brought you the idea of going to Carbon Zero [or] Net Zero carbon use.”

“They look at human beings as a waste of space — a waste of energy — and they want to harness that to run AI,” he says.

The company behind the movement is called FinalSpark.

According to their website, the organoids that power AI “live for about 100 days.”

“So, are we harvesting embryos, using them to power a supercomputer for 100 days, and then killing them and looking for more embryo stem cells?” asks Glenn in shock.

The short answer is yes.

“What you do is you start the embryonic process, but you arrest it before it gets too far and then you harvest the stem cells out of this artificially induced embryonic organism ... and you just grow those cells sort of in the way they grow fake meat cells,” Poulos explains, adding that this process is “not one and done.”

“It's not like, well, maybe once upon a time there was an embryo who had to die for the greater good. No, this is like a perpetual-motion machine; you’ve got to keep harvesting,” he says.

“Lord, that’s terrifying,” says Glenn.

“If we were created in the image of God, how far can you stray from that before something really horrible happens?” Poulos asks rhetorically, pointing to Nikola Tesla’s prescient warning: “You may live to see manmade horrors beyond your comprehension.”

“You now have scientists who don't necessarily believe in God [and] think that they are creating a god in AI now harvesting God's creation to power their new god,” says Glenn.

To hear more of the conversation, watch the clip below.


Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn’s masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis, and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Embarrassing: Sports Illustrated caught in AI scandal



Did you know that in order to be a good volleyball player, you need to own an actual volleyball?

Crazy concept, but thanks to writers like Drew Ortiz of Sports Illustrated, we have the latest insight into athletic development.

If you’re sitting there wondering what the heck we’re talking about, allow Glenn Beck to explain.

Drew, who is “the author of many stories” in Sports Illustrated, ”has spent much of his life outdoors. …There's rarely a weekend that goes by where Drew isn't out camping, hiking, or just back on his parents’ farm,” Glenn reads from Drew’s writer profile.

“Now Drew sounds like a regular guy, doesn’t he?”

At least that’s what everyone thought until one of his articles explained how “volleyball is very difficult, especially to practice, if you don't have a ball.”

And that’s when people started to realize that “Drew doesn’t exist.”

He’s actually a machine (and not a particularly smart one), or at least that’s what the AI testing system determined when it processed Drew’s work.

While Sports Illustrated has denied allegations that Drew Ortiz is the creation of AI, the outlet has “removed all of his writings,” which only seems to strengthen the theory that he’s not a real person.

And apparently Drew isn’t the only fictional writer at the American sports magazine.

“Looks like Drew doesn't exist as well as other writers at Sports Illustrated,” Glenn reports.

To hear more about the scandal, watch the clip below.


Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn’s masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis, and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Amazon will reimburse employees $4,000 if they cross state lines to get an abortion



Amazon is committing to financing the abortions of its employees.

On Monday, the second-largest private employer in the U.S. told its staff that it will pay up to $4,000 annually in travel expenses for “non-life-threatening medical treatments including abortions.”

Reuters reported that Amazon’s decision to subsidize its employees' abortions places the online mega-retailer on a growing list of large corporations with similar policies on the books. Citigroup Inc. and Yelp Inc. both announced that they would subsidize the abortion process for their employees in response to Republican-backed state laws limiting abortion access.

In a similar vein, the popular ride-sharing companies Uber and Lyft previously vowed to cover the legal fees for drivers in Texas who encounter legal difficulties for driving women to abortion clinics, Fortune reported.

The company’s new benefit will have retroactive coverage and is available to both its U.S. employees and their covered dependents who are enrolled in either the Premera or Aetna health plans. The reimbursement benefits are available to employees at all levels of the company. Warehouse workers and executives alike can be reimbursed for expenses incurred in their pursuit of an abortion.

However, in order to qualify for the reimbursement, the individuals seeking to receive an abortion must travel more than 100 miles.

Amazon announced that it would start financing abortions the same day that it stopped offering U.S.-based employees paid time off when they get diagnosed with COVID-19.

On Monday, a draft decision indicating that the U.S. Supreme Court is poised to overturnRoe v. Wade was leaked to the media.

The draft is of the court’s majority opinion and is written by Associate Justice Samuel Alito. It is believed that the opinion had already circulated inside the court prior to it being leaked.

“We hold that Roe and Casey must be overruled,” Alito wrote.

Roe was egregiously wrong from the start. Its reasoning was exceptionally weak, and the decision has had damaging consequences. And far from bringing about a national settlement of the abortion issue, Roe and Casey have enflamed debate and deepened division,” Alito continued.

The draft decision is related to an outstanding challenge against a piece of pro-life legislation out of Mississippi.

“The inescapable conclusion is that a right to abortion is not deeply rooted in the Nation’s history and traditions,” Alito concludes. “On the contrary, an unbroken tradition of prohibiting abortion on pain of criminal punishment persisted from the earliest days of common law until 1973.”

Report: Twitter is set to accept Elon Musk's $43 billion offer to buy the platform



It looks like Elon Musk will finally own Twitter.

Reuters reported that Twitter is poised to agree to sell to Musk for what the Tesla and SpaceX CEO called his “best and final” offer of $43 billion.

Musk’s offer includes purchasing outstanding shares of Twitter stock for $54.20. Twitter is expected to announce an agreement to the deal on Monday, once its board has met to formally recommend the transaction to the company’s shareholders.

However, it does remain possible that the deal could collapse at the last minute.

Musk is reportedly negotiating to buy Twitter in a personal capacity. None of the other companies under his control are involved in the deal.

Twitter has been unable to secure a “go-shop” provision under its agreement with Musk that would allow the company to solicit other bids once the deal with Musk is signed, but Twitter would still be allowed to accept offers from other parties by paying Musk a break-up fee for breaking the agreement.

Twitter shares were up 4.5% in pre-market trading, selling for $51.15 a share, in New York on Monday.

Musk has expressed his interest in buying Twitter and taking the company private to grow it so that it may become a platform that truly embraces the principles of free speech.

Previously, Musk has been highly critical of the platform’s commitment to free speech principles.

Free speech is essential to a functioning democracy.\n\nDo you believe Twitter rigorously adheres to this principle?
— Elon Musk (@Elon Musk) 1648193692

He has also expressed concern over the lack of content and engagement generated by high-profile Twitter accounts, voicing concern that the platform is “dying.”

Most of these \u201ctop\u201d accounts tweet rarely and post very little content. \n\nIs Twitter dying?https://twitter.com/stats_feed/status/1512729717085929475\u00a0\u2026
— Elon Musk (@Elon Musk) 1649511151

This new deal would come just four days after Musk unveiled how he would finance the acquisition, which caused Twitter’s board to take his offer more seriously. Many shareholders reportedly asked the board not to let the deal offered to them to slip away.

In a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Musk revealed that he had received commitments for $46.5 billion to help finance his purchase of Twitter from a group of banks led by Morgan Stanley.

According to Reuters, if Twitter and Musk finalize this deal, it would “represent an admission by Twitter that its new chief executive Parag Agrawal” is not proving successful in his attempts to make the company more profitable.

As recently as this past November, Twitter stocks were trading for higher than Musk’s offer price. The tech mogul’s negotiating tactics — of making one offer and sticking firmly with it — allegedly resemble the tactics of Warren Buffett and how he negotiates acquisitions.