Alex Jones’ ‘eerily accurate’ prediction on Biden leaving the race — and what may happen next
President Joe Biden ended his campaign this week, and to no one's surprise, Alex Jones was right again.
“Your prediction was eerily accurate to the day on which he would step down,” Liz Wheeler of “The Liz Wheeler Show” tells Jones. “Who’s behind that? Who made him step down? I have a very hard time believing that it was him.”
“We know the answer to that,” Jones says confidently. “The question is: What are the specifics?”
“It’s a big deal,” he continues. “Biden’s been out of his mind for years, the perfect puppet, and now they know that one’s going to buy a new election steal if it’s him. So, they want Kamala or Newsom or Hillary or ‘Big Mike’ Michelle Obama or Kamala. Anybody but him.”
“That’s why I’ve been predicting they would remove Biden imminently. Which they did,” he adds.
While no one knows exactly what has happened to the president, there are theories swirling. And Jones has his own.
“The point is that Biden was refusing to step down, and I said last week, I said, ‘He will have a medical emergency,’” Jones says. “They just tried to kill Trump, that's failed. Biden’s refusing to step down. It’s the same Deep State that wants full control and people that follow their orders.”
Now that Biden’s out, Americans have been left wondering who the Democratic nominee will be. While it seems that Kamala Harris will step into Biden’s shoes, Jones isn’t so sure.
“It needs to be Kamala on paper under the law to get the 198 million as of yesterday — it’s probably up now,” he tells Wheeler.
“But the Democrats have said that they want to have kind of a weird snap primary where the delegates or the donors with the delegates decide who’s there to at least act like it’s Democratic,” he continues.
“I mean, the sky’s the limit. They already tried to kill Trump, in my view. They already tried to take Trump off the ballot. They’ve already done all this, so we’re really seeing the desperate coup of the Democrat-controlled Deep State out in the open right now,” he adds.
Want more from Liz Wheeler?
To enjoy more of Liz’s based commentary, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.
Could THIS challenger explain Judge McAfee's decision to let Fani Willis stay AFTER he said she 'acted with a tremendous lapse in judgment'?
While the special prosecutor and alleged lover of Fani Willis, Nathan Wade, is off Trump’s case, the Fulton County district attorney can remain.
Sara Gonzales is floored by the decision, saying, “I don’t understand why she was allowed to stay on the case.”
However, she has an idea.
“There was a ‘challenger’ who threw his hat into the ring to challenge this particular judge,” Gonzales explains, adding, “I’m just wondering how much that had to do with the judge’s decision.”
The "challenger" happens to be an African-American civil rights activist.
Stu Burguiere believes that might have something to do with the questionable decision as well, noting that the judge’s district voted 73% in favor of Biden.
Because of this civil rights activist, the judge’s job is already in jeopardy. So, going easy on Fani Willis might be an act of self preservation.
“I hope this can still be taken care of,” Stu says, “but it’s hard to have hope in this day and age.”
While the outlook is bleak, Pat Gray hasn’t lost hope.
“Maybe it’s grounds for a mistrial. I mean, I’m not a lawyer, but it would seem to be if there’s already been impropriety going on there with the prosecution, I would think that opens things up for the Trump team. But I mean, I think they’ve got a good case anyway,” Gray says.
Want more from Sara Gonzales?
To enjoy more of Sara's no-holds-barred take to news and culture, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.
Another yarn spun during Jan. 6 committee hearings unravels — this time Cassidy Hutchinson's testimony
Congressional investigators released a report this week exposing the politicization of the Jan. 6 Select Committee along with its tactical myopia and apparent willingness to suppress critical facts when "legislatively prosecut[ing]" former President Donald Trump.
The report released Monday by House Subcommittee on Oversight Chairman Barry Loudermilk (R-Ga.) indicates that the Jan. 6 committee deleted records; hid multiple transcribed interviews; failed to turn over recordings to Republican lawmakers; suppressed evidence that contradicted Democrats' preferred narrative; and colluded with Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis, who ultimately launched an election interference trial of Trump in Georgia.
The Oversight committee's insights into Cassidy Hutchinson's 2022 testimony and its surrounding context are perhaps best illustrative of the broader problems affecting the Jan. 6 committee's so-called investigation.
The "Initial Findings Report" noted that Hutchinson, who served as assistant to Trump's former chief of staff Mark Meadows, participated in six transcribed interviews and one highly publicized hearing with the Jan. 6 committee. Apparently, in her fourth transcribed interview on June 20, 2022, Hutchinson managed to provide the committee with something they could sink their teeth into.
Hutchinson told the tale of how Trump supposedly got in a scuffle with a Secret Service agent and attempted to commandeer the presidential limousine.
Provided with this provocative story, the committee scheduled a public hearing eight days later with Hutchinson as the key witness, reportedly without even bothering to interview other witnesses who may have provided contradictory testimony.
Former U.S. Rep Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.) pressed Hutchinson to testify under oath during the public hearing about what happened after Trump was driven away from his speech at the Ellipse on Jan. 6, even though Hutchinson wasn't in the Suburban with Trump at the time — all the more evident because she appears to have erroneously said Trump was in "The Beast," the presidential limousine, when leaving the Ellipse.
Hutchinson told the committee about a conversation she allegedly had at the White House with Tony Ornato, Trump's former White House deputy chief of staff.
"Tony described [Trump] as being irate. The president said something to the effect of, 'I'm the f'ing president, take me up to the Capitol now,' to which [Secret Service Agent Bobby Engel] responded, 'Sir, we have to go back to the West Wing,'" said Hutchinson. "The president reached up towards the front of the vehicle to grab at the steering wheel. Mr. Engel grabbed his arm, said, 'Sir, you need to take your hand off the steering wheel.'"
Hutchinson suggested that Trump then lunged toward Engel, who she indicated was present for Ornato's later retelling of the event but did not contribute.
In the lead-up to the public hearing, the report indicated that "the Select Committee did not interview either of the two USSS agents referenced in her testimony, nor did the Select Committee interview any other individual implicated in her testimony."
The report further noted that the Jan. 6 committee only got around to interviewing the Secret Service agents months later when "it was obvious Republicans would win control of the House."
Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.), who served as chair of the Jan. 6 committee, reportedly admitted to failing to comply with House Rules when refusing to archive transcripts from transcribed interview or depositions of White House and USSS personnel.
"Many of these White House and USSS employees were either with President Trump or aware of his actions on January 6, yet none of their witness transcripts were archived with the House Clerk or provided to the Subcommittee," said the report. "Notably, the Select Committee published over 200 transcripts online, but did not publish these select transcripts."
It turns out that some of these hidden transcripts indicated Hutchinson's "sensational" story was a thing of fiction.
Only after Chairman Loudermilk leaned on the White House for several months to provide transcripts of the witness interviews was he able to review them in person.
"The testimony of these four White House employees directly contradicts claims made by Cassidy Hutchinson and by the Select Committee in the Final report," said the Oversight report. "None of the White House employees corroborated Hutchinson's sensational story."
In addition to indicating Hutchinson presented an "entirely different version of events" than what actually took place, White House employees reportedly further contradicted the Jan. 6 committee's claim that Trump intended to go the Capitol on Jan. 6.
"More than one of the White House employees testified to the exact opposite: that there was never any plan for the President to go to the Capitol on January 6," said the report. "The testimony of the White House employee refutes this claim and leaves no doubt that the Select Committee's claim is false."
A White House employee also refuted Hutchinson's claim that Trump said anything about the alleged chant "Hang Mike Pence," indicating the former president said nothing at all about the chants.
After providing the Jan. 6 committee and the liberal media with tall tales that cast shade on Trump, Hutchinson got a book deal with Simon and Schuster, guest spots on liberal talk shows, and glowing write-ups in publications such as the New York Times.
Chairman Loudermilk said in a statement, "For nearly two years former Speaker Nancy Pelosi's January 6th Select Committee promoted hearsay and cherry-picked information to promote its political goal — to legislatively prosecute former President Donald Trump."
"It was no surprise that the Select Committee's final report focused primarily on former President Donald Trump and his supporters, not the security failures and reforms needed to ensure the United States Capitol is safer today than in 2021," continued Loudermilk.
The Georgia Republican stressed that the "American people deserve the entire truth about what caused the violent breach at the United States Capitol of January 6, 2021. It is unfortunate the Select Committee succumbed to their political inclinations and chased false narratives instead of providing the important work of a genuine investigation."
Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!
3 Big Covid Whoppers Fauci Confessed To Congress This Week
Fauci confirmed many of the worst fears of those in the medical community who spoke out during his reign of terror.Kat Von D: 'I'm on fire for Jesus'
Last week, reality TV star, musician, and entrepreneur Kat Von D sat down with Blaze TV’s Allie Beth Stuckey to discuss her recent conversion to Christianity. The transcript below has been edited and condensed for clairity.
I was born in Mexico in 1982. My parents are missionary Christians from Argentina. At the time, my dad was on a mission in a very tiny pueblito in the middle of nowhere in Mexico called Montemorelos. It's in the state of Nuevo Leon, which is about seven hours south of Texas. And he was building clinics in places that just didn't have them.
My siblings and I lived in a literal third world country environment, and it was one of the most abundant times in our lives. I remember the floors in our house were just packed dirt. We had no running water, no electricity. And my first memory of Christmas was on those dirt floors, opening up a little homemade present that my parents got us. It was just an amazing time. Some of the best years of my childhood, and hopefully I can give something like that to my son in this crazy, wonky world we live in now.
We were brought up with God in our household. My parents were quite strict with that. I had a lot of questions as a kid, and I don't think my parents were equipped with the answers. Like what the resurrection was. I did go to Bible studies as a child, and by my early teens I had read the Bible twice but without really understanding it. I remember going to church as a child, being bored out of my mind, and getting down on the floor with the tithe envelopes and the little pencils that were there and just drawing. One of the things I really want to be able to do with my son when he asks questions is not to respond with “that’s just what we believe” or “that’s what faith is.”
I ended up going astray in a way. It’s not that I went around thinking about it, saying, “I'm an atheist.” I just didn't care.I discovered punk rock at a very early age. I don't want to blame that for my decision to walk away from God. Because I think the same free-thinking [urge] to question everything is what actually brought me back to God.
I've heard a lot more inspiring testimony than my own. Mine isn’t that crazy. I was just searching for answers and meaning in the wrong places like most people do. I ran away when I was 14. I came back, and I had a mohawk. I had started getting tattooed. This was a shock to my poor parents. At the time there weren’t any TV shows that normalized tattoos; to my parents, the only people getting tattooed were gang members, prostitutes, or drug addicts. They really believed their child was possessed by a demon.
At one point my parents were pretty desperate to “fix” me. So they sent me off to a “school” that was essentially a lockdown facility. And there was a lot of abuse. I endured some mental abuse but thankfully avoided the physical abuse I saw others endure. I was there for about six months until I lied my way out. And then I was taken to a kind of transitional boarding school.
At about 16 or 17, I started drinking. Not for fun; it was probably to cope with some of the trauma. When I came back home, my parents and I both agreed I should move out; it just wasn’t good for any of us. By then I had started tattooing and was making good money for a teenager and living in San Bernardino, which is about an hour and a half from L.A.
I fell in love with tattooing. I really saw that as a calling. I was good at it. I was good at people. I was a good listener. And I was an artist. I jumped to another tattoo shop with more experienced artists, and then I made my way to Los Angeles. And from there I just got on TV.
I was never the type of person who wanted to be on TV to be famous. I just love tattooing. And I wanted to be a good representation of the industry. I first got on a show called "Miami Ink." I was barely 21. At this point I was full-blown alcoholic. I was drinking all the time. I got introduced to drugs at that point, but I was functioning. Somehow I miraculously showed up to work every day, and I did a great job. It was a miserable experience. The other cast and I just didn’t get along. I signed the contract while I was drunk. I didn’t have a lawyer. I [ended up] signing away the rights to my name, my likeness, my art, and everything I created. To nullify that contract, I was offered "LA Ink," and it opened up my shop in L.A., which I had for about 12 years.
I was a seeker. I wasn't really actively pursuing any belief system. I just was sad. I was drinking, and I was trying to find answers in the wrong places. And it wasn't until I got sober, which will be 17 years ago this July, that I really started wanting to fix myself. And that's when I started getting into a lot of the New Age stuff and self-help books and a lot of meditation
I started learning about Transcendental Meditation. But it felt like patching a sinking ship with a Band-Aid. I would think, “This feels really good. And I'm so at peace.” I'd have anxiety at the airport, and I'd go into the bathroom and say my mantra and I’d be fine. But it was a crutch.
I'm not going to diss on the AA program, because it helps a lot of people. But when I got sober, I didn’t go to AA. I did read "The Big Book," which I loved. And I still love that book. I think in general everybody would benefit from a 12-step program, doing your inventory and making amends and doing all that stuff. That was very helpful for me.
[In AA] they talk about having a higher power. And that's the part where I’m like, “I feel like you're missing the God part.” Because your higher power can be this cactus in the corner. It can be Ozzy Osbourne. Whereas for me, I've been sober for a long time, but I don't feel like I was free from alcohol until I found God.
I kind of blame my husband for starting it. When the lockdowns happened, he said, “I think we got a lot of things wrong.” And he started showing me articles and some videos. And I started rethinking a lot of things that I thought were true, and it was the first step into questioning everything I had been doing. At the time BLM was going hard, I was in the middle of it [in Los Angeles]. I lived three doors down from the mayor. So we had Antifa in our front yard threatening people with Molotov cocktails and stuff like that. We were seeing things in real time. And they were much worse than what you saw on TV.
I started going down the list of what I was doing with my life and what my perspectives were. When I got to my spirituality, that's where I started really rethinking a lot of things. A friend had sent me a sermon from Pastor Jack Hibbs. And I loved it. It really spoke to me and answered a lot of questions that I had At the time, my son was still a baby and I wasn't going to church. But would we would watch the sermons every Sunday. And I just desired more and more and more, so I started studying the Bible.
[In 2020] I posted this post on Instagram where I just took a picture of a good chunk of these books from my library that I just wanted to get rid of. I don't want to say that they were haunting me, but I knew they were there. Everybody honed in on the witchcraft books, but I also threw away all my meditation books and books on yoga. I prayed a lot before posting that. I spent time writing that caption because I knew I wanted to start being able to talk about where I'm at in life.
I came to this really awesome realization that night that I don't want these crutches in my life any more. I just want Jesus, and it's a very narrow, a narrow road, right? All these breathing techniques, or spell work or nature worship — they're just crutches. They’re not really the answer. I would rather eliminate any distractions. It was a symbolic gesture, proclaiming where I stand. And it was crazy to watch the reaction in the comments. It was like demons hissing at each other. And it was coming from both sides. People who said “I don't think Aleister Crowley's evil” and then Christians attacking those people.
That night, two people came to my house. We lived in L.A. at the time and had a gated security system. I was upstairs with my son and the doorbell rang. My husband looked at the video screen, and it was this possessed person saying, “Hi, I don’t want to freak you out, but I just want to know if I could please have those books. I really need those books. I need those books.” And you could see the darkness in their eyes.
I think a lot of people, especially in the Christian community, call everything demonic. And I don't think everything is demonic. But in this case, I think it was. This person was possessed and no longer in control of themselves. People get obsessed with fame or with the desire to bring certain evils into your life. My husband ushered him away, but then a second person came and tried to break into our trash cans [to find my books]. It was a very sobering moment for me. I realized I didn’t want to have anything to do with this any more.
I have a lot of friends who are into stuff like tarot cards. And I love them so much and think I have more empathy and understanding than the average person, because I've been there. But there’s always this drama and dread and doom and gloom. But I would look around at my Christian friends and think, “I want what you have.” They’re not perfect by any means, but I love the light they have.
I wasn't born into a Baptist church. I'm seeking more traditionalism. When it comes to my worship, I don't want to go to a concert. We all dress nice when we go to church. And that's just our own personal thing, like, this is a sacred space. And I feel like other [churches] just didn't really align with what I'm looking for. I feel like God just, like, spit me out on the doorsteps of the most perfect church for us. It’s a very small congregation. It's a lot of old people. I have anxiety about being late. And so I got there too early and interrupted their prayer circle. And these people just stood up and embraced us. And they didn't really care about who people think we are. They just said, “You're the lady that bought the house down the street. And we've been praying for you.”
After I posted my baptism video, I saw a lot of sensationalized headlines. I was never in a cult. I was never a witch. I was definitely not a satanist. I know I look and dress like a villain. I've been documenting my life since I was 20. And I, this was one of the most important days of my life. I wanted to document it just like I would document my wedding and to share it with the world. Part of it for me was making amends with my followers, because for so many years I've been putting out a certain message. So to publicly proclaim this was me setting some things right.
I have no intention of cutting off my friends whom I don’t agree with. I don't think Jesus would either. I got a lot of criticism from Christians after I posted that baptism video. I think that Christians, when you do that, you don't realize how much harm you're doing. Some of the comments were really cruel and annoyingly holier than thou. And I would look at some of them and say, “What is to be gained from this comment? Who does it help? Does it help me? Does it help all my other followers?”
[They said,] “Her hand wasn't completely submerged.” So this is fake, or it doesn't count. You have to be fully submerged. But I was holding on to Pastor Brian's hands and I weigh 150 pounds and he’s an older gentleman. I was thankful he didn't drop me. And then other people were like, she's faking it. This is just for a PR stunt.
My dad plays a trumpet, and he ended up doing a trumpet version of “My Tribute” when I was in the back getting ready to go in the water. So I was already crying. And then I'm listening to Pastor Brian and the whole world disappeared, and I'm in this water with my pastor, and then he calls me a sister in Christ. The whole time I was just fighting tears. And somebody's like, “Look, she's just laughing the whole time. It’s fake.” And I was like, man, you know, you're no fun.
I don't watch horror movies any more. I just don't want to get scared any more. But some of my favorite movies to this day are about exorcisms. And I reflect on that on in a biblical way. I see demonic possessions, especially in addiction and in the guy who came to my door that night. So when I do watch some of that stuff, I think about my faith, I don't think, “Whoa, this is so great and gory.” People change. I've said some really cringey and awful things in my past interviews that I'm like, “Oh, I hope nobody ever looks at it.” Or even the books I've written in the past. I was a 20-year-old dumb kid; that's not who I am any more. And so why would I turn away my friends who know where I stand on things and know that I will always be an open door if they have a question?
And so when people say things like, “Oh, how could you be friends with them?” It's like, what do you think I should do? Should I just leave this guy with a bad [impression] of Christianity? I'm still gonna love my friends. I have friends who are prostitutes. I have friends who are drug addicts. I have friends who are going through really rough times or, you know, cheating on their spouses. But I have people who go through things and I pray for them just as much.
The one person whom I think about through all this is my husband. When we got together, we were both not Christian, and he's really helped me find my way without knowing it. And he's not necessarily on the same page, but he is very supportive. We go to church together every Sunday. But there's parts of him that are still questioning. Hopefully one day he can come to me and say, hey, I've given my heart to Jesus. That hasn't happened yet. And when you have an entire community of people attacking you, it turns people off.
If these [critics] genuinely cared about me or my husband, instead of picking us apart, I would hope that they would just pray for us instead. When you look at people, you just don't understand what they’re going through. I remember tattooing a man who accidentally killed his only son. He got a portrait that was paying homage, and it's like, how are you still here? I remember that day; I was pulling out of my tattoo shop and I saw him bandaged up and crossing the street to go back to his car. And I'm at the stoplight, and he's just passing people, and the people who are passing him have no idea what this man is carrying right now. We just treat each other so poorly all the time.
I'm not going to dress [differently]. Nothing’s changing in that department. You have no idea how many DMs I got from other goth kids who are in the same boat I was. Saying, “I'm at this crossroad. And I want to go back to church, but I don't have a church to go to,” or “I feel like an outcast even in my own family. I'm trying to make my way back to Jesus.”
I don't think I'm a dark person [because] I wear dark clothes. I'm not scared of death. I talk about it all the time. I’ve tattooed portraits of dead people [for] their loved ones for decades. I've read every grieving book, every bereavement book, and I think death is something we should be able to talk about. When I see a skull, I don't think, “That's demonic.” But if it triggers you spiritually, then keep scrolling, or don't listen to my music.
I was very lucky that I had parents who were Christian. I remember finding myself in very dark moments and intuitively praying. And it's so much more meaningful and real when you fall in love as adult. I'm on fire for Jesus. The more I learn, the more excited I get about things and the more at ease I am about what's happening in this world.
I don't plan on talking about it too much. I feel like there are some people who have that gift. And some people can be quiet witnesses. And that's me — I do better one-on-one with people. If somebody DMs me, or if someone on the street comes up to me, that’s totally cool. But I'm not going to be pounding on everybody's front door.
If you would have known my heart and mind before, your mind would be blown. I'm the best wife and the best mother I can be now, because of the changes that I've had. It's like a deprogramming that has taken place. My life before, I would have just been like this career boss babe or whatever it is that they call them. I have no interest in that any more. I love to be creative. And I love to have ideas and make them come to life with my mind and my hands. But my priorities have shifted.
Catch the full interview below:
Kat Von D's Incredible Christian Transformation: Must-See Interview! www.youtube.com
Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!
US Rep. releases Jan. 6 video images of Capitol Police officer who Blaze News writer says appears to have lied in court
U.S. Rep. Barry Loudermilk (R-Georgia) has released video images from Jan. 6, 2021, showing the movements of a Capitol Police officer who Blaze News investigative journalist Steve Baker said appears to have given false testimony regarding his whereabouts that day during a key encounter with members of the Oath Keepers.
Loudermilk, chairman of the Committee on House Administration Subcommittee on Oversight, said in a statement to Baker that he released the still frames — from closed-circuit TV video with timestamps — of U.S. Capitol Police Special Agent David Lazarus because "an allegation of a Capitol Police officer lying under oath is very serious and must be fully investigated."
What's the background?
Baker's Oct. 4 investigative story for Blaze News was based on his exhaustive examination of Jan. 6 CCTV video to which he was given access.
In that story, Baker noted that Jan. 6 prosecutors — in their attempt to prove Oath Keepers were guilty of trying to overthrow the U.S. government — said members of the group were involved in a contentious interaction with law enforcement at the top of the stairs next to the Capitol Rotunda, which also is known as the small or mini rotunda or the Speaker’s Lobby.
However, Baker said no video evidence from Capitol CCTV cameras was presented to the jury — despite the existence of at least 1,700 cameras in and around the building and grounds and 41,000 hours of footage. In fact, Baker said much of the video footage has been kept from the public defenders as well as the public.
Baker said prosecutors instead relied on the accounts of two law enforcement officers. One of them, Baker said, is Lazarus, a member of the security detail for then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) Baker said Lazarus testified that he passed USCP Officer Harry Dunn engaging with four Oath Keepers “three or four times” while he was evacuating Pelosi staffers trapped in a locked office in her chambers.
However, Baker said Lazarus could not have witnessed the interaction "because Lazarus was in another Senate office building across the street from Constitution Ave. at the time the encounter between Dunn and the Oath Keepers began." Baker noted that his Blaze Media investigation tracked Lazarus "while he was escorting Senators and staff on Capitol CCTV cameras."
Here's one of the timestamped Lazarus images that Loudermilk released to Blaze News:
Baker broke down the details in an X thread and included other released video images of Lazarus as well:
— (@)
— (@)
— (@)
— (@)
— (@)
Baker then offered a final note about Lazarus with another timestamped image of him: "At 2:56:46 p.m., Lazarus can be seen finally reaching the bottom of the staircase - at the top of which he claimed to have witnessed Dunn's 'very antagonistic' interaction with four Oath Keepers '3 or 4' times while rescuing '11 or 12' of Pelosi's staff from their offices."
Baker added the following in his X thread:
Dunn and Lazarus contradicted each other in their respective Oct. 31, 2022 trial testimonies. Dunn first claimed to have seen Lazarus already at the top of that staircase when he arrived at 2:44 p.m., being "hassled" by protestors.
By contrast, Lazarus testified that he saw Dunn already standing at the top of the staircase landing when he came up from behind him on those stairs. Both men lied in their conflicting stories because Lazarus was in a Senate office building at that moment in time.
It is a physical impossibility for either Dunn or Lazarus to have seen what they claimed in their testimonies in the Oath Keepers trial, and this is borne out by what myself and other @theblaze analysts saw on Capitol CCTV videos from access given to us by @RepLoudermilk.
In the end, Baker noted, prosecutors got their convictions of the Oath Keepers, who were soon sentenced to numerous years behind bars.
Capitol Police on Monday did not immediately respond to Blaze News' request for comment regarding Loudermilk's release of video images to Blaze News showing Lazarus' movements in the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, as well as regarding Baker's assertions about the timestamped images and Lazarus' testimony.
Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!
Glenn’s honest take on alien testimonies: 'Tonight we look at the evidence that we DO have'
Back in July, former intelligence officer David Grusch blew the whistle on the Pentagon for concealing proof of aliens and UAPs (formally known as UFOs).
Granted Grusch served for 14 years as an intelligence officer in the Air Force and the National Geospatial Intelligence Agency. Some believe he is credible and that his story is thus believable. Others, however, assume the entire ordeal is a giant psyop — a distraction to divert our attention away from other important news. And many still don’t know what to believe.
Glenn Beck is ready to unpack it all for the sake of truth.
“This is such a big story if it’s true and such a big con if it’s not,” he says.
Grusch told the House Oversight and Accountability Committee that the federal government is in possession of “crashed crafts” and that “non-human biologics” came with some of these crashed crafts.
While it’s natural to assume “non-human biologics” is synonymous with aliens, Glenn says that’s not necessarily true.
Granted that Grusch is “a buttoned-up military and government intelligence man. It’s probably safe to assume he’s going by the FDA’s definition of biologics, which includes ... 'sugars, proteins, or nucleic acids, or complex combinations of these substances, or may be living entities such as cells and tissues,'” Glenn explains.
Grusch also reported that multiple colleagues of his were “physically injured” by UAPs and that he and his wife personally witnessed things that were “very disturbing.”
“One of the reasons that all of this is nearly impossible to believe is the idea that hundreds, or maybe even thousands, of government officials and private contractors could see something like this so secret across multiple decades without any leaks,” Glenn says, clearly skeptical.
Further, Grusch isn’t the first whistleblower when it comes to concealed extraterrestrial knowledge; he is the highest level intelligence official to bring forth these claims, which should be noted, but he’s certainly no pioneer.
Glenn then recounts several other whistleblowers who came before Grusch and granted that their stories are in many ways similar, there’s either “some truth running through it” or it’s “a consistent trail of breadcrumbs [perpetuating] the lie of UFOs and alien visitation.”
“The trail of lies is much easier to believe,” admits Glenn, “but then the question is: why? Why would our government want us to believe that aliens are real and have visited Earth?”
To hear Glenn’s full analysis, watch the clip below.
Want more from Glenn Beck?
To enjoy more of Glenn’s masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis, and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.
www.theblaze.com
freebeacon.com