How a Texas court ruling could crush the left’s ESG agenda



In a significant victory, a federal judge in Texas has ruled that employers and asset managers cannot use environmental, social, and governance factors in employee retirement accounts. If this ruling holds up — which is likely, given the conservative composition of the appellate court — it will dramatically shift the balance of power between corporations and their employees.

This decision represents one of the most substantial blows to the ESG agenda to date. Companies that have been steering employees into ESG-focused investments, which prioritize progressive values over financial returns, now face legal repercussions. Continuing such practices would directly violate federal law. The ruling forces companies to re-evaluate their commitment to ESG initiatives, and many may withdraw from these funds before the case even reaches the appellate court.

Watching these corporations squirm as they try to backtrack and avoid legal repercussions is ever so satisfying.

The impact of this ruling could very well be the beginning of the end for the ESG movement as it’s been pushed by elites.

In even better news, BlackRock, a major player in the ESG movement, has officially left the United Nations’ International Association of Asset Managers. This is a direct rebuke of the global push for ESG initiatives and a major sign that the tide is turning. In contrast to the Glasgow Net Zero Conference in which the Global Financial Alliance for Net Zero — an organization championed by global elites — was pushing for ESG to be a central focus, BlackRock’s departure from the group signals that even those who were at the forefront of this movement are starting to distance themselves.

But it doesn't stop there. Every major U.S. bank has now announced that they too are leaving the U.N.’s Association of Net Zero ESG Bankers, another key part of the Glasgow Financial Alliance. For years, we’ve been warning that ESG in banking was one of the primary ways elites like Biden, the Davos crowd, and others were planning to reset the world’s economy.

The tides have turned — and now those very same banks are running away from ESG, a powerful signal of things to come. They know they’re on the losing side, and they’re scared that a new administration will come down hard on them for their involvement in these globalist initiatives.

In another win, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau unveiled a shocking new rule that, if it survives, would prohibit many financial institutions from de-banking customers based on their political or religious views, or even certain types of speech. While the rule is not as comprehensive as we need it to be, it’s a step in the right direction — and it includes concerns raised by our allies about the dangers of ESG. The Trump administration has promised to come down even harder on the banks with tougher rules, and this is a very good start.

Watching these corporations squirm as they try to backtrack and avoid legal repercussions is ever so satisfying. Some are running for cover while others are desperately trying to ingratiate themselves with the powers that be. It’s clear that the backbone of these companies is made of rubber, not steel. They don’t really believe in the ESG values they preach — they’re just playing the game to get in bed with the political elites.

Now that Trump is back in town, these corporations are showing their true colors. They never cared about their customers or the values they forced upon them. It was always about the power they could acquire through catering to those in power at the time.

No company should be afraid of the president of the United States. But they’re not afraid of Donald Trump. They’re afraid of the return of the rule of law. They know that fascistic public-private partnerships between the government and corporations are on the way out. That’s a victory for freedom and a victory for the American people.

Want more from Glenn Beck? Get Glenn's FREE email newsletter with his latest insights, top stories, show prep, and more delivered to your inbox.

Dem-friendly Republican's Texas speakership begins with homosexual engagement, Islamic rejection of Bible



Leftism was on full display in the Texas Capitol earlier this week during the first legislative session since 2023.

Perhaps the most notable moment came when a Democrat-friendly Republican became the Texas speaker, even though Republicans in the state House enjoy a sizeable majority.

'I had the honor of taking my oath of office to represent House District 92 for the second time on a historic Qur’an.'

After just two rounds of voting, state Rep. Dustin Burrows (R-Lubbock) soundly defeated Rep. David Cook (R-Mansfield), 85-55. Most of Burrows' votes came from Democrats, 46 to 39, even though the Texas House is made up of 88 Republicans and 62 Democrats.

"Every member. Every member will have a voice," Burrows said after his victory. "Every district. Every district will have a seat at the table."

Burrows replaces Rep. Dade Phelan, a controversial Republican who not only was seen as favoring Democrats and Democrat causes but who was even censured by his own party after doggedly seeking the impeachment of Republican state Attorney General Ken Paxton.

Paxton, who lobbied on behalf of Cook in the 2025 speaker race, issued a statement after Burrows was declared the winner.

The removal of the disgraced and corrupt Dade Phelan as Speaker of the House is a positive step for Texas. His close ally, Dustin Burrows, was elected with the support of most Democrats after he refused to honor the rules of the Republican Caucus.

Texas Republican voters made it clear they want conservative legislation to pass this session. It is now important that Speaker Burrows and his leadership team pass every conservative legislative priority in a timely manner to make [our] state more secure and more prosperous. That is what Texas Republicans expect.

The election of Burrows was not the only demonstration of leftism on Tuesday. Shortly after he was sworn in to office, Rep. Venton Jones (D-Dallas) proposed to his same-sex partner, Gregory Scott Jr., on the floor of the chamber. According to NBC News, Jones got down on one knee, and Scott shed tears as he accepted the engagement ring.

Jones, the first openly gay black member of the state House, also shared the news in a public statement. "Today, I took a renewed oath to serve my community with courage, conviction, and love. I made a promise to the person who has stood beside me through every step of this journey," Jones said.

"In a time when our love and our very existence are challenged, often in the halls of this very building, this moment is a reminder that love conquers all."

One of Jones' Democrat colleagues, Salman Bhojani — a Muslim native of Pakistan — celebrated the new legislative session for a different reason: Once again, he took the oath of office on the Quran rather than the Bible.

"I had the honor of taking my oath of office to represent House District 92 for the second time on a historic Qur’an. This sacred text inspires me to work across the aisle to make Texas better. As the 89th Legislative Session starts, I am committed to advocating for all," Bhojani posted to X, adding a picture captured of the moment.

Tuesday marked the second time that Bhojani has sworn in on a Quran, having first done so two years ago. "It is 217 years old. I am the first person that swore on the Quran. This was the first English-printed copy of the Quran in the Americas in ... history," he previously boasted during an online interview with Progress Texas.

H/T: Jason Whitely

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

FACT CHECK: Did Mark Cuban Move His Drug Company From Texas To California?

A post on Threads claims that billionaire and Dallas Mavericks owner Mark Cuban moved his “Cost Plus Drugs” company to California.   View on Threads   Verdict: False Cuban has not announced that the move has happened nor has he mentioned any plans to do this. Fact Check: Cuban is currently the c0-founder of “Mark […]

David French: Protecting Kids Online Can’t Impede Adults’ Porn Consumption

David French is not 'principled' for hinging his support for age verification laws on the condition that adults still get to consume damaging X-rated content, however, whenever, and wherever they’d like.

Discovery of sophisticated 'narco tunnel' in highly visible border area raises questions about surveillance



United States federal agents on Thursday uncovered a sophisticated "narco tunnel" between El Paso, Texas, and Juarez, Mexico.

The tunnel was approximately four feet wide and six feet high, reinforced with wooden beams, and equipped with electricity and a ventilation system.

'Someone had to have noticed that.'

A map of the man-made tunnel shared by Border Report showed that it began next to a six-lane highway in Juarez and continued under a levee and the Rio Grande. The entrance, a three-foot-by-three-foot hole, was hidden behind a metal plate.

Authorities stated that the tunnel, which was discovered by Border Patrol's Confined Space Entry Team, appears to have been constructed within the past year and was used to smuggle drugs and people into the U.S.

Homeland Security Investigations El Paso Special Agent in Charge Jason Stevens stated, "Transnational criminal organizations mistakenly think they can avoid detection by moving people and contraband underground."

"This recent discovery is a significant blow to their operations, as it highlights our capability to disrupt their sophisticated smuggling networks," he said.

Border Patrol El Paso Sector Chief Patrol Agent Anthony Good attributed the discovery to regular probes around the border.

However, former Border Patrol Tucson Sector Chief Patrol Agent Victor Manjarrez questioned how the tunnel was built in a high-visibility area without being detected sooner. He noted that the structure could not have been built with "a pick and shovel" but must have been built with construction machines.

"I find it hard to believe someone on the Mexican side did not know of a tunnel. There are too many logistical things that have to occur. One is, you gotta bring the equipment in. You may have started with a pick and shovel or vertical drilling, but ultimately you have to bring in equipment," Manjarrez told Border Report. "You are bringing a tremendous amount of dirt, rocks, things of that nature. You gotta put that somewhere."

"I'm certain the cartel did not hook up to the meter so they could pay their monthly bill on that, so they hooked that up to somewhere else, and someone had to have noticed that. To say they did not notice, that they weren't aware of that at this point, is not believable," he stated.

Manjarrez speculated that the tunnel was likely used to smuggle drugs or "high value" foreign nationals.

"It would make more sense it was being used to bring people from China, from Southeast Asia, or Europe that can pay $25,000 to $30,000 to be smuggled to the United States. If you go for volume, it becomes a risk because someone could talk. This isn't for the economic migrant you normally see here," he said. "Also, people coming from special interest areas. They may not be on the list itself but come from a terrorist region. Those are the ones more invested in not being detected."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Trump Must Immediately Build On Texas’ Successful Border Work

Texas has faithfully executed the law and played a vital role in national security -- a role the state must now maintain and reinforce.