Google founder's ex-wife speaks out about evils of ‘tech mafia’



The Big Tech elites have been laying “groundwork” to enable the policies of the Great Reset, and no one knows it better than Silicon Valley attorney, entrepreneur, RFK Jr. running mate, and ex-wife of Google co-founder Sergey Brin — Nicole Shanahan.

“Their money especially was being conscripted to set the groundwork for the Great Reset, specifically through a network of NGO advisors, relationship with Hollywood, relationship with Davos, and their own companies,” Shanahan told Allie Beth Stuckey in a recent interview on “Relatable.”

“If you look at who’s on these boards, who hangs out with each other, how the culture of tech wealth works,” Shanahan continued, “it’s a really small group of people, and it’s a really small group of people making these decisions.”


Glenn Beck of “The Glenn Beck Program” is well aware of plans for the Great Reset, but he’s shocked that Shanahan is warning about them.

“It is amazing to go from five years ago, everybody saying, ‘That’s crazy, that’s not happening,’ to the former wife of the head of Google coming out and saying, ‘Yeah, this was all orchestrated, we didn’t even know what we were into as wives of the Silicon Valley mafia wives,’ as she calls them,” Glenn tells Stuckey.

“She said that she really saw the reality of evil, the reality of hell, when she was deep into politics, and that kind of started to shift her perspective on, ‘Wait, who are the bad guys here? What’s going on? All of this evil is being done under the guise of really good intentions, especially in Silicon Valley,’” Stuckey explains.

And when Shanahan’s daughter was diagnosed with autism, she started attempting to figure out what could have caused it.

“As she was digging into the research, she found some things that kind of have been dubbed as right-wing conspiracy theories about different environmental factors, even pharmaceutical factors that could possibly cause some symptoms of autism,” Stuckey says.

“But she had a hard time researching because the search engine that almost everyone uses censors that kind of information. And, well, she was married to the co-founder of Google, who was playing a part in censoring that information, not only inhibiting her research for her daughter, but research for the effects of the COVID-19 vaccine,” she continues.

“And she shared that that caused, understandably, a lot of conflict in her life and still does,” she adds.

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn’s masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis, and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Glenn Beck vs. Ohio AG: Is Clearview AI a crime buster or Big Brother's blueprint?



Clearview AI has stirred up quite a controversy, and when you see what the company has been up to, it’s easy to see why.

The corporation has built a robust online database of over 40 billion facial images, which it gathered from various online sources, including social media, news sites, and random corners of the web. This has been done without explicit consent from the people pictured.

The software is pitched primarily to law enforcement, private security, and some corporate clients who need to identify people quickly. Users can upload a photo of a face, and it scans the database for matches and links to where the images originated — like a LinkedIn profile or a Facebook post.

Glenn Beck says it’s trouble. While it may be useful in certain situations, put in the hands of a rogue government, Clearview AI becomes a tool for totalitarianism.

Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost, however, is fighting to expand Clearview’s use in court cases.

On a recent episode of “The Glenn Beck Program,” the two engaged in a debate.

In a recent Ohio case, law enforcement used Clearview AI to match a blurry surveillance photo to a suspect. This information was then used to obtain a search warrant, which resulted in cops locating a gun and arresting the suspect. The judge, however, threw out the evidence because the warrant paperwork didn’t mention Clearview’s role, its disclaimer about not being court-ready evidence, or other possible matches it flagged.

That’s when Yost’s team stepped in and filed an appeal, arguing that the police’s use of Clearview AI was legitimate and that the evidence should stand. As of now, the court’s decision is undecided.

While Glenn agrees that Clearview technology “is a great thing to get the bad guys,” it’s “exactly the kind of technology” China uses “to track everybody.”

“I worry about that, too,” says Yost.

However, he argues that Clearview AI technology is not a violation of the Fourth Amendment because the images it gathers are from the public domain. It’s different, he says, than the Supreme Court case Kyllo v. United States, in which the court ruled that the cop who used thermal imaging technology to scan for marijuana growing in Danny Kyllo’s home violated his privacy rights.

But Glenn isn’t convinced.

“I am very, very concerned about this slippery, almost straight-down slope to the cage that AI could build for people,” he says. “We can have all of the best intentions, but it falls into the wrong hands, we lose several elections in a row, and it’ll be a prison; it'll be a panopticon like it is in China.”

“I couldn't agree with you more. It scares me what the government can do about this. If you think back to the Biden administration and social media and what they were doing — you multiply that, make that geometrically larger and that's the potential. We've got to be vigilant,” says Yost.

To hear more of the debate, watch the clip above. Leave us a comment below. What do you think? Does facial recognition technology catch crooks or pave the way for tyranny?

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn’s masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis, and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Why Kid Rock isn't terrified of AI music



Musicians, artists, and writers have notoriously been the group most against artificial intelligence taking over their line of work — but some of them are embracing it rather than fighting it.

And Kid Rock is one of them.

“Are you worried about art with AI?” Glenn Beck asks the country music star on “The Glenn Beck Program.”

“Not really, no. Everybody else is,” he responds.

“The way I look at it is, I looked at, like, Napster when that started, and I was like, ‘What’s going on?’” Kid Rock tells Glenn. “All the artists were up in arms, and the record companies wanted us to get behind, ‘They’re stealing, they’re pirating music.’”


“I could care less, I make all my money live,” he continues, noting that the technology behind AI is something he could use to his benefit.

“So I can give you some a capellas and my vocals, and you can model my voice, and then you can put it on your system, and however many people want to write songs for me with my voice can write them?” he asks, adding, “That’s kind of cool.”

“Let’s say I got a million people writing songs for me, if one of those people nails it, and they come up with this life-changing song, it’s great, I go play it live, I’m not seeing the evil in here yet,” he says.

Not only that, but because Kid Rock doesn’t believe there’s any chance of stopping it, there’s no reason to fight it either.

“We’re not going to stop it. I know that much. You are not going to stop it. So it’s like, let’s figure out how we use it as a new tool,” he adds.

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn’s masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis, and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

New ‘Snow White’ is so bad, THIS leftist outlet called it ‘a Marxist call to arms'



Disney’s new live-action “Snow White” movie starring Latina actress Rachel Zegler debuted this weekend after years in the making.

Long before it hit the box office, the film was expected to be a giant flop due to Zegler’s negative comments about the beloved 1937 classic, casting controversies, and the wokification of the original plot line.

And it turns out that the film’s premature criticism was dead on. The movie sucks.

To get the scoop on what exactly makes “Snow White” such a catastrophic failure that people are celebrating its box office flop, Glenn Beck invites Nerdrotic’s Gary Buechler to “The Glenn Beck Program.”


“I’m ecstatic at this failure,” says Buechler. “Rachel Zegler has become the symbol of everything that's wrong with modern Hollywood right now, and seeing it just crumble does my heart good.”

“Hollywood doesn't know how to be good anymore. They are so black-pilled; they are so dystopian; they are so nihilistic,” he tells Glenn.

According to Buechler, this woke version of “Snow White” is “essentially feminism versus femininity."

“Disney took the film that built their empire — that is a paradigm shift movie, that is sacred text in Hollywood — and just threw away the original script and gave us, and I'm not kidding, communist propaganda,” he condemns.

Buechler explains that in the film, Snow White’s parents run “a socialist utopia” where all equally share the bounty of the land, the handsome prince is replaced by a thief, and Snow White is more interested in leading than finding love.

The producers, given additional time due to the Hollywood strike, even made some edits to their original plan in response to the widespread criticism. But they still failed so miserably that even the BBC called the film “a Marxist call to arms.”

“This has to be the closest a Disney princess film has got to paraphrasing 'The Communist Manifesto,'” BBC’s Nicholas Barber wrote.

As for Zegler’s career, Buechler says, “It’s over.”

“She goes to Broadway, that would be my guess,” he says.

To hear more of the conversation, watch the clip above.

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn’s masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis, and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Tim Pool BLASTS COVID lies



The New York Times was one of many publications that consistently called conservatives conspiracy theorists for pointing out that the narrative Americans were sold about the COVID-19 pandemic did not seem to be the truth.

Now, they’re eating their words — but Liz Wheeler of “The Liz Wheeler Show” believes it’s too little, too late.

In a recently published article titled, “We Were Badly Mislead About the Event That Changes Our Lives,” the Times claims that those who dissented were portrayed as “kooks” and “cranks,” but that they may have been right all along.

“I read this and I thought, we weren’t portrayed as ‘kooks’ and ‘cranks,’ we were portrayed as dangerous and even as domestic terrorists,” Wheeler tells guest Tim Pool, adding, “I reject this op-ed as their peace offering.”


Not only does Wheeler reject the article on the grounds that it’s completely downplaying what dissenters went through, but the reason for the article is not to make amends.

“The reason that she seems mad about this, or slightly mad about this, is because these lies that she said we were willfully misled by the public health establishment as to the origin of this virus,” Wheeler explains, “it caused a significant decrease in public trust in public health officials.”

“The reason she’s mad about that is because now, it might cause you to question about whether you’re going to vaccinate your child or not,” she adds.

“They have the absurd narrative: Go wild, and then punish anybody who challenged the fact that their narrative made no sense and they didn’t want to abide by mandates or lockdowns,” Pool agrees.

“I don’t think we have ever seen, in our lifetime, a crackdown on voices like yours and voices like mine,” Wheeler adds.

Want more from Liz Wheeler?

To enjoy more of Liz’s based commentary, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

What AI got WRONG about the JFK files



Research teams across the nation, including Glenn Beck’s, have been utilizing xAI’s chatbot Grok to sift through the 80,000 pages of newly released JFK documents.

The verdict?

Well, it depends.

Glenn Beck explains why Grok and other AI chatbots can never be blindly trusted.

According to the findings of one research team that used Grok to sort through the files, Lyndon B. Johnson, the CIA with Allen Dulles, the mafia, Victor Petrov, and Lee Harvey Oswald “were all in collusion one way or another.”

When Glenn asked Grok himself, the chatbot gave the same answer.

However, one of Glenn’s researchers decided to hone in on a specific area and ask Grok to cite its sources.

When asked to point where in the files “LBJ told Allen Dulles to ‘proceed as discussed,’” which is a quote that appeared in Grok’s answer to Glenn, as well as other research teams, Grok said: “There is no verifiable evidence from the officially released JFK files that contains a direct quote from Lyndon B. Johnson to Allen Dulles stating ‘proceed as discussed.”’

The phrase, Grok claimed, stems "from speculation or unverified assertions rather than any documented evidence in the public record.”

“So we’re getting different answers,” says Glenn. “You should be able to ask and get to the same conclusion.”

“Never ever trust it. Know that [AI] was made in the image of its creator, and its creator is us. We're lazy, we cut corners, we lie sometimes ... it does all of those things,” he warns.

However, that doesn’t mean Glenn is against using Grok and other chatbots. There’s a strategy for using AI as a helpful tool. To hear it, watch the clip above.

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn’s masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis, and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Ted Cruz asks Elon Musk why the left hates him, and his answer is DEAD ON



As you’ve probably seen in the headlines, Tesla vehicles and facilities are going up in flames all across the country as radical MAGA-hating leftists try to stick it to Elon Musk for ensuring their tax dollars aren’t being wasted or used for corrupt causes.

What’s perhaps more upsetting is that many Democrats are defending the vandalism and the harassment of Tesla owners, some of whom have been doxxed.

How could anyone in government support what is clearly domestic terrorism?

Elon Musk answered that question beautifully on Senator Ted Cruz’s (R-Texas) podcast “Verdict with Ted Cruz.”

Liz Wheeler plays the clip.

“Why do they hate you so much?” Cruz asked.

“If DOGE was ineffective, if we were not actually getting rid of a bunch of waste and fraud – and a bunch of that fraud, I mean, from what we’re seeing, is overwhelmingly on the left. It’s not zero on the right, but these NGOs are almost all left-wing NGOs that are being funded, for example. So they hate me because DOGE is being effective and DOGE is getting rid of a lot of waste and fraud that people on the left were taking advantage of,” Musk responded.

“The single biggest thing that they're worried about is that DOGE is going to turn off fraudulent payments of entitlements — I mean everything from Social Security, Medicare, unemployment, disability, small business administration loans — ... to illegals. This is the crux of the matter. This is the thing why they really hate my guts and want me to die,” he continued. “By using entitlements fraud, the Democrats have been able to attract and retain vast numbers of illegal immigrants.”

“And buy voters,” Cruz added.

“And buy voters — exactly,” Musk agreed. “They basically bring in, I don’t know, 10-20 million people who are beholden to the Democrats for government handouts and will vote overwhelmingly Democrat.”

“It’s an election strategy,” co-host Ben Ferguson chimed in.

“Yes, and it doesn’t take much to turn the swing states blue,” Musk said.

“Elon Musk is right,” says Liz. “The reason that all this anger and vitriol and violence is being aimed at him is because he is under the direction of President Trump rooting out where the corruption festers.”

Musk is ruining the “Cloward-Piven plan”: “a plan of political warfare to overrun the United States with illegal aliens for the express purpose of taking advantage of our existing infrastructure — whether that be our public school systems or our neighborhoods, our housing supply, our food supply chains, our medical systems, our welfare systems — in order to crash those institutions,” she explains.

“The Cloward-Pivan plan uses illegal aliens as a vanguard to break our institutions here in the United States in order to do what enemies of the United States have always wanted to do: usher in communism.”

To hear more of Liz’s commentary and see the footage of Elon’s brilliant answer, watch the clip above.

Want more from Liz Wheeler?

To enjoy more of Liz’s based commentary, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Dept. of Education’s dirty little secret: It DEFIES its own law



As promised, President Trump is gearing up to slash the Department of Education, and as usual, the left is in a full-blown panic. It thrives on bloated bureaucracy.

And when you see the original legislation that created the ED, you’ll understand just how bloated and corrupt the department has become.

Glenn Beck reads from the Department of Education Organization Act of 1979 — the document that set the ED in stone.

“It is the intention of the Congress in the establishment of the Department to protect the rights of state and local governments and public and private educational institutions in the areas of educational policies and administration of programs and to strengthen and improve the control of such governments and institutions over their own educational programs and policies,” Glenn reads from Sec. 103.

“That is not what the DOE is doing,” he says.

Both he and co-host Stu Burguiere agree that while the law itself is pretty sound, the bureaucrats running the department have been doing the opposite of what it says.

“The establishment of the Department of Education shall not increase the authority of the federal government over education or diminish the responsibility for education which is reserved to the states and the local school systems and other instrumentalities of the states,” Glenn continues reading.

“This is not what the Department of Education is at all!” he exclaims, adding that he “wouldn’t necessarily have a problem” if the ED was run like the law says it should be run.

“No provision of a program administered by the Secretary or by any other officer of the Department shall be construed to authorize the Secretary or any such officer to exercise any direction, supervision, or control over the curriculum, program of instruction, administration, or personnel of any educational institution, school, or school system, over any accrediting agency or association, or over the selection or content of library resources, textbooks, or other instructional materials by any educational institution or school system, except to the extent authorized by law,” Glenn reads.

If the ED held to the law, “Do you know how many problems would go away?” he asks.

To hear more of the conversation, watch the clip above.

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn’s masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis, and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

JFK files: What do these NEW documents reveal?



On Tuesday, March 18, the National Archives released over 80,000 pages of previously classified documents related to the assassination of President John F. Kennedy.

What does this avalanche of new information reveal?

Glenn Beck and his chief researcher and security expert, Jason Buttrill, dig into what’s been revealed so far.

1. CIA memo / Gary Underhill

A CIA memo marked secret that’s dated July 19, 1967 included an excerpt from a June 1967 Ramparts magazine article, in which the story of Gary Underhill, a military intelligence veteran and CIA contractor, was told through the lens of his friend and confidant, who said that Underhill arrived at her place of residence in New Jersey shortly after Kennedy’s assassination. He was clearly “agitated” and blamed the president’s death on a CIA cabal.

He also allegedly indicated that he feared for his life. Six months later, Underhill was found dead in his apartment from a gunshot wound to the head. His death was ruled a suicide.

Glenn notes that while the story about Underhill has long been known, the CIA’s explicit documentation of the Ramparts article is news.

2. Oswald was a “poor shot.”

“The KGB watched Oswald closely while he was in the USSR, but files indicated that Oswald was a poor shot when he tried target practice in the Soviet Union,” says Glenn.

3. Letter about Oswald’s alleged plotting

“Another detail released was a letter sent by a man in 1978. He was a Soviet, and he made this comment to the British embassy. He claimed that he was detained in London on July 18, 1963, and questioned by authorities. He said that he told them about Lee Harvey Oswald, saying he planned to kill the president. He added that he warned American Vice Consul Tom Blackshire of the plans of Oswald, who was trying to defect to Russia,” Glenn reads, adding that this points to government incompetence.

“Right now, there is no ‘who’; there is no ‘okay, this is the person who pulled the trigger,”’ says Buttrill. “There's no deflection from the official Warren Commission report so far.”

The information that has been sifted through thus far certainly “[provides] more context,” though.

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn’s masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis, and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

SHOCKING background info on anti-Trump Judge James Boasberg



Judge James Boasberg issued an injunction in an attempt to force the Trump administration to turn around flights carrying alleged Venezuelan gang members.

And President Donald Trump is not happy.

“If a President doesn’t have the right to throw murderers, and other criminals, out of our Country because a Radical Left Lunatic Judge wants to assume the role of President, then our Country is in very big trouble, and destined to fail!” Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social.

Liz Wheeler of “The Liz Wheeler Show” is 100% on Trump’s side in this one.


“They committed acts of war, they committed invasions, and they committed incursions. Therefore, the president has every right to deport them to El Salvador the way that he did,” Wheeler says.

Not only does Wheeler believe Trump has every right to do what he’s done, but the judge trying to stop Trump has a questionable background that sheds a little light on his motivations.

“We have shocking information about his background that is very pertinent to the order that he gave, this illegitimate order,” Wheeler says. “This judge was a member of the corrupt FISA court.”

“You remember the FISA court, the FISA court that rubber-stamped the illegal spy warrants against Trump during the Russiagate hoax. Boasberg was one of those judges signing off on it. ‘You go ahead and spy on Trump,’” she continues.

Within these FISA warrants, an FBI attorney named Kevin Clinesmith fabricated evidence to make it appear that Trump’s former foreign-policy adviser, Carter Page, was colluding with the Russians.

Clinesmith was convicted of fabricating evidence — but he never served a day in prison.

“Judge James Boasberg personally sentenced Clinesmith,” Wheeler explains. “He made sure that FBI attorney Clinesmith never saw the inside of a jail cell, even for a single day. Despite the reality that Clinesmith's attempts to overthrow the elected U.S. government via fake evidence and fabricated warrants that Boasberg's FISA court was totally fine with.”

“This is the same judge that is now trying to exceed his authority for the same end — to destroy Donald Trump,” she adds.

Want more from Liz Wheeler?

To enjoy more of Liz’s based commentary, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.