What no one tells you about 'The Chosen' — but every Christian should know



Not since “The Passion of the Christ” has a TV show or movie about the life of Jesus captivated audiences quite like “The Chosen.”

The show is available on Netflix, Amazon Prime, and other streaming platforms, and over 200 million people have watched the crowdfunded historical drama that follows Jesus and his disciples around ancient Galilee and Judea.

That means the series, which premiered in 2017 and is now in its fifth season, is possibly the most successful Christian TV show of all time, and it is almost certainly the most successful crowdfunded media production in history.

What sets “The Chosen” apart is the show’s creativity and its commitment to visually and viscerally transporting viewers back to the first century. The tension of the time in which Jesus lived — at the intersection of the Greco-Roman and Jewish worlds — is palpable through the screen.

Captivating storylines and the show’s overall high production value also keep viewers glued to their screens.

Not only is “The Chosen” fun to watch, but creator Dallas Jenkins is honest about what he wants the show to accomplish. A Christian himself, Jenkins hopes the show motivates viewers to read the Bible for themselves.

"'The Chosen' is based on the true stories of the Gospels of Jesus Christ. Some locations and timelines have been combined or condensed. Backstories and some characters or dialogue have been added. However, all biblical and historical context and any artistic imagination are designed to support the truth and intention of the scriptures. Viewers are encouraged to read the Gospels," the series tells viewers in the first episode.

'They elicit a response from the viewer that corresponds to the response that the passages are trying to elicit from the reader.'

The show’s success indicates that Jenkins has probably accomplished his goal of encouraging at least some people to read more of the Bible for themselves. But does the show “support the truth and intention” of the biblical authors?

Biblical scholars who spoke to Blaze News gave their perspective on the biblical accuracy of the wildly popular series.

Is ‘The Chosen’ biblically accurate?

One criticism of “The Chosen” is that the show’s world-building and backstory development deviate too much from the Bible.

One critic called “The Chosen” a “dangerous source of entertainment, which dramatically takes Jesus and his words out of context.” Another critic said the “space-filling scenes” or those interactions that are not in the Bible “are dangerous.”

To be sure, there are countless interactions and conversations in the show that likely did not happen — and they certainly don’t appear in any of the four Gospel accounts.

For example, the show gives extra-biblical background on Mary Magdalene and includes a character for the wife of Peter the disciple. We know Peter was married because Jesus healed his mother-in-law, but the Gospel stories never introduce his wife. Most of the extra-biblical material, indeed, is related to the relationships among the characters and their dialogue.

But biblical scholars told Blaze News the creative liberties that “The Chosen” takes to produce a captivating story do not render the show biblically inaccurate.

In fact, New Testament scholar and professor at Gateway Seminary Dan Gurtner told Blaze News that he believes the show is “remarkably contextually accurate.”

“I like ‘The Chosen’ because I think they are faithful to what they're trying to do, and I think they elicit a response from the viewer that corresponds to the response that the passages are trying to elicit from the reader,” Gurtner said.

“They are faithful to the spirit of scripture. They take a lot of liberties, but they bring it back to the text,” he explained.

“All these backstories and all these intertwining things — which are completely made up, but they're in character with the people — they meet up with the biblical story,” he added. “I think that kind of creativity — it's fictitious, of course, and we get that — but they meet up with the biblical story. And whenever it meets up with the biblical story, it's right in step and completely in line with what the Bible actually says.”

New Testament scholar Paul Sloan, a biblical studies professor at Houston Christian University, told Blaze News that much of “The Chosen” is “accurate” and “well represented,” and “when it's altered, it's done so fairly and justly and in an entertaining way that I think is good to appreciate.”

Scholar Craig Keener, a professor at Asbury Theological Seminary, also praised the show for helping the audience relate with an accurate depiction of Jesus: a Jewish, Middle Eastern man.

“I think it nails Jesus' heart in the Gospels. I mean, in terms of blending all the Gospels together, I think it nails Jesus' heart,” Keener told Blaze News.

“I think it helps immerse us more in the Middle Eastern, early Jewish context of Jesus,” he added of the show. “Maybe not all the details are right, but it's way beyond what people are used to. And so it helps people identify more with the Jewishness of Jesus than church people may traditionally have done so. It's good cross-culturally helping us think that way.”

'The problem is when a film or a TV show comes off as if they are, and they don't realize all the ways in which they're being anachronistic or selective or creative.'

The scholars also emphasized that an important consideration when evaluating the accuracy of “The Chosen” is the fact that the biblical authors told history differently than we tell history today.

“The Gospels are historical, but they're not histories. They're ancient Greco-Roman biographies,” Gurtner said. “Any ancient author is not trying to write by the conventions of modern historiography.”

What that means, explained New Testament scholar and Bethel University professor John Dunne, is that the Gospels “aren't trying to provide a film recording, a video recording of what happened.” Rather, the Gospel stories “have theological interests,” he said, and “particular ways of storytelling” that are designed to communicate those theological interests and evoke a response from the audience.

Does the show’s accuracy even matter?

Multiple scholars who spoke to Blaze News said that “accuracy” is not the right metric by which to judge the show.

“It's the wrong metric because really what we're doing is we're comparing the film that we direct in our minds when we read the Gospels with an external film by another director who has imagined it differently,” explained Dunne.

The issue of accuracy and inaccuracy, on the other hand, is an important aspect when a show is not up front about the creative licenses its production takes, Dunne added.

“If a film is overtly saying, ‘We're not trying to be accurate, or we're not trying to X, Y, or Z,’ then I don't think it should be a metric,” he explained. “The problem is when a film or a TV show comes off as if they are, and they don't realize all the ways in which they're being anachronistic or selective or creative.”

But, as he noted, “The Chosen” does not commit that fault.

“It's only when people aren't aware of how they're taking liberties that I really want to push back,” Dunne said. “If they're very aware of all the liberties they're taking — and I think 'The Chosen' kind of revels in their own creativity — then the metric of accuracy doesn't come up for me.”

New Testament scholar Jason Staples, a professor at North Carolina State University, emphasized that biblical accuracy per se is not the mission of “The Chosen.”

“It's trying to be an entertaining adaptation for a modern audience of a lot of the things that are in the Gospels,” Staples said. “And as such, it has to make a lot of decisions for a combination of audience appeal and entertainment. And also there are a lot of places where the Gospels are sparse in terms of their details."

“So it just adds a lot of material to flesh things out that just aren't specified in the Gospels. And some of the things that it does are implausible, but perfectly within the bounds of a typical adaptation,” he explained. “So I think it's a pretty good and certainly entertaining adaptation of the material in the Gospels, but it is certainly very different from the Gospels in what it does.”

What about the inaccuracies?

While the show is a faithful adaptation of the Gospels, it is not without some historical inaccuracies.

For example, scholars who spoke to Blaze News noted historical inaccuracies related to building and city architecture, as well as the show’s inaccurate depiction of literacy levels in first-century Galilee.

'Jesus is not eradicating ritual purity. He is removing the source of impurity. He isn't getting rid of the system; he's getting rid of the impurity itself.'

They stressed, however, that those inaccuracies, which pertain to what biblical scholars call “background material,” don’t make a significant difference to the plot of the show or the depiction of Jesus’ ministry.

But one problem area most of the scholars identified is the show’s inaccurate depiction of Jesus’ interaction with ancient Judaism and the Jewish law.

“In terms of the purity regulations, there's just all sorts of mistakes about how people with skin diseases are handled in terms of what actually constitutes ritual impurity and what ritual impurity actually means,” Staples said. “There's this sort of conflation in ‘The Chosen’ about when someone is ritually impure that sort of in some way has something to say about their moral status, which in the Jewish Torah, the purity and impurity code is not a matter of morality.”

Staples, moreover, expressed concern that “The Chosen” suggests that Jesus “sort of opposes the ceremonial or ritual or purity regulations of the Torah in ways that the Jesus of the Gospels does not.”

Dunne shared a similar concern.

“Jesus is not eradicating ritual purity. He is removing the source of impurity. He isn't getting rid of the system; he's getting rid of the impurity itself,” he told Blaze News. “But when you see what ‘The Chosen’ does with it — oh my goodness! — they run in the opposite direction.”

The misrepresentations of ancient Judaism and Jesus’ relationship to the Jewish law is a fair critique, Sloan said, “because we're talking about real people, and obviously, Christians have a history of anti-Judaism.”

“So to the degree that some of their misrepresentations are actually perpetuating the tropes that contribute to that anti-Judaism, I think it's important to critique that,” he explained.

Does the show violate the second commandment?

Perhaps the most prominent critique of “The Chosen” is that it violates the second commandment, which prohibits idol worship — or, technically, making any image “in the form of anything in heaven above or on the earth beneath or in the waters below.”

One critic said “The Chosen” exemplifies a “clear violation of the 2nd Commandment” because the show “substitutes a created human in place of the uncreated Christ.” Popular pastor Voddie Baucham has also said he doesn’t watch “The Chosen” because he believes the show violates the second commandment.

'The joke is that if Jesus films violate the second commandment, then Jesus violated it first because he's the representation of God.'

But none of the scholars who spoke to Blaze News believe the show violates the second commandment by depicting Jesus on screen.

“It’s not portraying God the Father. Jesus actually became flesh,” Keener said.

Staples, on the other hand, pointed out that Christians generally interpret the second commandment to mean a prohibition against “making an image in order to bow down or in order to worship it, in order to treat it as though it were deity.” Because “The Chosen” was not made for worship, he doesn’t believe the show violates the second commandment.

Sloan offered Blaze News the same perspective.

“It’s not what [‘The Chosen’ is] there for. It's not an image that is being worshipped. It's not anything that is being treated as an idol,” he explained. “And if this is a transgression of image-making, then I would have to assume that every single artistic depiction of Jesus is also a violation of that.”

For critics who claim “The Chosen” transgresses the second commandment, Dunne said the logical end of that argument ends in a knot.

“The joke is that if Jesus films violate the second commandment, then Jesus violated it first because he's the representation of God, right?” he quipped.

Meanwhile, Jenkins has defended the show against the charge that it violates the second commandment.

“It’s not the portrayal or image itself that’s the issue. If it was, then as the verse says, 'anything' on earth or even water would be wrong to portray. It’s clearly the worship of it,” Jenkins said.

“But no one is worshipping the TV screen; we’re not claiming the show is the Bible or Jonathan [Roumie] is actually Jesus; and no one believes the portrayal is an object of worship or anything other than another way to illustrate and point people to truth,” he added. “On no conceivable level does 'The Chosen' compare to the gods and idols and images the Israelites were potentially worshipping to compete with God.”

Should you watch ‘The Chosen’?

If one of the central purposes of the show is to use beautiful filmmaking and storytelling to point the audience back to the Bible, then the biblical scholars who spoke to Blaze News would consider Jenkins’ mission a success.

Staples, for example, told Blaze News he believes the show gets the audience to think about issues connected to their faith while encouraging them to return to their Bibles.

'I watch what they presented, and it finds my affections drawn more to Christ and more attentive to the text.'

“And as a biblical scholar, things that get people to actually read the Bible are generally a plus for me,” he said.

Gurtner, meanwhile, praised “The Chosen” for doing to its audience what the Bible does to its readers: It confronts you with the person of Jesus — and forces you to respond.

“It does raise those questions of who do people say that Jesus is? That is the fundamental question,” he said. “And when you get to that question, it makes you deal with the, ‘So what?’ Once you realize who Jesus is, then what does that mean? What does that require of you?"

“Then all of a sudden, once you realize who Jesus is, all of a sudden you have to do something with what he claims,” Gurtner explained. “You can't just say, ‘OK, so Jesus is God. Now let me go about my life.’ All of a sudden, you have to take what he says. You can't just leave that on the floor.”

Keener agreed the show “challenges us to ask questions” and “invites us to think more deeply about the Gospels, not just to recite the stories, but to think about the details.”

Sloan even told Blaze News that he knows of people whose desire to read the Bible has been reinvigorated by “The Chosen.”

“I know people who have become more interested in the Gospels and reading the scriptures because of the show,” he said. “So I think that's a good testimony to the fact that these people are not just watching the show and then not reading their Bibles any more because of it. It's getting them interested.”

At one moment during his interview with Blaze News, Gurtner removed his scholarly lens and spoke about “The Chosen” from his Christian perspective.

What he said is perhaps the highest endorsement a scholar of his caliber — a bona fide expert on the synoptic Gospels — could offer “The Chosen.”

“This is not a scholarly perspective. This comes from the perspective of the Christian who wants to be faithful to Jesus, who knows the text and who desires to understand the text better and who is trying to understand what they're trying to present in ‘The Chosen.’ And that is, I watch what they presented, and it finds my affections drawn more to Christ and more attentive to the text,” Gurtner explained.

He went on, “I see this as a very well-produced, imperfect, but well-produced flashlight onto the word of God. And it's like putting a new light bulb in the light in my study when I open up my Bible. This is a really good new light bulb. I think I'm going to keep putting this light bulb into my light fixture in my study so that I'm going to really be able to see the word of God better. It doesn't replace the word of God. It helps me to see the word of God better. Why would I criticize the light bulb? It doesn't make sense to me.”

In that sense, Gurtner would argue that any Christian — and anyone curious about the person of Jesus — should watch “The Chosen” and wrestle with the questions it forces onto you.

“This isn't scholarship,” he said of the show. “This is media meant to edify.”

Christianity Must Control All Of Culture, Or It Won’t Control Any Of It

Christianity needs to hold the same monopoly that the left currently holds over our culture, or it will continue to lose.

Instead Of Boosting LGBT Agendas On Back To The Frontier, The Gaines Need To Go Back To The Bible

[rebelmouse-proxy-image https://thefederalist.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Screenshot-2025-07-14-at-11.12.44 AM-scaled-e1752510863298-1200x675.png crop_info="%7B%22image%22%3A%20%22https%3A//thefederalist.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Screenshot-2025-07-14-at-11.12.44%5Cu202fAM-scaled-e1752510863298-1200x675.png%22%7D" expand=1]In nine years, the Gaineses went from making traditional marriage the hill they die on to making it the hill they flippantly surrender.

Why Christianity is a pilgrimage — not a vacation



Last summer, I toured the set of "The Chosen," sprawling across Camp Hoblitzelle in Midlothian, Texas, not far from Mercury Studios, where Blaze Media calls home.

My parish priest came along. He said the opening blessing.

Every generation gets to choose whether or not to abandon Christianity forever.

None of the cast or crew were there, so we got to see the set in its most humble form, its bare life.

We stood in a first-century village built from scratch on Salvation Army land — a gift, Derral Eves told me, both for the show and for Bible education.

Eves is the executive producer and marketing mind behind "The Chosen," the global television phenomenon that has drawn in millions of viewers and pushed Christian storytelling into new creative territory.

“This generation probably isn’t going to open a Bible,” Eves told us. “But if they see something that speaks to them — they might. And once they do, Scripture preaches. That’s where we want them to go.”

The goal, he explained, is not only to present Christ authentically but to show people who had real problems and real lives and how those lives were upended by love.

“For years, we’ve only talked about the divine side of Jesus,” he said. “But he had a mom. He had friends. He had people around him whose lives were changed forever.”

Technologic

"The Chosen" has taken Christ’s pilgrimage into the future.

God’s loving grace reaches us in every way. Especially technology. Every time, it affirms a truth of Christianity: We believe in the one true living God, the font of all newness.

We have to remain technologic pilgrims: to use our tools but never be used by them.

As I pointed out in my article “God bless the meme evangelists,” every generation gets to choose whether or not to abandon Christianity forever. But no generation has. Instead, believers have multiplied, billions of disciples, constantly renewed by our life of constant exile.

Testimony

I wasn’t always Catholic. Before that, I was a kind of street Baptist. Nondenominational — in the later years, several congregants celebrated worship music with color guard and hula-hoops. One lady even strutted around with a snake on her shoulders.

The church, Agape Metro, was named after the Greek word for love, the essence of the pilgrim’s allegiance. It lasted five years before fracturing into several other churches. None seemed as guided by inspiration as Agape.

We held services anywhere: the playground of a downtrodden park, the rented hall of the community center, the high school gymnasium.

We eventually migrated to a home of sorts, the creaky upstairs of a decommissioned firehouse, easily a century old. Wobbly, dank, bare.

But this poverty suited the focus of our mission. Ministry took place on potholed streets, in battered neighborhoods, full of half-wild dogs and single mothers, boisterous with drunks and criminals.

Each of us contained the temple of the Holy Spirit. Architecture was spiritual. Anything else was vain and fleeting.

We were called to navigate the war zone of human life like a lost tribe, roaming and bare. I was baptized in a lake. I still drive by it sometimes. I can still feel my face rising from muddy water, can still see the spangles of light as I broke through the glass of the surface, brand-new, redeemed, born again.

Starship eyes, lit up with fire.

Anxiety of the pilgrim

Dietrich Bonhoeffer was stuck in a cell in a Gestapo prison, with a jingle stuck in his head: “Let pass, dear brothers, every pain; what you have missed I’ll bring again.”

In a letter, he explained: “What does this ‘I’ll bring again’ mean? It means that nothing is lost, that everything is taken up in Christ, although it is transformed, made transparent, clear, and free of all selfish desire. Christ restores all this as God originally intended it to be, without the distortion resulting from our sins.”

A few weeks later, Bonhoeffer was hanged by the Nazis. As the guards hauled him away, he announced the victory of his execution, “This is the end — for me the beginning of life."

The pilgrim belongs to God. The tourist belongs to spectacle.

Hitler had power, but not freedom — not like this. If God is with us, who can be against us? Absolutely nobody. Not the Nazis, not even Satan, and certainly not death. No darkness can overcome the flow of God’s light.

This migration is the heart of Christianity. It unlocks eternity and brings it into our world. We walk through the desert, homeless and poor, and as we collapse, we smile, because when we’re weak, we’re strong.

Birkenstocks

Fr. Vincent Lampert, an exorcist in Indianapolis, explained it to me plainly: “Jesus gave his apostles authority over unclean spirits. That’s what the Church continues.”

His power is passed down. But it’s not about spectacle or grand battles. It’s about presence.

Jesus didn’t tell us to run for office. He told us to go — two by two, with sandals on our feet. “If a town doesn’t welcome you,” he said, “dust off your feet and move on.”

And if it does? Linger. Enjoy the community. Then go again, poor banished children of Eve.

Myth-breakers

In Acts 14, Paul and Barnabas fled from one town to the next, preaching as they darted from martyrdom and tragedy. In Lystra, they healed a crippled man on the street.

The locals, caught in pagan delusion, flipped out.

They shouted, "The gods have come down to us in human form!" (Acts 14:11). They called Barnabas "Zeus" and Paul "Hermes," and they brought out oxen for sacrifice.

The apostles tore their clothes in protest: “We are mortals just like you, and we bring you good news: that you should turn from these worthless things to the living God, who made the heaven and the earth and the sea and all that is in them."

But the evil one caught up with them and spread his whispers through the crowd, a scandal that led to the stoning of Paul: The persecutors “dragged him outside the city, thinking he was dead. But after the disciples had gathered around him, he got up and went back into the city.”

Rebellion

Critics and enemies of Christianity love to conflate Christ with the gods of antiquity — as if the Christian story is just another version of ancient mythology. But this is the same error the Greeks made in Acts. They tried to fit the gospel into a pagan framework.

But there are no longer pilgrimages in the name of Venus or Mars. Their temples are ruins. Their rituals are forgotten. Meanwhile, time itself has been reshaped around the birth of Christ. His story still sends people walking.

I recently spoke with James Quiggle, who has written over 75 commentaries on Scripture and Christian doctrine. When I asked about this tendency to reshape Jesus, he pointed to the root issue: rebellion. Rebellion against God, against His values, His authority, His love.

“When people reject the true God,” Quiggle told me, “they still need to worship something. So they invent a version of Jesus that fits their rebellion — one with just enough divinity to inspire, but not enough to convict.”

They make Him manageable. A philosopher. A demigod. A temporary vessel. Something that can bless their path without calling them to leave it.

But the real Jesus doesn’t meet you halfway. He calls you to follow. To become a pilgrim. The joy of the Christian journey isn’t that we invent God — it’s that He calls us out of ourselves and into communion. The apostles followed a person, not an idea. And that’s still the offer.

The good news

The Acts of the Apostles opens with the ascension and Pentecost — explosions of glory. But the real miracle is quieter. It’s the joy. Somehow, Acts is a joyful, and exciting, book.

These men were hunted. Tortured. Killed in the most horrific ways. They could have saved themselves by denying the Resurrection. They didn’t.

Instead, they laughed. They sang hymns in prison cells. They broke bread and preached hope. Only John lived to old age, and not for lack of trying to kill him.

They knew the cross was not the end. They had seen the empty tomb. Like the good thief to Christ’s right, they looked through the smoke and saw eternity. And with their gaze facing that light, they never stopped walking.

Pilgrims and tourists

The Christian life is a pilgrimage, not a vacation. The pilgrim knows nowhere is safe except the final holy site. Pilgrims make vows, embrace discomfort, and walk toward holiness.

Tourists, by contrast, chase moments. They want stimulation, not transformation. As Byung-Chul Han puts it, they live in a “totalization of Here and Now” — a string of disconnected experiences, stripped of meaning.

The tourist performs; the pilgrim belongs.

Philosopher Giorgio Agamben once wrote that the tourist undergoes a kind of self-sacrifice — not to unite heaven and earth, but to “celebrate the destruction of all possible use.”

The pilgrim belongs to God. The tourist belongs to spectacle.

Kingdoms in conflict

From the angel’s annunciation in Luke to the agony of Gethsemane, the Gospels present a slow-motion collision between the kingdoms of men and the kingdom of God.

The kingdom of emperors versus the kingdom for pilgrims and apostles.

One is gilded, political, and violent. The other is veiled in mystery. One builds temples to power. The other sleeps in a manger, walks with lepers, dies on a tree.

First person

In Acts 16, Luke shifts. Suddenly, he’s no longer writing about the apostles. He’s with them.

“We got ready at once to leave for Macedonia,” he writes. No explanation. No apology. Just a new pronoun and the sense that we are in this together now.

By Acts 27, Luke is still there — documenting shipwrecks and storms and miracles with the intimacy of someone who lived it. The Gospel of Luke and Acts, taken together, make up 27.5% of the New Testament. Nearly a third. The Church’s story is told through a writer who wasn’t there at the beginning — but who joined when the Spirit led him into pilgrimage.

Jesus Christ, superstar: TV hit 'The Chosen' scores on big screen



How bad did "Snow White" flop? Bad enough to get hammered by run-of-the-mill Jason Statham flick "A Working Man" in its second weekend in theaters.

Another title also lapped the Disney dud, except it’s not a movie but part of a long-running TV show.

'This fan base ... they are incredible. They love to gather communally, and they’re all very loyal.'

“The Chosen: Last Supper Part 1” earned a per-screen average of $4,743 last weekend, a thousand-plus more than “Snow White” attracted by the same metric. The show, detailing the life and times of Jesus Christ, has been a sensation from the jump eight years ago.

Early 'Supper'

“Last Supper Part 1,” the beginning of the show’s fifth season, will be available to stream in June on Prime Video and, at a date to be determined, for free via the official “Chosen” app.

Audiences, apparently, couldn’t wait that long.

It shouldn’t be shocking to see “The Chosen” stand tall against Hollywood’s biggest films. “The Chosen” is a consistent moneymaker in theaters courtesy of Fathom Entertainment.

The Colorado-based company first brought the story to the big screen via “Christmas with the Chosen: The Messengers.” That 2021 title earned an impressive $13.7 million in select theaters, and a new tradition was born.

The latest theatrical release in the series, “The Chosen: Last Supper Part 1” became the best-selling installment in less than a week with $15 million from U.S. theaters ... and counting. One difference this time? IMAX theaters shared “The Chosen” with fans.

Looking for hope

Ray Nutt, chief executive officer of Fathom Entertainment, says the show’s theatrical success started as the global pandemic started to recede in 2021.

“People were looking for some hope, some faith, and to gather communally,” says Nutt, who previously served as senior vice president of business relations at Regal Entertainment Group.

Fathom Entertainment quickly learned this wasn’t just another faith-based property.

“This fan base ... they are incredible. They love to gather communally, and they’re all very loyal,” Nutt said.

A different approach

Fathom offers an alternative to big studio films and franchises. The company serves up reissues of classic films — think this year’s 50th anniversary rerelease of “Monty Python and the Holy Grail” — to indie fare and faith-friendly films like the upcoming “Carlo Acutis: Roadmap to Reality.” That film, detailing the journey of the first Millennial saint, hits theaters April 27.

The company regularly reaches out to faith-based audiences, a group sometimes ignored by traditional Hollywood. The company’s loyalty to faith-friendly titles comes from deep research into that sprawling demographic, Nutt said.

And of course, results.

“We’ve had a lot of luck with Catholic content,” he said, adding that “Mother Teresa: No Greater Love” performed particularly well in 2022. “We’ve drilled down into certain categories where we know there are audiences, and we communicate with them.”

Follow the money

Nutt isn’t surprised to see mainstream Hollywood companies expand their faith-friendly content in recent years. Netflix is currently prepping an update on “The Chronicles of Narnia” by Oscar-nominee Greta Gerwig. Prime Video has found success with the recent “House of David,” already greenlit for a second season.

“Hollywood will follow the money ... we’re very proud we’ve been able to pioneer this space,” he said.

Nutt says Fathom is constantly evaluating its business model to address consumer craving.

One example? This year, Fathom will allow audiences to catch up with recent “Chosen” installments, giving them the chance to “binge” all three season five updates, even if they missed “Last Supper Part 1,” for example.

Part of the Fathom Entertainment model is that films stay in theaters for a limited time. The “Monty Python” rerelease, for example, will be shown on just two nights — May 4 and 7.

The theatrical landscape is undergoing seismic shifts of late. Theatrical windows — the time between a film’s release and its debut on home-streaming platforms — are shrinking. Box office numbers have yet to recover from their pre-pandemic levels. The 2025 box office receipts have been troubling, above and beyond Disney's disappointing "Snow White" tally.

'A very resilient industry'

Nutt remains bullish on the theatrical experience in 2025 and beyond.

“It’s a very resilient industry and somewhat recession proof,” he said, recalling how often observers predicted the theatrical model’s death in the past. Some said the advent of television would strike that mortal blow. Others predicted the dawn of cable television options like HBO would do the same.

Innovation matters on the theatrical level, and we’re seeing that across the industry. Some mainstream theaters are toying with 4DX experiences, where the consumer’s chair moves along with the action on screen, among other enhancements.

For Fathom, it might be as simple as having film historian Leonard Maltin greet audiences with trivia about a beloved film. Nutt compares it to an MLB giveaway, where attendees get a free T-shirt or similar souvenir.

“Our research tells us that’s really working for us,” he said. “If you do something that might be extra, like Fathom does all the time, you’ll get that person no matter what the window is, off the couch and into the movie theater.”

“The Chosen: Last Supper Part 2” (episodes 3-5) debuts April 4, with the third installment (episodes 6-8) arriving April 11. Show fans can choose the “binge-fest” option mid-April.

‘Homestead’ Is Proof Christian Films Are Getting Better — But There’s Room For Improvement

With 'Homestead,' Angel Studios has set out to embrace a kind of dark storytelling but with a Christian edge.

Did Jesus really pray for Judas? 'The Chosen' faces backlash over 'super unbiblical' scene



Dallas Jenkins, creator of the hit TV show "The Chosen," is defending a scene from the show's upcoming new season.

The controversial and tense scene, from the unreleased season 5, depicts Jesus speaking with Judas before the betrayal.

In the scene, Jesus tells Judas that he has a "choice to make": "Who you belong to. Who has your heart?" Jesus then says, "I want it, and I've had it before. You followed me willingly." Judas responds by telling Jesus, "There is nothing more that I want than that," to which Jesus says, "Then I will pray for you."

The scene generated widespread backlash on social media with accusations that the scene is "super unbiblical."

As evidence, critics highlighted several passages from the Gospel of John:

  • John 6:64: "'Yet there are some of you who do not believe.' For Jesus had known from the beginning which of them did not believe and who would betray him."
  • John 6:70-71: "Then Jesus replied, 'Have I not chosen you, the Twelve? Yet one of you is a devil!' (He meant Judas, the son of Simon Iscariot, who, though one of the Twelve, was later to betray him.)"
  • John 17:12: "None has been lost except the one doomed to destruction so that Scripture would be fulfilled."

Critics, therefore, suggest that Jesus never had Judas' heart and that Judas was never a true follower of Jesus because he was predetermined to be damned.

The problem with the scene, the critics argued, is that it implies Judas was once a follower of Jesus — thus suggesting that salvation can be lost — and that Jesus might pray that Judas would not betray Him, which Jesus did not do and which would run counter to God's redemptive plan. Critics also raised the point that the scene is not depicted in the Bible.

Yes, the controversial scene is not in the Bible. But most of Jesus' life — His every interaction, teaching, and dialogue — is not recorded in the Bible.

Earlier this month, Jenkins responded to the controversy in a new video, denying charges that his show is committing heresy.

"We are not implying that Jesus is going to pray that Judas will change his mind," he said. "Yes, Judas' betrayal is part of the Father's will. It is part of this crucifixion and ultimately salvation story. So Jesus did not say in the scene, 'I'll pray for you, Judas, that you'll change your mind from whatever you’re about to do.'"

Regarding Jesus' statement that he would pray for Judas, Jenkins pointed to Matthew 5:44 and Luke 6:27-28, teachings from Jesus in which He commands his followers to love and to pray for their enemies.

In the end, Jenkins explained the show believes Judas was, in fact, once a follower of Jesus — but not at the time of the betrayal, which Jenkins described as "God's will" — and believes Jesus prayed for His enemies, including Judas.

Whether or not one agrees with Jenkins, it's important not to misunderstand the Bible or "The Chosen." In this case, I think critics of the scene have partially misunderstood the purpose of both.

First, the Bible does not "tell history" in the same manner that modern people expect history to be told (i.e., surveillance-camera style).

While the Bible is true because it is God's infallible Word, each of the Gospel writers had a specific motive for writing his stories: They are showing that Jesus of Nazareth is, in fact, the long-awaited, promised Jewish Messiah. And importantly, the Gospel writers are posing the same question to you that Jesus asked his disciples: "Who do you say that I am?" (Matthew 16:13-16; Mark 8:27-29; Luke 9:18-20).

What the Gospel writers did not intend to do is to tell the story of Jesus in the same manner that we read history in modern textbooks.

We should, therefore, expect creative license in films and TV shows depicting biblical stories.

Yes, the controversial scene is not in the Bible. But most of Jesus' life — His every interaction, teaching, and dialogue — is not recorded in the Bible. This fact raises an important question: Is it fair or right to expect the Bible to tell the story of Jesus in a manner that God did not intend, i.e., with our modern suppositions and expectations of historical storytelling?

Second, given that a TV show like "The Chosen" must use creative license to actually develop a cohesive plot, we should ask: Is "The Chosen" being faithful to scripture?

While viewers of "The Chosen" and its critics disagree about the answer to the question, Jenkins has said repeatedly that he and his team are seeking to create a faithful portrayal of the biblical story.

In the first episode of the show, "The Chosen" informs viewers:

"The Chosen" is based on the true stories of the Gospels of Jesus Christ. Some locations and timelines have been combined or condensed. Backstories and some characters or dialogue have been added. However, all biblical and historical context and any artistic imagination are designed to support the truth and intention of the scriptures. Viewers are encouraged to read the Gospels.

The mission of "The Chosen," then, is clear: to create a faithful depiction of the life and ministry of Jesus and to lead viewers to the Bible and to God.

We can agree or disagree about the faithfulness of the added backstory and dialogue. But "The Chosen" has chosen a worthy mission, one that all Christians should pray God uses to bear fruit for His kingdom.

These 5 Fall Film Releases Show Inspirational Dramas Are Leveling Up

After this year’s runaway success of ‘Jesus Revolution’ and ‘Sound of Freedom,’ a handful of dramas are hoping to find a wide audience.

I Don’t Want To Boycott ‘The Chosen,’ But The Cast And Crew Are Forcing Me To Walk Away

According to several 'Chosen' actors, tolerance is apparently a one-way street.
Saul Loeb/Getty Images

Christians are right to raise red flags about rainbow flags

How am I, a normal Christian trying not to choke on all of the LGBT alphabet soup being shoved down my throat, the controversial one here?