Alleged attempted Trump assassin's political rant revealed in prison letter



Ryan Wesley Routh, the 48-year-old Floridian charged with attempting to assassinate President-elect Donald Trump, revealed his political discontent in a letter addressed to a Politico reporter.

Routh was apprehended on September 16 after a Secret Service agent spotted the barrel of a rifle poking out of the bushes on golf course at the Trump International Golf Club at West Palm Beach, Florida. Routh was subsequently charged with attempting to kill the then-presidential candidate on September 26.

'I am unclear how we allowed ourselves to fall into just a two-party system, but it infuriates me.'

In the letter, which was written before the election, Routh called Trump a "dictator" and said we "must limit all Presidential power before Trump seizes our country" as well as "remove the power of our military by the President and place it with Congress before January."

Routh also ranted about the two-party system, claiming it is "designed to exclude most everyone" and forces voters to choose between "such flawed candidates."

“I am unclear how we allowed ourselves to fall into just a two-party system, but it infuriates me," Routh said in the letter.

“My entire life has been plagued by D’s and R’s," Routh continued. "It seems not long ago there was a push for the libertarian party and now a green party and maybe Truth party. But for some reason our leaders have not allowed any other party [to] be recognized in any race."

Routh's alleged assassination attempt came just two months after 20-year-old Thomas Matthew Crooks fired shots at Trump in July during a rally in Butler County, Pennsylvania. In the letter, Routh likened himself to Crooks, saying they were both “ready to die for freedom and democracy.”

Routh rounded out his rantings with a closing message demanding peace.

“My fellowmen,” the alleged would-be assassin wrote, “please demand peace.”

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

More voters trust Trump over Harris on key issue



More voters across the seven battlegrounds trust former President Donald Trump to handle democracy over Vice President Kamala Harris, even as she repeatedly labels her Republican opponent a "fascist," according to a recent poll from the Washington Post.

Trump holds a three-point advantage over Harris on handling threats to democracy, according to the poll released Wednesday. At the same time, Harris and her party have incessantly hammered Trump for being a "fascist," a "threat to democracy," and even likening him to Hitler over the course of the campaign.

Although Harris is favored to handle social issues like abortion and health care, she is underwater on key issues like crime and immigration, according to the poll.

This trend remains true across undecided voters across key states, with 32% saying they trust Trump to handle democracy while 28% said the same for Harris, according to the poll.

Over a quarter of uncommitted voters in these states said they don't trust either candidate.

The issue of democracy ranks relatively high to swing-state voters, with 61% overall saying it is extremely important, including 71% of Democrats, 61% of Republicans, and 55% of independents, according to the poll.

Trump is also favored to handle top issues among swing-state voters.

Inflation and the economy have consistently ranked as top priorities, with 66% and 65%, respectively, saying it is "extremely important" to their vote for president, according to the poll. Trump is trusted over Harris 49% to 33% to handle inflation and 51% to 36% to handle the economy.

This disparity is likely attributable to the Biden-Harris administration's handling of the economy over the last three and a half years. The majority of key-state voters, 58%, said the economy is getting worse, while just 21% said it stayed the same and 21% said it got better, according to the poll.

Although Harris is favored to handle social issues like abortion and health care, she is underwater on key issues like crime and immigration, according to the poll. Trump polls at 45% trust to handle crime, while Harris trails at 35%. Similarly, 52% of battleground voters trust Trump to handle immigration, while just 33% said the same for Harris.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

President Joe Biden Threatens 2024 Election Won’t Be ‘Peaceful’

[rebelmouse-proxy-image https://thefederalist.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Screenshot-2024-10-04-at-1.33.14 PM-e1728066858989-1200x675.png crop_info="%7B%22image%22%3A%20%22https%3A//thefederalist.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Screenshot-2024-10-04-at-1.33.14%5Cu202fPM-e1728066858989-1200x675.png%22%7D" expand=1]Biden’s comments come roughly 24 hours before Trump returns to the site of his first failed assassination attempt in Butler, Pennsylvania.

Debate Flashback: Trump Said Democrat Rhetoric Led Directly To Assassination Attempts Against Him

'I probably took a bullet to the head because of the things that they say about me.'

Kamala Will Be The Democrat Nominee And Will Lose Unless There’s Rampant Foul Play

The Kamala Harris campaign will in no way be an effort at distancing itself from Biden's abysmal record. There's no clean slate to be had.

Steve Scalise following assassination attempt on Trump: 'This inciendary rhetoric must stop'



Rep. Steve Scalise (R-La.) and several other Republican lawmakers were practicing for a charity baseball game in 2017 when a leftist terrorist took aim at them and opened fire. Scalise, among the wounded, took a bullet to the hip. He suffered fractured bones, damaged organs, and severe bleeding.

Following the assassination attempt on President Donald Trump Saturday, Scalise noted, "For weeks Democrat leaders have been fueling ludicrous hysteria that Donald Trump winning re-election would be the end of democracy in America. Clearly we've seen far left lunatics act on violent rhetoric in the past."

"This incendiary rhetoric must stop," added Scalise.

While a handful of Democrats condemned the attempted assassination of Trump in Butler, Pennsylvania, many in their party have spent years and untold sums of money vilifying Trump and his tens of millions of supporters.

"This MAGA threat is a threat to the brick and mortar of our democratic institutions," President Joe Biden stressed in a speech last September. "It's also a threat to the character of our nation that gives our Constitution life, that binds us together as Americans, a common cause."

In December, Biden wrote, "Trump poses many threats to our country: The right to choose, civil rights, voting rights, and America's standing in the world. But the greatest threat he poses is to our democracy."

'He will destroy this country, our democracy.'

Sen. J.D. Vance (R-Ohio) noted after the Trump rally shooting, "The central premise of the Biden campaign is that President Donald Trump is an authoritarian fascist who must be stopped at all costs. That rhetoric led directly to President Trump's attempted assassination."

Plenty of Democrats besides Biden have worked ardently to push this narrative despite knowing all along it was bogus.

Years after calling Trump and his fellow Republicans "enemies of the state," Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) suggested in April that Trump is "a great threat to our democracy."

The Democratic National Committee has, for instance, has been running an ad campaign in multiple states labeling Trump not only a "fraud," a "liar," and a "denier" but also a "threat to our democracy," reported The Hill.

There have, of course, been variations on this theme.

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) said Trump presents a "clear and present danger" both to the Congress and to the country. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.), apparently reading from the same script, indicated that every moment Trump is in office is a "clear and present danger to the safety and security of the American people."

In May, California Rep. Maxine Waters (D), long a champion for street violence, attempted to paint Trump as a dictator in waiting.

Waters suggested to MSNBC talking head Jonathan Capehart that Trump would seek a third term and stated, "Donald Trump will do any and everything that he can possibly get away with. He does not at all support the Constitution of the United States of America. This is a man who we better be careful about."

Rep. Robert Garcia (D-Calif.) chimed in, telling Capehart, "If Donald Trump gets re-elected, there is no doubt that he will try to stay in office beyond his four-year term. He will destroy this country, our democracy."

Biden — whose team lashed out at Trump for using the word "bloodbath" in reference to the economic fallout of continued offshoring of jobs under the current administration — suggested on a donors-only call last week that "it's time to put Trump in a bullseye."

The New York Sun noted that unlike Trump's "bloodbath" comment, Biden's "bullseye" remark "has no banal application."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Ezra Klein reveals Democrats never really believed what they were saying about a certain 'existential threat'



Democrats, media personalities, and other individuals with uneasy relationships with the truth have spent years suggesting that President Donald Trump is "an existential threat to our democracy."

The suggestion that the majority decision by American voters to elect a candidate disliked by the political establishment would mean the end of the very system by which they elected him has also been repeated on numerous occasions by the very man most likely to benefit from this narrative: President Joe Biden.

Shortly after a Biden official's group successfully got the Democratic incumbent's top rival temporarily removed from the primary ballot in Colorado late last year, Biden tweeted, "Trump poses many threats to our country: The right to choose, civil rights, voting rights, and America's standing in the world. But the greatest threat he poses is to our democracy."

'All these, you know, kind of phrases that are thrown about ... on the op-ed pages of the New York Times and on MSNBC.'

All this work to paint Trump as a threat to democracy has effectively been undone.

Ezra Klein, the leftist founder of Vox, revealed to a fellow traveler at another leftist blog Wednesday that Biden was not the only Democrat who appears not to have really believed in the existential threat narrative.

Tim Miller of the Bulwark told Klein on his podcast that he frequently encounters "this 'democracy is at threat,' 'it's an existential threat,' all these, you know, kind of phrases that are thrown about ... on the op-ed pages of the New York Times and on MSNBC where I frequent."

Klein later explained how top Democrats, cognizant of the likelihood Biden will suffer a humiliating defeat in November, can justify not asking him to exit the race despite their peers having floated this existential threat as a likely consequence.

'Unlike Biden and many others, I refuse to participate in a campaign to scare voters with the idea that Trump will end our democratic system.'

"Top Democrats believe that if Joe Biden is on top of the ticket, he will lose, but are also not coming out and calling on him to resign. I think there are a lot of ways to say it, but I think one thing that is being revealed is that ... whatever they believe intellectually, they certainly do not believe Donald Trump is an existential threat to American democracy," said Klein.

Klein suggested he respected Democratic Maine Rep. Jared Golden's recent op-ed in the Bangor Daily News, which signaled this understanding among Democrats that Trump does not pose a risk to democracy.

Golden wrote, "While I don't plan to vote for him, Donald Trump is going to win. And I'm OK with that."

"Democrats' post-debate hand-wringing is based on the idea that a Trump victory is not just a political loss, but a unique threat to our democracy. I reject the premise. Unlike Biden and many others, I refuse to participate in a campaign to scare voters with the idea that Trump will end our democratic system," continued Golden. "I urge everyone — voters, elected officials, the media, and all citizens — to ignore the chattering class' scare tactics and political pipe dreams. We don't need party insiders in smoke-filled back rooms to save us. We can defend our democracy without them."

"Golden was unusual in saying that, but I think that if you look at how a lot of these Democrats are acting, that is sort of what they believe," Klein told Miller. "People are, like, weighing this set of things, like, 'It would be quite unpleasant for me personally to come out against the president as an elected official in a Democratic Party' and weighing what will happen if Donald Trump wins and saying ... 'I can live with Donald Trump winning.' And I've had people say that to me off the record, to be fair."

"Really?" asked Miller.

"I've had top Democrats say to me basically something like, 'I don't know why all these Democrats who think Donald Trump is an existential threat to democracy are acting the way they are. But the reason I'm acting the way I am is because I don't think that,'" said Klein.

"Who the f*** is this?" responded Miller. "Out your sources, Ezra! I'm about to be in leaking-text mode over here myself. Like, that is crazy."

"I find it maddening," said Klein. "But I do find it consistent. Look, you can say this is true in a lot of things, right. It's a charge Republicans always throw at liberals, which is that if they really believe climate change is a problem, they wouldn't fly on planes."

While Klein's admissions helped kill the existential threat narrative, it was already on life support thanks to Biden's recent interview with ABC News' George Stephanopoulos.

Stephanopoulos asked Biden, "If you stay in [the race] and Trump is elected, and everything you're warning about comes to pass, how will you feel in January?"

Biden answered, "I'll feel, as long as I gave it my all and I did as goodest as I know I can do, that's what this is about."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

CNN tries to blade RFK Jr., but he turns interview on its head: 'Biden is a much worse threat to democracy'



Robert F. Kennedy Jr., running as an independent candidate for president, is poised to kneecap President Joe Biden in critical swing states. The prospect that American voters might exercise their civic right and free will to support someone besides Biden is apparently intolerable to members of the liberal media, who have embraced the geriatric Democrat's suggestion that for democracy to survive past November 2024, Biden must remain in power.

CNN's Erin Burnett is the latest Democratic talking head to paint Kennedy, 70, as a "spoiler" and his success as an indirect threat to democracy. However, Kennedy refused to play her game Monday and turned her scare-mongering on its head.

The titular host of "Erin Burnett OutFront" cited recent polling indicating that Kennedy would draw 12% of the Democratic vote in Georgia but only 5% of the Republican vote.

"So when you look at it that way, how can you say that your campaign is not taking more [votes] from Biden?" asked Burnett.

"I don't care one way or the other," said Kennedy, adding that those who appear keen to vote for him are disenchanted Americans who would otherwise likely not vote at all.

After framing Kennedy as a possible "spoiler," Burnett asked Kennedy, "A moment ago, you said you essentially see Trump and Biden as the same. Different issues. Do you really believe that? When people talk about the threat to democracy that Trump poses, do you really think that that is equal to Biden?"

"I make the argument that President Biden is a much worse threat to democracy," responded Kennedy. "And the reason for that is President Biden is the first candidate in history, the first president in history that has used the federal agencies to censor political speech, to censor his opponent."

"I can say that because I just won a case, the federal court of appeals, now before the Supreme Court, shows that [Biden] started censoring not just me — 37 hours after he took the oath of office, he was censoring me," continued Kennedy. "No president in the country has ever done that."

The U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments earlier this month concerning whether the Biden administration violated the Constitution when it leaned on social media companies to censor and suppress Americans' protected free speech in the interest of promoting its preferred narratives online.

Last year, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals agreed with a district court's assessment that there was plenty of evidence of a "coordinated campaign" of unprecedented "magnitude orchestrated by federal officials that jeopardized a fundamental aspect of American life."

Blaze News previously reported that U.S. District Judge Terry A. Doughty wrote that the Biden administration "used its power to silence the opposition. Opposition to COVID-19 vaccines; opposition to COVID-19 masking and lockdowns; opposition to the lab-leak theory of COVID-19; opposition to the validity of the 2020 election; opposition to President Biden's policies; statements that the Hunter Biden laptop story was true; and opposition to policies of the government officials in power."

The Biden administration has fought ardently to maintain its ability to clamp down on speech it regards as "misinformation" or "harmful."

Kennedy has personally been subjected to censorship efforts in recent years. For instance, Instagram banned Kennedy in 2021, stating he had "repeatedly shar[ed] debunked claims about the coronavirus or vaccines."

In 2022, Facebook and Instagram banned Kennedy's Children's Health Defense organization for criticizing the administration's preferred narrative about the supposed safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines.

Kennedy said in a statement at the time, "Facebook is acting here as a surrogate for the Federal government's crusade to silence all criticism of draconian government policies."

The independent underscored to Burnett Monday, "The greatest threat to democracy is not somebody who questions election returns, but a president of the United States who used the power of his office to force the social media companies — Facebook, Instagram, Twitter — to open up a portal and give access to that portal to the FBI, to the CIA, to the IRS, to CISA, to NIH, to censor his political critics."

RFK Jr says Biden poses a bigger threat than Trump: "Biden is the first president in history that has used federal agencies to censor political speech to censor his opponent. No president has even done that. The greatest threat is not somebody who questions election returns."
— (@)

Kennedy added that Biden, framed as a protector of democracy by Democratic boosters in the media, has also refused to grant his political opponent Secret Service protection "for political reasons."

Politico reported that Kennedy's campaign is racking up millions in debt to a private security firm because of the Biden administration's refusal to abide by custom and grant Kennedy protection.

"[Biden is] weaponizing the federal agencies. Those are really critical threats to democracy," said Kennedy. "If you have a government that can silence its opponent, it has license for any atrocity."

Throughout the remainder of the interview, Burnett desperately attempted to blade Kennedy on other issues but proved grossly ineffective.

Steve Bannon, former Trump strategist and host of the "War Room," recently suggested to Russell Brand that "Bobby Kennedy is a dagger at the heart of the Democratic Party. ... And they know this. This is why they're coming down on him so hard."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Bloomberg: '2024 is the year of elections and that's a threat to democracy'



Opinion writers at Bloomberg and other liberal publications appear to share at least one thing in common with President Joe Biden: a sense that democracy is safe only so long as the right candidates are winning. It turns out, the right candidates happen to be establishment liberals.

Return of the 'unthinkables'

On Sundays, Bloomberg Opinion senior editor Tobin Harshaw cobbles together the various opinions his publication spat out over the course of the previous week and attempts to pull at the threads common among them. This Sunday, in a roundup entitled "2024 Is the Year of Elections and That's a Threat to Democracy," Harshaw exposed his team's disdain for democratic processes that yield results unfavorable to the liberal status quo.

India, Indonesia, Pakistan, Russia, Mexico, Iran, the U.K., South Africa, Austria, Taiwan, the Czech Republic, and possibly Ukraine are among the 64 countries set to hold elections this year, along with the European Union.

"41% of the world's population is having major elections this year. Yay democracy! Right?" wrote Harshaw. "Not really, what with extremist populist parties — mostly right-wing — on the rise everywhere from the European Union to the Pacific rim."

Harshaw referenced a weekend piece by John Micklethwait and Adrian Wooldridge, which cast the 2016 election of Donald Trump and the restoration of British sovereignty via its Brexit break with the European Union as "unthinkables," then suggested the world in 2024 "is almost a mirror image of 2016."

"In this year of elections, voters in countries representing 41% of the world's population will go to the polls — and in a terrifying number of cases, candidates who would have been seen as extremist wild cards in 2016 look the strongest," wrote the Bloomberg duo.

"The long-shot unthinkables from eight years ago are now the firm favorites, or even just the accepted status quo," wrote Micklethwait and Wooldridge. "Bookmakers give Trump a 40% chance of winning November's presidential election. His closest rival, Joe Biden, is an 81-year-old prone to gaffes and memory lapses, exactly the rival that Trump would want in the grueling marathon that is a modern presidential race."

Not only is a candidate loathed by establishment Washington and the liberal media poised to win the 2024 presidential election, but right-leaning populists farther afield — such as Dutch prime ministerial candidate Geert Wilders and France's Marine Le Pen — are also ascendant, to the chagrin of liberal onlookers in the media.

The Bloomberg duo suggested optimists might be satisfied to know there's a 10% chance of "more benign possibilities" seizing the day. In the case of the U.S. election, they floated the names of Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer (D) and Nikki Haley as so-called "benign" options.

After insinuating that the basic requirement that things turn out "alright" in 2024 is that "somebody other than Trump wins the US presidency," Harshaw noted that voters may also threaten democracy in the island nation of Taiwan, where "another victory by the ruling Democratic Progressive Party may bring the territory closer to a Chinese invasion."

The head of the DPP, current Vice President Lai Ching-te, has been called a "complete troublemaker" by the Chinese regime.

To deliver the Bloomberg opinion team a "surprisingly good year," voters will have to make sure that "America will be celebrating its first female president; Trump and Netanyahu will be spending more time with their lawyers; the US and China will be devoting more time to mending their economic relationship and less to shadowboxing over Taiwan; [British leftist Keir] Starmer will have begun [reunification] negotiations with the EU; the Israelis and Palestinians will be talking to each other seriously, for the first time in decades; and one or another of the world’s nastier dictatorships will have fallen."

Birds of a feather

The Atlantic is another liberal outfit that has fearmongered over the possibility that voters may not provide establishmentarians with what Harshaw called a "good year."

Brian Klaas, a contributing writer for the Atlantic, suggested Saturday that "even with all this voting, democracy is under severe threat, endangered by predatory politicians who rig elections and disgruntled voters willing to hand over power to autocratic leaders." Klaas even came up with a term to denote the tendency for democratic elections to produce results he doesn't like: "counterfeit democracy."

The decision to seek remedy for bad leadership at the ballot box is emblematic of democracy's erosion, according to Klaas.

Rather than lean into the kind of "stolen election" rhetoric failed Democratic candidates Stacey Abrams and Hillary Clinton have deployed in recent years, Klaas suggested that democracy is failing because of a "toxic cycle: Governance is dysfunctional, so politicians fail to deliver for voters—and voters respond to those failures by contemplating whether authoritarian rule might be better."

"Billions of ordinary people around the world will vote this year," wrote the Atlantic contributor. "If they make the wrong choice, 2024 may be remembered as the year the world embraced elections without democracy."

Campaigning on theme

The democracy rhetoric deployed in the Atlantic and Bloomberg pieces has been central to Biden's re-election campaign.

Within hours of a Democrat-aligned group getting his top rival removed from the primary ballot last month, Biden tweeted, "Trump poses many threats to our country: The right to choose, civil rights, voting rights, and America's standing in the world."

"But the greatest threat he poses is to our democracy," continued Biden. "If we lose that, we lose everything."

In his first major campaign event of 2024, Biden said, "America, as we begin this election year, we must be clear, democracy is on the ballot. Your freedom is on the ballot."

While he claimed that "democracy is about being able to bring about peaceful change," Biden also insinuated that voters' decision to change the man in the White House could mean democracy's end.

The Biden campaign has also capitalized on this suggestion in the decrepit candidate's new 2024 campaign ad.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Election Games: The REAL ‘Threat to Democracy’ EXPOSED



On Wednesday night's episode of "GlennTV," Glenn Beck examines the “Voldemort” topic of Democrats and the media. It’s the topic that they have deemed shall not be named or mentioned: election interference. Glenn does NOT question the results of the 2020 election. Instead, he exposes a process that could forever change how we vote in all future elections.

Remember this admission from Time magazine just a month after Joe Biden took office: “A well-funded cabal of powerful people, ranging across industries and ideologies, working together behind the scenes to influence perceptions, change rules and laws, steer media coverage and control the flow of information.” These are THEIR WORDS. A “cabal” influencing the election kind of sounds EXACTLY like what Democrats accuse Republicans of doing.

Glenn pulls the curtain on the entire scheme of Democrats to influence and NATIONALIZE elections and gives you the solutions to stop the game in its tracks.

Watch the full episode of "Glenn TV" below:


Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn’s masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis, and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.