Couch: Sprinter Allyson Felix might be our last authentic Olympic superstar and hero



No one will remember Allyson Felix as the greatest American track athlete in history. That's because she never told us she was. Nike never told us that, either, so how could she be?

Felix was the most important American athlete at the Tokyo Olympics, right when we needed her most. At 35 and in her final Olympics, she won the gold medal in the 4x400 relay and the bronze in the 400-meter individual sprint. That gave her 11 Olympic medals, making her the most decorated Olympic track athlete in American history, even more so than Carl Lewis. More than Jesse Owens. More than Wilma Rudolph. More than Jackie Joyner-Kersee, Babe Didrikson, Jim Thorpe, or Michael Johnson.

That's not why we needed her so much, though. Felix showed that you can be a superstar in the look-at-me generation without focusing entirely on yourself. You can stand for something socially important to you and at the same time stand up to corporate backers and not sell your soul.

Did we even know someone like Allyson Felix could still exist? Let's hope people get the message, because the Olympics were defined by fallen stars more than superstars. From all appearances, Felix is a healthy, happy, strong, proud new mother with a lot of guts, a lot of money, and a lot of Olympic medals.

By contrast, what do you see when you look at Simone Biles? Or Naomi Osaka? Or Novak Djokovic? They never smiled once. They were hyped up by the GOAT machine – corporate sponsors insisting that they are the best ever and will do even more in Tokyo. And they failed miserably. Grim, unhappy, needing mental help.

It's a trendy thing now to say that Biles and Osaka have "started the discussion" about mental health in sports, or even just among young people. I can see how that's true and important, but it's also important that Felix be in that same discussion.

She is the correct path to the mountaintop, the safest path, the healthiest path. In a world where LeBron James will stand up for social causes except anything that is critical of China and Nike, where his bread is buttered, Felix stood up to Nike, risked her finances, and made real change.

She was under no less pressure than Biles or Osaka to make the most of herself and to be the best. And her stances were always with others in mind.

She did it right.

She decided to start a family and got pregnant in 2018, as her contract with Nike was up. She was offered a new deal, which came, she said, with a 70% pay cut.

Felix felt wronged and also felt that the apparel business in general treated women athletes poorly when they decided to have families. So she stood up for them, as well as herself, in a social justice stance that was genuine and from the heart. She wrote an editorial in the New York Times that said:

"I asked Nike to contractually guarantee that I wouldn't be punished if I didn't perform at my best in the months surrounding childbirth. I wanted to set a new standard. If I, one of Nike's most widely marketed athletes, couldn't secure these protections, who could? Nike declined."

Under Felix's pressure, as well as pressure from other athletes, Nike and the industry buckled. Nike changed its policy.

Felix had an emergency C-section in November 2018 at 32 weeks pregnant because of a health issue that threatened both her life and her daughter's. Felix then became an advocate for health issues regarding black women and pregnancy.

This is the way to do social justice, without corporate direction or a self-aggrandizing marketing plan. The pressure on the mental health of today's athletes is coming from so many places, mostly from social media and excessive parents. And when athletes reach the top, the corporate marketers are waiting for them, to heap on more pressure.

Felix, who was once a prodigy, found her way through it all. We saw her in the Olympic trials on Father's Day needing to finish in the top three. She took the lead, fell back to fourth and fifth, then relentlessly came back and qualified for Tokyo.

All with her daughter, Camryn, in the stands watching.

You rarely take a lead in a sprint, fall behind, and come back. She did it again in Tokyo in the 400 to win the bronze medal.

Is Felix the GOAT of American track and field? I still feel Lewis probably is. You don't always have to be hyped up that way to matter. Felix could be the last role model to prove it.

Whitlock: Dominance of US women at Tokyo Olympics demonstrates access without investment is worthless



The Olympic Games are a reminder that America produces the strongest, most accomplished, and skilled women in the world.

With a gold-medal victory over Brazil on Saturday, the U.S. women's volleyball team pushed America past China in the race for gold. We won 39-38. We won the overall medal count 113-88 over China.

Our women led us to victory. Sixty-six of our 113 medals were won by women. The dominance of American women is not new. Our women have been outperforming our men since the 2008 Beijing Olympics. The performance gap is now widening.

It's an indication that no country on the planet has invested more resources toward the physical development of women than the United States. It's proof of the popular idiom, "you get what you pay for."

I am not complaining about the investment. Participation in sports is a great tool in promoting good health and strong leadership. The landmark 1972 Title IX legislation changed sports for women in a good way. Before Title IX, American women rarely participated in sports at the high school or collegiate level. Less than 2% of college athletic budgets were directed toward women.

Title IX changed that. The legislation — signed by former President Richard Nixon and co-authored by congresswoman Patsy Mink (D-Hawaii) and Sen. Birch Bayh (D-Ind.) — prohibited any school receiving federal funds from discriminating based on sex. The law caused a dramatic pivot in the way athletic departments spent their money. It did far more than open doors for women in athletics. It provoked financial investment.

Which brings me to my point.

Title IX is an outgrowth from the civil rights movement. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 inspired Title IX. The 1964 law prohibited sex-based discrimination in the workplace. The feminist movement quickly capitalized on the law's passage and sought equalize financial funding between girls and boys, men and women.

Women realized that access was great, but investment was better. Black people settled for access to white schools, neighborhoods, and businesses. We were uninterested in self-sufficiency.

Again, I'm not criticizing tennis star Billie Jean King and the other feminists who led the charge for Title IX. They were smart, strategic, and pragmatic.

Black people had the exact same opportunity in the aftermath of the Civil Rights Act. As I mentioned in a previous column, Daniel Patrick Moynihan, working as an Assistant Secretary of Labor in President Lyndon Johnson's administration, called for investment in the negro family in 1965. He wrote what would be called the "Moynihan Report," a five-chapter analysis of issues impacting black Americans. His report was titled, "The Negro Family: The Case for National Action."

Liberals, of course, labeled his work racist. The mainstream media smeared Moynihan and his assertion that America should invest in the black family in general and the black man in particular. After initially supporting Moynihan's report, President Johnson disavowed it after the media backlash.

Almost immediately, white female liberals started making their case for national action to promote women. That call for national action led to Title IX.

Let me repeat, I am not criticizing women for fighting for equal treatment. I'm simply pointing out that one group calls for strategic investment and another group calls for access (and reparations).

Fifty years of investment in women's athletics has produced remarkable results. Our women are the best in the world, and it's not really close. Strategic investment works. It prepares you for new opportunities. Unprepared people do not maximize opportunities.

Let's suppose women athletes had demanded access to participate in men's sports rather than the resources to get their sports up to standards. Where would they be today if they had begged for integration rather than independence? Would they be the most dominant athletes on the planet?

Moynihan observed that America needed to invest in the black family to get it up to standard. Once the family was up to standard, he correctly assumed the neighborhoods and schools would get up to standard.

With a shove from corporate media, black elites chose dependence and integration.

I'm not remotely pro-segregation. I just realize the worthlessness of integration without independence, self-sufficiency, and shared cultural values.

Team USA superstars call out American media after winning gold medal: 'Teach these people some loyalty'



NBA superstars Kevin Durant and Draymond Green sharply criticized American media on Saturday after Team USA won the gold medal for men's basketball in the Tokyo Olympics.

What is the background?

Last month, ESPN analyst Kendrick Perkins, a former NBA player himself, voiced doubt about Team USA's ability to win the gold medal.

"I'm not confident at all," Perkins said. "And it's no disrespect but you look at the players they have [Durant], [Green]— they play cute, right? In a good way, right. They get buckets? They're not guys that are going to go down there and mix it up in the trenches."

Perkins added that other teams played more physically, which he said was key to winning basketball games in the Olympics.

The comments, from Perkins and other sports commentators, followed two back-to-back losses by Team USA in exhibition games prior to the Olympics. The losses were notable because Team USA rarely loses basketball games on the world stage.

What did the athletes say?

After Team USA beat France to win the gold medal, Durant, who scored 29 points en route to victory, blasted critics on social media. He was joined by Green.

"Everybody who said we were going to take the L— they had some power rankings out," Durant began before being interrupted, referring to FIBA rankings.

"Kendrick Perkins, you talk a lot of s***, a lot of s***. Act like you're American," Green interrupted.

Durant then continued, "They had some power rankings out. They had us fourth behind Slovenia. Come on, man. Talking about they're catching up to us, like, are you serious? This skill is unmatched, you dig? ... I had to talk my s*** real quick."

(Content Warning:This video contains strong language):

“I had to talk to my sh*t real quick” KD and Draymond letting the doubters have it! 🤣🤣 https://t.co/htDBi1A2vt

— Complex Sports (@ComplexSports) 1628313729.0

Green continued his criticism of American media — and Perkins, in particular — at a post-game press conference in which he explained why winning gold in Tokyo felt a "lot sweeter" than winning gold in the 2016 Olympics, citing "doubters."

You turn on American sports talk TV, and you got guys like Kendrick Perkins, you know, doubting us. Somebody needs to teach these people some loyalty. How about you cheer for your country? But then when guys don't play, "Oh, you need to go represent the country." And then you lose, hit a little bump in the road. And everybody's, "Oh, everybody's caught America." You are an American, too. Act like it.

Do your job. You know, I do some media stuff. I understand doing your job. But, when you talk about a special group, you better be sure you're right. And a lot of people got it wrong. And trust me, I'll be posting those guys. I'll be posting everybody I found who said something. No one holds people accountable anymore, but I will.

For his part, Perkins congratulated Team USA on Twitter, but said he was going to "keep talking my Sh$t."

Yahoo Sports columnist clobbered for saying China is 'kicking' US 'tail' in Olympics for winning more golds — although fewer total medals



If Yahoo Sports columnist Dan Wetzel was looking to garner a little attention, he sure got it in the wake of his Wednesday piece titled, "Sorry, America: China's leading the real Olympic medal count."

What are the details?

Wetzel's opening salvo pretty much says it all: "China is kicking the United States' tail (at least for now) in these Olympics, although you wouldn't know it if you just scanned the medal tables in the American media."

His argument is that U.S. news outlets — even his own — tally Olympic medal standings according to total medals won as opposed to which country has nabbed the most gold medals.

And the tally at noon ET Wednesday showed the U.S. on top with 79 medals, and China in second with 70. But Wetzel insists the tally should be presented to the world according to which country has the most gold medals — and that would be China with 32 compared to the U.S. with 25.

Wetzel called the total medal tally "ridiculous" and said it means China's "somehow not as good" and to "try telling China's seven extra gold medalists that their victories didn't matter."

More from his piece:

The rest of the world favors gold over everything. That's how the International Olympic Committee tallies it. Same with the medal standing on the Toyko 2020 website. It's good enough for media companies all over the world, just not in the U.S. apparently.

Everyone else has this right since, quite literally, gold is better than the others. It's a simple concept.

Gold. Silver. Bronze.

The gold medalist gets the highest spot on the podium. The flag of the country that the gold medalist represents is raised higher than the others. They play the anthem of the gold medalist, not the others.

There is no subtlety here. There is no room for interpretation. At no point was it ever suggested that the three spots are equals. If they were, then they'd just hand out three gold medals.

"The U.S. though, like its opposition to the metric system, decides to go it alone and, hey, what a coincidence, it just happens to make it look like the Americans are having the most success at the Olympics, when we most certainly are not," he added.

Wetzel also noted that American media's total medal count is "embarrassing" and "humiliating" as it makes it seem like the numbers are being reworked in favor of the U.S.

He ended up suggesting that medals should be weighed for the sake of overall standings. "Say three points for gold, two for silver and one for bronze. Or whatever value needs to be assigned. Then it wouldn't be all about the gold, but it also wouldn't pretend gold was bronze."

Big-time backlash

As you might expect, commenters on Wetzel's piece took no prisoners.

  • "If the other medals don't count, why do they hand them out?" one commenter asked. "This is a bad take by Dan, and he should be embarrassed."
  • "Isn't this the same guy who wrote a gushing column about third place finishing [gymnast Simone] Biles?" another commenter wondered. "Why did he bother if only first place counts?" (Wetzel, in fact, penned two laudatory columns about Biles' third-place finish on the balance beam — here and here.)
  • "I see the Biles superfan is puckering up to China," another commenter mocked.
  • "Dan needs to go live in China; he wouldn't be able to write an article like this about China," another commenter observed.
  • "Dan may survive when China takes over the U.S.," another commenter quipped. "He has the inside track."
  • "Lighten up, Francis," another commenter declared. "We can all read the chart just fine. Do they really pay you to write this stuff?"

Couch: Simone Biles and Novak Djokovic star in forgettable 'Selfie Games'



Four days left, and the Tokyo Olympics still haven't been defined by heart-warming moments as much as tension and self-absorption. Is this all we are now?

I'm still a sucker. I'll admit that. I've been to five Olympics as a reporter – from Beijing to Athens, from Torino to Salt Lake and London, too. And every time I've been swept up by the Olympic spirit and ideal. I've believed in it.

It's about bringing cultures together and watching the world mesh through years of hard work and sport. It's about getting to know other people and fighting along with them as much as against them. It's a bigger task this year than ever, and something we can really use.

Four more days and the Tokyo Olympics will be over. And maybe these Games have already been defined:

The Selfie Games, where athletes show that they have no understanding at all of the concept of other people. What a reversal that would be of the meaning of the Olympics.

Simone Biles walked off during the final round of the women's team gymnastics competition, saying the stress had played havoc with her mind. She just walked off, quit fighting, and left it to her teammates. She has been championed for it ever since.

Biles isn't the only one. On Saturday, Novak Djokovic, the Serbian who could be known as the greatest tennis player of all time by the end of next month, threw an outrageous temper tantrum while losing his bronze medal match. He smashed his racquet against the net post, then threw it into an open area of the stands. And then he withdrew from the mixed doubles bronze medal match.

Did he even think about Nina Stojanovic?

She was his mixed doubles partner and teammate. Did he think about her dreams and her Olympic spirit? Hah! He was still angry about losing his singles match. It was about his lost personal moment, his chance. He did claim it was because of multiple injuries.

Did Biles think of her teammates? She and Djokovic could be the GOATs of their sports, and they behave like this?

We've seen the ideal in flashes. American runner Isaiah Jewett and Nijel Amos of Botswana accidentally tripped each other in the 800 meters and fell to the track. They slowly got up, put arms around each and jogged to the finish line together.

On Tuesday, wrestler Tamyra Mensah-Stock won gold and then wrapped the American flag around her shoulders and talked roughly a million miles an hour through a smile about how much she loves representing America. She said she couldn't stop crying, and that they were "tears of joy.''

She stood in such stark contrast to Biles, Djokovic and tennis player Naomi Osaka, the faces of the Games who were all one big ball of stress and joylessness. Fortunately, they're all gone now.

The scary thought is that these aren't prima donnas. This is taught. And it's not even limited to athletes.

It's a cultural thing now, where parents teach their kids to get as much as they can and to focus on themselves.

In sports, parents turn kids into little professional athletes by the time they're, say, 4 years old. Their childhoods are stolen as they're groomed for a moment. They're taught to think only of their needs and wants.

I'm not saying that's exactly what happened with Biles, Djokovic and Osaka. I don't know. But it connects with today's athletes.

Today, kids grow up in a social media world, where they make "friends'' they never meet and try desperately for likes from people they actually don't know. They post pictures of themselves and focus on themselves.

And without actual human interaction, they don't learn a thing about empathy or emotional intelligence.

We train people to think about themselves and not others.

These are modern-day issues, and that could be how we have earned our first Selfie Games.

For the star athletes, the self-obsession is taken all the way to the top by a hype machine, bigger than ever, telling them how great they are.

The Olympics used to be the prime goal for athletes. With some of these superstars, it's just another event for the hype machine.

So Biles is pressured to improve on her perfection and built up behind a massive marketing campaign. Djokovic's handlers want to prove not only that he can win all four majors in the same year – something no man has done in 50 years -- but that he can win the gold medal, too, and be better than the all-time best.

And in women's tennis, Osaka was given $50 million in endorsements primarily to be another face of the Games. It was too much for her to handle.

She lost early in the Olympics. Biles barely competed. Djokovic didn't medal.

We had already determined who the champions are, already decided who the heroes will be, and paid them for it. Some of these athletes are too big for the Olympics.

The Games might be special to people like Mensah-Stock, and Jewett, Amos and Stojanovic. To the hyped-up superstars, do they mean anything more than another business trip?

So the question is whether the heart of the Olympics can still show through, dominate and define. The world needs that heart.

The clock is ticking. We have four days to find out.

Wang Yuguo/Xinhua via Getty Images

What The Delightful Patriotism Of Olympian Tamyra Mensah-Stock Says About America

American athletes can make a lot of money demonizing their own country these days. U.S. wrestler Tamyra Mensah-Stock has taken a different route.