Texas radical charged with making terroristic threats against Erika Kirk



The widow of assassinated Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk will join Arkansas Republican Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders, BlazeTV host Allie Beth Stuckey, and other influential conservative women in San Antonio next month for the Turning Point Women's Leadership Summit — an event geared toward "women who are ready to rise fully into the life they were created to lead and who value courage, conviction, and clarity in every season."

News of Erika Kirk's imminent arrival enraged at least one radical. Jacob Wenske, 26, allegedly threatened to murder the TPUSA CEO and bomb the event.

Wenske was arrested on Thursday and slapped with a pair of third-degree felony charges of making a terroristic threat involving public fear or serious bodily injury or public disruption. His bond has been set at $120,000.

'God’s justice is certain.'

According to the arrest warrant obtained by KSAT-TV, Wenske allegedly replied to an April social media post about the three-day TPUSA event, writing, "I know exactly where to bomb."

Wenske allegedly said in a separate post, "I can't wait to be the valet for her escort," apparently referring to Erika Kirk, who is scheduled to be a featured speaker at the event.

An email sent in January 2026 from an account that is registered to Wenske stated, "Death to Erika Kirk and every single speaker there!! America will live on without those scum on this earth. Every Christian nationalist shall perish in the bombing that will take place at every single Turning Point rally and event," said the warrant.

RELATED: TPUSA speaker hit with death threats after trans-identifying student is killed — suspect turns himself in

Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images

Leftists in the Democratic Party, the media, academia, and elsewhere have fearmongered for years about the imagined threat posed by "Christian nationalism" — a catchall term used to describe their ideological foes who also happen to be Christian in a nation almost entirely founded by Christians and where today over six in 10 adults are Christian.

James Talarico, for instance — the Democrat nominee running against Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton for a U.S. Senate seat — recently claimed that "Christian nationalism is a threat to democracy" and that "when fascism comes to America, it'll be wrapped in the flag and carrying the cross."

CNN, which has advanced similar fear narratives, released a documentary earlier this year titled "The Rise of Christian Nationalism." The hour-long agitprop not only warned of the ascendancy of "white evangelical culture" but identified Erika Kirk's murdered husband as a proponent of the movement — even though Charlie Kirk stated in 2024 that "Christian Nationalism" is "a boogeyman they've invested to silence you" and noted before his assassination that he had never described himself as a Christian nationalist.

"Turning Point USA takes all threats seriously and we work closely with law enforcement at all levels to respond to and resolve any threats," the organization said in a statement. "We are grateful to the San Antonio Police Department and the FBI for their rapid response and arrest of the individual making these threats."

TPUSA noted further that the safety of its attendees, speakers, and staff is its top priority and that all of its events "include enhanced, multi-layered security measures that are enforced by both private security and local police."

"We refuse to let threats silence us," added TPUSA.

Erika Kirk wrote the following in a Thursday post on X, "The wicked plots against the righteous and gnashes his teeth at him, but the Lord laughs at the wicked, for he sees that his day is coming. The wicked draw the sword and bend their bows to bring down the poor and needy, to slay those whose way is upright; their sword shall enter their own heart, and their bows shall be broken. Psalm 37:12-15."

Kirk added, "God’s justice is certain."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Utah Valley University is working VERY hard to hide the truth about Charlie Kirk's assassination



Utah Valley University has given excuse after excuse in response to public records requests for the UVU Police Department in the months since Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk was assassinated on the UVU campus on September 10, allegedly by Tyler Robinson.

'I got you covered.'

Like other concerned Americans, Blaze News wanted to better understand the security measures that were put in place in the lead-up to the TPUSA college tour event that fateful day. Our concerns were heightened after Kirk's former head of security, Brian Harpole, suggested to podcast host Shawn Ryan in November that UVU police, including Chief Jeff Long, had failed to implement certain security measures before Kirk's murder and then went dark after it.

RELATED: 'Horrific choice': Utah Valley University nailed with backlash for choosing Charlie Kirk critic as commencement speaker

- YouTube

Harpole claimed that the UVU amphitheater setting was too exposed and that UVUPD neglected to reach out to other local law enforcement agencies to ensure that they had enough officers on the ground and resources like drones to secure the area, especially considering the anticipated size of the crowd.

According to an alleged text exchange between Harpole and Chief Long — an image of which can be seen at the 56:19 mark of the podcast episode — Harpole had also identified specific concerns about "roof access" two days prior to the deadly shooting, but Long had assured him, "I got you covered."

After the shooting, Harpole claimed that he and his team reached out to Long, but "he's never called us back."

So long ago and so much effort: UVU can't be bothered

Harpole also suggested that individuals and/or the media submit public records requests under the federal Freedom of Information Act for all the messages Long sent and received on state-issued devices. Blaze News took that advice — but has been stonewalled at every turn.

On November 24, Blaze News first submitted a FOIA request — called GRAMA in Utah, for the Government Records Access and Management Act — for all of Long's messages on any messaging or social media platform between September 3 and September 11, 2025. That request was denied on December 4 because a "person's name; mailing address; email address; and daytime telephone number" from Blaze News was allegedly not included.

Of note, Blaze News has a GRAMA account for UVU with that information stored, though when it was stored cannot be verified.

'The time frame "September 3, 2025, to September 11, 2025" passed a considerable time ago.'

Blaze News then resubmitted the request on two occasions. The first was received on January 14. On February 5, UVU claimed it needed "additional time to fulfill" the request because of the "extraordinary circumstance" but that the request would be fulfilled within 10 business days.

On February 19, UVU said it needed an additional 10 business days.

On March 5, UVU said it needed yet another 10 business days.

Finally, on March 17, Blaze News received 14 heavily redacted Microsoft Teams messages, most of which were not useful. None of the speakers are identified by name, so it is unknown whether any of these statements can be attributed to Chief Long.

The most insightful exchange came at 9:15 a.m. on September 10, the day of the shooting.

A person identified as 63G-2-305(11) says: "Let the fun begin! The turning point group is wondering if they can have access to drive under the hall of flags to drop off their equipment? There is a gate there that needs to be unlocked."

Part of the response from person 63G-2-305(12) is redacted, but 63G-2-305(12) continues, "The two GOP guys whi [sic] visited yesterday really stirred the pot!"

63G-2-305(11) then says with unwitting foreboding: "Really?! Oh no! It was weird the way they came on campus. Let's hope nothing crazy happens." The person believed to be responder 63G-2-305(12) replies: "It's all good!"

RELATED: ‘This one’s for you, Charlie’: TPUSA’s ‘All-American Halftime Show’ draws millions of viewers during Super Bowl

Screenshot of documents sent to Blaze News

Even though UVU had granted itself three extensions for this request, in its response, UVU refused to provide Blaze News with any text messages from Long's phone between September 3 and September 11 on the grounds that too much time had passed since the shooting and that finding the messages would involve too much work:

For the University to conduct a search for text messages, the employee would have to open and review each text message thread on their phone to see if that thread includes the date range you specified. Then the employee would have to determine if it was a personal text or public record. If the text was a public record, the employee would have to screenshot the entire thread for the period and compile those screenshots to a form that can be shared. In addition, seeing as the time frame “September 3, 2025, to September 11, 2025” passed a considerable time ago, this search process would be a time-consuming interference from the employee’s day-to-day operations and responsibilities to maintain the safety of the University.

UVU gave the same reason for denying the request for Long's texts Blaze News submitted on April 1. When Blaze News reminded UVU that all of Long's messages are presumed public unless a specific GRAMA exemption applies and that inconvenience and the personal nature of some messages were not exemptions under the statute, two weeks later, Blaze News received 19 screenshots — of almost no investigatory value.

Eight of the screenshots were of text alerts about the shooting that were presumably sent campus-wide.

One was a message from a reporter from a local Utah outlet requesting an interview with Chief Long.

Three screenshots contain expressions of concern about people, presumably Long or other members of UVUPD, who had to endure the stress of the event, both in the planning stages immediately before it and in the aftermath of the shooting.

Three others relate to a single conversation about U.S. Sens. Mike Lee (R-Utah) and John Curtis (R-Utah) possibly attending the event.

Just two screenshots reveal interesting information. In one conversation that took place only a half-hour before Kirk was fatally shot, someone, presumably Long, estimated that the crowd had swelled to 3,000.

"Woah! That is pretty good! Is it okay?" the interlocutor replied.

"Do you think there are more in support or against," the interlocutor added, but to no reply.

Then 15 minutes after the shooting, someone asked what they should tell the "people calling." "She said shes even gotten the new York times [sic]," the person added.

"Don't give any statements," was the reply, presumably from Long.

The text messages Harpole claimed to have exchanged with Long were not included in any of the documents UVU sent to Blaze News. Efforts to reach Harpole for comment were unsuccessful.

RELATED: Elderly man who falsely confessed to shooting Charlie Kirk sentenced to prison

Screenshot of documents sent to Blaze News

In its response to Blaze News, UVU justified not disclosing other messages on Long's phone because doing so:

  • "could reasonably be expected to jeopardize the life or safety of an individual";
  • "would jeopardize the security of public property, buildings, or systems"; and
  • "would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy."

Even the suspected murderer gets a say?

Blaze News is apparently not the only outlet frustrated by UVU's limited compliance with public records requests about Kirk's murder.

In an article titled "Utah Valley University continues to deny request for documents in Charlie Kirk shooting" dated February 17, KSTU reported not only the denials from UVU but that suspect Tyler Robinson and his attorneys had even weighed in on its GRAMA request. The outlet said it received "a letter from Tyler Robinson and his attorneys in support of the university's decision to deny the release of the security plan."

KSTU appeared unfazed by the denials for public records from UVU, claiming that they are "typical of the public records process." However, the outlet noted that this letter from the suspect and his legal team was "unusual."

Back in April, the Daily Caller News Foundation similarly reported that in response to its public records request, UVU had "heavily redacted files and withheld others entirely."

UVUPD did not respond to a request for comment from Blaze News about this lack of transparency.

'These things ... unfortunately they happen'

Long joined the UVUPD as deputy chief in 2022 and was named chief in December 2024. Government disclosure documents show that Long earned more than $125,000 in wages and benefits from taxpayers in 2024 alone.

And the most popular conservative activist in America was shot and killed on his watch.

Just hours after the shooting, Long and other officials appeared at a press conference, where Long professed to be "devastated" and described the deadly shooting as "a police chief's nightmare."

"We train for these things, and you think you have things covered, and um, you know, these things, um, you know, unfortunately they happen," he continued. "You try to get, you try to get your bases covered, and unfortunately today we didn't. And because of that we had this tragic incident."

Long has not made any public comments about the shooting since.

Harpole indicated to Shawn Ryan that Long bears considerable responsibility for the ongoing questions and speculation about UVU security that day.

"Why he won't stand up like a man and admit this, I don't know," Harpole said of Long, "but he's watching a bunch of men lose their careers.

"And he's okay with it."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Allie Beth Stuckey issues stern warning to Christian right: Mocking Erika Kirk is a ‘soul sickness’ and a risky gamble with your soul



In the several months since Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk’s death, his widow, Erika Kirk, has faced consistent and intense online harassment, mockery of her public grief, egregious accusations, and threats from both sides of the political aisle.

Allie Beth Stuckey, BlazeTV host of “Relatable,” has been deeply disturbed by all the vitriol unleashed against Erika — especially when it comes from the "Christian" right.

No matter what Erika does, says Allie — smile, cry, stay home, or go out into public — there awaits a host of people ready to mock and accuse her.

The latest example of this occurred following the White House Correspondents' Dinner, which was cut short due to a would-be assassin rushing a security checkpoint and firing multiple shots in an attempt to kill President Trump and other administration officials. A video of Erika crying and expressing a desire to go home after the incident went viral on social media, with many accusing her of faking tears and performing.

Many of those accusers, Allie points out, identify as conservative Christians.

“You are just playing this very dangerous game with your soul; you're gambling here,” says warns. “Like this is such a dangerous thing for you to have to bring before the Lord one day — that you found it to be an entertaining sport to mock someone's widow.”

It’s OK to “criticize a public figure” and express hesitation about “the official law enforcement story,” Allie concedes, as long as you do these things “without relentlessly and mercilessly mocking.” Those unable to refrain from mockery and hatred are suffering from “a soul sickness,” she argues.

“If you do feel good about [mocking Erika] and you're like, ‘Well, I don't really feel any conviction. I think that this is fine,’ that's not an indication that what you're doing is OK,” she declares. “That's an indication that you are callous; that you worship the god of self; you worship the god of money; you worship the god of entertainment; you worship the god of sensationalism — not the God of scripture.”

“If you keep feeling good about and finding joy in the mockery of a widow, that is an indication of the absence of the Holy Spirit in your life. It just is,” she continues, “and that's not Allie Stuckey’s judgment, OK? That is the nature of the Holy Spirit because he is the convictor.”

Many of the most horrific injustices in the history of the world, she reminds, happened because callousness to the suffering of others became normalized.

“It takes one person being willing to go out there and consistently dehumanize and consistently deride, and then it takes a few people being entertained by it, and then more people being entertained by it, and then it becomes less of a person that you're talking about, and it just becomes this abstract thing,” says Allie. “These people talking about Erika, I don't even think they see her as a person.”

“When someone's humanity in your mind goes away, you can justify anything,” she warns.

And when we become numb to widows' suffering specifically — that’s even more dangerous territory, at least spiritually, Allie argues.

Citing Isaiah 1:17, Psalm 68:5, and Exodus 22:22-24, she says, “It seems like [widows are] something that's super important to God.”

For the people who may not be mocking or deriding Erika but are constantly criticizing her role as TPUSA’s CEO, claiming she should be at home with her kids instead, Allie has a blunt message: “I promise you that Erika loves her kids more than you do. ... I promise you that she thinks about their well-being and thinks about what is best for them more than you do.”

If anyone is concerned about Erika or her children, the best thing they can do is to pray, she says.

When it comes to Erika Kirk or any public figure, Allie stresses that she’s “not even asking for us to all agree” because “we can all have opinions.”

“I'm asking for some humanity here, right?” she says, “And I've just been super disappointed in some people who used to be in my audience who have just become so merciless when it comes to this woman.”

“This is like a huge indication of just very dark spiritual sickness, and it grieves me. I’m really praying about it.”

To hear more, watch the video above.

Want more from Allie Beth Stuckey?

To enjoy more of Allie’s upbeat and in-depth coverage of culture, news, and theology from a Christian, conservative perspective, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

'America's Government Teacher' who maligned Charlie Kirk right after his assassination wants you to know she's the victim



A liberal author who refers refers to herself online as "America's Government Teacher" was asked to give the 2026 commencement speech at Utah Valley University. Sharon McMahon's invitation to speak was, however, rescinded last month following significant backlash over her criticism of Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk in the immediate aftermath of his assassination.

McMahon has since gone on a media tour in an apparent effort to convince the American public that she's not just a free-speech warrior but the victim of conspiring forces.

How it started

Two days after Kirk's Sept. 10, 2025, assassination at Utah Valley University, McMahon joined other radicals in maligning the murdered father of two.

'She is a force of nature.'

McMahon — a middle-aged former high school teacher who purportedly fights "misinformation" and routinely criticizes conservatives and conservative initiatives — shared a series of de-contextualized quotes from Kirk on social media, then stated, "These aren’t sound bites taken out of context. Millions of people feel they were harmed, and the murder that was horrific and should never have happened does not magically erase what was said or done."

McMahon proceeded to accuse the just-murdered conservative of advancing "bigoted ideas on a stage that reached tens of millions."

While acknowledging that Kirk's assassination was a tragedy, she emphasized that the bloodletting "does not erase the harm many experienced from his words, and the ensuing actions his followers took."

On March 26, Utah Valley University announced that McMahon would keynote its annual commencement ceremony on April 29 and receive an honorary doctorate of education.

"Sharon McMahon is an original. She is a force of nature and a force for good," stated the university's then-president, Astrid Tuminez, who stepped down last week. "She underlines how each of us can contribute to a vibrant democracy and how strength comes from knowledge, kindness, and collective action."

RELATED: Judge APOLOGIZES to suspected would-be Trump assassin — and compares him to Jan. 6 defendants

Trent Nelson/Salt Lake Tribune/Getty Images

That a woman who maligned Kirk would feature as the commencement speaker at the very institution where the young father of two was murdered did not sit well with members of the school's TPUSA chapter, some Republican lawmakers, and other conservatives.

'Why does UVU think this is okay? It’s not.'

Caleb Chilcutt, president of the school's TPUSA chapter, stated, "Hours immediately after Charlie's assassination, Sharon McMahon posted a now deleted series of out-of-context quotes from Charlie in an effort to tarnish his name and minimize the tragedy, rather than offering condolences or condemning political violence."

"Platforming someone who treated a historic and tragic political assassination not as a moment to grieve but as an opportunity to create content is tone-deaf and disrespectful to those still affected, especially on campus," continued Chilcutt. "There are countless better alternatives, and the fact that the university is choosing McMahon is entirely disappointing to all of us still reeling from his loss."

Former Republican Utah Rep. Jason Chaffetz told Fox News that McMahon was a "liberal hack" and a "horrific choice" for commencement speaker.

Utah Sen. Mike Lee (R) also blasted the decision, writing, "What if Charlie Kirk had been a beloved figure on the left, rather than among conservatives? And what if Sharon McMahon were a conservative — one who had defamed Charlie Kirk immediately after his horrific assassination at UVU? Would UVU have scheduled her to speak at commencement? Not in a million years. Not in ten million years. So why does UVU think this is okay? It’s not."

Republican state Rep. Trevor Lee cited McMahon's planned speech as cause to "withhold taxpayer funds from UVU."

The university evidently had a change of heart amid the scrutiny of McMahon's past remarks.

"Due to increased safety concerns related to the speaker and in consultation with public safety professionals and Sharon McMahon, Utah Valley University has decided to proceed without a featured commencement speaker for this year’s ceremony," UVU announced on April 16.

How it's going

Last month, McMahon told her sob story to the New York Times, then complained in subsequent interviews with the Minnesota Star Tribune and Newsweek's "The 1600" podcast about her "cancellation" and Republican officials' alleged "concerted effort" to silence her speech.

The Free Press, the neocon blog founded by Bari Weiss, rolled out the red carpet this week — just days after the Salt Lake Tribune published the speech she allegedly planned to give at UVU — for McMahon to push her victimhood narrative in full.

McMahon claimed in a lengthy and self-aggrandizing opinion piece that the university's decision to cancel her speech "is so serious" and a "lesson for everyone who cares about freedom of speech."

After defending her criticism of Kirk — writing both "that condemning Charlie Kirk’s assassination did not require treating his public record as untouchable" and that she was trying to "educate those who had never thought of Kirk as anything but a positive force in the world" — McMahon said that her disinvitation to give the UVU commencement speech was the result of the government "using its power to punish protected speech."

While McMahon accepted the grounds for her speech's cancellation, acknowledging that there were "real and visceral" safety concerns, she blamed "government officials and Turning Point USA" — those who, exercising their own free speech, questioned the university's speaker selection — for helping to supposedly create the "danger."

"America's Government Teacher" leaned harder into the victimhood narrative toward the end of her piece, suggesting that her disinvitation "should concern people who loved Charlie Kirk" and painting herself as something of a free speech canary in the coal mine.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

GOP Voters Don’t Want Mike Pence’s Republican Party

Framing the Indiana primary victories as 'retribution' from President Trump is all wrong. Voters side with Trump when he sides with us.

Father, mother, daughter federally indicted for alleged assault on TPUSA reporter Savanah Hernandez



The Department of Justice revealed a federal indictment against three individuals accused of assaulting Turning Point USA reporter Savanah Hernandez during an anti-ICE protest in Minnesota.

Video footage of the April 11 incident appeared to show Paige Ostroushko, a Minnesota resident, blowing a whistle just inches from Hernandez's ear before pushing her to the ground.

'This incident isn't just about me, but about every single journalist who has been attacked while doing their job.'

After Hernandez returned to her feet, Deyanna Ostroushko, Paige's mother, confronted the reporter, claiming that Hernandez had instigated the physical altercation.

"Did you f**king hit my daughter?" Deyanna yelled in Hernandez's face, video showed.

Hernandez pushed Deyanna away and seemed to walk off to distance herself from the mob of anti-ICE protesters, according to the video.

"Stop touching me!" Hernandez shouted.

RELATED: TPUSA Frontlines reporter brutally attacked by Antifa mob tells Sara Gonzales the full story mainstream media won’t touch

Savanah Hernandez. Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images

Chris Ostroushko, Paige's father, stepped into the chaos, approaching Hernandez and pushing her, causing her to fall onto the pavement, video showed.

Paige then appeared to go after Hernandez again, and the two got into a brief scuffle.

On Wednesday, a four-count federal indictment was unsealed by the U.S. District Court of Minnesota, charging each member of the Ostroushko family. The indictment did not name the victim.

Chris and Paige Ostroushko "did by force or by threat of force willfully injure, intimidate, and interfere with, and attempt to injure, intimidate, and interfere with the rights of another," the indictment read.

All three family members were accused of aiding and abetting the assault of the victim.

Hernandez sought medical treatment following the altercation and was told that she suffered a concussion and multiple sprains.

"I'm incredibly grateful to the FBI and DOJ for their swift response to the attack I experienced," Hernandez told Blaze News. "This incident isn't just about me, but about every single journalist who has been attacked while doing their job. Today's indictment sets an extremely important precedent for every American and is a strong message to the radical left wing that they are not allowed to violently attack people with impunity any more."

“Today, Christopher, Deyanna, and Paige Ostrouchko [sic] were indicted by a grand jury for allegedly assaulting journalist and Turning Point USA contributor Savannah [sic] Hernandez, while she was lawfully reporting on anti-ICE protests outside a federal building in St. Paul,” stated acting Attorney General Todd Blanche.

“Hernandez was allegedly surrounded, physically assaulted, and shoved to the ground — simply because she was identified by the defendants as a conservative journalist,” Blanche continued. “That is NOT ‘peaceful protest.’ These deplorable actions as charged in the indictment will not be tolerated in America, and this Department of Justice will always punish unhinged acts of political violence.”

RELATED: ‘The threats are real’: Glenn Beck issues urgent call for courage as violence against conservatives escalates

Savanah Hernandez. James Devaney/GC Images

In a recent interview with One America News Network, Chris Ostroushko, a 6', 51-year-old man who weighs 240 lbs., according to online court records, seemed shocked by the backlash he and his family have received.

"It's a little overwhelming and makes me second-guess even living in this country, to be honest with you, with all that's going on," Ostroushko told the news outlet.

He has described Hernandez as the aggressor and claimed that he was protecting his wife and daughter.

The Ostroushko family claimed that after the video went viral, they were doxxed and lost their jobs.

Paige Ostroushko started a GoFundMe requesting $12,000, claiming that she witnessed a "deeply triggering" verbal exchange with "an individual present" who was interviewing attendees about ICE. This "led to emotional distress and a confrontation between the individual and me," she said, claiming self-defense. She also stated that she suffered "head, neck and knee injuries." As of Wednesday afternoon, she had raised $900.

An additional GoFundMe page was started to support the family, requesting $8,000. It has so far raised $310.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

‘He was pretty emotional’: TPUSA’s Andrew Kolvet tells Glenn Beck about Fetterman’s tearful apology to Erika Kirk after WHCD shooting



In the wake of Saturday’s shooting at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner — in which 31-year-old Cole Tomas Allen allegedly rushed a security checkpoint and opened fire in an attempt to assassinate President Trump and other administration officials — at least one prominent Democrat is showing signs of remorse.

On a recent episode of “The Glenn Beck Program,” Glenn spoke with Turning Point USA spokesperson and executive producer of “The Charlie Kirk Show” Andrew Kolvet about Sen. John Fetterman’s recent conversation with Erika Kirk.

“There was a moment with John Fetterman and Erika that I heard about where he was pretty emotional, and he just apologized for whatever he could,” says Kolvet, noting that this conversation happened shortly after the WHCD incident.

“Good for John Fetterman. That’s a real moment,” he adds.

Glenn notes that for some time he has wanted to speak with Fetterman to tell him that despite their political differences, he admires Fetterman’s bravery to take stands against his own party, likely at the expense of being primaried.

“It’s interesting to me that somebody who just says common-sense stuff that is a Democrat … is so chased out of their own party. They can’t have anybody who is at all not a radical. They must have radicals in there,” Glenn emphasizes.

He calls the Democrats out for their complicity in the escalating political violence: “Democrats, you’re not an innocent bystander at this point. There’s too much evidence.”

“These people want to destroy the United States of America. If you want a violent destruction of your country, you just keep going down this road,” he cautions.

In the meantime, conservatives, he says, will continue to "do everything [they] can to stop it,” including continuing “to warn and to beg and to plead and to vote.”

But if Democrats continue to stoke the fires of violence, the consequences are bleak for everyone, including their own families.

“Your children and your grandchildren will suffer under Marxism and fascism and death and squalor — and you will be responsible for it!” Glenn warns.

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn’s masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis, and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.