Major win for parents: Supreme Court bans schools from transitioning students in secret



The Supreme Court has granted a request from a group of California parents to reinstate a ruling that bans schools from hiding “children’s gender presentation” from them — and forces them to follow the parents' instructions regarding the names and pronouns the children use.

BlazeTV host Allie Beth Stuckey counts this as a win.

“Parents should absolutely know if their child is going by different pronouns or declaring that they are a boy at school. Right now in California, a student can go to school, say that ‘I want to transition to the opposite sex,’ and the student doesn’t have to notify parents,” she explains.

“They can socially transition that child. They can also get that child to a particular professional that will help them get the psychiatric care and the different medical treatments that they are seeking in order to look like the opposite sex,” she says.


Stuckey recalls a case out of California concerning Abigail Martinez, who lost custody of her teenage daughter Yaeli because she refused to support her transition.

Yaeli was placed in a group home, and a judge ruled that she could begin cross-sex hormones — but Yaeli took her own life.

“That’s what happens when you remove kids from the homes of parents who simply want what is best for their kids,” Stuckey says.

“You’ve got people framing this as, like, ‘Oh, it’s protection from abuse when the school won’t inform the parents of what’s really going on.’ The opposite is true. No one cares about your child the way that you do. No one knows your child the way that you do. The school does not care if your child lives or dies,” she continues.

However, while Stuckey is pleased with the ruling, she points out that it was only ruled unconstitutional because of the parental rights aspect, and there’s a long way to go before all of it is “completely illegal and stigmatized and criminalized.”

“You should actually go to prison if you are calling a child by the wrong, non-biological pronoun and encouraging them to change sexes,” Stuckey says.

“The Supreme Court is not where they need to be in understanding what is actually driving this gender deception among kids. It’s not genuine gender dysphoria,” she continues.

“It is pornography. It is propaganda. It is sexual perversion and even sexual abuse that’s going on. It has very little to do with gender dysphoria. So we’re not yet to the root of all of this in driving this out legally and ideologically, but this absolutely is a win for parents,” she adds.

Want more from Allie Beth Stuckey?

To enjoy more of Allie’s upbeat and in-depth coverage of culture, news, and theology from a Christian, conservative perspective, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Violence Is The Logical And Desired Outcome Of Leftists’ Trans Victim Narrative

After wallowing in the left's grievance politics, people are beginning to behave in predictably violent ways.

Disney Refuses To Say If Man Who Posted Photos Of Women In Park Bathroom Will Be Banned

Despite the company's silence on this particular incident, Disney has banned its fair share of people.

Budweiser's groveling new ad after trans backlash



Anheuser-Busch has lost over $6 billion since its Dylan Mulvaney partnership began, and it's pulling out some marketing moves to make up for it.

Bud Light released a message from its CEO, which Pat Gray calls “terrific.”

The CEO writes in one part, “My time serving this country taught me the importance of accountability and the values upon which America was founded: freedom, hard work, and respect for one another. As CEO of Anheuser-Busch, I am focused on building and protecting our remarkable history and heritage.”

Gray then shows Anheuser-Busch’s latest commercial, which is rife with American values, Clydesdales, and blue-collar imagery.

Grays co-host, Keith Malinak, says, “Oh they’re scared, they are quaking.”

He adds mockingly, “Let’s make people forget that we’re now a foreign-owned company now too.”

Anheuser-Busch is a Belgian multinational drink and brewing company based in Leuven, Belgium — not America — as the commercial might lead you to believe.

Malinak mentions that it’s not just Anheuser-Bush that’s suffering via self-inflicted, woke wounds.

Dicks Sporting Goods lost its shareholders $250 million when it stopped carrying guns. Disney streaming services lost a billion per quarter. Netflix lost 9 billion after the "Cuties" boycott — and the list goes on.

“So just know,” he adds, “that when a company goes woke, they literally go broke.”


Want more from Pat Gray?

To enjoy more of Pat's biting analysis and signature wit as he restores common sense to a senseless world, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

JK Rowling shuts down trans activist with perfect two-word response that goes mega-viral



Author J.K. Rowling went viral on Sunday after responding to a transgender activist who attacked her without provocation.

What is the background?

On Sunday, Rowling criticized Scottish politicians for issuing groveling apologies after they participated in a demonstration in which at least one person had a "decapitate TERFs" sign, the Glasgow World reported.

"A strange new form of temporary blindness has broken out among Scottish politicians," Rowling tweeted. "None of them could read placards calling for violence against women while standing inches away from them, yet they were instantly cured when photos of them posing with the signs hit the press."

In response, trans activist India Willoughby claimed the "decapitate TERFs" sign did not exist and said that Rowling does not "represent women." Then Willoughby took a direct shot at Rowling.

"I’m more of a woman than JK Rowling will ever be," Willoughby claimed.

How did Rowling respond?

Willoughby's claim — that as a biological male Willoughby is more of a woman than Rowling, who is a biological woman — quickly caught the "Harry Potter" author's attention.

Rowling responded with just two words.

"Citation needed," she said.

\u201cCitation needed.\u201d
— J.K. Rowling (@J.K. Rowling) 1674411168

The response generated nearly 140,000 "likes" and more than 16 million views by Monday afternoon.

Rowling is a regular target for trans activists because she has repeatedly made it clear that she opposes progressive trans ideology on the grounds that it erases the legitimacy of women.

Trans activists accuse Rowling of being a TERF, which stands for "trans-exclusionary radical feminist." Even dictionary.com defines the label negatively, saying that TERF refers to "an advocate of radical feminism who believes that a trans woman’s gender identity is not legitimate and who is hostile to the inclusion of trans people and gender-diverse people in the feminist movement."

Anything else?

Willoughby later celebrated that Willoughby's rhetorical attack on Rowling drew the billionaire author's attention, as well as the attention of comedian Ricky Gervais.

Posting a screenshot of Rowling's reply, which showed that Gervais had "liked" Rowling's response, Willoughby wrote, "It’s insane that my existence annoys two people on Twitter who between them have a combined Twitter following of 30 million people! That’s nuts, isn’t it?"

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!