Josh Seiter FAKED being trans to troll the left



Alex Stein was right.

A few months ago, he called out former "Bachelorette" star Josh Seiter for faking his gender transition in order to troll the world — and Seiter is now confirming Stein’s original suspicions.

“Well, I’ve got to be honest. For the last five months I’ve been conducting a social experiment online to expose how gullible and how delusional the left is,” Seiter tells Stein of “Prime Time with Alex Stein.”

“You were accepted by some, you were demonized by most, and now you’re saying this was all a ruse, this was a social experiment,” Stein says. “So, what you did is arguably one of the greatest social experiments of our modern internet age in my opinion.”


“Any biological man putting on woman-face and putting on makeup is pulling a stunt,” Seiter explains. “They are faking being a woman. And, so what I did was I faked being a faker. I pretended to be a pretender. We are all the same. We’re all men that were putting on makeup and dressing and claiming we were women.”

“And I hope that this could help some people understand that just because you put on dresses and makeup as a man, doesn’t magically make you a woman,” he adds.

Stein, who has put on tuck-friendly bathing suits in Target and pretended to be transgender for a short period of time himself in order to drive that same point home, is impressed by Seiter’s dedication to his experiment.

“You actually stayed in character for months on end, did multiple interviews, went on multiple shows,” Stein says. “Behind closed doors, I’m sure you didn’t pretend to be a woman, but you stayed in character every moment even when you’re just talking to somebody casually. So really, you’re an incredible actor Josh.”

“I think any trans person is an incredible actor. They’re all pretending to be something they’re not,” Seiter responds. “I hope I showed how ridiculous and absurd it is.”

Want more from Alex Stein?

To enjoy more of Alex's culture jamming, comedic monologues, skits, and street segments, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Will Ferrell’s transgender flick unintentionally disproves it's own narrative



Will Ferrell released a new Netflix documentary that explores the relationship between Ferrell and his “transgender” friend Andrew Steele, who now identifies as “Harper” — and it’s every bit as delusional as you might assume.

“We always say ‘quote unquote’ or ‘so-called’ or ‘what’s referred to’ because there’s no such thing as transitioning. Your gender and sex are one and the same. They’re not two different categories,” Allie Beth Stuckey of “Relatable” comments.

“Now we’ve got a Netflix series saying that a man who has lived as a man his entire life is now a woman and should be accepted as a woman and should be able to go into women’s spaces to be regarded as a woman,” she says, adding, “and Will Ferrell is just like ‘It’s no big deal, who cares, like he’s just happy.’”

And recent comments made by Ferrell make his deluded take on the matter abundantly clear.

“There is hatred out there. It’s very real and it’s very unsafe for trans people in certain situations. But I don’t know why trans people are meant to be threatening to me as a cis-male,” Ferrell said.

The famous actor also reportedly said that “it’s strange” to him because “Harper is finally her.”

“If the trans community is a threat to you, I think it stems from not being confident or safe with yourself,” he added.

“Remember, Will Ferrell is a multi-millionaire who has already made his career in Hollywood. He’s a man himself, and he has sons, and so these people who always claim they’re on the side of empathy I guess have a hard time understanding why we as women, as moms and parents who have daughters, why we would not want these men entering our spaces,” Stuckey says.

While the film itself sets out to claim that transgenders are hated across the country, especially in red states, the film ends up disproving their own narrative.

“Steele is treated warmly by people all over the country. Which I think is good, like I do think just in a personal interaction you can treat anyone, no matter who they are, warmly,” Stuckey says, noting that if the tables were turned, the reception might not be so friendly.

“If you made a documentary of someone with a MAGA hat,” she says, “and he went to a bar in New York, I guarantee you he would probably be physically assaulted because remember, politics is the religion of the left. It is their theology.”

Not only does the film disprove its own narrative but the questions being asked by Ferrell appear intentionally surface-level in order to keep “Harper” from facing any legitimate critiques.

“The questions that are being asked by Will Ferrell aren’t like, ‘Okay, so you’re going to share a bathroom with these women?’ The questions are just like, ‘How do you feel? Does this make you happy? Are you your authentic self?” Stuckey explains.

“We live in a world that says all of your feelings are valid. All of your feelings are not valid. They may all be real, but valid means they’re rooted in truth. Some of our feelings are just downright lies,” she adds.


Want more from Allie Beth Stuckey?

To enjoy more of Allie’s upbeat and in-depth coverage of culture, news, and theology from a Christian, conservative perspective, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Virginia women’s college will no longer admit trans students, citing founder’s will



Sweet Briar College, a women’s school in Virginia, recently announced that it will no longer admit trans-identifying students, citing its founder’s Will.

The private women’s liberal arts school, which was established in 1901 through the estate of Indiana Fletcher Williams, did not previously have any policies regarding gender identity. However, recent changes to the Common Application, a nonprofit organization that allows students to apply to schools on one standardized form, prompted the college to make some changes of its own.

'Understands the term [women] in its historic and traditional way.'

In addition to “female” and “male,” the Common Application, used by more than 1,000 colleges, now allows students to select “X” or “another legal sex.”

According to Jenny Rickard, the nonprofit’s president and chief executive officer, the updates “represent the next step in an ongoing effort to create an equitable, just, and inclusive college admission process for all students -- no matter how they identify.”

In a message to the campus, Sweet Briar College leaders wrote that the changes to the application have “present[ed] a challenge both for students applying for admission and administrators and staff making admissions decisions.”

“Previously, the College did not have a stated admissions policy addressing applicants identifying as other genders, but instead addressed applicants on a case-by-case basis,” the college’s correspondence explained. “This year, however, the Common Application included additional options for the selection of the legal sex … of applicants apart from male or female, creating confusion for applicants seeking to apply to a women’s college like Sweet Briar.”

“In fact, various parts of the Common Application now include as many as four gender … designations,” the college added.

Sweet Briar College noted that the institution is in a “unique position as the only women’s college in the country that was founded by and governed in accordance with a will that has been codified into law by the state’s legislature.” That Will, belonging to the school’s founder, Fletcher Williams, was “codified by the General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Virginia on February 9, 1901, as the College’s Charter.”

According to the school, the board “must honor the dictates of the Will, which imposes the requirement that the College be a place of ‘girls and young women’ – a phrase that must be interpreted as it was understood at the time the Will was written.”

The college told Inside Higher Ed that while “political and other influences” have called “the meaning of the term ‘woman’ into question,” the board “understands the term [women] in its historic and traditional way consistent with the intentions of our founder.”

Some students and alumnae have vowed to push back on the college’s declaration.

English professor and faculty senate chairman John Gregory Brown stated that the faculty voted 48-4 to urge the board to rescind the policy.

“It really excludes any student who would be offended by those positions ... who doesn’t want to be in a place where discrimination is codified in this way,” Brown told the Independent. “I think it’s a financially disastrous decision for the college.”

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

3 important facts Christians need to know about Tim Walz



Vice President Kamala Harris announced on Tuesday that she selected Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz (D) to be her running mate.

Walz, a far-left governor, self-identifies as a "Minnesota Lutheran," though he rarely discusses his faith publicly, according to the Religion News Service. Walz, moreover, refers to Pilgrim Lutheran Church in St. Paul as "my parish." That church is a congregation in the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America, one of the most progressive and liberal Christian denominations in the United States.

'The Harris-Walz ticket is the most radical on abortion and gender ideology in American history.'

But what should Christians know about his policy positions and record as governor of Minnesota?

1. Abortion

Walz is unabashedly pro-abortion, in both rhetoric and policy.

For example, two bills that Walz signed into law last year make Minnesota one of the most pro-abortion states in America.

The first bill, the Protect Reproductive Options Act, codified into Minnesota law a "fundamental right ... to obtain an abortion." The bill imposes no limits on abortion. Minnesota, in fact, is one of just seven states (and Washington, D.C.) that imposes no legal gestational limit on abortions. The second bill, Minnesota Senate Bill 2995, essentially eliminated "nearly all the protective and modestly pro-life features of existing Minnesota law," according to National Review.

"Abortion is health care," Walz said earlier this year.

If you combine Walz's radical pro-abortion views and record with Harris', then you generate "the most pro-abortion presidential ticket America has ever seen," said Marjorie Dannenfelser, president of SBA Pro-Life America.

2. LGBTQ agenda

Not only does Walz support the LGBTQ agenda, but he has turned Minnesota into a "trans refuge."

Last year, Walz signed a bill — the so-called "Trans Refuge" Act — and an executive order protecting so-called "gender-affirming" procedures for children while prohibiting legal action against people who travel to Minnesota for so-called "gender-affirming" care.

Walz has also banned "conversion therapy."

There is, of course, also the law that requires period products to "be available to all menstruating students in restrooms regularly used by students in grades 4 to 12." This means that boys' bathrooms in Minnesota schools do make available pads and tampons.

Walz, moreover, is described by his critics as "anti-parent."

Walz's record on issues related to the LGBTQ agenda has earned him high praise from GLAAD, which released a statement on Tuesday celebrating his "proven record" on these issues.

3. COVID pandemic and religious freedom

Walz, like many other Democratic governors, instituted harsh restrictions on residents during the COVID-19 pandemic.

But Walz took heat from Christians during the pandemic for enacting policies they argued were religiously discriminatory. Case in point: In May 2020, Walz signed an executive order allowing retail shops to re-open at 50% capacity — while still prohibiting in-person religious gatherings to 10 people.

After pushback from Catholic and Lutherans — who promised to buck Walz's restrictions — Walz allowed churches to re-open at 25% capacity.

"Governor Walz, a former teacher, gets an F in religious liberties," said Erick Kaardal, special counsel at the Thomas More Society.

Levi Secord, pastor of Christ Bible Church in Minnesota, added of Walz's record on religious freedom:

Walz and Democrats in Minnesota sought to coerce religious institutions to hire against their sincerely held beliefs. Democrats enacted a change to employment law that would have forced religious institutions, including churches, to hire against their beliefs about sexuality and gender. Thanks to a groundswell of opposition from local churches, this was eventually reversed. Sadly, under a new proposed amendment, Walz’s party is trying again to undermine religious liberty.

Earlier this year, however, Walz did sign a law that clarified religious protections under the state's Human Rights Act.

"Governor Tim Walz is a radical progressive," said Dr. Andrew Walker, a professor at Southern Baptist Theological Seminary.

"There's no way to downplay the fact of this. He's aggressively pushed some of the most pro-trans and anti-religious liberty policies in the United States," Walker explained. "Don't take the bait on the grandfatherly Midwest persona. Christians, please be clear-eyed about the anti-human agenda on the Democratic ticket."

The Minnesota Family Counsel explained, "The Harris-Walz ticket is the most radical on abortion and gender ideology in American history."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Camera captures moment FBI agents show up at whistleblower's home after she helps expose sex-change program at Texas hospital



The FBI dispatched two agents to the home of a Texas nurse after she spoke to journalist Christopher Rufo about the sex-change program at Texas Children's Hospital.

Last year, Rufo broke news about an elaborate sex-change program happening at Texas Children's Hospital. A whistleblower gave Rufo documents proving the hospital continued its "transgender medicine" operations despite publicly saying the program had ended. That whistleblower was Dr. Eithan Haim, whom the Justice Department has now indicted on four felony charges for allegedly violating medical privacy laws.

'They promised they would make life difficult for me if I was trying to protect the leaker.'

Haim's bravery encouraged a second whistleblower to come forward.

Last May, that whistleblower provided new insight into how physicians at Texas Children's Hospital provided "transgender medicine," explained how "transgender medicine is highly lucrative," and described her workplace as having a "demonic presence."

On Tuesday, Rufo revealed the identity of the whistleblower, registered nurse Vanessa Sivadge.

In the new report, Sivadge accused Texas Children's Hospital of engaging in Medicaid fraud.

"The largest children's hospital in the country is illegally billing Medicaid for transgender procedures," she said. "It is evident that the hospital continues to believe it is above the law not just by concealing the existence of their transgender medicine program from the public, but by stealing from the federal government."

What is shocking is what happened to Sivadge after she initially spoke to Rufo.

Two months after their conversation, Sivadge called Rufo in a "panic," he recounted. Sivadge told Rufo that two FBI agents unexpectedly showed up at her home wanting to talk about "some of the things that have been going on at work lately."

Sivadge's doorbell camera captured her partner opening the door to their home as two FBI agents flashed their badges and demanded to speak with Sivadge.

(You can view that footage here).

According to Sivadge, the FBI agents told her that she was a "person of interest" in the investigation into Dr. Haim.

"They promised they would make life difficult for me if I was trying to protect the leaker," Sivadge told Rufo. "They said I was ‘not safe’ at work and claimed that someone at my workplace had given my name to the FBI."

In the months since that visit, FBI agents have not re-appeared at her home. Still, Sivadge told Rufo that she is motivated to fight against the transgender agenda.

"My faith and my gut, just knowing right from wrong, compels me," she said. "I was born for this. I have no doubt this is what I am supposed to do."

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton (R) has confirmed that his office is investigating the newest whistleblower allegations.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Trans-identifying athlete who caused injuries at girls’ basketball game ‘caught staring’ at topless female: Report



The trans-identifying high school athlete who caused multiple injuries during a February girls’ basketball game was previously suspended from a rowing team after the male was “caught staring” at a topless female changing in the locker room, the Daily Mail reported.

What’s the background?

The Collegiate Charter School of Lowell in Massachusetts opted to forfeit a basketball game against KIPP Academy Lynn on February 8 after three of its players were benched due to injuries, Blaze News previously reported.

According to the charter school, the remaining players on the team “expressed concern” to their coach that they may also sustain injuries if they continued.

“The players feared getting injured and not being able to compete in the playoffs,” the charter school stated.

A male, trans-identifying KIPP Academy Lynn player, who is reportedly over six feet tall and has facial hair, was allegedly responsible for causing multiple injuries throughout the game.

A video of one of the game’s plays showed the KIPP Academy Lynn athlete ripping the basketball away from a female opponent, causing her to fall to the ground. She then appears to fail to stand up as she clutches her back in pain, according to the video.

Following the incident, the charter school released a statement supporting its coach’s decision to forfeit the game, noting the “roughness of [the] play” that was caught on video.

KIPP Academy “condemn[ed] harmful comments being made online toward members of our community.” The male player, believed to be 17 or 18 years old, is reportedly on the school’s girls’ volleyball team and track team.

Athlete booted from rowing team

A March 20, 2024, report sent to the United States Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee by Republican Sen. Bill Cassidy from Louisiana revealed that the trans-identifying male athlete was previously suspended from a “private, free-standing rowing league” in Massachusetts governed by the United States Rowing Association, according to a parent.

The parent told the committee that the male athlete was permitted to join the women’s varsity crew team but was removed after “caus[ing] many issues for the female athletes.”

“The male athlete was also allowed to use the women’s locker room in accordance with USA Rowing [USRowing] policy,” the report read. “The female athletes avoided using the locker room, but nonetheless a few months later, the male athlete was caught staring openly at one of the female athletes while she changed her clothes in the women’s locker room and remarked, ‘oooh t*****s!’ When a female athlete nearby asked if it was the first time he had seen female breasts, the male responded, ‘uhh yeah’ with a laugh. The male athlete was suspended for this incident.”

The report called the incident a “direct case of harassment.”

Fifteen parents penned a letter to USRowing in October 2022 claiming their children were “intimidated” into silence, the Quillette reported. According to the parents, the male athlete joined the female rowing team after placing “near the bottom” on the club’s male team. Parents claimed that the athlete did not shave or make any other attempts to appear more feminine, noting he also continued to wear the male club’s uniform.

“Our daughters have stayed quiet because they are afraid,” parents wrote, according to Quillette. “Name-calling and the threat of mental health is being used as emotional blackmail to keep us all quiet while women are harmed and devalued. ... Our daughters also faced a locker room situation where they were uncomfortable. ... They stopped changing in the locker room and began to hide away. These young girls should never have been put through being told they had to face a male body everyday as they undressed.”

“The rowing team also required the male athlete to room with them on trips. The girls spoke to us about quitting rowing because of the intimidation of being forced to be in a hotel room alone with a male,” the parents added.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Indeed is paying $10,000 for workers to relocate so long as they are transvestites or have kids who've rejected their biological sex



Indeed, among the world's top job sites, is offering to help pay for employees to relocate. Not all employees, however; just those who reject the reality of their biological sex and those workers whose children are purportedly "gender non-conforming, transgender or non-binary."

The woke company told Axios that it internally announced this relocation benefit accommodating the reality-averse in July, but is only just now discussing it publicly.

$10,000 will reportedly be awarded to any transvestic, U.S.-based worker who seeks so-called "gender-affirming care" — a euphemism for destructive hormone therapies and genital mutilation procedures — but presently lives in an area where state laws or other government directives hinder the worker in obtaining it.

The same benefit similarly applies to workers seeking to move their gender-dysphoric kids out of areas that presently protect children from undergoing irreversible "gender-affirming care."

Bloomberg reported that the company, where at least one executive cites "queen" as a preferred pronoun, will also cover any tax liability created by the payment.

Extra to boosting ESG scores and placating LGBT activists, it appears that this initiative has something also to do with retention.

"Our transgender, non-binary and gender non-conforming colleagues are integral to our business and culture at Indeed," Misty Gaither, vice president of DEI at the company, told Axios. "We know employees thrive and do their best work when they can bring their authentic selves to work. ... We also believe that everyone has the right to make the healthcare decisions that they feel are right for themselves and their families."

Among the handful of workers who have so far taken advantage is 30-year-old Sam Burger, a content creator at the company who used to go by Magdalene but now uses plural pronouns. She reportedly used the handout to leave Austin, Texas, for Denver, Colorado, which she figured would be a better fit. Bloomberg indicated the $10,000 has gone a long way, especially since the move has cost Burger roughly only $5,000 to date.

"As soon as I found out that I was getting the money, it was very much like a weight lifted," she said.

It's unclear how the sincerity of claimants is assessed and whether normal employees might be able to exploit the benefit simply by claiming to be transvestites.

Gaither, based in the San Francisco Bay Area, noted in the company's 2023 DEI report, "We're focused on making progress towards our goal to increase representation of women and underrepresented genders (URG) to 50% at all levels of Indeed's global workforce, and increase U.S. workforce representation of underrepresented racial and ethnic minorities (URM) to 30% by 2030."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Alice Cooper shreds efforts by gender ideologues to confuse kids about their sexuality, riffs on insanity of woke culture: 'What are we in, a Kurt Vonnegut novel?'



Shock rocker Alice Cooper — born Vincent Damon Furnier — noted last year that the first thing he does in the morning is "make a cup of coffee, grab [his] Bible, then spend the next hour reading and praying."

It appears that in addition to being attuned to the highest reality, Cooper, whose new album "Road" debuts Friday, is also cognizant of biological realities that LGBT activists are alternatively keen to dismiss or reject altogether at the expense of the innocent.

After recollecting upon his rise to fame as well as on how he once babysat a young Keanu Reeves — whom he retroactively referred to as "John Wick" — the rocker blasted efforts by gender ideologues to confuse children and woke cultural imperialism in a recent interview with Stereogum.

Stereogum's Rachel Brodsky ostensibly set Cooper up to win over leftists with a softball question concerning his "forward-thinking responses to questions about sexuality and gender" in a 1974 interview.

"Recently some of your 'theatrical' rock peers have commented about gender identity, with Paul Stanley and Dee Snider calling gender-affirming care for kids a 'sad and dangerous fad,'" said Brodsky. "As someone who played around with gender expectations early on, do you have any thoughts on what some of your contemporaries have said before they walked those comments back?"

Cooper made clear by his response that the time for "Mr. Nice Guy" had passed, at least with regards to gender ideology.

The rocker called so-called transgenderism "a fad," stressing that it is "wrong when you've got a six-year-old kid who has no idea. He just wants to play, and you're confusing him[,] telling him, 'Yeah, you're a boy, but you could be a girl if you want to be.' I think that's so confusing to a kid. It's even confusing to a teenager."

"You're still trying to find your identity, and yet here's this thing going on, saying, 'Yeah, but you can be anything you want. You can be a cat if you want to be.' I mean, if you identify as a tree," continued Cooper. "And I'm going, 'Come on! What are we in, a Kurt Vonnegut novel?' It's so absurd, that it's gone now to the point of absurdity."

"I look at it this way, the logical way: If you have these genitals, you're a boy. If you have those genitals, you're a girl," he said, adding that an individual's desired sex does not negate their actual sex.

Brodsky, agitated by Cooper's answer, responded, "I don't think parents are encouraging doubt in their kids' identities. I would just hope that they listen to their kids and find pediatricians that provide appropriate care."

The interviewer's intimation that parents are better off finding a doctor who might mutilate their confused kids didn't sit well with Cooper, who suggested he could "see somebody really taking advantage of this."

Cooper extended his criticism beyond the efforts to confuse kids by social constructivists to the "whole woke thing."

"Who's making the rules? Is there a building somewhere in New York where people sit down every day and say, 'Okay, we can't say "mother" now. We have to say "birthing person." Get that out on the wire right now'? Who is this person making these rules? I don't get it. I'm not being old school about it. I'm being logical," he said.

Cooper indicated he doesn't know "one person that agrees with the woke thing," calling it a "huge comedy."

Leftists didn't find Cooper's critique of gender ideology and woke neologisms funny.

Rolling Stone — fresh off of denigrating a working-class musician, criticizing an anti-child trafficking film, and spreading more falsehoods — denounced Cooper, suggesting he had "leaned on right-wing, anti-trans scare tactics."

Although Rolling Stone staff writer Jon Blistein took issue with the musician's apparent refusal to sever sex from gender as the Mayo Clinic has elected to do, he appeared most incensed by Cooper's suggestion that a "guy can walk into a woman's bathroom at any time and just say, 'I just feel like I'm a woman today,' and have the time of his life in there[.] ... Somebody's going to get raped."

Blistein wrote, "These 'bathroom predator' myths been widely debunked."

However, contrary to Blistein's contention, there have been multiple incidents in which transvestites have stolen into women's areas and traumatized the real females therein. For instance, a male reportedly raped a young girl at Stone Bridge High School in Loudoun County, Virginia, after taking advantage of the school's LGBT policies.

Like Rolling Stone, Billboard zeroed in on Cooper's apparent opposition to ruining children's lives with genital mutilation and irreversible hormone therapies, writing that he was "anti-trans" and against "best-practice medical care for transgender youth."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

ALICE COOPER 'I'm Alice' - Official Video - New Album 'Road' Out August 25thyoutu.be

American Medical Association journal: There's no moral reason why taxpayers shouldn't subsidize uterus transplants for men



The American Medical Association has floated the suggestion that there's no moral reason why taxpayers should not subsidize the provision of wombs from dead or living women to transvestites so that they can carry babies.

A peer-reviewed paper published in the AMA Journal of Ethics in June concluded that even "if there are limits on subsidies, the case could be made that no moral obstacle stands in the way of justifying subsidies for UTx [uterus transplantation] for some transwomen and transmen, just as there seems to be no fully persuasive argument against gestating a child via UTx."

Timothy F. Murphy, a professor of philosophy in the biomedical sciences at the University of Illinois College of Medicine, and Kelsey Mumford, a medical student at Dell Medical School with a gender studies certificate, neither one a medical doctor, claimed that in light of the success of UTx in real women, men "who want to gestate their own children" and men who "want uterus transplants to consolidate their identities but not to gestate children" might take interest in the procedure.

After all, their inability to ever normally bear children might leave them experiencing "psychological dissonance in a way that undermines their health and well-being," according to the academics. "The lack of a uterus also closes off the prospect of gestating a child in a way that is available to women as a class. It follows that lack of a uterus is an obstacle to full participation in the social goods attached to women's identity."

The paper's authors insinuated, on the basis of a 2021 bioethics paper, that transvestites may no longer need to suffer disappointment on account of reality, claiming there are "no absolute barriers in anatomy, hormones, and obstetric considerations that would rule out the possibility of successful UTx" in men.

After arguing that it may not only be morally justifiable but scientifically possible for men suffering gender dysphoria to carry children in wombs lifted from real women, Murphy and Mumford broached the matter of cost.

Since the estimated costs for the procedure run between $100,000 and $300,000, at least for females — there's presently no indication how much it would cost for a man, since it's never been done before — Murphy and Mumford indicated that "all parties interested in UTx will look to both private insurance and government providers for help covering costs."

While acknowledging that most states and the federal government do not presently subsidize fertility treatment for women and that there will inevitably be various criteria for eligibility, the paper's authors concluded that there are no moral obstacles in the way of granting men uteri or enabling them to carry children in their naturally barren bodies.

This paper appeared in an issue entitled "Patient-Centered Transgender Surgical Care."

Mumford introduced the issue with an editorial, wherein she noted that "we have now reached a tipping point" in the field of gender dysphoria-affirming genital mutilation and hormone treatments, where the "focus has largely shifted from fighting for its acceptance as a treatment modality and increasing patients' access to it toward ethical stewardship of this now-validated and accessible set of procedures."

"Rather than funding objective medical studies on transgender medicine, the AMA has chosen activist positions on this delicate topic," Dr. Martin Makary, professor at Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, told the Washington Examiner.

"Why don’t they fund a study on the 10-year regret rate of children who undergo transitioning surgery? What is the suicide rate among those who undergo aggressive hormone or surgical treatment versus long-term talk therapy?" asked Makary.

"Medicine has many crisis issues today — overtreatment, the medical-industrial complex, stagnant cancer research, and skyrocketing health care costs," continued Makary. "It’s odd that the AMA is skipping over these giant issues to focus on uterus transplants for transgender people."

The Daily Mail reported that uterus transplants have only been executed successfully around 100 times worldwide for women. It is a multilayered process that takes over 18 months on average.

Makary told "Fox & Friends" that it's medically possible to do, but the "question is, should it be done?"

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Ne-Yo bends knee to leftist agenda, apologizes for defending children from trans ideology: 'Insensitive and offensive'



Singer Ne-Yo is backtracking after he questioned the trans agenda and parents who enable their children to embrace it.

In a statement posted to social media, Ne-Yo, a Grammy-winning musician whose real name is Shaffer Smith, offered his "deepest apologies" to anyone offended by his decision to stand against trans ideology.

"After much reflection, I’d like to express my deepest apologies to anyone that I may have hurt with my comments on parenting and gender identity," Smith said.

"I've always been an advocate for love and inclusivity in the LGBTQI+ community, so I understand how my comments could’ve been interpreted as insensitive and offensive," he continued. "Gender identity is nuanced and I can honestly admit that I plan to better educate myself on the topic, so I can approach future conversations with more empathy."

— (@)

As TheBlaze reported, Smith criticized trans ideology in a recent interview where he connected the rise of LGBTQ-identifying children to parents abdicating the role as shepherds of their children.

"I feel like the parents have almost forgotten what the role of a parent is," Smith said in the interview. "If your little boy comes up to you and says, ‘Daddy I wanna be a girl,’ and you just let him rock with that? He's 5. If you let this 5-year-old little boy eat candy all day, he's gonna do that.

"Like, when did it become a good idea to let a 5-year-old, let a 6-year-old, let a 12-year-old make a life-changing decision for themselves? When did that happen?" he questioned. "He can’t drive a car yet, but he can decide his sex?"

Smith, moreover, compared trans ideology to someone identifying as a "goldfish." Smith said adults can identify however they want, but said he would not participate in their delusions. "I'm not going to call you a goldfish," he declared.

Ne-Yo: When Did it Become OK for a 12-Year-Old Boy to Say He Wants to Be a Girl? (Part 3) www.youtube.com

It's not clear what prompted Smith to apologize. His interview circulated on social media over the weekend and was widely applauded. By contrast, his apology was sharply panned, and he was labeled a "coward."

The apology is even more confusing, because, after the comments gained attention, Smith initially defended his comments, according to Billboard, explaining that he was stating his opinion and he didn't care if his perspective upset others.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!