How Trump can help get justice for Canada's Freedom Convoy prisoners



Of all those cheering Donald Trump’s recent re-election as a victory over leftist tyranny, one group has especially personal reasons to celebrate: the roughly 1,400 Americans charged with crimes related to the Capitol protests of January 6, 2021.

While these defendants and their families wait for the pardons Trump has hinted at, another set of prisoners languishes behind bars to the north. Though Canadian and not subject to the president-elect’s direct authority, their fate may also depend on actions Trump takes during his second term.

Pressure from Biden emboldened Trudeau to invoke Canada’s Emergencies Act, which grants the federal government additional powers during threats to national security.

Like the January 6 protests that preceded it, the movement that came to be known as the Freedom Convoy was a massive, decentralized, and spontaneously organized uprising against the authoritarian injustices of a liberal regime, this one of the Liberal Party of Canada.

A nationwide rebellion

It began in January 2022, when Canadian truckers organized a few separate convoys protesting COVID vaccine mandates for crossing the United States border. As these convoys converged in the capital, Ottawa, the movement grew into a nationwide rebellion against Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s draconian regime of pandemic restrictions.

The Freedom Convoy lit a fire around the world, garnering praise from former president Trump and inspiring many similar protests, including the People’s Convoy here in the United States. Over three weeks, thousands of Canadians demonstrated in Ottawa and around the country, disrupting traffic and blockading various border crossings.

The protests were so effective, in fact, that they drew the ire of the Biden administration, then — as today — aggressively prosecuting anyone involved with the January 6 “insurrection.”

The Democrat Party line was to cast these protesters as conspirators in the worst attack on America since 9/11, or even Pearl Harbor. As such, participants who were guilty of trespassing, at most, found themselves burdened with additional, spurious charges such as "entering and remaining in a restricted building" or "disorderly conduct.”

Sentencing, too, was and continues to be unduly harsh — especially in cases involving no violence or property damage, let alone any demonstrable intent to overthrow the government. One such glaring example is that of Christian Secor, currently serving 42 months in federal prison essentially for sitting in Vice President Pence’s Senate seat.

Biden butts in

It was this authoritarian zeal that President Biden brought to the situation in Canada, America’s largest trading partner and longtime ally, with which it shares the longest undefended border in the world. Pressure from Biden emboldened Trudeau to invoke Canada’s Emergencies Act, which grants the federal government additional powers during threats to national security, a move Trudeau was considering from the get-go.

The crackdown was swift and merciless. A situation at one of these protests, used by Trudeau to justify his controversial use of the Emergencies Act, involved four men arrested the night before it was invoked.

The arrests took place at the protest in Coutts, a tiny village where Alberta Highway 4 crosses into Montana to become Interstate 15. As one of the busiest border crossings on the entire prairie, Coutts was of particular concern to both Biden and Trudeau

Royal railroading

On February 13, 2022, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police raided the protest site at Coutts and arrested 13 people, charging many with mischief and other nuisance charges that were likewise leveled at those in Ottawa later that week.

Based on unrecorded and unverifiable testimony from undercover officers, and having confiscated hunting rifles using a faulty warrant, four of those arrested were charged with "conspiracy to murder police officers," a heinous accusation that shocked the nation.

Despite having no criminal records or histories of violence, these four men, who would come to be known as the Coutts Four, were held without bail for two years while waiting to come to trial.

Two of the men, Jerry Morin, a 43-year-old electrical lineman, and Tony Olienick, a 42-year-old trucking, excavation, and quarrying company owner, were kept for long periods of time in solitary confinement, a recognized form of torture and surely beyond the pale for a country like Canada, which has a proud tradition of leading U.N. peacekeeping missions and advocating for civil rights and democracy around the world.

Conspiracy of silence

During the two years of these men’s incarceration, the Canadian media said nothing about their treatment or the dubious and murky nature of their charges.

The allegations about the Coutts Four, before ever being tested in court, were cited in a mandatory inquest into Trudeau’s invocation of the Emergencies Act, and they continue to be seen as a legitimating factor, even though another Superior Court ruling found Trudeau’s invocation to be "unreasonable" and "unjustified."

To this day, few Canadians — never mind Americans — are aware of what happened to the Coutts Four.

Morin and Chris Lysak, 50, an electrician, were eventually released in February 2024 after pleading guilty to lesser charges.

It is widely understood that the confession from Morin to "conspiracy to traffic firearms" was coerced by keeping him solitary; his appeal is pending. During the trial, the "firearms" undercover officers claimed Morin handled were proven to be socks, underwear, and a guitar.

Lysak plead guilty to a gun mishandling charge, an easily applied offense in a country with no constitutionally protected gun rights and where owning a pistol is nearly impossible.

It is also a very strange coincidence that Lysak and Morin were released about a week after Tucker Carlson appeared on stage in Alberta and mentioned their case. Thus far, Carlson is the only major media personality to have highlighted the plight of the Coutts Four at all.

A case of collusion?

The other two men, Olienick and Chris Carbert, eventually went to trial over two years after being arrested. While acquitted of the charge of conspiracy to murder police officers, they were found guilty of the lesser charges of mischief and possession of weapons for a dangerous purpose.

In sentencing of the two men, the judge effectively did an "end run" around that not-guilty verdict, comparing their peaceful protest to another case in which a man drove his vehicle into Canada’s Parliament and wandered around with guns, actively looking for politicians to shoot.

As if that weren't indication enough of the political nature of the case, evidence allegedly showing that Crown Prosector Steven Johnston broke the law in building a case against the Coutts Four has been sealed. Given what we know about allegations of collusion between Johnston and the RCMP, it seems likely that the case against the Coutts Four would have been thrown out.

Olienick and Carbert remain in custody, serving out six and a half years for politically trumped-up charges.

Like the Biden administration, which (as if to avenge the Democrats’ humiliating defeat at the polls) has vowed to spend its final two months making even more January 6 arrests, Trudeau is unrepentant about turning on his own people.

Trump vs. Trudeau

What, then, can Trump do once he takes office in January?

While the two leaders have had a congenial enough relationship in the past, Trudeau and his ministers have spent a lot of time bad-mouthing Trump in Canada’s Parliament; President Trump’s new Cabinet nominees have taken note and are starting off their relationship with Trudeau on a sour note.

There’s also the matter of Trudeau’s plummeting popularity within Canada. With members of his own party recently urging him to step down, the prime minister is more vulnerable than at any other time in his career.

This presents ideal conditions for Trump to press the issue of the Coutts Four, perhaps in trade policy negotiations or while pointing out Canada’s failure to live up to its NATO commitments or adequately fund its own military.

Then, of course, there’s Canada’s tendency to let an alarming number of illegal immigrants, including hundreds of terrorists, slip across the border and into America.

MAGA diplomacy

President Trump would do his many freedom-loving fans in Canada a great service by publicly acknowledging the Coutts Four as political prisoners, persecuted, like so many of the Freedom Convoy protestors, by an overzealous, politically-motivated government, which is still convicting peaceful protesters to this day.

Such an acknowledgment would emphasize Trump’s commitment to undo the damage wrought by the Biden regime, while strongly encouraging Canada to safeguard the liberty of its own citizens.

With both countries having atoned for the shameful treatment of their own citizens, America and Canada could then build an even stronger relationship, one based on mutual prosperity and security.

FACT CHECK: Instagram Post Makes False Claim About Hochul, Truckers

The post claims Hochul said truckers not delivering to New York is a 'hate crime'

FACT CHECK: Video Claims To Show Impact Of Trucker Boycott On New York

A video shared on X claims to show the impact of a trucker boycott on New York. You get what you voted: #Truckers nationwide are not to deliver food, produce, goods to #NewYork… This is the result what those #American #libtards deserve!#LiberalSinkingShip #LiberalismIsAMentalDisease #USA #America #DemonRats pic.twitter.com/L6NjMDd7fE — sietun (@sietun64946) February 19, 2024 Verdict: Misleading […]

The REAL reason farmers and truckers are rising up all around the world



Farmers around the world are rising up to protest regulations that are threatening to destroy not just their industry — but the countries they’ve learned to thrive in.

France, Greece, Italy, the Netherlands, and Spain have all seen recent protests against these regulations. In France, entire herds of livestock have been led into the city to stop traffic, and manure has been sprayed on government buildings.

“This is not just an American problem,” Glenn Beck comments. “What they’re protesting is about to affect every single citizen on planet Earth.”

The protests are a reaction to the actions of global elites, who allege that they’re trying to save the environment.

One of those elites is John Kerry, who, at the recent AIM for Climate Summit, was adamant that agriculture is a problem for the environment.

“Agriculture contributes about 33% of all emissions of the world,” he told the audience. “Depending a little bit on how you count it, but it’s anywhere from 26% to 33%, and we can’t get to net zero, we don’t get this job done, unless agriculture is front and center as part of the solution.”

“You can’t just continue to both warm the planet while also expecting to feed it. Doesn’t work. So we have to reduce emissions from the food system,” he added.

“I’m not an expert on this, but has anybody considered how many people will go hungry in the race to eliminate 30%?” Glenn asks. “Did they factor in how many ranchers and farmers will be forced into poverty? Have they thought about the ramifications of something that has taken us thousands of years to perfect — to change it in a four-year-period?”

To learn more, watch the video below.


Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn’s masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis, and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Court rules Trudeau's use of martial law to crush peaceful trucker protest was 'unjustified' and unlawful



A Canadian federal court ruled Tuesday that Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's use of martial law in 2022 to crush the peaceful trucker protests "was not justified." Justice Richard Mosley noted further that "the decision to issue the Proclamation was unreasonable and led to infringement of Charter rights."

While a poll indicated last month that a supermajority of Canadians already wanted Trudeau to resign, he now faces additional pressure to step down. However, his deputy — who recently smirked as a reporter was bashed and arrested by police for asking her questions — indicated the Liberal regime will continue to defend its actions and appeal the ruling.

Meanwhile, NDP leader Jagmeet Singh and his socialist party are attempting to retroactively qualify their support for the Emergencies Act invocation, suggesting they had championed it "reluctantly."

What's the background?

The trucker protests, dubbed the Freedom Convoy by organizers, kicked off in early 2022 in response to the Canadian government's draconian COVID-19 vaccine mandates and travel restrictions, which greatly impacted the livelihoods of those whose jobs required them to leave the house.

A massive convoy comprising Canadian flag-adorned trucks and other vehicles drove across the country, cheered on by massive crowds at various stops along the way, until it ultimately reached Ottawa, the nation's capital.

In Ottawa, multitudes of citizens crewed outside their Parliament, calling on the Liberal regime to drop some of its pandemic protocols, which even one of the authors of Canada's Charter of Rights and Freedoms said were unconstitutional.

The protests took on the atmosphere of a winter festival, complete with bounce castles, saunas, musical performances, dancing, and speeches. Crime dropped in the Canadian capital during this so-called occupation, and demonstrators periodically shoveled the sidewalks.

— (@)

Not all were keen on the protests, however. Affluent residents in the government city claimed they were left traumatized by the sight of Canadian flags and the sound of honking, according to CTV News.

While Trudeau had not intervened in previous political protests — such as those staged by BLM or Idle No More activists — and had not taken similar action in 2020 when anti-pipeline activists blockaded Canadian rail lines, paralyzing the country, the peaceful trucker protests were evidently too much for him to bear.

Martial law

With the approval of his Cabinet and the support of Singh's New Democratic Party, Trudeau invoked the Emergencies Act from Feb. 17 to 23, 2023. At the time of the declaration, there were still around 500 trucks remaining in Ottawa.

"These illegal blockades are hurting Canadians, and they need to stop," said Trudeau.

The Emergencies Act is a revised version of Canada's former War Measures Act, which can be invoked in national emergencies that "seriously threate[n] the ability of the Government of Canada to preserve the sovereignty, security and territorial integrity of Canada."

Police seized fuel from the truckers in subzero conditions, towed 115 trucks, and arrested hundreds of protesters. The Liberal regime also discussed deploying German Leopard battle tanks against protesters; froze 257 bank accounts; and altogether clamped down on public criticism of government overreach.

Trudeau was condemned by members of the Conservative Party and civil rights organizations, as well as by foreign dignitaries.

An internal Department of Public Safety report later revealed there was no evidence of violence committed by Freedom Convoy protesters in Ottawa; that "the majority of the events have been peaceful"; and that the "disruption to government activities is so far minor."

In late 2022, Trudeau told the Public Order Emergency Commission what allegedly made the Freedom Convoy unusual was that the protesters expressed a "certain level of frustration" that was "very concerning."

— (@)

'Unjustified'

Siding with civil liberties groups in his Tuesday ruling, Justice Mosley indicated that while economically impactful, the Freedom Convoy protests neither threatened national security nor warranted martial law.

"I have concluded that the decision to issue the Proclamation [of the Emergencies Act] does not bear the hallmarks of reasonableness – justification, transparency and intelligibility – and was not justified," wrote Mosley.

The court also found that the Trudeau regime had not exhausted other available, less extreme legal options to tackle what it perceived as a threat.

"Due to its nature and to the broad powers it grants the Federal Executive, the Emergencies Act is a tool of last resort," wrote Mosley. "The GIC cannot invoke the Emergencies Act because it is convenient, or because it may work better than other tools at their disposal or available to the provinces."

The Canadian Civil Liberties Association, one of the groups that challenged the Liberal regime, said in a statement, "Emergency is not in the eye of the beholder. Emergency powers are necessary in extreme circumstances, but they are also dangerous to democracy. They should be used sparingly and carefully."

"They cannot be used even to address a massive and disruptive demonstration if that could have been dealt with through regular policing and laws," continued the CCLA. "The Federal Court agreed that this threshold was not met."

Canadian Constitution Foundation executive director Joanna Baron, who also challenged the use of the act, said, "The invocation of the Emergencies Act is one of the worst examples of government overreach during the pandemic and we are very pleased to see Justice Mosley recognize that Charter rights were breached and that Cabinet must follow the law and only use the Act as a tool of last resort."

Liberals unrepentant amidst resignation calls

While Trudeau dodged questions from reporters after the ruling, Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland indicated the Liberal regime is unrepentant and will appeal the ruling, reported the National Post.

"The public safety of Canadians was under threat; our national security, which includes our national economic security, was under threat," said Freeland. "I was convinced at the time. It was the right thing to do. It was the necessary thing to do."

— (@)

Cosmin Dzsurdzsa of True North intimated the appeal might be well received, given that two-thirds of the 15 Federal Court of Appeal judges were Liberal appointees.

Conservative Party Leader Pierre Poilievre — poised to beat Trudeau in the next election should the Liberal fail to resign — said Trudeau "broke the highest law in the land with the Emergencies Act. He cause the crisis by dividing people. Then he violated Charter rights to illegally suppress citizens."

Former Conservative Party Leader Andrew Scheer stressed that "Trudeau must now answer for his reckless abandonment of the law and the most basic freedoms of all Canadians."

Scheer said in another message, "Never again let Trudeau give a lecture about Charter rights."

Maxime Bernier, head of the People's Party of Canada, reiterated that the Liberal government is a "tyrannical regime," adding in a subsequent tweet that the decision by the Liberal government was "absolutely horrendous, violent, abusive and unnecessary."

Ezra Levant, the publisher of Rebel News, suggested that in "any healthy democracy he'd resign."

Jay Bhattacharya, professor at the Stanford School of Medicine and co-author of the "Great Barrington Declaration," wrote, "In light of the Federal Court ruling that the Canadian government violated the basic civil rights of its citizens by invoking the Emergencies Act, Justin Trudeau should resign and there should be a new election."

Dr. Jordan Peterson wrote, "If the government violates its own constitution in what way is it still the government? A dead serious question @JustinTrudeau[.] Looks like it's high time for you to hit the road, Jack."

Trudeau presently has a disapproval rating of 64% according to the Angus Reid Institute. An Ipsos poll last month indicated that 69% of Canadians think Trudeau should step down.

Trudeau appears to be in hiding, as he has no public events scheduled for Wednesday.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Like Rail Workers, Truckers Are Also Feeling The Pain Of Predatory Systems

There must be clear legal criteria differentiating drivers who are truly independent contractors from those who are employees.

Port Of Oakland Back Open After Newsom Herds Protesters Into ‘Free Speech Zones’

'Only we will hurt ourselves and port of Oakland business'