Can the Democrats scare the Supreme Court out of hearing Trump’s appeal?
Donald Trump has been convicted on 34 counts in his New York hush-money trial — and Americans everywhere are horrified.
Not only because the former president may be going to prison, but the additional looming consequences could be game-changing.
“I think it also will be used as the excuse for Joe Biden not debating him. ‘I don’t debate a felon,’” Glenn Beck predicts, mocking Biden.
“They’re moving past this and they’re moving to the Supreme Court,” Glenn continues. “They are launching cannon balls at the ship, saying, ‘Don’t you dare get involved in this trial.’”
“They sent the message to Alito and Thomas and everybody else, ‘Back off, stay down,’” he explains.
“That’s the entire point of this process, in a nutshell, is intimidation. Telling them to back down, do not stand in our way,” Glenn’s chief researcher, Jason Buttrill, agrees.
“I’m glad you talk about this going to the Supreme Court. This is absolutely getting appealed,” Buttrill says. “But first he has to go to sentencing. Now, normally, in a sane world, I would say you know he’s only going to get probation, maybe at the very worst like house arrest.”
While the Democrats are doing everything they can to keep Trump out of the White House, their plan might be backfiring when it comes to their support.
“People who didn’t vote and don’t like Donald Trump, I’ve seen them yesterday give and commit to voting for him,” Glenn says, adding that however, “there is a chance this works out horribly.”
Want more from Glenn Beck?
To enjoy more of Glenn’s masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis, and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.
Missouri AG Andrew Bailey: Trump trial an ‘illicit witch hunt,' jury 'a roving commission'
Jurors in former president Donald Trump’s New York hush-money trial have deliberated on whether or not to convict him — and they did.
However, Glenn Beck believes there are some major issues.
“Four of them can say, ‘I think you know he falsified checks,’ whatever they think the crime is because it wasn’t really defined. Even if they don’t agree on the crime, if 12 of them think he committed some crime, well, then he’s guilty. I’ve never heard that before,” Glenn says.
Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey is in agreement.
“This reeks of desperation by the prosecutor and the judge to obtain a conviction. If people were not previously convinced that this was an illicit witch hunt prosecution, they should be so now,” Bailey says. “This is insane.”
Bailey notes that this violates the Sixth Amendment as well as the former president’s Due Process rights.
“How’s he supposed to know how to offer a defense if he doesn’t even know what the target crime is?” Bailey says.
“It empowers this jury to become a roving commission, and again, that reeks of desperation.”
“That violates the basic constitutional tenets that underpin the Due Process Clause and the Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial,” he says.
What has happened reminds Bailey of a story from the past.
“There was a Roman emperor who used to nail the laws to the highest point on the columns so that the Roman citizens wouldn’t be able to read them. And that’s what this is like. I mean, the judge is saying, ‘Jury, I’m going to charge you to find a crime, any crime you want, and I’m not gonna let you read the jury instructions. Trust me, you guys, just go back and pick something you want to convict him of,’” Bailey tells Glenn.
“How is the jury supposed to apply facts to the law if they can’t see the law in front of them?"
Want more from Glenn Beck?
To enjoy more of Glenn’s masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis, and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.
www.theblaze.com
freebeacon.com