'Nothing to be proud of': State Department spits on USAID's grave following Bono, Obama eulogies



Bono, the Irish singer valued at around $700 million whose real name is Paul David Hewson, did his apparent best on the May 30 episode of "The Joe Rogan Experience" to push the narrative that the Trump administration's dismantling of the U.S. Agency for International Development would result in the deaths of multitudes of foreigners.

Rogan didn't buy what Bono was selling, noting, "For sure, it was a money-laundering operation. For sure, there was no oversight. For sure, billions of dollars are missing."

Just as the Irishman's fearmongering fell flat on the podcast, similar efforts by Bill Gates and other super-wealthy individuals apparently keen to keep American taxpayers running funds through their organizations and on the hook for wasteful foreign projects failed to achieve their desired effect.

'The amount of USAID dollars going to local partners increased only from 4% to 6%.'

The USAID was officially shuttered on Tuesday, just weeks after the State Department took over its foreign assistance programs.

Responding to the eulogies offered up for USAID during a video conference on Monday by former Presidents Barack Obama and George W. Bush, as well as by Bono, State Department spokeswoman Tammy Bruce made abundantly clear that tears shed for the agency are wasted on what was a bloated and ineffective bureaucracy.

To drive home her point, Bruce damned the former agency with some admissions from its former administrator and longtime champion, Samantha Power.

RELATED: Rubio, Vance outline the 'work of a generation,' next steps for the American renewal: 'This is a 20-year project'

 "USAID" etched onto a covering where signage used to be at the US Agency for International Development headquarters in Washington, DC. Photographer: Kent Nishimura/Bloomberg via Getty Images

"Samantha Power, the last USAID director under the last administration at the end of 2024, complained in public statements that when she started only 7 percent of aid money that was assigned to various projects and groups made it to its intended destination, and that’s because of bureaucracy and layers of contractors," said Bruce. "And she was proud that she got it up to 10 percent."

Power noted in a 2021 speech, "In the last decade, despite numerous efforts, initiatives, and even support from Capitol Hill, the amount of USAID dollars going to local partners increased only from 4% to 6%."

She suggested that cash was instead poured into big, remote NGOs "because working with local partners, it turns out, is more difficult, time-consuming, and it's riskier," adding that local partners "often lack the internal accounting expertise our contracts require."

USAID funds are instead gobbled up by "implementing partners," such as private contractors, government agencies, NGOs, and international organizations. The Congressional Research Service noted:

Few foreign governments receive direct budget support, and some foreign assistance dollars never leave the United States at all — instead going to a U.S. business for the end benefit of a foreign population. Money goes to U.S. farmers, defense contractors, and management consultants, among others, for commodities or services provided to benefit foreign populations.

In 2021, Power set a target for the agency: By 2025, 25% of USAID funding would go directly to the intended destinations to support the efforts of locally led organizations. The Democratic former adviser to Obama failed miserably.

According to Devex, the percentage of eligible funding that went to local organizations went from 10.2% in 2022 to 9.6% the following year.

'We are not ending foreign aid. We are making it more nimble.'

"Less than 10% of our foreign assistance dollars flowing through USAID is actually reaching those communities," Walter Kerr, co-founding executive director of Unlock Aid, told PBS earlier this year. "About 98% of USAID grants pay for activities and not results."

"Forty-three percent of [the activities] failed to achieve about half of the intended results. But in spite of that, they still got paid in full almost every time and sometimes more," added Kerr.

Kerr indicated that working with local partners could prove far more effective.

"One study found that, when working with a local partner, as opposed to an international aid contractor, you could find savings upwards of 32% alone. And that's a conservative estimate," said Kerr.

RELATED: Pentagon spox responds to Blaze News reporter on Ukraine saying aid reduction will embolden Russia

 Photo by Joe Raedle/Getty Images

Bruce noted that within the Trump administration's new foreign aid framework, bureaus will be assigned to various regions around the globe.

"That foreign assistance for that region will now sit with the bureau assigned to that region as opposed to some massive bureaucracy, not even housed in our building, dealing with countries and regions separately without dealing with the experts here who understand what those regions might need," said Bruce. "It will be more efficient. It will be more effective. We are not ending foreign aid. We are making it more nimble."

'This era of government-sanctioned inefficiency has officially come to an end.'

Obama, among those evidently happy to pretend USAID was worth its salt, said in a video excerpt obtained by the Associated Press on Monday, "Gutting USAID is a travesty, and it's a tragedy. Because it's some of the most important work happening anywhere in the world."

Bono reportedly read a poem, repeated his suggestion that millions will now die without USAID, then told agency workers, "They called you crooks. When you were the best of us."

Bruce countered in her Wednesday press conference by stating that "there is nothing to be proud of when 90%, according to Samantha Power, is not even making it to the people to whom it was promised."

Secretary of State Marco Rubio said in a July 1 article on his department's Substack page, "Beyond creating a globe-spanning NGO industrial complex at taxpayer expense, USAID has little to show since the end of the Cold War. Development objectives have rarely been met, instability has often worsened, and anti-American sentiment has only grown. On the global stage, the countries that benefit the most from our generosity usually fail to reciprocate."

"This era of government-sanctioned inefficiency has officially come to an end," continued Rubio. "Under the Trump Administration, we will finally have a foreign funding mission in America that prioritizes our national interests."

 

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

NYT Casually Admits USAID Squandered Money But Still Laments Its Closure

Around 1,000 USAID programs are still alive, and now managed through the State Department. The U.S. is still doing good internationally.

From Martha’s Vineyard to NBA suites: USAID official and contractors defraud taxpayers of $550 million



A decade-long fraud and bribery scheme involving the United States Agency for International Development further reinforced the Trump administration's case for restructuring the fraud-plagued agency.

On Thursday, Trump's Department of Justice published a press release announcing that a former USAID official and three senior leaders from three private companies pleaded guilty to a massive plot to defraud American taxpayers dating back to 2013.

The scheme involved at least 14 contracts totaling over $550 million in taxpayer funds.

'A former USAID employee and three others were using funds to pay for things like a lavish country club wedding and a Martha's Vineyard estate, all on the taxpayer's dime.'

Roderick Watson, who previously worked as a USAID contracting officer, agreed to receive bribes from Darryl Britt, then owner and president of Apprio Inc., to influence contracts awarded to the company.

Early in the scheme, PM Consulting Group LLC, doing business as Vistant, was a subcontractor to Apprio on one of the awarded contracts.

RELATED: USAID program contractor defrauds taxpayers of $100,000 in latest agency scandal

  Photo by Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images

Between 2018 and 2022, Apprio lost its eligibility to be a prime contractor for new USAID contracts under the SBA 8(a) contracting program. Apprio and Vistant responded by switching around their scheme, allowing Vistant to act as the prime contractor and Apprio its subcontractor.

Britt and Walter Barnes, Vistant's then-owner and president, bribed Watson, often funneling money through Paul Young, then president of a subcontractor to the two companies. Britt and Barnes also hid their illegal activities through fake invoices and falsely listed Watson and shell companies on electronic bank transfers.

Their bribes also included electronics, suite tickets to an NBA game, two residential mortgage down payments, and employment for relatives.

Watson allegedly received $1 million in bribes.

The DOJ explained how Watson used his influence to ensure that Apprio and Vistant received the USAID awards.

"In exchange for the bribe payments, Watson influenced the award of contracts to Apprio and Vistant by manipulating the procurement process at USAID through various means, including recommending their companies to other USAID decisionmakers for non-competitive contract awards, disclosing sensitive procurement information during the competitive bidding process, providing positive performance evaluations to a government agency, and approving decisions on the contracts, such as increased funding and a security clearance," the press release read.

In connection with the fraud scheme, Apprio and Vistant agreed to admit criminal liability and engage in deferred prosecution agreements for three years, which require the companies to submit disclosures to the DOJ.

"As part of these resolutions, both Apprio and Vistant admitted to engaging in a conspiracy to commit bribery of a public official and securities fraud," the department stated.

The DOJ noted Apprio's and Vistant's cooperation in its investigation and credited the companies for their "timely remedial measures."

RELATED: Republicans to watch when Trump’s $9.4 billion cut comes to the Senate

  Photo by LUIS TATO/AFP via Getty Images

Watson pleaded guilty to bribery by a public official and faces up to 15 years in prison. His sentencing is scheduled for October 6.

Barnes pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit bribery of a public official and securities fraud. His sentencing is slated for October 14, and he faces a maximum penalty of five years in prison.

Britt pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit bribery of a public official and faces up to five years in prison. His sentencing is scheduled for July 28.

Young pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit bribery of a public official. He is looking at a maximum penalty of five years in prison and faces sentencing on September 3.

A senior State Department official told Blaze News, "These guilty pleas further underscore the need for State Department oversight over U.S. foreign aid. A former USAID employee and three others were using funds to pay for things like a lavish country club wedding and a Martha's Vineyard estate, all on the taxpayer's dime. The Trump administration remains relentless in defending American taxpayers' dollars and weeding out waste, fraud, and abuse from our federal government."

Apprio Inc., and Vistant did not immediately respond to a request for comment from Blaze News.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Clinton judge blocked workforce cuts — yet Rubio just proved with USAID that where there's a will, there's a way



A Clinton judge barred the Trump administration last month from executing any large-scale reductions in force in order to "preserve the status quo."

Secretary of State Marco Rubio ordered on Tuesday the termination of the U.S. Agency for International Development's remaining overseas staff, demonstrating that some obstacles created by meddlesome federal judges can easily be surmounted.

How it started

A gang of labor unions, leftist NGOs, and local governments sued the Trump administration in late April, hoping to block the government's reduction-in-force plans.

Their complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, suggested that the "president does not possess authority to reorganize, downsize, or otherwise transform the agencies of the federal government, unless and until Congress authorizes such action" and argued that President Donald Trump's Feb. 11 executive order aimed at "eliminating waste, bloat, and insularity" was unlawful.

'Every day that the preliminary injunction remains in effect, a government-wide program to implement agency RIFs is being halted and delayed.'

The plaintiffs demanded the court: declare that Trump had violated the Constitution; declare that the White House's Office of Management and Budget, the Office of Personnel Management, and the Department of Government Efficiency "exceeded statutory authority and acted in an arbitrary and capricious manner"; vacate Trump's executive order and relevant agency memoranda; and restrain the Trump administration from enforcing Trump's workforce executive order.

They found a sympathetic U.S. district court judge in Susan Illston, a Clinton appointee who came recommended by former Democratic Sen. Barbara Boxer and the late Sen. Dianne Feinstein of California.

RELATED: USAID program contractor defrauds taxpayers of $100,000 in latest agency scandal

 Photo by John Moore/Getty Images

Illston granted the gang of change-averse plaintiffs a temporary restraining order on May 9, then hit the administration with an injunction on May 22, blocking Trump's executive order and barring 20 executive-branch entities and "any other individuals acting under their authority or the authority of the president" from executing any reductions in force.

Illston stated that "the president likely must request congressional cooperation to order the changes he seeks."

After the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit refused to overturn the Clinton judge's order, the Trump administration asked for the U.S. Supreme Court to intervene.

U.S. Solicitor General D. John Sauer noted in the government's request for a stay that "every day that the preliminary injunction remains in effect, a government-wide program to implement agency RIFs is being halted and delayed, maintaining a bloated and inefficient workforce while wasting countless taxpayer dollars."

"The inevitable consequence is to compel federal agencies to keep large numbers of employees on the payroll without necessity, at unrecoverable taxpayer expense, thereby frustrating the government’s efforts to impose budgetary discipline and build a more efficient workforce," wrote Sauer.

The solicitor general also suggested that the "district court's novel imposition of limits on the president’s ability to control executive agencies in exercising their power over personnel is the same type of important question of federal law that warrants this Court’s review."

The gang responded on Monday, asking the high court to keep Illston's order in place.

How it's going

On Tuesday, Rubio told American embassies around the world to get cracking on abolishing all USAID positions, noting in a cable obtained by the Guardian that the State Department "is streamlining procedures under National Security Decision Directive 38 to abolish all USAID overseas positions."

The national security directive cited by Rubio gives the highest-ranking diplomat assigned to a given country control of the size, composition, and mandate of overseas staffing for U.S. government agencies.

'It shouldn't surprise anyone.'

All USAID positions will reportedly be erased by Sept. 30. This will impact hundreds of staff, including contractors, locally employed workers, and foreign service officers.

The secretary noted further that the State Department would take over the agency's foreign assistance programs by next week.

RELATED: Rubio, Vance outline the 'work of a generation,' next steps for the American renewal: 'This is a 20-year project'

 Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

State Department spokeswoman Tammy Bruce told reporters Tuesday "that was not a surprise. It shouldn't surprise anyone."

"It’s nothing new, and it is exactly what we previewed in February and March of this year," said Bruce, adding that the aim of the change is to make sure that America's aid efforts around the world correspond with the "America First agenda."

Rubio made the order days after Bill Gates reportedly made a secret visit to the White House and begged him to reverse course on changes to the foreign aid regime.

It appears that Gates' last-ditch charm offensive, first reported by Tara Palmeri of the Red Letter, was no more effective than his USAID-themed smear campaign, where he characterized Elon Musk as a hard-hearted killer of millions.

The plaintiffs for whom Judge Illston blocked Trump's executive order claimed that Rubio's recent action appears to violate the federal court's injunction, reported the Associated Press.

However, Daniel Holler, Rubio's deputy chief of staff, clarified in a Monday court filing that the actions taken with regard to USAID staffers predate the blocked Trump order.

Holler noted that:

  • Rubio got the ball rolling on developing "a plan to reorganize the Department to be more streamlined and to advance the administration's core America First diplomatic priorities" in late January;
  • Rubio informed Congress of his intention to explore "a potential reorganization of USAID and/or its potential absorption by the Department of State" in a Feb. 3 letter;
  • subsequent reorganization efforts were "undertaken solely at the direction and discretion of Secretary Rubio" and predate Trump's February order;
  • the reorganization is intended to address foreign policy needs, an assertion that appears to hint at the limits of Illston's jurisdiction.

When asked about the significance of these firings and the broader cleanup at USAID, a State Department spokesperson told Blaze News, "Under President Trump's leadership, Secretary Rubio is taking a historic step in realigning how the United States delivers foreign aid and implements its America First Foreign Policy to ensure foreign assistance advances U.S. national interests."

"In connection with the Department assuming responsibility for limited former USAID programming, the Secretary approved the hiring of certain positions for both American (U.S. direct hire) and locally employed staff," added the spokesperson.

In terms of next steps, the spokesperson indicated that the U.S. will continue to provide lifesaving humanitarian assistance but noted "the United States cannot feed the world alone. We ask capable nations to increase their share of the burden for life-saving foreign aid."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Rock Star Bono Twists Death Projections In Defense Of Corrupt USAID

The sanctimonious U2 front man claims 300,000 people have died because of the Trump administration, but that isn't true.

EXCLUSIVE: State Department Divide Breaks Open Between Establishment, MAGA Loyalists Over USAID Cuts

EXCLUSIVE: State Department Divide Breaks Open Between Establishment, MAGA Loyalists Over USAID Cuts

DOGE official snags lead role at USAID as left scrambles to shield wasteful agency



Secretary of State Marco Rubio designated authority over the United States Agency for International Development to a Department of Government Efficiency senior official, according to an email obtained by the Associated Press.

The Tuesday email from USAID Deputy Director Pete Marocco to State Department staff revealed that he would be replaced by Jeremy Lewin of the DOGE and Kenneth Jackson, a State Department official tapped as the acting president of the U.S. Institute of Peace, the New York Times reported.

'USAID is under control, accountable and stable.'

Marocco noted that the new appointment would be "effective immediately."

"It's been my honor to assist Secretary Rubio in his leadership of USAID through some difficult stages to pivot this enterprise away from its abuses of the past," Marocco wrote. "Now that USAID is under control, accountable and stable, I am going to return to my post as the Director of Foreign Assistance to bring value back to the American people."

Tammy Bruce, a State Department spokesperson, confirmed on Wednesday that Marocco would serve as the agency's director of foreign assistance. She called it "an indispensable role in aligning all U.S. government foreign assistance with the president's priorities."

The AP reported that Lewin's appointment marked "at least the second DOGE lieutenant" to move to the USAID.

While with the DOGE, Lewin played a key role in dismantling the USAID's waste, which included terminating 83% of its contracts and placing the remainder under the State Department.

A memo obtained by the Times reportedly revealed that the State Department plans to redesignate the USAID as the U.S. Agency for International Humanitarian Assistance and terminate its current independent status.

Also earlier this week, U.S. District Judge Theodore Chuang in Maryland, in response to a lawsuit filed by USAID staffers, blocked the DOGE from making additional cuts. The complaint claimed that the DOGE and Elon Musk lacked the authority to dismantle the agency.

After ruling that the cuts were most likely unconstitutional, the judge ordered that the DOGE restore staffers' email and computer access.

"To deny plaintiffs' Appointments Clause claim solely on the basis that, on paper, Musk has no formal legal authority relating to the decisions at issue, even if he is actually exercising significant authority on governmental matters, would open the door to an end-run around the Appointments Clause," Chuang wrote in his decision.

Several Republican lawmakers are seeking to codify the DOGE, a move that would help shield it from the left's relentless lawfare.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Trump admin confirms all non-'essential' USAID personnel on leave, 1,600 positions being terminated



Democratic politicians and beneficiaries of taxpayer-funded U.S. Agency for International Development handouts — both foreign and domestic — have raged against the possibility that the pre-eminent international humanitarian and development arm of the federal government might undergo reform or possibly even be closed.

Their protest was evidently in vain.

The Trump administration has placed all personnel at the U.S. Agency for International Development "with the exception of designated personnel responsible for mission-critical functions, core leadership and/or specially designated programs" on administrative leave.

The action went into effect at 11:59 p.m. on Sunday.

According to a notice from the USAID Office of Inspector General, the administration is also eliminating 1,600 positions at the agency that are currently occupied.

The announcement comes on the heels of U.S. District Judge Carl Nichols' Friday decision to dissolve a temporary restraining order that protected 2,014 USAID employees from being placed on administrative leave. Those 2,014 employees would have been in addition to another 2,140 employees who were already on leave, reported the Courthouse News Service.

The union coalition of USAID employees that initially sued claimed that there would be "'catastrophic' 'humanitarian consequences' if USAID — either due to the funding freeze or a lack of staff — cannot continue to administer its standard foreign aid programs."

Nichols noted that the government "also identified plausible harms that could ensue if its actions with respect to USAID are not permitted to resume" and concluded that the plaintiffs had failed to demonstrate that "they or their members will suffer irreparable injury absent an injunction."

President Donald Trump noted in an executive order on his first day in office that the "foreign aid industry and bureaucracy are not aligned with American interests and in many cases antithetical to American values."

'You just gotta basically get rid of the whole thing.'

The president further indicated that moving forward, it would be the "policy of United States that no further United States foreign assistance shall be disbursed in a manner that is not fully aligned with the foreign policy of the President of the United States."

The U.S. Department of Government Efficiency took a close look at USAID and exposed its apparent use of taxpayer funds to support anti-American and leftist causes.

Blaze News previously reported, for example, that USAID blew $45 million on DEI scholarships in Burma; $2 million on sex-change activism in Guatemala; $37.9 million to study HIV among prostitutes, their johns, and transvestites in South Africa; $520 million for consultant-driven climate alarmist investments in Africa; $20 million on a "Sesame Street" show in Iraq; $1 million on a Hamas-linked charity in Gaza; and $4.67 million on EcoHealth Alliance, the scandal-plagued group whose subcontractor executed gain-of-function experiments on coronaviruses at the Wuhan lab.

Elon Musk, the head of the DOGE, suggested earlier this month, "As we dug into USAID, it became apparent that what we have here is not an apple with a worm in it, but we have, actually, just a ball of worms."

"And when there is no apple, you just gotta basically get rid of the whole thing," added Musk.

While dead weight was put on leave, agency personnel deemed "essential" were notified by 5 p.m. on Feb. 23 that they were expected to continue working.

Workers overseas who are getting the boot will apparently have access to a USAID-funded return travel program and will enjoy continued access to agency systems and diplomatic resources until their return home.

The American Foreign Service Association, the union that filed the lawsuit challenging terminations at USAID, said in a statement, "AFSA is deeply disappointed by the administration's hurried and callous decision to keep our dedicated public servants in limbo."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!