GOP Senators On The Fence For Trump Nominees Voted To Confirm Worst Of The Worst For Biden

While many of these Republicans supported Biden's cabinet confirmations, they now seem tentative about Trump's selections.

Critics highlight Sen. Ernst's trans advocacy following revelation she's trying to spike Hegseth nomination



Establishmentarians are desperate to prevent decorated Army veteran Pete Hegseth from becoming President-elect Donald Trump's defense secretary. Opposition from Democrats, defense lobbyists, and the liberal media is surmountable; however, Hegseth will require the support of most Republicans going into the 119th Congress.

Sources close to the Senate confirmed to Blaze News this week that Sen. Joni Ernst of Iowa has been actively lobbying against Hegseth's nomination. One source indicated that Ernst is serving as a "useful proxy" for the likes of Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) and what remains of the old guard.

When looking into possible reasons why Ernst might want to spike the nomination, critics found that Ernst has a disparate vision for the U.S. military — one not so different from the woke and alienating reality that manifested under the current Democratic administration.

Turning Point USA CEO Charlie Kirk was among the critics whohighlighted an August interview wherein the Iowa senator advocated for the continued presence of medical transvestites in the military and rejected the suggestion that the military is woke. Kirk wrote, "Maybe this is why she's leading the charge against Hegseth?"

Ernst, who served for over two decades in the Army Reserve and the Army National Guard, told the titular host of PBS' "Firing Line with Margaret Hoover" in August that "we have transgender people serving in our military. They will bleed red just as the rest of us."

The senator, recently touted by ABC News as a possible candidate to replace Hegseth, has long defended permitting medical transvestites to serve in the military on the condition that they can meet physical requirements.

Blaze News previously reported that whereas mentally ill recruits, individuals reliant on medications, women with abnormal uterine bleeding, men with deformed genitals, those with chronic anxiety, and those who have committed self-harm are routinely barred from joining the military, similar prohibitions have apparently been relaxed under the Biden administration for those claiming to be "transgender."

'[The DOD] committed a Bud Light.'

Ernst told Hoover that there are certain situations in which it makes sense not to integrate transvestites, giving the example of keeping a male transvestite who has yet to complete his sex change out of women's barracks. However, the senator signaled continued opposition to Trump's previous and potential blanket bans on transvestic service members, stating, "If they bring value to our unit, if they have specialties that we can use, especially if we want to maintain an all-volunteer force, we want to bring that talent into our services."

Significant doubt has been cast in recent years on the corresponding value proposition.

Then-Secretary of Defense James Mattis stated in a Feb. 22, 2018, Pentagon memo that in "the Department's best military judgment, the Department of Defense concludes that there are substantial risks associated with allowing the accession and retention of individuals with a history or diagnosis of gender dysphoria and require or have already undertaken a course of treatment to change their gender."

Thomas Spoehr, former director of the Heritage Foundation’s Center for National Defense, concluded in 2021 that the Biden administration's "decision to change U.S. military policy and allow unrestricted service by transgender individuals — without regard to whether they suffer from gender dysphoria — will result in a direct negative impact on military readiness linked to service members who are less able to deploy and perform their individual missions."

Hegseth may be amenable to a transvestite ban.

"I think we're at a 's*** or get off the pot' moment. We are at a tipping point for total institutional corruption, and Trump has a chance to reverse that," Hegseth recently told the "Shawn Ryan Show." "[The DOD] committed a Bud Light. In search of a non-traditional constituency, they offended their core constituency."

Hegseth suggested on the "Take It Outside with Jay Cutler and Sam Mackey" podcast that medical transvestites in the military are "not deployable" because they are "reliant on chemicals."

Trump's pick for defense secretary has also questioned having female service members on the battlefield, telling Shawn Ryan, "It hasn't made us more effective, hasn't made us more lethal, has made fighting more complicated."

'If you vote against him, primaries will ensue.'

Ernst, who has voiced support for requiring women to register for the draft and previously voted to confirm President Joe Biden's defense secretary pick, Gen. Lloyd Austin, has emphasized that "women are perfectly capable of contributing in combat, whether it's combat arms or someone like me that was supporting combat operations with the movement of goods up into combat zones."

Ernst similarly pushed back on the suggestion that the military has been "marred with a sentiment of wokeness, some social experimentation," telling Hoover, "Our military is not woke. I would say that there is civilian leadership of thee military that is woke. ... There is a difference between the leadership and those that serve in uniform."

Rebecca Grant, vice president of the Lexington Institute, told Bloomberg that Ernst's reluctance to back Hegseth may also have something to do with a 2017 sexual assault allegation against the Fox News host. Even though no charges were ever filed and Hegseth's attorneys have repeatedly stressed that the allegations were false, Grant suggested that the nominee will have to once again rebut the allegations to reassure Ernst, who was reportedly raped in college.

After meeting with Hegseth Wednesday, the Iowa senator noted on X, "I appreciate Pete Hegseth's service to our country, something we both share. Today, as part of the confirmation process, we had a frank and thorough conversation."

BlazeTV host Liz Wheeler tweeted, "Why is Joni Ernst a GOP Senator? Supports trans in the military. Supports gun control. Supports giving Ukraine more $$. Votes Dem 38% of the time. Voted for Lloyd Austin, Biden Sec Def who oversaw deadly Afghanistan withdrawal. If she won't vote Pete, time to fire Joni."

"This is a direct attempt to undermine the President and his voters," wrote Kirk. "Pete Hegseth is the redline. If you vote against him, primaries will ensue."

When asked whether she was leading the charge against Hegseth, Ernst told RealClearPolitics, "There is absolutely no campaign against Pete."

"I just want to make sure the process is able to play out and that we’re thoroughly vetting him. I do believe that Pete deserves to have a hearing. All the rumblings out there are absolutely false. My role as a senator is to make sure that we are putting to bed any rumors, any anonymous whatever," continued the senator. "We just need to make sure that he is thoroughly vetted and that he has his opportunity to go in front of the committee, recount his service, and rebut any allegations."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Republican Senator Introduces Federal Ban On Mutilating Trans Procedures For Children

Sen. Marshall introduced a federal ban on mutilating transgender procedures for minors that would punish anyone who performs such procedures.

ROOKE: Trump Should Test Unprecedented Power If Senate Doesn’t Play Ball With Appointments

'He is merely the battering ram that voters use to bring back the balance of power'

ROOKE: Don’t Let Calls For Unity Fool You. The GOP Is Still At War

'This is a war the establishment cannot be allowed to win'

‘People Violate Laws Anytime They Want’: PA County Dems Defy State Law To Count Hundreds Of Illegal Votes

Democrats on the Bucks County Board of Commissioners voted to illegally count misdated and undated ballots in an attempt to swing Pennsylvania’s U.S. Senate election in favor of ousted Democrat incumbent Sen. Bob Casey, D-Penn. The vote comes after the Pennsylvania Supreme Court already ruled those ballots were not allowed to be counted, per state […]

McCormick sues over 'illegal ballots' — RNC chair calls out Dems for attempt to overturn PA election



Multiple local and national publications called the U.S. Senate race in Pennsylvania last week for Republican challenger and combat veteran Dave McCormick. Although the writing is on the wall, Sen. Bob Casey, the Democratic incumbent, has refused to admit defeat. Casey's allies are now engaging in the very conduct and echoing the same kind of language that Democrats have spent years condemning.

Days after the Wall Street Journal's editorial board claimed that Marc Elias, elections attorney for the Democratic Party, was "back and trying to steal a Senate seat for Bob Casey," Republican National Committee chairman Michael Whatley warned that Democratic officials and lawyers "are trying to sow doubt in the democratic process."

That doubt is sure to grow, now that the state is holding a recount and Democrats are pushing to count illegal ballots.

Secretary of the Commonwealth Al Schmidt announced Wednesday that the unofficial results, with Philadelphia's legal and uncontested ballots accounted for, automatically triggered a statewide recount under Pennsylvania law. McCormick reportedly leads Casey by 29,338 votes, 48.93% to 48.50%. To avoid a recount, the Republican senator-elect would need to lead his opponent by 0.5%.

Schmidt indicated that after completing their initial counts, counties must begin the recount by no later than Nov. 20, then report the results to the state secretary by Nov. 27. The cost to the taxpayer of confirming Casey's loss will be in excess of $1 million.

McCormick's communications director Elizabeth noted, "Senator-Elect McCormick's lead is insurmountable, which the AP made clear. A recount will be a waste of time & taxpayer money, but it is Casey's prerogative. McCormick knows what it's like to lose an election & is sure Senator Casey will eventually reach the right conclusion."

Mark Harris, McCormick campaign consultant who has repeatedly emphasized there is no path to victory remaining for Casey, tweeted, "Since 2000, no US Senate race up by more than 500 votes has switched leads. Again I am the broken record but there's no path for Casey except wasting $1M+ of taxpayer [money.]"

'STOP the counting of illegal ballots.'

"Recounts are shifting a very small number of votes," Deb Otis, director of research and policy at FairVote told the Associated Press last month. "We're going to see recounts in 2024 that are not going to change the outcome."

The Wall Street Journal editorial board indicated Sunday that a recount would afford Marc Elias "a chance to try his legal shenanigans, which are likely to run the gamut from challenging votes for Mr. McCormick to searching for heretofore undiscovered ballots for Mr. Casey."

"Mr. Elias helped to steal a Senate seat in Minnesota for Al Franken in 2008 by finding a judge to count previously rejected ballots and overturn the lead of Republican Norm Coleman," continued the Journal. "The Elias method is to look for friendly judges who will rule in his favor. Pennsylvania has a Republican secretary of state who supervises elections but an especially partisan elected Democratic majority on the state Supreme Court. So far Gov. Josh Shapiro and other officials aren’t commenting on Mr. Elias."

Whatley vowed to ensure the RNC and Pennsylvania GOP "will have attorneys and observers in every county in the state to ensure only lawful ballots are counted. Again."

According to Whatley, the RNC filed two new lawsuits Wednesday evening in Bucks County and with the Pennsylvania Supreme Court to "STOP the counting of illegal ballots."

Whatley clarified that Bucks County "is once again violating Pennsylvania law, this time by choosing to count undated and incorrectly dated ballots in a race that Dave McCormick has already won."

The lawsuit filed by Senator-elect McCormick and the RNC against Bucks County states that the board's decision "is legally erroneous because undated or misdated mail ballots are invalid as a matter of law and cannot be counted in the 2024 General Election — as the Pennsylvania Supreme Court has already made clear."

LevittownNow.com reported that the Democrat-controlled Bucks County Board of Elections approved canvassing and counting for most of the nearly 4,500 provisional ballots it has received.

The county election board is also counting hundreds of undated and incorrectly dated mail-in ballots even though the Pennsylvania Supreme Court has ruled and reiterated that county election officials cannot count absentee ballots with incorrect or missing dates. State law requires mail-in ballots to be returned in two envelopes — an inner secrecy envelope and an outer envelope on which voters must pen their signatures and the current date.

"The Board's baffling decision not to enforce the date requirement and to count noncompliant ballots thus directly contravenes binding Pennsylvania law," continues the complaint.

The lawsuit further claims that the county board's decision violates the U.S. Constitution's Equal Protection Clause and the Pennsylvania Constitution.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Trump panics the swamp by naming Matt Gaetz as next AG. Here are the meltdowns, the obstacles, and the way through.



President-elect Donald Trump announced Wednesday that he wants to replace Attorney General Merrick Garland with firebrand Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.), leaving elements of the Republican old guard in stunned silence and prompting plenty of Democrats to panic.

Despite efforts by outbound Democrat Sen. Bob Casey's cronies in Pennsylvania to reduce the GOP's majority, Republicans will nevertheless control the U.S. Senate in January — meaning that they have the numbers to confirm Gaetz as attorney general. However, there may not presently be sufficient willpower to see him through.

Extra to resistance from nominal allies, Gaetz — who resigned his House seat following Trump's announcement — also faces incredible opposition from the liberal establishment. Nevertheless, there are multiple ways forward that will see Trump's intention realized and the Department of Justice helmed by a longtime critic hell-bent on radical reform.

The announcement

For his incoming administration, Trump wants several disruptors in top positions: decorated Army combat veteran Pete Hegseth as secretary of defense; Lt. Col. Tulsi Gabbard as director of National Intelligence; Elon Musk and Ohio entrepreneur Vivek Ramaswamy running the proposed Department of Government Efficiency; Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) as head of the State Department; and. Florida Rep. Mike Waltz, a former Green Beret, as his national security adviser.

'Matt will end Weaponized Government.'

Trump announced Wednesday that he would be nominating Gaetz — who proved instrumental last year in ousting former Rep. Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) as speaker of the House — to take over the Department of Justice, where officials have been updating their resumes since Nov. 5 in anticipation of a thorough housecleaning.

"Matt is a deeply gifted and tenacious attorney, trained at the William & Mary College of Law, who has distinguished himself in Congress through his focus on achieving desperately needed reform at the Department of Justice," wrote Trump. "Few issues in America are more important than ending the partisan Weaponization of our Justice System."

Gaetz, a frequent guest on Stephen K. Bannon's "War Room" podcast and a target of a frivolous DOJ sex-trafficking investigation, has impressed upon his fellow conservatives the need to rein in the administrative state.

"I don't care if it takes every second of our time and every ounce of our energy," Gaetz said in his 2023 CPAC speech. "We either get this government back on our side or we defund and get rid of, abolish the FBI, the CDC, ATF, DOJ, every last one of them if they do not come to heel."

"Matt will end Weaponized Government, protect our Borders, dismantle Criminal Organizations and restore Americans' badly-shattered Faith and Confidence in the Justice Department," continued Trump. "On the House Judiciary Committee, which performs oversight of DOJ, Matt played a key role in defeating the Russia, Russia, Russia Hoax, and exposing alarming and systemic Government Corruption and Weaponization. He is a Champion for the Constitution and the Rule of Law."

'This is really a vomit-in-your-mouth moment for alumni [from] the Department of Justice.'

The president-elect added, "Matt will root out the systemic corruption at DOJ, and return the Department to its true mission of fighting Crime, and upholding our Democracy and Constitution."

Gaetz responded on X, "It will be an honor to serve as President Trump's Attorney General."

The reaction

While numerous Republicans keen to see Trump deliver on his campaign promises celebrated the Gaetz pick, Democrats, liberal talking heads, and other exponents of the old regime did not respond well to the news that the man deemed a "bomb-thrower" by the New York Times would soon be running the Justice Department.

New Mexico Sen. Martin Heinrich (D) wrote, "People voted for cheaper eggs, not whatever the f@#€ this is."

"No question about Matt Gaetz's qualifications — totally lacking. His only relevant law enforcement experience is as a target of a criminal investigation," tweeted Connecticut Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D). "He'll weaponize DOJ for political ends. He'll be a national security risk — ill-equipped to be in charge of prosecuting espionage, terrorism, drug trafficking, & more."

"Confirming him would mean affirming the worst potential abuses of DOJ," tweeted Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.). "He must be rejected by the Senate."

Rep. Jared Huffman (D-Calif.) told Axios that Gaetz and Trump's other picks "are deeply unserious choices, and to the surprise of no one who remembers the first Trump presidency, they signal a lot of chaos and incompetency to come."

Democratic Rep. Dan Kildee (Mich.) suggested Trump's account had been hacked, calling the pick "insanity."

Republican Sen. Chuck Grassley (Iowa) was reportedly "exasperated" upon hearing the news, standing in awe for nearly half a minute.

David Laufman, former chief of the counterintelligence and export control section in the Obama Department of Justice's National Security Division, told the flummoxed host of MSNBC's "Deadline White House" that "this is really a vomit-in-your-mouth moment for alumni [from] the Department of Justice and for people around the United States who care about the rule of law."

"This nomination reflects the crudest contempt and disrespect for the rule of law, the Department of Justice as an institution, and for the thousands of men and women across this country who every day strive to carry out their mission to represent the people of the United States and the rules of the United States Constitution and bring justice around this country," added Laufman.

CNN legal analyst Elie Honig similarly had trouble digesting the news, echoing the technocratic arguments raised earlier this week for why Hegseth should not run the DOD.

'He's the attorney general! Suck it up.'

"[Gaetz] has never worked a day in his life as a prosecutor," said Honig. "He's only practiced law for a few years at the very local level. We've had AGs before who have never been prosecutors, but they've all had serious positions in the Justice Department in non-prosecutorial roles. Matt Gaetz is completely unknown to this profession."

Honig added, "He is there to weaponize."

Officials at the DOJ were similarly melting down Wednesday night.

MSNBC collected the following responses to the announcement from DOJ officials, including senior bureaucrats:

  • "OMG."
  • "How many other prospective attorneys general had previous experience as the subject of a criminal investigation?"
  • "Absolutely unbelievable."
  • "Did not see this coming."
  • "What the f*** is happening?"
  • "Truly stunning."
  • "Insane."
  • "Absolutely unbelievable."

Whether bureaucrats believe it or not, Gaetz will likely take over the DOJ in January, assuming he is able to navigate the obstacles ahead.

The way forward

Liberals are not the only ones keen to keep Gaetz from controlling the DOJ. There is apparently some resistance from nominal Republicans in the U.S. Senate.

A Republican senator speaking on the condition of anonymity told Fox News Digital, "He will never get confirmed."

Another Senate Republican source suggested, "Ain't gonna happen."

Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas) appeared noncommittal, telling reporters, "I think we have to consider any nominee by the president seriously, but we also have a constitutional responsibility."

The Associated Press indicated that Maine Sen. Susan Collins (R) may similarly be on the fence, stating she was "shocked" by the nomination.

"I recognize that the president-elect has the right to nominate whomever he wishes, but we in Congress have a responsibility under the Constitution and our advise and consent, which will lead to hearings, an FBI background check, and an awful lot of questions being asked in this case," said Collins. "I'm sure that there will be many, many questions raised at Mr. Gaetz’s hearing if in fact the nomination goes forward."

Responding to the question of whether he will support Gaetz's confirmation, Wisconsin Sen. Ron Johnson (R) said, "We'll see."

There was an outstanding House Ethics investigation into Gaetz regarding denied allegations of sexual misconduct, illicit drug use, the acceptance of improper gifts, and the attempt to obstruct government investigations; however, that investigation effectively died with his resignation, as the House no longer has jurisdiction.

House Speaker Mike Johnson confirmed that Gaetz issued his resignation letter effective immediately and indicated that the promptitude of the resignation will enable Republicans to fill his seat as early as Jan. 3, 2025.

If Republican senators don't get on board, Trump could push to appoint Gaetz through a recess appointment — something Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) indicated would be the way through.

When asked about the prospect of an AG Gaetz, Massie told reporters, "Recess appointments! He's the attorney general! Suck it up."

The Constitution allows for recess appointments as a way to avoid protracted government vacancies.

Sen. John Thune (R-S.D.), the next Senate majority leader, has agreed to recess appointments, tweeting, "We must act quickly and decisively to get the president's nominees in place as soon as possible, & all options are on the table to make that happen, including recess appointments. We cannot let Schumer and Senate Dems block the will of the American people."

Former Trump adviser and repeat Biden-Harris DOJ target Steve Bannon stressed that a recess appointment should be avoided in favor of a vote.

"We have to show them we ain't going to do this in the dark," said Bannon. "Not this one."

Sean Davis, co-founder of the Federalist, noted on X, "With Gaetz having resigned his seat in the House, if the Senate tries to reject his AG confirmation, DeSantis can always appoint Gaetz to fill Rubio's Senate seat."

"Would be interesting to see senators have to choose between Gaetz as AG or as their colleague for years to come," added Davis.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Newly Minted ‘Election Denier’ Sen. Bob Casey Refuses To Accept Loss

Sen. Casey took a break from solving crime, hunger, and war to spend time impeaching Donald Trump for asking questions about the 2020 election.

Critics lay into Fetterman for attacking Pennsylvanians who didn't vote Democrat



Days after he unwittingly nudged Joe Rogan farther toward an endorsement of President-elect Donald Trump, Pennsylvania Sen. John Fetterman (D) found a group of constituents to scapegoat for the consequential defeat of one of his fellow Democrats.

Rather than admit the weakness of his comrades' pitch to Americans or acknowledge that Republicans simply did a better job overall, Fetterman belittled Green Party voters for fulfilling their civic duty.

Fetterman jumped on X to complain after Republican David McCormick successfully ousted Democratic Sen. Bob Casey, giving the GOP an even greater majority in the U.S. Senate with at least 53 seats.

First, he took aim at the Associated Press for calling the race for McCormick, writing, "@AP_Politics shouldn't make a call in this race until every Pennsylvanian has their vote counted."

As it became clear that the Associated Press was not budging and the race might not fall within recount territory, Fetterman lashed out at those who would dare upset the Democrats' political ambitions.

"Pennsylvania is going to count every last vote," tweeted Fetterman. "That's not controversial — that's the law. Also, Green dips***s' votes helping elect the GOP."

'Probably not the smartest choice.'

Accompanying the senator's tweet was an image highlighting the number of votes Green Party candidate Leila Hazou received. At the time of writing, the Associated Press indicated that with 98% of the votes counted, Hazou, a Palestinian activist with an apparent problem with white men, netted 64,127 votes, amounting to 0.9% of the total. John Thomas, the Libertarian candidate whom Fetterman apparently overlooked, secured 1.3% of the vote.

Fetterman evidently figured that without Hazou in the race, those votes would necessarily have gone to Casey, who lost by roughly 0.5%.

Fetterman's tweet served as yet another reminder of how little Democrats think of Americans who support parties other than their own.

Back in 2008, Barack Obama suggested that working-class voters in Pennsylvania and the Midwest who were ambivalent about supporting him in his first bid for the presidency were "bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment." Years later, failed presidential candidate Hillary Clinton called her 2016 opponent's supporters "irredeemable" "deplorables." Weeks ago, President Joe Biden called Trump supporters "garbage."

The Democratic senator's "dips****" comment this week was not well received.

Elon Musk wrote, "Calling Green voters 'dips****' is not a great way to win them over."

Scott Presler, the conservative activist who worked diligently in recent months to turn out the vote for Trump in the Keystone State, responded, "I think Green Party voters are going to remember you calling them names when you're running for re-election. Probably not the smartest choice. We'll be sure to remind them."

"Cope Fetterlump," wrote one X user."

YouTuber David Freiheit, known under his online pseudonym "Viva Frei," noted, "What a f***ing idiot. Instead of understanding why Dems are losing, they call the people whose support then want 'dips****.' Hey dumb***, maybe don't adopt the rhetoric of the very same Tim Walz dips*** who just caused your demonic party to suffer the most devastating defeat since Mondale. Dips***."

While keen to blame Green Party voters, Fetterman may have done more political damage overall with his pre-election interview on "The Joe Rogan Experience," where he struggled to provide satisfactory answers to the host's questions about Democrats' exploitation of the border crisis.

After his win, McCormick indicated that he was "honored and excited to represent EVERY Pennsylvanian."

The Associated Press indicated when calling the race that even if Casey carried six out of 10 of the remaining votes, he still would not win. Nevertheless, Casey has yet to concede his defeat.

The defeated Democrat said in a statement Thursday evening, "We must allow that process to play out and ensure that every vote that is eligible to be counted will be counted. That is what Pennsylvania deserves."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!