White House insider spills the tea on Biden’s cognitive decline in undercover report: 'He’ll be dead in a year'



Remember when the media and White House officials gaslit and shamed us for questioning President Biden’s cognitive state? Remember when they claimed that the videos of Biden stumbling over his words and misspeaking were deep fakes?

Well, according to undercover reporting, certain key members of the Biden administration were fully aware of his cognitive decline well before it became evident to the public, and yet they continued to portray a false narrative of stability and competence.

Pat Gray plays an Instagram reel recently posted by O’Keefe Media Group that exposes Henry Appel, a National Security adviser in the Biden administration, spilling the tea on an undercover camera.

“Well, here’s some tea. Joe Biden is, like, dead. Not literally. Like, he, like, can’t say a sentence. He’s, like, really, like progressed in his old age. Everybody recognizes it. I can’t believe it wasn’t a bigger scandal earlier,” Appel said. “He’ll be dead in a year.”

Appel then went on to describe a time when Biden, who was at the time traveling overseas, called his office asking for NSC adviser Jake Sullivan. Appel had to explain to the president that Sullivan was traveling on the same trip with Biden.

Appel’s admission highlights the deep disregard for transparency and accountability at the highest levels of government.

To hear Pat and the “Unleashed” team’s commentary, watch the clip above.

Want more from Pat Gray?

To enjoy more of Pat's biting analysis and signature wit as he restores common sense to a senseless world, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

MARK LEVIN issues a dire warning to parents about public schools



The corruption plaguing our public education system manifests itself in many forms. From critical race theory to LGBTQ issues, conservatives have grown weary of the curriculum taught to children.

In this episode of "LevinTV," Mark Levin reacted to an undercover video that alleges discriminatory hiring practices that target potential teachers based on political views, age, and religion. Mark walked through the content and explained how the assistant principal at Cos Cob Elementary School, Jeremy Boland, appears to abuse the trust of parents to indoctrinate students.

In the video, Boland tells the undercover journalist that he will not hire teachers under 30 who side with parents, nor will he hire older teachers with a politically "stuck mindset." Boland further says, "the older you get, the more set in your ways, the more conservative you get," and added that if he hired one of these older teachers, he would "never be able to fire her" and "he would never be able to change her."

Mark expounded on the issues raised in the video. He pointed to the States' need to destroy the family structure and connected the dots to illustrate why Boland treats students' "parents as the enemy." Mark urged parents to remove their children from the "Marxist public school system" before their children are entirely devoured.

Watch the video for Mark's breakdown of the "unbelievable" and blatant "bigotry" allegedly unfolding in Greenwich, Connecticut.



Want more from Mark Levin?

To enjoy more of "the Great One" — Mark Levin as you've never seen him before — subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

James O'Keefe's opening testimony on FBI and DOJ overreach leaves House Judiciary Committee speechless

James O'Keefe's opening testimony on FBI and DOJ overreach leaves House Judiciary Committee speechless



On May 10, James O'Keefe of Project Veritas gave his opening statement on the Department of Justice and Federal Bureau of Investigation's overreach on members of the press. O'Keefe delivered his statement to members of Congress.

The House Judiciary Committee recently showed unanimous bipartisan support for new legislation protecting journalists from government overreach. This hearing received little media coverage.

House Representative Ralph Norman of South Carolina was sympathetic to O'Keefe's ordeal and questioned how far the DOJ and FBI appear to have gone in this case. Here is the transcript:

O'Keefe: "Ashley Biden's attorney, a woman named Roberta Kaplan, responded by saying, 'We should send to the southern district of New York. In just 24 days, Ms. Kaplan got her political favor fulfilled when the Southern District of New York approved the first of nineteen secret subpoenas.'"

Rep Norman: "Is this collusion, in your opinion, with what's happening really to both of you all in your opinion?"

O'Keefe: "I think Ashley Biden's attorney's statement about 'we should send to the Southern District of New York' is self-evident. There is also a poster in the room. You can see the four photos there; we find this extraordinary that Roberta Kaplan is the same attorney [representing] Ashley Biden. She's also the same attorney for former New York Governor Andrew Cuomo, and she represents the woman married to the son of the U.S. attorney who signed all the secret warrants against me. So, those are the facts, and [they] are pretty self-evident facts, and I don't wish to opine beyond the facts."

Rep Norman: "That's unbelievable. Every American needs to know what not only you all have gone through but to see these facts."

O'Keefe: "There's disparate treatment at the Department of Justice, including how they define journalists. A journalist is a person who regularly gathers, prepares, collects, photographs, records, writes, and edits information that concerns national stories."

O'Keefe: "The Southern District of New York wrote in pleadings that I'm not a journalist because I don't get permission from the subjects I investigate. So that directly contradicts common sense as well as the law. So obviously, we can't trust the Department of Justice with the power to define who is and who is not a journalist depending upon who's in charge. That goes against everything the First Amendment stands for, Sir."