Capitol Police officers are forced to take out loans to pay their bills because of government shutdown, union boss says



The head of the U.S. Capitol Police union excoriated politicians for continuing the government shutdown over the deleterious effects on the officers on the force.

Gus Papathanasiou, chairman of the United States Capitol Police Labor Committee, also seemingly made a subtle jab at Sen. Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.).

'As this shutdown continues, every day is WORSE, not "Better" for all of us.'

"This Govt shutdown needs to end! It's negatively impacting all of our officers here at the USCP who are forced to work, and now will not receive their first full paycheck," reads the statement to Blaze News from Papathanasiou.

The shutdown entered into a fourth week, with negotiations showing little sign of progress. The Capitol Police missed their first full paycheck on Oct. 10.

"Not only does this shutdown negatively impact federal cops but all federal workers throughout this country," he continued. "Officers are starting to take out loans to pay their bills, rent, mortgages, food for their families, and the list goes on. As this shutdown continues, every day is WORSE, not 'Better' for all of us."

Papathanasiou was likely referring to a controversial statement from Schumer that many saw as tone-deaf and insensitive.

"Every day gets better for us," Schumer asserted as the shutdown entered a second week.

RELATED: Who is to blame for the government shutdown? CNN analyst finds astounding results

Photo by Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images

Trump also bashed Schumer over the comment.

"Chuck Schumer recently said, 'Every day gets better' during their Radical Left Shutdown," the president wrote on social media. "I DISAGREE! If nothing is done, because of 'Leader' Chuck Schumer and the Democrats, our Brave Troops will miss the paychecks they are rightfully due on October 15th."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Blaze Media investigation triggers congressional inquiry into alleged Capitol Police perjury



A Blaze Media investigation has triggered a congressional inquiry into alleged U.S. Capitol Police perjury, according to a Friday analysis by Blaze News investigative journalist Steve Baker.

What are the details?

U.S. Rep. Barry Loudermilk (R-Ga.) — who chairs the Committee on House Administration Subcommittee on Oversight, which has jurisdiction over Capitol Police — penned a March 1 letter to USCP Chief J. Thomas Manger, Baker noted.

The four-page missive demanded two things: more complete information about a 2016 disciplinary report concerning Special Agent David Lazarus — and details about an internal affairs investigation of Lazarus last November that stemmed directly from Blaze Media’s reporting, Baker wrote.

Loudermilk's letter notes that on Nov. 7, 2023, Lazarus was referred to the USCP Office of Professional Responsibility "for allegedly not being truthful in testimony in a high-profile criminal court case involving an incident in the Capitol building on January 6, 2021."

In the letter, Loudermilk asserted what Baker's investigation of Lazarus last October uncovered: Lazarus could not have witnessed on Jan. 6 what he testified to have seen during the Oath Keepers trial since video evidence shows Lazarus was in another part of the Capitol at the time.

Proof of Perjury | The Truth About January 6 youtu.be

What's more, neither Capitol Police nor the Justice Department made the Capitol CCTV videos of Lazarus’ movements in the Capitol on January 6 available to the Oath Keepers' defense teams, Baker said.

More from Baker's Friday analysis:

Loudermilk’s letter also provides an additional detail that, if true, would raise additional questions about federal prosecutors’ conduct of the Oath Keepers’ trial. According to Loudermilk, OPR investigators “relied on the statements of a federal prosecutor in the case in which Special Agent Lazarus was called as a witness.”

Blaze Media also learned from a congressional source that federal prosecutors “were definitely consulted/interviewed” by Capitol Police investigators during their inquiry in November.

Loudermilk's letter adds that OPR interviewed Lazarus on Dec. 18, 2023, and when an investigating USCP officer asked Lazarus if he committed perjury in his testimony, Lazarus responded, “No.”

But Loudermilk wasn't done with Lazarus.

Baker also reported in his Friday analysis that a former high-ranking USCP officer — who asked for anonymity out of fear of retaliation — had told Blaze Media about a "past disciplinary event that cast doubt on Lazarus’ trial testimony and his credibility in general."
More from Baker's analysis:
In 2016, Lazarus, who was assigned to the Dignitary Protection Division, was involved in the cover-up of an incident in which he was discovered to be drinking on duty. Lying in an internal affairs investigation is a “terminable” offense. At the very least, the incident should have been made known to the Oath Keepers’ defense team, which might have used the knowledge to impeach Lazarus’ testimony during cross-examination.

But Lazarus wasn’t fired. And the Oath Keepers’ lawyers were left in the dark.

Baker added in his Friday analysis that USCP leadership and their general counsel, Thomas “Tad” DiBiase, have resisted the efforts of Blaze Media — and even those of Loudermilk's committee — to acquire the 2016 OPR disciplinary report on Lazarus. However, Baker also reported that a senior aide with Loudermilk's committee has seen the OPR report and said its contents are “nuclear.”

In regard to the allegation that Lazarus was drinking alcohol while on duty in 2016, Loudermilk's letter revealed that despite the OPR sustaining the allegation — as well as approval of that recommendation by the USCP Inspector for the USCP Dignitary Protection Division Commander — it was all overruled by the USCP Office of General Counsel. Loudermilk's letter also said "it appears that Agent Lazarus may have intentionally given false or misleading statements" during the 2016 investigation.

In addition, Baker added in his Friday analysis that Blaze Media has learned from Oath Keeper defense attorneys that neither the USCP nor federal prosecutors disclosed Lazarus’ 2016 OPR investigation to them before his October 31, 2022, testimony.

Now what?

Loudermilk concluded his letter to USCP Chief Manger with the following:

The incomplete OPR investigation regarding Special Agent Lazarus’ testimony regarding the incident in the Capitol on January 6, 2021, coupled with the OGC overruling the recommendation of OPR and a Division Commander regarding Special Agent Lazarus’ violation of USCP policy, and the possibility Special Agent Lazarus made false statements, raises significant questions about USCP’s internal accountability and discipline structure. The lack of a robust investigation into the allegations that Agent Lazarus potentially lied under oath is unacceptable.

To better understand USCP’s internal processes and guidelines for discipline, I ask that you provide the Subcommittee with the complete USCP guidelines for OPR discipline and any additional information that informed the outcomes of these OPR investigations.

Capitol Police on Friday didn't immediately respond to Blaze News' request for comment on Baker's latest analysis.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Drunk driving, fraud, and an agency 'golden boy': Blaze Media's Steve Baker exposes apparent scandals in the US Capitol Police



Steve Baker, an investigative reporter with Blaze Media who was recently arrested in connection with his work as an independent journalist documenting the events of January 6, has an explosive new report that indicates that several current and former uniformed members of the United States Capitol Police — including a USCP assistant chief who recently testified in front of Congress — effectively failed upward, receiving prestigious promotions despite previous professional scandals that were ultimately hushed up.

'Ask them what they call it': Overtime fraud

The main focus of Baker's investigation involves an overtime pay scandal in the USCP Dignitary Protection Division that occurred nearly a decade and a half ago and reportedly lasted at least a year. The scandal had at least three known participants: Wendy Colmore, John Erickson, and Sean Gallagher.

In January 2010, former USCP Sergeant Rhoda Henderson, long since retired, became suspicious of some overtime hours submitted by Colmore, Erickson, and Gallagher. According to a July 2014 report from National Journal, DPD officers were limited in the overtime hours they could report because they could not earn more than $8,596 every two weeks.

To sidestep that rule and ensure that they received payment for all their OT hours, Colmore, Erickson, and Gallagher began "time shifting" by distributing hours onto other pay periods to keep themselves below the $8,596 threshold, Henderson claimed.

When Henderson first reported her suspicions in summer 2012, she said that her superiors brushed her off. However, she had collected a treasure trove of digital receipts that revealed the scam.

An intra-agency memorandum dated a year later indicated that "all three" eventually copped to the scandal. "All three claim that this was not a conspiracy," the memorandum said, according to Baker. "What was it then? Ask them what they call it when three people all agree to backfill overtime and not inform their chain of command."

Henderson recently told Baker that in perpetrating the scam, Colmore, Erickson, and Gallagher committed "felonies" that ought to at least have resulted in immediate termination. "Had this been me or any other officer (those not part of command staff) who would have committed this crime," she told National Journal in 2014, "we would have been fired. There's no doubt in my mind."

Jim Konczos, then chairman of the Capitol Police Labor Committee's executive board, agreed. "If these allegations are true, this is criminal in nature, not administrative by any means," Konczos said. "This conduct should result in termination, nothing less. We can't have supervisors stealing time and/or money. This conduct, besides being criminal, impairs the efficiency and reputation of the department."

'Defrauded the government': Lt. Wendy Colmore

When questioned in 2013, Gallagher, then a USCP captain and the supervisor of Colmore and Erickson, pointed the finger at Colmore, a lieutenant, as the architect of the scheme. A memorandum from that year shows that Colmore had previously contacted a superior officer and inquired about rules governing "time shifting." Despite receiving a response that such practices were not permitted, Colmore and her colleagues apparently began fudging their timesheets anyway.

In all, Colmore's role in the scheme "defrauded the government of $6,870," according to a USCP document viewed by Baker. Colmore also had a "sustained charge of conduct unbecoming" from a separate internal affairs investigation in 2000.

Even with those marks on her record, Colmore was never fired, though she was recommended for demotion to sergeant. She left the USCP in 2014 and joined the U.S. Senate sergeant at arms a year later, according to a LinkedIn profile believed to be hers.

'Passed out, extremelyintoxicated': Deputy Chief John Erickson

As unsavory as some of Colmore's behavior has been, Erickson's past transgressions are even worse. Not only was he implicated in the overtime scheme and ordered to serve a 20-day suspension and pay back at least some of the defrauded money, but he was reportedly twice caught driving under the influence, once while on duty.

The first incident occurred in 1997 in San Antonio, Texas, when Erickson was working security detail for then-Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich. Shortly before 3:30 a.m. on June 28 that year, Erickson was discovered in "a government-rented convertible" parked along the side of a road with "his head on his chest, passed out, extremely intoxicated," a police report said. Officers described his speech as "slurred," his breath as smelling of "intoxicants," and his eyes as "bloodshot."

Erickson refused to take a breathalyzer, was arrested, and spent several hours in jail. He later received a warning from the USCP and a 10-day suspension without pay, according to USCP documents viewed by Baker.

Erickson apparently did not learn his lesson, however, as he was involved in an even more serious alcohol-related incident less than five years later. In January 2002, Erickson was off duty when he reportedly swerved and crashed his personal vehicle into a Maryland State Police cruiser parked along Route 50 just outside D.C. in New Carrollton, Maryland. A trooper was in the vehicle at the time and sustained "minor injuries" during the crash, the Washington Post reported at the time.

Following the crash, Erickson was suspended for 30 days without pay, charged with conduct unbecoming, and issued a "last chance agreement, in lieu of termination," USCP documents said.

These serious marks on his record seem to have have had no negative effect on his USCP career, though. In fact, he has continued to advance, prompting some to refer to him as "Teflon John." In the year following the overtime scandal, Erickson was promoted to captain, and a penalty assessment memorandum about the scandal called him "an outstanding employee."

Last October, Erickson was named a USCP deputy chief.

'The golden boy': Assistant Chief Sean Gallagher

Of the three USCP uniformed officers caught in the overtime scandal, Sean Gallagher should have suffered the worst penalties. At the time the scandal was uncovered, Gallagher was a captain, entrusted with signing off on timesheets such as those submitted by Colmore and Erickson. Yet on his timesheets, Gallagher forged the signature of his superior, Inspector Daniel Malloy, apparently choosing different-colored pens to conceal his misconduct.

This was not Gallagher's first foray into forgery at the USCP. He was also the subject of a prior internal affairs investigation in which he claimed "that his forgery of his supervisors [sic] signature never resulted in personal gain," USCP documents revealed, according to Baker.

Those words may have come back to haunt Gallagher, who is believed to have pocketed an extra $10,000 as a result of time-shifting. Documents in connection with that incident claimed he was motivated by the "significant personal gain" it would yield.

Gallagher was supposed to pay back all the money he stole from the department and be demoted to lieutenant, but whether those consequences were ever enforced is uncertain. One unnamed USCP source familiar with the matter told Baker that Gallagher remained a captain, served just a 10-day suspension, and was promoted to inspector in 2018.

Within the next three years, Gallagher received two more promotions. In 2019, he was named a USCP deputy chief before becoming an assistant chief in June 2021.

When asked why uniformed officers like Gallagher received such seemingly preferential treatment despite serious, possibly even criminal, missteps, former USCP Captain Eric Keenan, one of the only current or former USCP employees willing to go on the record with Baker, said that Gallagher ingratiated himself with powerful people in the department.

From "day one," Keenan told Baker, Gallagher was "the golden boy who could do no wrong."

A Praetorian Guard of sorts: USCP and political influence

As distastefully as some in federal law enforcement have behaved, the larger problem with these scandals at the USCP is that they seem to have put unscrupulous people into positions with significant power, Steve Baker claimed. Earlier this month, Assistant Chief Sean Gallagher even testified at a congressional hearing about pipe bombs placed near the headquarters of the Republican and Democratic National Committees hours before the protest on January 6.
"Those statements [about the pipe bombs] come from our trained bomb techs, highly trained, highly capable bomb techs," asserted Gallagher, a man who has been caught committing forgery on multiple occasions.
Baker believes that the likes of Gallagher, Deputy Chief John Erickson, and former Lt. Wendy Colmore represent a much deeper problem at the USCP. "The U.S. Capitol Police know 'where the bodies are buried' and who buried them," Baker claimed. "This gives them tremendous power — power even over the outcome of controversial or closely contested legislation."
USCP officers have seemingly wrested so much power away from elected officials that Baker compared them with the Praetorian Guard, a once-proud unit of officers entrusted with protecting Roman emperors that eventually devolved into an elitist group of gatekeepers who, in essence, controlled the empire.
Despite possible corruption in the upper echelon of the USCP and the Biden administration's apparent prosecution of him for exercising his constitutional rights as a member of the free press, Baker says he is not deterred. "Blaze Media’s investigation into Capitol Police corruption will continue," he stated.
Neither the USCP nor Wendy Colmore responded to Blaze News' request for comment.
Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Capitol Police won't charge Democratic staffer for filming sodomy in Senate hearing room



The U.S. Capitol Police announced Thursday that no criminal charges will be filed against the men who filmed themselves engaging in sodomy on Dec. 13, 2023, in the Hart Senate Office Building — one of whom was a staffer for Democratic Sen. Ben Cardin (Md.).

The USCP said in a statement, "After consulting with federal and local prosecutors, as well as doing a comprehensive investigation and review of possible charges, it was determined that – despite a likely violation of Congressional policy – there is currently no evidence that a crime was committed."

The USCP indicated further that the "two people of interest were not cooperative, nor were the elements of any of the possible crimes met. The Congressional staffer, who has since resigned from his job, exercised his Fifth Amendment right to remain silent and refused to talk to us."

A pornographic video featuring unprotected buggery in a conference room on Capitol Hill, near Cardin's office, was shared online to a group for gay men in December. The Spectator reported on the video, and the Daily Caller obtained a copy.

The Spectator noted that the "images and videos are explicit — and conspicuously and deliberately contain the staffer's face."

The set for the amateur pornographic film, Hart 216, was also the setting for the September 11 Commission hearings, former FBI Director James Comey's testimony on former President Donald Trump in 2017, and the confirmation hearings for multiple Supreme Court justice nominees, reported Time.

According to the USCP, the "hearing room was not open to the public at the time, [but] the Congressional staffer involved had access to the room."

Amidst mounting questions and significant backlash, Cardin released a short statement, noting, "Aidan Maese-Czeropski is no longer employed by the U.S. Senate. We will have no further comment on this personnel matter."

Maese-Czeropski, who had been working for Cardin for two years, painted himself as a victim, noting in a post on LinkedIn, "This has been a difficult time for me, as I have been attacked for who I love to pursue a political agenda. While some of my actions in the past have shown poor judgment, I love my job and would never disrespect my workplace."

Cardin's former staffer also posted various deviant posts on social media, including one where he allegedly photographed himself naked with the caption, "waiting for @LindseyGrahamSC in the work showers."

"Any attempts to characterize my actions otherwise are fabricated and I will be exploring what legal options are available to me in these matters," continued Cardin's former staffer.

Maese-Czeropski also intimated in the post that he was not the anti-Semitic Democratic staffer who reportedly confronted Jewish Republican Rep. Max Miller (Ohio) in early December, saying, "Free Palestine!"

Maese-Czeropski has appeared in at least one other video: a November 2020 promotional video for then-candidate Joe Biden.

— (@)

Days after the story broke, Cardin told a Fox News reporter, "I was angry. I was disappointed."

"It's a breach of trust," added Cardin, who has in recent years been a vocal champion of the LGBT agenda.

Some critics have suggested the refusal to hold Maese-Czeropski accountable is reflective of preferential treatment by law enforcement in Washington, D.C..

Mark Hemingway of RealClearInvestigations wrote, "Let me get this straight... merely walking through the capitol unauthorized is a felony. But having public sex in the building, filming it, and putting it online doesn't merit a public lewdness charge? Please tell why I am supposed to respect rule of law in this country."

LifeNews.com tweeted, "They're not going to charge anyone for having gay sex in the Senate hearing room, but pro-life people who prayed and sang in an abortion center are going to prison for 11 years."

Donald Trump Jr. noted, "They're usually pretty anal about even minor infractions. I guess filming gay sex in a secure senate meeting room is different."

Mike Davis of the Article III Project called the USCP's refusal to press charges "truly outrageous."

"Senate staffers have access to the Capitol *for official business*--not to produce and broadcast their porn videos. Trespassing. Misuse of government property. Misuse of government funds. Lewd acts. Indecent exposure. The evidence is on their own video," wrote Davis.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!