Matt Hunt/Getty Images

Horowitz: Sudden deaths and pregnancy problems finally recognized, but the cause? Not so much

If Pfizer openly lied about the shots stopping transmission, are we really to believe the company didn’t lie about the safety of the shots either? Are we really to believe that the millions of adverse events reported and thousands of case studies of injuries are not just the tip of the iceberg of this sudden death syndrome? Well, now that the sudden heart attacks, strokes, blood clots, and maternal-fetal complications are too jarring to ignore, as the media has been doing for over a year, widespread deaths are being blamed on COVID or other random speculative causes rather than on the cause that has so much data and academic literature identifying it as the culprit.

According to a new report published in Heart Rhythm, “Video games may represent a serious risk to some children with arrhythmic conditions.” So why all of a sudden? “They might be lethal in patients with predisposing, but often previously unrecognized arrhythmic conditions. Children who suddenly lose consciousness while electronic gaming should be assessed by a heart specialist as this could be the first sign of a serious heart problem.”

Perforce, we are to believe it wasn’t until 2021 that children started suddenly suffering from irregular heartbeats, even though they have been playing too many video games for years. Just ignore the timing and chase the squirrel! Heart Rhythm is the official journal of the Heart Rhythm Society, the Cardiac Electrophysiology Society, and the Pediatric & Congenital Electrophysiology Society, published by Elsevier. The report was picked up by media all over the world this week.

For the most part the media know that in the long run these random excuses will not fly with the public, which is why they are conveniently blaming everything on COVID. Last week, Fortune published a piece from an ER doctor titled, “Strokes, heart attacks, sudden deaths: Does America understand the long-term risks of catching COVID?” Well, at least the recognition of these facts represents some degree of progress. However, the author failed to even entertain any of the evidence from VAERS and other studies that the shots could be responsible. She instead pins the blame on COVID.

The problem with this assertion is that we didn’t see these sudden deaths in 2020 – the year of COVID pre-vaccine – only in 2021 and onward, coinciding with the take-up of the vaccines. Moreover, in 2022 we have only experienced Omicron, which everyone agrees is much less thrombotic and affects the heart less than the previous variants. Yet in April 2022, Yvette D’ath, the Queensland health minister, said the following about “code one” emergency calls from citizens at the time: “I don’t think anyone can explain why we saw a 40% jump in code ones. … We just had a lot of heart attacks and chest pains and trouble breathing, respiratory issues. Sometimes you can’t explain why those things happen, but unfortunately they do.”

There is no doubt that the original spike protein could damage the heart, but how much more that should apply to a gene therapy that codes your body to produce an unknown number of spikes in an unknown number of locations, potentially for months on end, in a very unnatural way that gets beyond your body’s immune defenses and other blood barriers.

A recent German autopsy study of someone who died of sudden heart death found the damage from the spike protein of the shot in an individual who did not have COVID. VAERS alone has almost 53,000 cases of myocarditis and nearly 17,000 heart attacks in the reporting database.

Three Italian surgeons recently warned they are seeing abnormal blood samples from sick patients with sudden illnesses after having been jabbed. In a peer-reviewed study published in the International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research, out of 1,000 mainly vaccinated patients who sought medical attention because of various ailments, only 6% presented with normal-looking blood samples. “There were 948 subjects (94% of the total sample) whose blood showed aggregation of erythrocytes and the presence of particles of various shapes and sizes of unclear origin one month after the mRNA inoculation,” concluded the Italian doctors. “In 12 subjects, blood was examined with the same method before vaccination, showing a perfectly normal hematological distribution. The alterations found after the inoculation of the mRNA injections further reinforce the suspicion that the modifications were due to the so-called ‘vaccines’ themselves.”

With all the heart and circulatory concerns stemming from the spike protein, it was inevitable that we’d experience maternal-fetal problems too. Their existence was vehemently denied until recently. The Washington Post reports that doctors are absolutely perplexed about the growing pregnancy complications and the rise in stillbirths.

Ilhem Messaoudi, a professor of immunology at the University of Kentucky, said she and many of her colleagues have been taken aback by the extent to which pregnancy has been affected by the pandemic. Like many researchers, she had initially thought of covid-19, the disease caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, as a respiratory illness and did not expect it to impact reproductive organs.

Instead, she and other pregnancy experts have spent the past few years scrambling to understand spikes in maternal complications — first reported anecdotally then verified in several large studies — including an extremely small but nonetheless alarming group of unusual stillbirths. “I was naive,” Messaoudi reflected. “Now I wonder, ‘What else have we been missing?’”

The authors go on to insinuate that COVID could be the cause but offer nothing but freehand speculation and the fact that “it will be decades before we know the extent of the coronavirus's effects on human health.” Gee, perhaps we should at least entertain that maybe the product that delivers spike protein and is largely deposited in the ovaries might have something to do with the trends that, again, began in 2021 and not in 2020?

If you just look at the known, up-front, immediate, and common moderate inflammatory symptoms from the shots, it is shocking that nobody would investigate them as the cause of sudden deaths and sudden pregnancy complications. A new survey of vaccine side effects from Saudi Arabia published in the International Journal of General Medicine shockingly showed that anywhere between 7% and 13% of those who got either the Pfizer or AstraZeneca shots experienced irregular heartbeat, chest pain, or shortness of breath, aside from the massive percentage that experienced fever, headache, and other flu-like symptoms.

That is a massive percentage of pretty serious symptoms related to heart health, especially considering that over 5 billion people got at least one jab and many of them got 2-5 doses. So with all that smoke, and then the adjacent fire of countless people dropping dead of heart ailments at young ages, it is criminal and absurd not to begin the investigation of the shots as a prime suspect.

The final nail in the coffin is the fact that, according to newly released CDC pharmacovigilance data, thanks to attorney Aaron Siri and ICAN, the level of moderate injury from the shots was through the roof, comporting with the numbers from the Saudi survey. Evidently, the CDC had a V-safe program where 10 million Americans reported a relatively small subset of adverse events through a reporting app. Among those 10 million people, there were over 70 million adverse events, and nearly 8% of the 10 million had to seek medical attention, often several times, to deal with the injury or ailment. Roughly a quarter of all the individuals had to miss work the next day. And 4.2 million of the 70 million ailments were classified as being serious. Extrapolated for the population who got the shots, that would equal over 100,000 million serious ailments for the entire population!

In other words, the CDC knew this from day one as they got the reports back from their secret reporting app, which verified all along that VAERS was just the tip of the iceberg and is woefully underreported, as horrific as its numbers are at face value.

Rather than immediately taking the shots off the market, the FDA approved on Wednesday a booster shot, for which its own study concedes, “The safety and immunogenicity of the bivalent omicron-containing mRNA-1273.214 booster vaccine are NOT known.” Well, unfortunately, we would love for the safety to at least be unknown at this point. We know a lot. And it’s not good.

Horowitz: CDC issues alert for child hepatitis, but will we discover the cause?



One after another, we are seeing mysterious illnesses pop up throughout the world, with many young people either dying or getting ill suddenly. Over the past year and a half, we have injected half of all humanity with multiple doses of a dangerous mRNA gene therapy that has already clearly caused numerous neurological, hematological, and cardiac illnesses, and there are over 1,000 others observed by Pfizer in the first few months of the rollout. Yet the government agencies are taking a “see no evil, hear no evil” approach and won’t even investigate the shots as a potential cause of any of these maladies.

The latest craze in the media is the sudden occurrence of severe hepatitis among young children in the U.S. and several European countries. After several weeks of media reports across both continents of mysterious outbreaks of pediatric hepatitis, the CDC issued an alert last Thursday asking pediatricians to be on the lookout for hepatitis, which is liver inflammation, often expressed symptomatically with jaundice and gastroenterological problems.

There have been nine cases of hepatitis in children in Alabama and two in North Carolina, several of whom needed liver transplants. The CDC, in its statement, seems to have eliminated COVID or the typical hepatitis viruses that cause the inflammation as a culprit. However, the agency appears to be focusing its investigation on adenovirus as a potential cause, because it claims some of the kids were infected with adenovirus type 41.

However, while this concern should not be ruled out, notice what is never ruled in? The inflammatory gene therapy that was just introduced to the entire population. Adenoviruses are almost as common and as mild as rhinoviruses in children, and we’ve never experienced this problem before. Why would adenovirus suddenly become pro-inflammatory in the liver without any other confounding factors? Why wouldn’t we look at the brand-new product that is known to cause inflammation and produce auto-antibodies in numerous parts of the body, but most prominently in the liver, where the highest concentration of the lipid nanoparticles is deposited?

While the CDC is correct that inflammation of the liver “can be caused by viral infections, alcohol use, toxins, medications, and certain other medical conditions,” it is missing one major cause: autoimmune hepatitis. Here’s why, at a minimum, you’d want to investigate the shots as a potential culprit or contributing factor:

1) We know that the shots seem to trigger an uncontrolled antibody response all over the body, with the mRNA coding the tissue to produce spike proteins throughout the body. The spike protein triggers the inflammatory auto-antibody response throughout the body, but is carried most prominently to the liver. The Canadian bio-distribution table (p. 23) shows that the Pfizer shot’s lipid nanoparticles are deposited in the liver more than anywhere else after the injection site itself.

After just 48 hours, roughly 16% of the 50-microgram dose was deposited in the liver. Several months ago, researchers at Thomas Jefferson University found that the lipid nanoparticles used in the mRNA vaccines were hyper-inflammatory in mice. “The mRNA-LNP platforms' potency in supporting the induction of adaptive immune responses and the observed side effects may stem from the LNPs' highly inflammatory nature,” concluded the paper, published in Science Direct.

2) The European Medicines Agency has an assessment of the animal trials on Comirnaty and found (p. 49) liver inflammation in some rats:

If you trace the areas of inflammatory responses in the rates, they coincide with the areas that received a substantial deposit of lipid nanoparticles, such as the bone marrow, spleen, and lymph nodes.

3) In February, a bombshell study was published in Sweden the showed that in vitro, Pfizer mRNA vaccines use a reverse transcriptase enzyme called LINE-1 to potentially reverse-transcribe the genetic code of the vaccine into the DNA. Guess which cell tissues were used in that study? Liver cells! “In the BNT162b2 toxicity report, no genotoxicity nor carcinogenicity studies have been provided,” observed the authors. “Our study shows that BNT162b2 can be reverse transcribed to DNA in liver cell line Huh7, and this may give rise to the concern if BNT162b2-derived DNA may be integrated into the host genome and affect the integrity of genomic DNA, which may potentially mediate genotoxic side effects.”

Given what we know about reverse transcription and the concentration of the vaccine depositing in the liver, how could we rule out the vaccine as the cause of liver inflammation?

4) Last year, Dutch researchers posted an observational study of an 82-year old patient who they believe suffered a reactivation of hepatitis C infection after receiving the Pfizer shot, which “manifested with jaundice, loss of consciousness, hepatic coma and death.” A number of acute hepatitis injury cases have been recorded in VAERS and linked back to the shots.

of Hepatitis from the CDC Wonder Data Base\n\nNot exhaustive, just what I have tweeted thus farhttps://twitter.com/JeanRees10/status/1457170848486416385\u00a0\u2026
— Jean Rees (@Jean Rees) 1650161397

The bottom line is that we are seeing epidemics of autoimmune diseases pop up everywhere. Every doctor I’ve consulted on the issue of COVID treatment and vaccine injury attests to a sudden, unnatural spike in Epstein-Barr virus (the virus that causes mononucleosis) and shingles, two autoimmune diseases believed to be triggered by the shots. It doesn’t mean that every sudden mysterious ailment is caused by the shots, but what it does mean is that the medical community will never have interest in even investigating the shots as a contributing factor.

Earlier this year, an Israeli Health Ministry survey found that roughly 24% of people with pre-existing autoimmune disorders reported a worsening or reactivation of their condition after taking a Pfizer booster. There is no doubt that the shots are triggering certain autoimmune disorders. We also know that autoimmune hepatitis exists and certain auto-antibodies can inflame the liver and attack liver cells. When in history have we ever liberally handed out a shot that triggers an uncontrolled antibody response throughout the body to a very pro-inflammatory spike protein that happens to be deposited in the liver?

Just as with the uncanny explanations for youngsters suddenly getting strokes and heart attacks, it will at least be grimly amusing to watch the array of theories presented for the sudden spike in liver inflammation.

Horowitz: Moderna pushing high-dose shot for babies who are in no danger from COVID



Would red-state governors tolerate a federally funded program to distribute abortifacients in their states? Well, these same governors need to make it clear that Pfizer and Moderna are the new Planned Parenthood and are not welcome to distribute their poison shots in their states, especially for babies.

The pandemic has basically been declared over, babies and toddlers were never in danger, the shots no longer work, and they have been proven devastating in adverse events, even with the amount of long-term consequences we see. Yet both Pfizer and Moderna are in the process of senselessly and cruelly targeting the youngest children for the COVID shots. However, there is something particularly concerning about Moderna’s shot, in that the company is proposing to use a 25-milligram dose on babies 6 months to 2 years old, more than eight times the dose of Pfizer’s baby shot!

We are talking about kids weighing 15-25 pounds, and they are giving a dose that is almost as big as Pfizer’s adult dose. It’s one-fourth the dosage of Moderna’s adult dose, but that is still a much greater concentration for an average 6-month baby than it is for an adult of 160 pounds. How could anyone think this is safe?

Here’s what is really going on. All of the Pfizer and Moderna studies even for older children have shown zero serious COVID cases in the respective placebo groups. So in order to show efficacy, they created arbitrary benchmarks for presence of specific antibody levels generated by the shots. Putting aside the fact that high antibody levels without the proper T cell responses are actually not a good thing, fail to provide sterilizing immunity, and potentially cause autoimmune problems, the drug companies are caught in a catch-22 with dosage. Pfizer rightly tested those under 5 years old with a 3-milligram dose. But then it failed to stimulate a proper antibody response, which is why the company had to temporarily withdraw its application for EUA.

Moderna, on the other hand, figured they’d solve the problem by giving babies and toddlers a whopping 25-milligram dose. Even then, they misleadingly tethered their study of 2- to 4-year-olds to 5- and 6-year-olds in order to even register this illusory efficacy. However, any sane person on the FDA advisory committee should automatically nix this shot on account of its dangerous concentration for babies who, at just 6 months, average (for girls) as light as 16 pounds. Thus, while a 20-year-old adult weighing 180 pounds could be getting 0.55 micrograms per pound with the 100-microgram dose, a 6-month-old baby could be getting more than 1.5 micrograms per pound, roughly three times as potent. And we already know how problematic the adult concentration of Moderna was for many young adults, especially related to cardiac issues.

Then again, the entire premise of approving this shot at any dose for babies is taking a chapter out of Josef Mengele’s book of human experiments. By definition, there is zero emergency now, and even at the peak of the pandemic, there was no emergency for young children. There was, by definition, zero efficacy against serious illness, and they claim 37%-43% efficacy against infection for the various age groups. However, what are the consequences of getting an infection if it’s not serious? They report 17% of the kids got fever from the shots! So you are giving them fever and something that can induce several thousand ailments and maladies long-term (with no long-term safety data) for the 40% chance of … avoiding fever from the virus!

Also, the FDA plainly stated (p. 10) that “a point estimate for a placebo controlled efficacy trial of at least 50%” must be demonstrated in the trial in order to receive emergency use authorization. Moderna’s own untransparent data demonstrates the shot has not met the threshold for consideration

But that’s assuming you believe the 40% efficacy the way you believed the 90%+ efficacy against the original strain in the first adult studies. Now, if you believe there is still even a 40% VE rate against Omicron, especially against infection, after every single country-based analysis of real-world data showed negative efficacy since the beginning of Omicron (and U.K. data showed it even in Delta), I have a biolab to sell you in Wuhan. According to the U.K. Health Security Agency’s most recent report, efficacy against infection for some age groups is now lower than -300%.

But let’s play Charlie Brown in the football game with Lucy for a moment and assume that this time, they are telling the truth about 37%-43% efficacy against infection. Even the most conservative estimates of the adverse events from thousands of maladies detailed in Pfizer’s own document now released via FOIA demonstrate how it is immoral to market this to any child. Moderna has failed to disclose the number and types of adverse events. What it did divulge, however, is concerning. “The majority of adverse events were mild or moderate and were more frequently reported after dose two,” read the press release. The majority were mild or moderate, which means that a good number of them could have been significant. It also means that a minority but still measurable number of the adverse events were severe. How many and what type? They don’t say.

Remember how a number of countries banned Moderna’s shot for those under 30 because it caused exponentially more myocarditis than even Pfizer, presumably because of the higher dose? Iceland completely banned it. And this is when the shot was alleged to be more effective and for older strains of the virus. Now, they are using an expired shot for babies at a massive dose – much greater per pound – knowing the cardiac issues. Moreover, Moderna has been even less transparent than Pfizer, so we don’t even have its list of known adverse events the company is undoubtedly quietly monitoring. This is no longer malpractice but downright Third Reich-level malfeasance.

Horowitz: VAERS myocarditis already 47% of 2021 in just first 2 months of 2022



One of the most criminal aspects of the COVID regime was the decision to pressure low-risk teens into getting a shot that was known to cause cardiac inflammation. Myocarditis used to be a rare disorder discussed mainly in academic literature, but now it is everywhere. What have we done to a generation of young hearts, and what is being done to detect, diagnose, and treat the problem? Unless we can find an angle that ties in to Ukraine, our politicians, media, and medical establishment don’t care.

We are over a year into the known safety signals of this vaccine for myocarditis, and yet the shots still have not been pulled, even for younger males. In fact, it’s still a requirement in many colleges. Yet reports of myocarditis and pericarditis are so prevalent now that just in the first eight weeks of 2022, we’re already at 47% of the total VAERS submissions for 2021. There were 24,177 reports of pericarditis/myocarditis submitted to VAERS in 2021. In 2022, just through Feb. 25, there were 11,289 reports, which is nearly half of last year’s total. Here is the graphic presentation from Open VAERS:

The reporting to VAERS is very disturbing because the trend line of vaccination, especially for the younger people more prone to this heart inflammation, has halted to a trickle in recent weeks. So why are there so many more reports this year? There are likely two possible explanations. Either more people and doctors know about VAERS and know to look for myocarditis, or there is a time bomb with many more people now realizing they have heart problems months later. Either way, this means that the initial estimates of case prevalence were just the tip of the iceberg, and we are likely to see young hearts damaged for years to come.

What is so shocking is that several weeks ago, the CDC recognized the problem and attempted to get ahead of it by suggesting that “an 8-week interval may be optimal for some people ages 12 years and older, especially for males ages 12 to 39 years.” But historically, if we recognized even a fraction of heart problems from a shot, it would have been pulled from the market entirely! Yet here they are still recommending it, despite the fact that the virus poses low risk for this age group, notwithstanding the fact that the shot doesn’t stop transmission and that it is now outdated for the current strain of the virus!

If the reporting of myocarditis and pericarditis continues at this rate, we’ll see over 73,000 cases this year. And even if more people have become aware of VAERS, it is still woefully underreported.

It’s not acceptable (and never was) for the media and the pharma-paid “fact checkers” to automatically dismiss VAERS. It is our main pharmaco-surveillance tool and was put in place precisely to serve as the consolation to the public for Congress absolving vaccine manufactures of liability. Also, the data complements what we’ve learned universally from all the myocarditis vaccine studies – that it targets teens and early 20s more than other age groups and is more potent after the second dose. Here is the age breakdown of the VAERS reporting:

The CDC’s own researchers published a study in JAMA in which they clinically confirmed most of the myocarditis submissions to VAERS. As such, they concluded, “Given the high verification rate of reports of myocarditis to VAERS after mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccination, underreporting is more likely. Therefore, the actual rates of myocarditis per million doses of vaccine are likely higher than estimated.”

Moreover, now we have documents released via FOIA showing that Pfizer admits VAERS is a robust and legitimate safety signal reporting tool. In a document from March 2020 titled, “WAIVER REQUEST FOR FDA-DESIGNATED SUFFIX FOR BIOLOGICS,” Pfizer responds to an FDA consideration that the shots might need a new adverse event monitoring system by advocating that “Pfizer believes that an additional suffix for COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine (nucleoside modified) would be burdensome and redundant as the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has existing methods to ensure safe dispensing and optimal pharmacovigilance of vaccines.” They referred to the existing methods as “robust” and listed VAERS as one of the tools.

Thus, Pfizer can’t have it both ways. If VAERS was a good enough system to support its licensure agreement, then it must be held accountable for the blaring safety signals emanating from the existing system. We also now know that Pfizer knew of over 1,200 fatalities early on, adverse events in 23% of the trial group, hundreds of categories of severe adverse events, understood the injection does not stay in the injection site, and was aware of the fact that 16% of the lipid nanoparticles are deposited in the liver. Pfizer also lied and stated that the shots provide “Active immunisation to prevent COVID-19 caused by SARS-CoV-2,” as if it were a fully sterilizing vaccine. They also conceded early on in the newly released document (p. 24) that the inflammation increases with the second and third doses.

In other words, all this paints a picture that there is zero safety net for the public, and the sky is the limit in terms of the scope and severity of adverse events we will see in the coming months. The public already knows this, at least subconsciously, because we are now seeing warnings about cardio surveillance programs for athletes, as numerous athletes continue to drop suddenly.

For this academic year, the Orange County, California, public school system put out a new warning for its athletics department to now mandate electrocardiogram (ECG) screenings for all high school students signed up for athletic programs. The reason? “ECG screenings help identify athletes who are at risk for sudden cardiac arrest which is the leading cause of death in athletics.” Why beginning in 2021-2022? What changed? And why won’t they identify those who got the shots as the culprits? Well, some of these same California schools are stilling requiring this shot!

Unfortunately, electrocardiograms are often insufficient to detect myocarditis early on, according to several cardiologists I’ve spoken to who have been treating vaccine-induced cardiac injury. Cardiac MRIs are needed to detect scabbing, but insurance companies don’t want to pay for them. Our government has a responsibility to pay for cardiac MRIs in young males who’ve received the shots, so they can detect latent heart inflammation before it’s too late.

In 1999, when our government still cared about human beings, the RotaShield vaccine for rotavirus was pulled from the market after just 10,000 infants received it because of a suspected potential 1/2,500 risk of intussusception, a rare disorder causing the blockage of the intestines. At the time, the CDC strongly encouraged the use of VAERS to surveil the extent of the problem. Now, with hundreds of potentially dangerous ailments, they won’t stop the vaccine even for those at the lowest risk for COVID and the highest risk for myocarditis – even after the pandemic was declared over and even for a vaccine that no longer works.

Just how prevalent is myocarditis? In one emergency room at the University of Tel Aviv Medical Center, there were eight cases of myocarditis in a small age group after having received the shots, according to a study published in Circular. This was in February and March 2021, before practitioners were even on alert for this safety signal. In another study published in the Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society, eight adolescents presented over the course of 36 days to Nicklaus Children’s Hospital in Miami with perimyocarditis. These were just the people who presented within 4 days of receiving a dose of the Pfizer shot, shortly after it was approved for this age group.

Ironically, the longer we go on promoting and mandating the shots, instead of pulling them from the market – despite the dreadful degree of safety problems – the more it acclimates the public to the new normal of “sacrifice” and tolerance for an even greater degree of risk in order to “do the right thing.” Which raises the bar even further so that anything short of proving with the scientific method that 50% of people will die from it will be insufficient for pulling the gene therapy. We are like frogs in boiling water.

Nobody explained it better than Stefan Oelrich, head of Bayer’s pharmaceutical division, at the 2021 World Health Summit (at 1:37:25). Gleefully trumpeting the future of “cell and gene therapy,” Oelrich touted the mRNA shots as the first triumph of this technology. “If we had surveyed two years ago the public if you were willing to take gene or cell therapy and inject it into your body we would have probably had a 95% refusal rate,” said Oelrich with a twinkle in his eye. “I think this pandemic has also opened many people’s eyes to innovation in a way that maybe was not possible before.”

Indeed! The new normal. Just wait until the next mRNA and you will heartily embrace the taste of innovation.

Pfizer CEO declares that people who spread 'misinformation' about vaccines are 'criminals'



Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla does not appreciate people spreading what he calls "misinformation" about his company's COVID vaccine. He's so adamant about it that he has declared that people who share lies about vaccines are actually criminals in his mind.

According to Bourla, these miscreants are responsible for the deaths of millions of people.

What's that now?

Bourla, whose company has received billions of dollars from the U.S. government alone for its vaccine, made his comments Tuesday while speaking with the Atlantic Council, a Washington, D.C.-based think tank, CNBC reported.

During his conversation with Atlantic Council CEO Frederick Kempe, Bourla ripped into a "very small" number of people who share misinformation about the vaccines on purpose and intentionally mislead the vaccine-hesitant population.

The deaths of millions of people are their heads, according to the drug company chief.

"There are two groups of people," he said. "There are the people that are vaccinated; there are people that are skeptical about the vaccination. Both of them are afraid. Those that are getting the vaccine, they are afraid of the disease, and they believe, because people are not getting vaccinated, they are increasing their risk to them, they are increasing their exposure. They are mad [at] them that they don't get the vaccine."

"Those that don't get the vaccine, they're afraid of the vaccine," Bourla continued. "And they are mad [at] the people that are pressing them to get it."

"Those I understand," he said. "They are very good people. They are decent people, but they have a fear — and I understand it. And they don't want to take chances."

"But there is a very small part of professionals [who] circulate, on purpose, misinformation, so that they will mislead those that have concerns," Bourla added. "Those people are criminals."

"They're criminals because they are literally costing millions of lives," he added.

Kempe agreed, saying they "should be treated as criminals as well."

The Pfizer top dog also lectured Tuesday that people's lives can get "back to normal" once many of the millions of vaccine-hesitant Americans move from unvaccinated to vaccinated.

"The only thing that stands between the new way of life and the current way of life is, frankly, hesitancy to vaccinations," Bourla told the Atlantic Council, CNBC reported.

.@pfizer CEO Albert Bourla: People who share "misinformation" on vaccines' efficacy are "criminals."\n\n"They're not bad people. They're criminals because they have literally cost millions of lives."pic.twitter.com/VjIXs5rQCg

— Tom Elliott (@tomselliott) 1636483687

According to the New York Times' latest data compilation on vaccinations in the U.S., nearly 80% of people 12 years old and older have receive at least one dose of a COVID vax. About two-thirds of all Americans have received at least one jab, which includes children not yet eligible for the shots, the Times said.

The most vaccinated states are Massachusetts and Vermont, where 81% of residents have received at least one shot. Close behind are Connecticut, Pennsylvania, and Hawaii at 80%.

The least vaccinated state is West Virginia. Less than half (49%) of Mountain Staters have received at least one dose.

Horowitz: It’s time for candidates and politicians to boycott Pfizer’s toxic PAC donations



This is Pfizer's country. We merely live in it.

Many of us have forgotten that the impetus behind the infamous 2005 Kelo v. New London court case, in which the principle of private-use eminent domain was established for none other than Pfizer. In other words, 16 years ago, Pfizer established the principle of "your property, our choice." Now the company has established the principle of "your body, our choice." What we have witnessed the past year is that no matter how illogical, dangerous, and immoral Pfizer's mandate is on the American people, now including pushing a dangerous shot on young kids who clearly don't need to assume such risk, whatever Pfizer wants, Pfizer gets. There is a reason for it. The company has bought out the politicians in both parties.

Pfizer now has 92 lobbyists in Washington split between the two parties, not to mention high-roller PR firms to help with the (political) science. Pfizer's political action committee donated to 228 federal lawmakers at a price tag of over $4 million. Although people think of doctors and scientists when Pfizer comes to mind, the company likely has as many politicians working for it. The National Pulse found 74 known former White House staffers and staff of members and committees in Congress controlled by both parties now working for the Big Pharma god. Pfizer spent over $13 million on lobbying expenditures, not to mention buying up the airwaves to the point that news agencies cannot report a negative word about the company.

You can definitely trust these news outlets to tell you the truth about Pfizer products. https://t.co/gjTpZpRvGV

— Tyler Cardon (@TyCardon) 1634696302.0

In other words, Pfizer is now strong enough that it could blatantly poison our children with myocarditis and other known and unknown side effects – with zero absolute risk reduction of COVID – and will get away with it. Pfizer's wish is not only the government's command, but its mandate on we the people. The only way to break its impervious grip over our lives and bodies is to make it taboo for any candidate to take money from the pharma giant. Conservatives must make Republican primary candidates pledge never to take money again from Pfizer as a candidate or an incumbent.

Over three decades ago, Americans for Tax Reform created the famous no-tax pledge, barring candidates who sign the document from ever voting for a net tax increase. Such a clear and simple message resulted in the GOP essentially adhering to that one promise, despite violating every other facet of conservatism for decades. Republicans are now low-tax socialists and globalists, but until the bitter end they will all support low taxes. Perhaps it's time for a "No Pfizer Pledge" in which all candidates will swear off all money, lobbying, or meeting with this barbaric organization that now has more power than any elected entity.

Even if one is a dogmatic supporter of these shots and completely ignores all of the death, destruction, and viral enhancement they have created, nobody alive can look you in the eye and suggest that the drive to inject young children is driven by any shred of morality. Putting aside the immoral FDA policy of allowing Pfizer to control its own destiny without third-party audits, the company's own data showed zero cases of serious illness in both the trial and control groups in its study of 5- to 11-year-olds. There is zero benefit against serious illness, which is the only reason to vaccinate children, especially with an experimental and novel technology that has already caused numerous heart ailments in young boys and men. Moreover, roughly half the children already got the virus in some form, making any degree of risk from the shot unjustified, yet there is no desire to subject them to testing before the shot. How can Pfizer possibly justify emergency use for an ailment that its own trial showed caused no serious illness in any young child?

Now, let's look at the safety side. Despite unprecedented cases of myocarditis among young males, Pfizer admits on page 11 of its FDA briefing document that "the current clinical development program is too small to detect any potential risks of myocarditis associated with vaccination" and that it will take five years to "evaluate long term sequelae of post-vaccination myocarditis/pericarditis." Incidentally, despite the small sample size (p. 47), one child in the study group did develop Henoch–Schönlein purpura, an immunologically mediated inflammation of the small blood vessels.

How is it moral to turn the children into de facto animal trials? Come back to us in five years and you can get authorization for your shot. Then again, we already have the result of the immoral experimentation on teenagers from the past half-year. According to one study (Hoeg et al.), "for boys 12-15 without medical comorbidities receiving their second mRNA vaccination dose," the rate of hospitalization for myocarditis was "3.7 to 6.1 times higher than their 120-day COVID-19 hospitalization risk as of August 21, 2021." That is just from one side effect! How are the executives not in jail, the shots not suspended, and politicians not completely swearing off any relationship with these companies?

It is criminal to do a trial with such a small sample size when it will likely take a million shots to even find a supposed benefit from the vaccine while there are myocarditis incidents among males every few thousand!

WE CANNOT RISK vaccinating 5 to 11 year-olds1 in ~5,200 12 to 17 yo males in Ontario are experiencing myocarditis… https://t.co/mLlbHtCIlV

— Kelly Brown (@rubiconcapital_) 1634945008.0

Incidentally, a sample size of just two young children who happened to be mistakenly given the Pfizer COVID shot at a Walgreens in Evansville, Indiana, instead of the flu shot resulted in both of them suffering from heart conditions. While it is true that those children were given the full adult dose, the fact that we saw heart issues right away from it doesn't exactly reflect positively on the entire concoction, regardless of the dose.

The signals of likely vaccine-related deaths stemming from heart conditions in young males are jarring enough to suspend these vaccines, yet they are responding to those signals by mandating them and then pushing them on even younger children. According to an analysis by the Hart Group, excess mortality in the U.K. for 15- to 19-year-olds has spiked as much as 47% above the baseline level since May 1, right around when teens and young adults began to get vaccinated. The deaths also spiked among 20- to 29-year-olds and in both groups were dominated by males. Concomitantly, they also observed "a clear rise in ambulance cardiac and respiratory arrest calls in England and ambulance calls for people becoming unconscious starting from May 2021."

The rate of increase in excess deaths among young adults, while slightly higher at the beginning of the year because of COVID (and the likely cascading effects of depression, isolation, and drugs), seemed to skyrocket during the spring and summer when younger adults were mass vaccinated. This is the trend in both Europe and the U.S.

⚰️ Excess Deaths ⚰️Euromomo: 🇪🇺🇬🇧🇨🇭🇳🇴🇮🇱🇺🇦👨👩 Younger Adults 👩👨Why the excess ⚰️ in these countries in 2021? 🤔… https://t.co/9hGqQM6iFv

— Miss Conceptions (@MConceptions) 1634898392.0

Excess mortality in young adults in Europe and the USA.Something really wrong is going on in 2021 vs 2020. https://t.co/oKcMooL4fC

— Covid19Crusher (@Covid19Crusher) 1635068478.0

Again, we are talking about a group of people who, to begin with, are at extremely low risk from this virus, putting aside the fact that there are much safer treatments that don't cause blood clotting and heart disorders.

Not surprisingly, sales for Pfizer's drug for treating myocarditis, Vyndamax, are up 77%.

Sales of Pfizer drug for myocarditis treatment, Vyndamax, are up 77% in the US. strong cross sell strategy, dest… https://t.co/fI7EVlgcZ1

— Real Developments (@pdubdev) 1635112292.0

It is simply criminal for Pfizer to be pushing this shot on children, and it is shameful for any politician to be associated with the company. Even with just 1% of adverse events being reported to VAERS, there are currently a total of 818,044 adverse events , including 117,399 reports of serious injuries and 17,128 reports of deaths from all of the COVID vaccines together.

Evidently, Pfizer believes in the adage of Karl Marx, "The last capitalist we hang shall be the one who sold us the rope." But it doesn't have to be this way. Not if there is at least one political party not bought out by this truly evil empire. Any takers?