Vaccine-injured Americans fight to hold Biden-Harris admin accountable over censorship campaign



Novel COVID-19 vaccines advertised as "safe and effective" left multitudes of Americans injured or worse during the pandemic. Some of those individuals still physically capable went online to express their concerns, share their life-changing experiences, and engage with others medically compromised by government mandates and experimental science. However, in many cases, they found themselves unable to do so.

Their posts were suppressed. Their accounts were deleted or quarantined. Their speech was altogether stifled.

Several vaccine-injured Americans are seeking to hold the Biden-Harris administration and its apparent coconspirators to account for this insult to injury.

The New Civil Liberties Alliance filed an amended complaint Friday in the case Dressen, et al. v. Flaherty, et al. on behalf of five individuals who suffered vaccine-related injuries, along with a sixth plaintiff who lost his son to a vaccine-related death.

The suit names as defendants various elements of the Democratic administration, including President Joe Biden, White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre, and Health Secretary Xavier Becerra, along with alumni of the effectively defunct Stanford Internet Observatory's Virality Project.

According to the NCLA, the Biden White House, the Surgeon General's Office, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and other elements of the Biden-Harris administration worked to "coerce, induce, and collude with social media platforms to censor, suppress, and label as 'misinformation' speech expressed by those who have suffered vaccine-related injuries."

The amended complaint further details how this apparent censorship scheme has continued since the lawsuit was first filed in May of last year.

'The federal government has launched a war against purported mis-, dis-, and malinformation, which it claims must be suppressed despite the First Amendment.'

"It is not the government's role to curate, filter, or suppress disfavored speech before it reaches the eyes and ears of American citizens. Yet that is precisely what is going on here," says the complaint. "This case challenges the government's mass-censorship program and the shocking role that it has played (and continues to play) in ensuring that disfavored viewpoints deemed a threat to its agenda are suppressed."

On its face, the case appears to share much in common with Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s Kennedy v. Biden, which was green-lit last month by U.S. District Judge Terry A. Doughty of the Western District of Louisiana, as well as the related case Murthy v. Biden.

Like the other two, this case points out the pressure the Biden-Harris administration exerted on social media companies such as Facebook and Twitter to censor speech that did not violate any of the platforms' existing policies. Like Kennedy, it also cites on multiple occasions the discovery produced in Murthy.

In a 6-3 June ruling, the Supreme Court said that the plaintiffs in Murthy lacked standing. Kennedy and the plaintiffs in this case appear far better positioned to succeed.

Among the many instances of censorship raised in the suit was the elimination of a private Facebook support group called "A Wee Sprinkle of Hope," which comprised thousands of vaccine-injured members.

In that instance, plaintiff Brianne Dressen — who is also suing AstraZeneca for allegedly leaving her with a debilitating injury — posted an infographic listing various post-COVID vaccine side effects, which are now widely known. She also linked to a press conference explaining the extent and nature of her injuries.

Dressen soon learned that her support page had been disabled for violating the platform's "Community Standards on misinformation that could cause physical harm," according to the complaint.

When she and other former members of "A Wee Sprinkle of Hope" started a new support group on Facebook, the platform again began policing, flagging, and "fact-checking" their posts despite using code and keyword substitutes.

Ernest Ramirez, another defendant, apparently set up a GoFundMe page to fundraise for a trip to Washington, D.C., where he intended to discuss his son's vaccine-related death. The complaint indicates Ramirez had his account terminated for supposedly violating the terms of service for "Prohibited Conduct."

Although denying a grieving father the means to provide further meaning to his boy's death was bad enough, perhaps even more unsettling was what Facebook allegedly did on the birthday of Ramirez's son.

Ramirez posted an image of himself beside his son's casket with the caption, "My goodbyes to my Baby Boy." According to the complaint, Facebook flagged the post with the label "partly false information." On the other hand, Twitter reportedly deleted the photo and told Ramirez to "make sure you're sharing reliable information."

The complaint is replete with similarly damning tales of censorship and explains precisely how the federal government put its thumbs on the scales.

Perhaps the most provocative assertion in the amended complaint is the following:

The federal government has launched a war against purported mis-, dis-, and malinformation, which it claims must be suppressed despite the First Amendment in order to protect American citizens from supposedly harmful or dangerous ideas. Indeed, Defendants admit to suppressing truthful speech, including stories of vaccine side effects that it has expressly acknowledged to be true, but which the government nevertheless targets for censorship because such speech 'could fuel vaccine hesitancy.'

The plaintiffs seek an injunction against further state-orchestrated censorship, claiming that their First Amendment rights were violated and that the government defendants, with the exception of Biden, exceeded the authority delegated to them by Congress.

Casey Norman, litigation counsel with the NCLA, said, "If there is any case that exemplifies why the First Amendment exists — as well as the abominable and Orwellian consequences that take place when the government evades its restraint — it is this one."

"The plaintiffs in this case posed a threat to the Biden Administration, because their personal experiences conflicted with the government’s heavy-handed approach to Covid-19 vaccination, which was predicated on the false claim that vaccine injuries were virtually nonexistent," said Jenin Younes, also litigation counsel with the NCLA.

This appears to be one among several signals that a possible reckoning is imminent where COVID authoritarians and reckless drug manufacturers are concerned.

In June, Kansas Attorney General Kris Kobach (R) announced that the Sunflower State was suing Pfizer for "misleading claims it made related to the COVID vaccine."

The British-Swedish pharmaceutical giant AstraZeneca, responsible for the Oxford-AstraZeneca COVID-19 viral-vector vaccine, is presently fighting a class-action lawsuit brought by apparent victims and deceased victims' families.

After years of denying its vaccine could cause blot clots, AstraZeneca admitted in a February court document that "it is admitted that the AZ vaccine can, in very rare cases, cause [thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome]. The causal mechanism is not known."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Tucker Carlson tours South Central Los Angeles with Ice Cube, discusses his vaccine stand and the sham of BLM activism



Rapper and entrepreneur O'Shea Jackson Sr., better known as Ice Cube, toured South Central Los Angeles with Tucker Carlson on a special episode of the former Fox News star's show subtitled, "Stay in Your Lane." The viral episode presently has over 6.5 million views.

Driving down memory lane and past the ravages of decades of failed Democratic policies, the two broached various subjects, including the COVID vaccine, exploitative activist movements, and unaccountable politicians.

Disenchantment with politics

"Three decades and billions of dollars later, it's still a tough place," Carlson narrated ahead of asking Jackson, "How do you think politicians in Los Angeles have done running this city?"

"It's pretty much the same people running it the same way," said Jackson. "Politicians only really pay attention to the people that give them money. Everybody else is kinda an extra in their movie. ... Politicians have hidden agendas. They owe a lot of people a lot of favors. The more money you give them, the more you're listened to."

When pressed on whether he had "fallen for a politician" in the past, Jackson recalled hopes and dreams previously dashed. He indicated, for instance, that former President Barack Obama's election had filled him with pride, "but then you look around, years go by, and not much changed for people I know, people I care about."

Carlson cut to clips indicating that race relations suffered a precipitous decline under Obama and "race riots" had spiked.

Gallup revealed in 2016 that the plurality of black respondents (39%) and majority of white respondents (51%) indicated Obama's presidency had made race relations worse, noting, "It is clear that the optimism Americans initially had for a black president's ability to improve race relations and the situation for blacks has long since faded."

Jackson emphasized that this was par for the course: "It didn't change with Bush, it didn't change with Clinton, it didn't change with the other Bush or Reagan, Carter. ... At the end of the day, it's still the same results."

Race hustlers

Carlson noted that in the wake of George Floyd's death, "we were told" to expect a "second civil rights movement."

Playing footage of derelict buildings and homeless encampments, Carlson stated, "If there was going to be liberation in the wake of the Floyd riots, this is where you would see the effects," alluding to the billions reportedly raised by corporate America for BLM and related groups.

"Three years ago, a bunch of big companies put hundreds of millions of dollars into Black Lives Matter," said Carlson. "Did that improve the neighborhood you grew up in?"

"Whenever you do that, most of the time, it's a lot of people siphoning that money off the top," said Jackson.

TheBlaze previously reported that BLM paid its co-founder Patrisse Cullors' baby daddy nearly five times more than it gave to the Trayvon Martin Foundation.

In April 2022, it was revealed that the BLM organization allegedly used funds donated to the cause to purchase a $6 million home in southern California with cash.

Financial statements also revealed that board members spent lavishly and blew money both on pricey consulting firms and expensive properties internationally.

"The kicker is a lot of people say they're gonna give the money, but they don't even give the money," said Jackson. "They just get the article wrote, everybody think they're great, and they never even give the money."

The costs of independence and submission

Jackson said, "I wouldn't be here if I stayed in my lane. ... I never wanted to be controlled."

The rapper indicated that those seeking to pressure him into a particular way of acting or thinking have often attempted to do so indirectly, prompting those in his circle to bring him around. The example he raised was the COVID-19 vaccine, which he refused at great personal cost.

TheBlaze previously reported that Jackson was slated to star in a comedy movie alongside Jack Black, for which he would have been paid roughly $9 million. There was one catch: he would have to get the COVID vaccine.

Jackson said on a podcast in November, "Those motherf*****s didn’t give it to me because I wouldn’t get the shot. I didn’t turn it down. ... They just wouldn’t give it to me. The COVID shot, the jab … I didn’t need it. I didn’t catch that s*** at all. Nothing. F*** them. I didn’t need that s***."

Asked by Carlson why he didn't submit to the vaccine demand, Jackson said, "I'm not real good with direct orders."

Jackson added, "It wasn't ready, you know? It was a six-month kind of rush job, and I didn't feel safe."

Carlson responded, "But they told you you were safe."

"I know what they said," said Jackson, laughing. "And I heard 'em. I heard 'em loud and clear, but it's not their decision. There's no repercussions if they're wrong, but I can get all the repercussions if they're wrong."

Jackson noted it wasn't a tough call to reject the dictates of the medical establishment, saying, "I wanted to be an example for my kids. You know, really make sure they didn't take it either. Show them that I want to stand by convictions and that I was willing, you know, to lose $9 million and more because we probably lost more since then."

The rapper indicated that he knows people injured by the vaccine who "suffer every day and it's hard to watch," adding, "suffering in silence is not the answer all the time. Sometimes you gotta let people know what's going on."

The duo agreed that "there's no penalty for lying, no one's ever punished for lying. It's only telling the truth that gets you in trouble."

— (@)

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Watch Joe Rogan's Face When RFK Jr. Tells Him These Censored Facts | Direct Message | Rubin Report

Watch Joe Rogan's Face When RFK Jr. Tells Him These Censored Facts | Direct Message | Rubin Report

Pfizer and Moderna will begin clinical trials to determine adverse heart risks from COVID-19 vaccines, such as myocarditis



The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued an emergency use authorization (EUA) for the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine on Dec. 11, 2020. A week later, the FDA issued an EUA for Moderna's COVID-19 vaccine. Now, nearly two years later, Pfizer and Moderna will launch clinical trials to track adverse health issues stemming from the COVID-19 vaccines, such as myocarditis – inflammation of the heart muscle.

Pfizer is in the infancy of beginning clinical trials to determine if there are any health risks associated with their own vaccine. In a partnership with the Pediatric Heart Network, the trial will focus on vaccine recipients who have suffered heart issues following being jabbed with the COVID-19 vaccine. The clinical trials will monitor patients for five years.

Enrollment for the study in the U.S. and Canada has not started yet. However, the research team has already identified more than 250 patients with myocarditis, according to Dr. Dongngan Truong – a pediatrician at the University of Utah Health and a co-lead on the Pfizer study.

NBC News reported on Friday, "The team will also compare the patients to a subset of patients with multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children, also known as MIS-C, which is associated with a COVID infection."

The first findings are not expected to be released until sometime next year.

Moderna will be conducting their own studies about possible side effects of the COVID vaccines in five countries with the assistance of the European Medicines Agency. The data from those studies are not expected to be released to the public until next summer.

Dr. Paul Burton – Moderna's chief medical officer – admitted that scientists are not certain as to what causes the possible heart issues from the COVID-19 vaccine.

“We don’t understand yet and there’s no good mechanism to explain it,” Burton conceded to NBC News.

Burton theorized that the spike protein in the vaccine may stimulate a negative reaction in the body that could cause inflammation in the heart.

NBC News highlighted the alarming struggles of one Michigan man who suffered major health issues after receiving a COVID vaccine.

In October 2021, Detroit native Da’Vion Miller was found unconscious in the bathroom of his home one week after receiving his first dose of Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine. Miller, who was only 22 years old at the time, experienced chest pain two days after getting vaccinated. He also suffered from fatigue, dizziness, and shortness of breath.

Miller was rushed to the Henry Ford West Bloomfield Hospital, where he was diagnosed with myocarditis and pericarditis – inflammation of the outer lining of the heart.

Miller's doctor advised him not to receive his second dose of the COVID vaccine.

In the year since being diagnosed with myocarditis, Miller is still experiencing chest pain and has been in and out of the hospital.

In July 2021, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) released a report that stated: "An elevated risk for myocarditis among mRNA COVID-19 vaccinees has been observed, particularly in males aged 12–29 years."

The report found, "Myocarditis reporting rates were 40.6 cases per million second doses of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines administered to males aged 12−29 years."

The CDC added, "Myocarditis and pericarditis have rarely been reported. When reported, the cases have especially been in adolescents and young adult males within several days after mRNA COVID-19 vaccination (Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna)."

In April, an Israeli large-population study of 196,992 unvaccinated adults who were post-COVID-19 infection were "not associated with either myocarditis or pericarditis."

"We did not observe an increased incidence of neither pericarditis nor myocarditis in adult patients recovering from COVID-19 infection," the authors wrote.

Horowitz: More VAERS-reported vaccine deaths in our military than COVID deaths



Both political parties are salivating to draw our military into the Russia-Ukraine war, but neither of them seems to care about what our own leaders have done to these soldiers.

It is now abundantly clear from numerous data points that the shots have caused unimaginable injury among the general population. Military doctors have come forward to show the enormity of this damage in the military, yet the military has chosen to cover it up and tamper with their own health surveillance data in order to conceal the magnitude of the injury. Meanwhile, new data presented in a Florida federal court on behalf of a Navy SEAL demonstrates that, at a minimum, more people died from the shot than from COVID.

On March 10, attorney Mat Staver of Liberty Counsel presented data in court showing 127 VAERS-reported COVID vaccine-related deaths in the military in 2021. That is more than the 93 reported COVID deaths in the military since the beginning of the pandemic. And keep in mind, COVID deaths tend to be overestimated, while VAERS-reported deaths, especially in the military, are underreported. Even CDC researchers recently conceded that “the actual rates of myocarditis per million doses of vaccine are likely higher than estimated” by VAERS reports.

The military VAERS data was initially discovered by Dr. Jessica Rose, a biologist and mathematician who has likely published more information on VAERS than anyone in the world. VAERS has a box to check for those in the military to select upon submission, and she counted 127 reported deaths stemming from service members in 2021.

This safety signal from the universal reporting system is the most significant evidence to date that the DMED (Defense Medical Epidemiology Data) specifically monitoring the military, as originally presented by the whistleblowers, was correct when it showed a massive surge in injuries ranging from neurological and cardio to cancers and immune disorders. According to the military, though, the 2016-2020 baseline used by the whistleblowers was plagued by a glitch just at the time these military doctors pulled the information (not before and not after!) and the numbers for those years were always as high as those in 2021. The problem is that the VAERS data, by definition, indicate that 2021 had to have experienced a surge in injuries. It’s just a question of how much. Here is the VAERS data for vaccine-related hospitalizations in 2021 compared to previous years.

Again, with VAERS being woefully underreported, especially in the military with so much pressure against speaking ill of the injections, it makes sense that the diagnosis codes in DMED would be exponentially higher. Given the unprecedented vaccine injuries that we already have seen in the civilian world, and as indicated by the VAERS death and hospitalization data, it would make sense that there was a 37% increase in military hospitalizations in 2021 over the five-year average, as presented by the whistleblowers in the court case.

Here is the data from the whistleblowers as presented by attorney Tom Renz to Senator Ron Johnson showing a 37% increase with two months of 2021 still not reported. If the numbers for November and December followed the same trajectory, it would show a 55% increase in military hospitalizations for 2021 over the five-year average.

Now, here is the data the DOD is showing after fixing the alleged “glitch,” which now reveals no baseline increase whatsoever.

If you extrapolate the numbers for a full 12-month period, it would show a 2% decrease in hospitalizations over the five-year average. So the military would have us believe that not only did the baseline degree of vaccine injury we already know occurred in the civilian world not exist in the military, but they are essentially saying that COVID itself never made an appearance! Here we have the military expelling soldiers for not getting a shot for a virus they claim, based on their “new” data, never touched the health of the service members.

Until the Florida court hearing, Pentagon officials have not publicly issued a statement of narrative on how they claim their data glitched and why only for certain convenient categories and only for a period of time. They merely offered a few on-the-record sentences to PolitiFact. Thanks to Judge Douglas Merryday’s injunction on the vaccine mandate in Navy SEAL 1 vs. Austin, we will finally obtain discovery of the facts. However, the DOD is still dragging its feet. Officials failed to send a single doctor or representative from the military to testify in court.

Meanwhile, the plaintiffs called three military flight surgeons, Lt. Col. Peter Chambers, Lt. Col. Teresa Long, and Col. (Ret.) Stewart Tankersley, to the stand to discuss their experience treating mass vaccine injury in the military. When Liberty Counsel’s Mat Staver asked Lt. Col. Long a question about the DMED, she said, “I have been ordered not to answer that question.” Judge Merryday immediately asked, “Ordered by who?” She then testified that the night before, she was told by her commanders not to testify, which is likely a violation of the Whistleblower Act and constitutes tampering with the witness. Here is the report of the hearing from Liberty Counsel:

Staver then asked Dr. Long if the information the military ordered her not to testify to was relevant and important to the court and the public. She said, “Yes.” Staver then asked, “Why?”

Dr. Long paused, held back tears, looked at the judge and said, “I have so many soldiers being destroyed by this vaccine. Not a single member of my senior command has discussed my concerns with me. ... I have nothing to gain and everything to lose by talking about it. I’m OK with that because I am watching people get absolutely destroyed.”

Dr. Long said she is inundated morning, noon and night regarding people who have been injured by taking the COVID shots. Those injured are “predominantly pilots, and pilots have to meet one of the highest fitness standards.”

She also said she is aware of at least two people who committed suicide under pressure to get the shots and threat of punishment for refusal.

Dr. Long also testified that based on the VAERS database, deaths of military members from the vaccines exceed deaths from COVID itself.

The military’s only response was to send a Word document to their lawyer (with no letterhead or signature) explaining the “glitch” in the data. However, the statement of narrative raises more questions than it answers. Officials claim that “not all DMED queries were affected by the corrupt data.” Also, the corruption was only from August 2021 to January 29, 2022. Those were the dates that they knew the flight surgeons were pulling the data. Plus, it was only for 2016-2020, an arbitrary baseline pulled by the whistleblowers. In other words, the glitch was only for the categories and for the time period that they needed it to be glitched – nothing more, nothing less!

How much longer will Congress ignore the Watergate of the military?

Pressure To Give Preschoolers Covid Shots Could Shatter Public Trust In Vaccines

It seems as if regulators consider the risk-benefit analysis less important than getting jabs into as many people’s bodies as possible.

Horowitz: 6 important COVID data points that destroy the prevailing narrative



“When you get vaccinated, you not only protect your own health, that of the family, but also you contribute to the community health by preventing the spread of the virus throughout the community. And in other words, you become a dead end to the virus.” ~Dr. Fauci, Face the Nation, May 16, 2021

“Negative efficacy.” Get used to that term, because every day more data suggests we are already in the vaccination twilight zone of all pain and no gain – just as with the lockdowns.

It is tearing humanity apart. COVID fascism is the most serious human rights threat we’ve faced in our lifetimes, and the latest science and data demonstrate that it’s all built upon a false premise. While people tuned out the news over the holiday week, many have missed the growing incontrovertible evidence that not only is there risk and zero benefit to taking any of the COVID shots, but there is actually negative efficacy against the virus. In other words, not only does it put you on the hook for known and unknown short-term and long-term injury without stopping COVID, it now actually makes you more vulnerable to COVID.

As you read these latest points, just remember that this is the injection for which police in Europe are now using dogs and batons against those protesting it. All these human rights abuses for a shot that, especially with the new variant, has become moot.

1) 96% of all Omicron cases in Germany among vaccinated: The respected Robert Koch Institute reported last week that among the 4,206 Germans infected with Omicron for whom their vaccination status was known, 95.58% were fully vaccinated. More than a quarter of them had booster shots. Given that the overall background rate for vaccination in Germany is 70%, this means that the shots now have a -87% effectiveness rate against Omicron.

Data from Robert Koch Institute shows only 4% of Omicron cases coming from the 30% of the country which is unvaccinated.\n\nIn other words, not being vaccinated has 87% efficacy against infection in Germany, using the same calculation that vaccine advocates have employed. https://twitter.com/Tim_Roehn/status/1476575806969335812\u00a0\u2026pic.twitter.com/rYLHnVNYOH
— PLC (@PLC) 1640926860

2) Omicron among vaccinated outpacing unvaccinated by 28% in Ontario: The government in Ontario posts continuous data on case rates by vaccination status. The fact that the vaccinated have rapidly overtaken the unvaccinated in new infections demonstrates a clear negative effect of the shots against Omicron.

Vaccinated 28% ahead of unvaccinated now in Ontario.pic.twitter.com/cm7PHWculu
— Covid19Crusher (@Covid19Crusher) 1640881781

3) In Denmark, 89.7% of all Omicron cases were among fully vaccinated: As of Dec. 31, just 8.5% of all cases in Denmark were unvaccinated, according to the Statens Serum Institut. Overall, 77.9% of Denmark is fully vaccinated, and Omicron seems to hit younger people for whom there is a greater unvaccinated pool, which indicates clear negative efficacy. Even for non-Omicron variants, the un-injected composed only 23.7% of the cases.

4) Just 25% of the Omicron hospitalizations in the U.K. are unvaccinated: Not only are the vaccinated more likely to contract Omicron, but they are likely more at risk to be hospitalized. While American hospitals put out unverifiable information about “nearly everyone seriously ill with COVID being unvaccinated,” the U.K. continues to put out quality continuous data that shows the opposite. According to the U.K.’s Health Security Agency’s latest “Omicron daily overview,” just 25% of those in the hospital with suspected Omicron cases are unvaccinated.


Although that is roughly in line with the percentage of unvaccinated overall in the U.K., we know that Omicron cases are overwhelmingly among younger people who have a greater share of the unvaccinated. Dr. Abdi Mahamud, the WHO’s incident manager for COVID, said last week that Omicron has not hit most of the elderly yet.

According to the latest U.K. vaccine surveillance report (p. 21), between 32% and 40% of the age groups under 40 are unvaccinated. Which means that, with a 25% hospitalization rate, the unvaccinated are very possibly underrepresented in the Omicron hospitalized population, which again indicates negative efficacy to the shots.

5) 33 of 34 hospitalizations in Delhi hospital were vaccinated: The Indian Express reported that 33 of the 34 people hospitalized for Omicron in Delhi’s Lok Nayak hospital were fully vaccinated. Two of them received the booster shot. While some of them were international travelers, it’s important to remember that India has a much lower vaccination rate than the West. This is another small indication that not only might one be more likely to get Omicron after having gotten the shots, but possibly could be more vulnerable to hospitalizations, very likely due to some form of antibody dependent disease enhancement (ADE).

6) Vaccinated exponentially more likely to get re-infected with COVID: A new preprint study from Bangladesh found that among 404 people re-infected with COVID, having been vaccinated made someone 2.45 times more likely to get re-infected with a mild infection, 16.1 times more likely to get a moderate infection, and 3.9 times more likely to be re-infected severely, relative to someone with prior infection who was not vaccinated. Although overall re-infections were rare, vaccination was a greater risk factor of re-infection that co-morbidities!


Hence, the findings of this first-in-its-kind study harmonize with what a Public Health England survey found in October; namely, that the vaccines seem to erase a degree of N (nucleocapsid) antibodies generated by prior infection in favor of narrower S (spike) antibodies. "Recent observations from UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) surveillance data that N antibody levels appear to be lower in individuals who acquire infection following 2 doses of vaccination,” stated the week 42 report from the U.K. (p. 23).

This finding also correlates with what researchers from Mount Sinai in New York and Hospital La Paz in Madrid found last year – that the second dose of the vaccine “determines a contraction of the spike-specific T cell response." In that report, researchers already observed that other research has shown "the second vaccination dose appears to exert a detrimental effect in the overall magnitude of the spike-specific humoral response in COVID-19 recovered individuals."

At this point, how is there any benefit, much less a net benefit, from the shots? There are currently 21,000 deaths reported to VAERS, along with 110,000 hospitalizations and over 1 million total adverse events. Most deaths and injuries are never reported to VAERS. Now that the efficacy is, at best, a wash and at worst negative, why are we not discussing the short-term and long-term liabilities of the shots?

Remember, the VAERS numbers don’t even begin to quantify the long-term concerns, such as cancer and auto-immune diseases. A heavily redacted analysis of the Pfizer shot (p. 16) from the Australian Therapeutic Goods Agency (TGA) flatly conceded, “Neither genotoxicity nor carcinogenicity studies were performed.”

Consider the fact that the CEO of Indiana-based life insurance company OneAmerica, which has been around since 1877, revealed last week that the death rate among 18- to 64-year-old Hoosiers is up 40% from pre-pandemic levels. That is four times above what risk assessors consider catastrophic. Yes, some of this has been due to the virus, but given the age group, OneAmerica CEO Scott Davidson said that most of the claims for deaths being filed are not classified as COVID-19 deaths. Brian Tabor, the president of the Indiana Hospital Association, who spoke at the same news conference as Davidson, said that Indiana hospitals are flooded with patients “with many different conditions.” Any wonder what those ailments are if not COVID itself?

Indeed, those who say the injections are a “medical miracle” are correct, just not in the way they meant it.