Horowitz: It’s time for candidates and politicians to boycott Pfizer’s toxic PAC donations



This is Pfizer's country. We merely live in it.

Many of us have forgotten that the impetus behind the infamous 2005 Kelo v. New London court case, in which the principle of private-use eminent domain was established for none other than Pfizer. In other words, 16 years ago, Pfizer established the principle of "your property, our choice." Now the company has established the principle of "your body, our choice." What we have witnessed the past year is that no matter how illogical, dangerous, and immoral Pfizer's mandate is on the American people, now including pushing a dangerous shot on young kids who clearly don't need to assume such risk, whatever Pfizer wants, Pfizer gets. There is a reason for it. The company has bought out the politicians in both parties.

Pfizer now has 92 lobbyists in Washington split between the two parties, not to mention high-roller PR firms to help with the (political) science. Pfizer's political action committee donated to 228 federal lawmakers at a price tag of over $4 million. Although people think of doctors and scientists when Pfizer comes to mind, the company likely has as many politicians working for it. The National Pulse found 74 known former White House staffers and staff of members and committees in Congress controlled by both parties now working for the Big Pharma god. Pfizer spent over $13 million on lobbying expenditures, not to mention buying up the airwaves to the point that news agencies cannot report a negative word about the company.

You can definitely trust these news outlets to tell you the truth about Pfizer products. https://t.co/gjTpZpRvGV

— Tyler Cardon (@TyCardon) 1634696302.0

In other words, Pfizer is now strong enough that it could blatantly poison our children with myocarditis and other known and unknown side effects – with zero absolute risk reduction of COVID – and will get away with it. Pfizer's wish is not only the government's command, but its mandate on we the people. The only way to break its impervious grip over our lives and bodies is to make it taboo for any candidate to take money from the pharma giant. Conservatives must make Republican primary candidates pledge never to take money again from Pfizer as a candidate or an incumbent.

Over three decades ago, Americans for Tax Reform created the famous no-tax pledge, barring candidates who sign the document from ever voting for a net tax increase. Such a clear and simple message resulted in the GOP essentially adhering to that one promise, despite violating every other facet of conservatism for decades. Republicans are now low-tax socialists and globalists, but until the bitter end they will all support low taxes. Perhaps it's time for a "No Pfizer Pledge" in which all candidates will swear off all money, lobbying, or meeting with this barbaric organization that now has more power than any elected entity.

Even if one is a dogmatic supporter of these shots and completely ignores all of the death, destruction, and viral enhancement they have created, nobody alive can look you in the eye and suggest that the drive to inject young children is driven by any shred of morality. Putting aside the immoral FDA policy of allowing Pfizer to control its own destiny without third-party audits, the company's own data showed zero cases of serious illness in both the trial and control groups in its study of 5- to 11-year-olds. There is zero benefit against serious illness, which is the only reason to vaccinate children, especially with an experimental and novel technology that has already caused numerous heart ailments in young boys and men. Moreover, roughly half the children already got the virus in some form, making any degree of risk from the shot unjustified, yet there is no desire to subject them to testing before the shot. How can Pfizer possibly justify emergency use for an ailment that its own trial showed caused no serious illness in any young child?

Now, let's look at the safety side. Despite unprecedented cases of myocarditis among young males, Pfizer admits on page 11 of its FDA briefing document that "the current clinical development program is too small to detect any potential risks of myocarditis associated with vaccination" and that it will take five years to "evaluate long term sequelae of post-vaccination myocarditis/pericarditis." Incidentally, despite the small sample size (p. 47), one child in the study group did develop Henoch–Schönlein purpura, an immunologically mediated inflammation of the small blood vessels.

How is it moral to turn the children into de facto animal trials? Come back to us in five years and you can get authorization for your shot. Then again, we already have the result of the immoral experimentation on teenagers from the past half-year. According to one study (Hoeg et al.), "for boys 12-15 without medical comorbidities receiving their second mRNA vaccination dose," the rate of hospitalization for myocarditis was "3.7 to 6.1 times higher than their 120-day COVID-19 hospitalization risk as of August 21, 2021." That is just from one side effect! How are the executives not in jail, the shots not suspended, and politicians not completely swearing off any relationship with these companies?

It is criminal to do a trial with such a small sample size when it will likely take a million shots to even find a supposed benefit from the vaccine while there are myocarditis incidents among males every few thousand!

WE CANNOT RISK vaccinating 5 to 11 year-olds1 in ~5,200 12 to 17 yo males in Ontario are experiencing myocarditis… https://t.co/mLlbHtCIlV

— Kelly Brown (@rubiconcapital_) 1634945008.0

Incidentally, a sample size of just two young children who happened to be mistakenly given the Pfizer COVID shot at a Walgreens in Evansville, Indiana, instead of the flu shot resulted in both of them suffering from heart conditions. While it is true that those children were given the full adult dose, the fact that we saw heart issues right away from it doesn't exactly reflect positively on the entire concoction, regardless of the dose.

The signals of likely vaccine-related deaths stemming from heart conditions in young males are jarring enough to suspend these vaccines, yet they are responding to those signals by mandating them and then pushing them on even younger children. According to an analysis by the Hart Group, excess mortality in the U.K. for 15- to 19-year-olds has spiked as much as 47% above the baseline level since May 1, right around when teens and young adults began to get vaccinated. The deaths also spiked among 20- to 29-year-olds and in both groups were dominated by males. Concomitantly, they also observed "a clear rise in ambulance cardiac and respiratory arrest calls in England and ambulance calls for people becoming unconscious starting from May 2021."

The rate of increase in excess deaths among young adults, while slightly higher at the beginning of the year because of COVID (and the likely cascading effects of depression, isolation, and drugs), seemed to skyrocket during the spring and summer when younger adults were mass vaccinated. This is the trend in both Europe and the U.S.

⚰️ Excess Deaths ⚰️Euromomo: 🇪🇺🇬🇧🇨🇭🇳🇴🇮🇱🇺🇦👨👩 Younger Adults 👩👨Why the excess ⚰️ in these countries in 2021? 🤔… https://t.co/9hGqQM6iFv

— Miss Conceptions (@MConceptions) 1634898392.0

Excess mortality in young adults in Europe and the USA.Something really wrong is going on in 2021 vs 2020. https://t.co/oKcMooL4fC

— Covid19Crusher (@Covid19Crusher) 1635068478.0

Again, we are talking about a group of people who, to begin with, are at extremely low risk from this virus, putting aside the fact that there are much safer treatments that don't cause blood clotting and heart disorders.

Not surprisingly, sales for Pfizer's drug for treating myocarditis, Vyndamax, are up 77%.

Sales of Pfizer drug for myocarditis treatment, Vyndamax, are up 77% in the US. strong cross sell strategy, dest… https://t.co/fI7EVlgcZ1

— Real Developments (@pdubdev) 1635112292.0

It is simply criminal for Pfizer to be pushing this shot on children, and it is shameful for any politician to be associated with the company. Even with just 1% of adverse events being reported to VAERS, there are currently a total of 818,044 adverse events , including 117,399 reports of serious injuries and 17,128 reports of deaths from all of the COVID vaccines together.

Evidently, Pfizer believes in the adage of Karl Marx, "The last capitalist we hang shall be the one who sold us the rope." But it doesn't have to be this way. Not if there is at least one political party not bought out by this truly evil empire. Any takers?

Horowitz: The medical field's immoral war on children



"The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment." —Nuremberg Code

Wanted: a pediatrician who actually believes in science and not child abuse.

My children are months overdue for their checkups because they are distraught about having to wear masks. The baby, who doesn't yet have to cover her breathing orifices, was traumatized at her recent visit by seeing everyone dressed like a mummy. How can it be that the doctors responsible most for the health of children can't read simple data and studies showing clearly that children are more at risk from the trauma of the response to COVID than from the virus?

Scientists from University College London and the Universities of York, Bristol, and Liverpool studied the data from all pediatric COVID-19 infections in the U.K. and found that just 25 children under 18 likely died from the virus in a country with over 12 million children. Only six of those children had no known serious underlying conditions, although the authors caution that they could not confirm that all of them were indeed healthy. The rest of the fatalities were among those with the sorts of conditions that cause people to die every year from other endemic respiratory viruses for which we never disrupt society or force masking and experimental injections.

"During the same time period studied there were 124 deaths from suicide and 268 deaths from trauma, emphasizing COVID-19 is rarely fatal in CYP," concluded the U.K. scientists.

According to this data, healthy children under 18 have a 1 in 2 million chance of dying of COVID in the U.K. over the course of a year. According to the CDC, in the U.S., every person has a 1 in 500,000 chance of being struck by lightening in a given year. In other words, there is more math and science behind destroying the lives of children and forcing them to wear a protective suit or stay inside for a year because of lightening than because of COVID.

The forced masking and vaccination of children is likely the biggest scandal of all time. For pediatrician offices to continue focusing their regulations on COVID when every other ailment is a bigger threat to children is global malpractice that will leave an indelible stain on a profession that now follows voodoo rituals over science. There is simply no way a pediatrician can possibly think it's humane to pressure children to get the experimental injections, even if the risk factors are as low as they believe.

Even if we are to trust Pfizer's own trial data (p. 27) and allow the foxes of profit from guarding the academic henhouse, there is a 1 in 333 risk for a serious adverse event (SAE) from the vaccine. Pfizer's trial resulted in 5 SAEs out of 1,127 12- to 15-year-olds in the vaccine group, as opposed to 1 in the 1,127 of the placebo group. That was the number of serious adverse events in just 30 days. If this excess absolute risk of 0.003 (0.3%) for SAEs holds up, that means for every 333 children 12-15 years old who are vaccinated, there would be one serious adverse event.

So, let's assume that somehow the vaccine is 100% effective in stopping the one in 2 million pediatric deaths. On the way to that 2 million pediatric vaccination number, over 6,000 children would suffer serious adverse effects, including life-altering disabilities and deaths. But that is from Pfizer's untrustworthy data. A detailed analysis from Israel's Hadassah Medical Center found that the rate of just one serious side effect – myocarditis – was as high as 1 in every 3,000-6,000 among young men.

The cruel irony is that most of the children in the trial did develop mild side effects. Within a few days after the second injunction, 66% of the 12- to 15-year-olds developed fatigue, 65% developed headaches, and 42% developed chills. This is the upper bounds of serious illness that children would get from the virus itself, assuming they are even symptomatic. Worse, 13% developed moderate or serious muscle pain, a much greater share than those who develop it from the virus. Thus, they have swapped out a front-loaded guarantee of afflicting children with these symptoms for a chance of perhaps avoiding those same symptoms for some, while creating an exponentially greater chance of serious, immutable side effects. Yet they have now taken their show down the road to get approval for injections for those younger than 12!

Another important finding of this British study is that initial estimates of pediatric COVID deaths were overestimated by 61%. If we were to extrapolate that number to the U.S., it would mean there were only 133 COVID deaths (out of 331 reported), which fits in proportionately given that the U.K. is one-fifth the population of the U.S. and reported 25 pediatric deaths. This would mean that fewer kids died of COVID than in almost every flu season this past decade.

Pediatric Flu/COVID comp https://t.co/Tz69zFQWoK

— Phil Kerpen (@kerpen) 1625766117.0

Yet the CDC is shockingly requiring children who don't get the experimental shots to wear masks all day in school this fall. Mind you, children are far more protected unvaccinated than adults are with a vaccine, even assuming it's 97% effective.

Reminder: Even if vaccines are 97% effective, mortality risk for *unvaccinated* children is lower than vaccinated a… https://t.co/JKYLg7aZJT

— Phil Kerpen (@kerpen) 1625845289.0

Once we have proven mathematically that the medical "experts" are lying to us about the threat of COVID to children, there is no reason to believe they are not lying about every other premise of the virus: treatment, non-pharmaceutical interventions, and vaccines. Why aren't the state legislatures in red states holding hearings and auditing everything their respective state departments of health are doing about COVID and revisiting those policies? Everything that is being done regarding treatment, vaccines, natural immunity, and most certainly children is based on false science and needs an immediate course correction.

At a minimum, state legislatures should ban all doctors and other venues from ever masking children and immediately cease and desist from marketing the experimental vaccines. Until children can see a doctor while breathing properly, there is not a single state that is truly free of COVID fascism.

Horowitz: CDC admits to heart problems among young vaccinated. Solution? More vaccination!



When in the history of vaccines have we seen the CDC put out information showing that young males who get a specific shot temporarily approved by the FDA are up to 200 times more likely to suffer from heart inflammation as a side effect? As crazy as that outcome is, even zanier is that even after these revelations, nothing is being done to prevent colleges from forcing young adults to assume such risk for a virus that poses no statistically significant clinical danger to them.

Yesterday, the CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices finally held its emergency meeting to discuss the emerging evidence of myocarditis cases among newly vaccinated teens and young adults. The group conceded that there is a "likely association" between vaccination of young people, particularly males, and myocarditis.

"Clinical presentation of myocarditis cases following vaccination has been distinct, occurring most often within one week after dose two, with chest pain as the most common presentation," said Dr. Grace Lee, who chairs the committee's safety group.

ACIP published an updated presentation showing striking data from the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System indicating an elevated risk among people under 30 years old — the very people who are not susceptible to serious illness from COVID. The data for 18- to 24-year-old males showed as much as a 200-fold increase in myocarditis cases within seven days of the second dose over the background rate of everyday myocarditis occurrence.

I expected to see a follow-up statement with the CDC recommending the FDA pull authorization for the vaccine among younger people, not to mention a cease-and-desist notice to all private and public entities forcing teens to get vaccinated for a summer job or entry into college. Instead … crickets!

The government establishment is needlessly imposing an experimental mRNA vaccine on people who are not threatened by the virus. Also, this is just one side effect we are now observing from data that is likely under-reported due to the cumbersome process (and threat of prosecution for falsification) doctors must navigate to report adverse events.

When have we ever done something like this in all our medical history? Typically, a novel vaccine this experimental that has already proven to come with side effects would be pulled from the market by a mile. Yet it is still being forced down the throats of youngsters through endless taxpayer-funded marketing and even coercion.

In fact, not only was ACIP silent on the call to action that should have been engendered by its findings, it continues to recommend use of the vaccine even for those who get myocarditis after the first dose!

This is insane. @CDCgov ACIP is suggesting if a kid has heart injury from dose 1 of #CovidVaccine go ahead and cons… https://t.co/5RnGLhsdPI

— Philip Holloway 😊 (@PhilHollowayEsq) 1624471022.0

They note the doctor should "consider proceeding" with the second dose of the shot, even after a patient suffers myocarditis from the first shot, so long as the heart has recovered!

But again, for what? To what end? How could something like a cold for young adults justify such risk we never assume in any other experimental product?

Because the "system" demands it.

Just consider the fact that on Monday, a number of internet sleuths helped publicize guidance from the WHO that children under 18 are not recommended to get the vaccine. That guidance had been on the website for several months, but the minute it was made famous, the WHO modified the language:

Here's the "before" & "after" on the WHO's recommendation re: vaccinating children against C19."Before" today's r… https://t.co/EgviRnstd5

— Emma Woodhouse 😁 (@EWoodhouse7) 1624404180.0

The WHO underwent a similar flip on asymptomatic transmission and mask-wearing after its initial non-political guidance was publicized. In May 2020, the WHO said that asymptomatic spread was "very rare." Then, like any time a major scientific figure reveals the truth, the WHO suddenly recanted that position when the media raised a howl. But the "experts" never explained where the evidence exists to show major community spread through asymptomatic individuals. However, the subsequent research all backed up the original scientifically grounded assertion before the political science kicked in.

Likewise, with regard to universal masking, the WHO initially advised against healthy people wearing masks in a community setting, even going so far as to call it a "false sense of security."

"The wide use of masks by healthy people in the community setting is not supported by current evidence and carries uncertainties and critical risks," wrote the WHO in the April 6, 2020, guidance. On June 5, it reiterated that there is no evidence to suggest masks help, but reversed course anyway due to political pressure. Despite its warning countries to do further research, especially with children wearing masks, not a single randomized controlled trial has shown masks to work in the ensuing months, yet the policy was never changed, just as with asymptomatic spread and vaccine side effects.

The questions everyone must ask: If they are willing to lie to us on these questions, how can we take anything else about the virus and vaccines for granted? For example, who is to say there are no long-term concerns about health risks from this vaccine given that there were never any long-term trials conducted before essentially making this vaccine mandatory in many aspects of the workplace and culture?

The advisory panel shockingly concluded that the benefits of receiving a shot still "clearly outweigh" the risks. However, we already know that unvaccinated children are still less at risk than vaccinated young adults and 100 times less at risk than vaccinated 75+-year-olds! And that doesn't account for the fact that the CDC's own data show that 45% of the small number of hospitalizations blamed on COVID were likely incidental and really driven by other ailments. Plus, as of March, over 40% of those ages 4-49 were already infected. Not only does that fact make vaccination 100% risk and zero benefit, there are several studies that show those already previously infected have more common and severe reactions to the vaccine.

The only possible way to understand the benefit of experimenting on children outweighing the risks is if you are getting rich off turning a generation of children into lab rats.

Horowitz: As the CDC rushes to experiment on children, its own data show K-12 likely have herd immunity



Nearly 42% of Americans ages 5-17 — roughly overlapping with the ages of K-12 schoolchildren — have already been infected with SARS-CoV-2, according to CDC's best estimate. That observation, culled from CDC's "Estimated rates of COVID-19 disease outcomes, per 100,000" by my friend Phil Kerpen, has earth-shattering implications that refute the premise behind the CDC's continued panic over children and COVID, as well as the rush to vaccinate them despite the unknown risks.

The CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices planned to hold an emergency meeting on Friday to discuss the emerging evidence of myocarditis cases among newly vaccinated teens and young adults. However, the "emergency" had to be pushed off by the retroactive holiday of "Juneteenth," itself celebrated on Saturday. In the meantime, it's totally fine to continue to vaccinating teens — in many places, requiring it — without further study, despite the fact that they likely have already achieved herd immunity. This comes even as the World Health Organization has taken the position that "Children should not be vaccinated for the moment."

We've already known that this virus is less of a threat to children than the flu. However, the latest data from the CDC show that even this mild virus (for children) is already in the rearview mirror, making the entire debate over current policy moot.

About 42% of the K-12 population had already recovered from COVID by the end of March, per CDC best estimate. That… https://t.co/tAzGAFgDNH

— Phil Kerpen (@kerpen) 1623982847.0

The CDC's best estimate of infections per 100,000 by the end of March is that 5- to 17-year-olds have had the highest rate of infection per 100,000. If you do the math, that adds up to 41.532%. This is earth-shattering for several reasons.

We know from most places in the country, including the Los Angeles area, that the virus essentially became extinct when they reached the 40% infection mark. The virus seemed to wane in almost every part of the country when serology tests showed about 40% with antibodies, and if the CDC is estimating that school-age children had an even slightly higher rate, it means they are certainly immune without the vaccine. In other words, not only is the virus not serious enough to experiment with a new vaccine for children, it has likely passed.

Moreover, if 42% of school-age children have already gotten the virus, despite the child abuse regimen of masking, isolation, and testing we've foisted upon them, what does that tell you about the efficacy of those voodoo "non-pharmaceutical interventions"? Many local governments are requiring children to wear masks until they get vaccinated, but clearly masks have not prevented the inevitable.

It was clear from day one that the virus had long spread throughout the country before we even recognized it. The CDC's own research on mitigating the spread of flu indicates that "the effectiveness of pandemic mitigation strategies will erode rapidly as the cumulative illness rate prior to implementation climbs above 1 percent of the population in an affected area."

Last week, the Wall Street Journal reported that "a National Institutes of Health research program identified seven people in states from Mississippi to Wisconsin to Pennsylvania who were infected with the new virus days or weeks before the first cases were confirmed in their areas." Thus, even if these mitigation strategies somehow work under the right circumstances, in the U.S., those horses already left the barn. Yet, here we are with over 40% already infected and we are still acting as if non-pharmaceutical interventions can prevent the spread.

Sadly, while children have already achieved herd immunity to this inconsequential virus, the mental health problems, as well as side effects from the experimental mRNA shots, will continue indefinitely. Newton-Wellesley Hospital in Newton, Massachusetts, is reporting an 80% increase in mental health-related pediatric visits to its emergency department this past year and three times the number of 8- to 18-year-old patient admissions for suicide attempts.

There is no herd immunity threshold for this problem because the senseless child abuse is continuing. My son recently ran across boys on a playground wearing masks outside in Maryland's oppressively humid climate. When he told them they don't have to wear them, they were shocked. Clearly, the parents couldn't care less about their own children, and it's all coming from the government and the media.

Now, ignorant parents are being led by a maleficent government to expand the mask abuse to experimental gene therapy. Just consider the insanity of requiring vaccines for children. According to the latest data from the CDC's VEARS, a 12- to 15-year-old male is eight times more likely to suffer from myocarditis after the second Pfizer shot than from the virus itself.

1/ Per VAERS update today, & CDC’s Covid Net via data analyst @JeanRees10: At PRESENT, “Hospitalization for myocar… https://t.co/noYCLkYSTt

— Andrew Bostom, MD, MS (@andrewbostom) 1624032284.0

According to VEARS, there are now more reported cases of chest pain resulting from the new COVID shots in just six months than from all other vaccines combined for all years.

@Autumnlilyx1 For "chest pain" (the other main presenting symptom of myocarditis) the figures are:All vaccines ev… https://t.co/RZIpdiE97n

— Jonathan Engler 🌸 (@jengleruk) 1624272187.0

To paraphrase John Kerry on the Vietnam War, how can you ask a child to be the last child to die for a lie?