Meat the enemy: How protein became the left's newest microaggression



It's official: Protein has entered the culture war.

We would die if we did not eat protein. But apparently the macronutrient is now “right-coded.”

Eating protein is now a political act — a meat-powered microaggression. Of course, this is absurd.

In a Vanity Fair article on America's "obsession" with protein — a think piece that reads like a political manifesto from a gender studies seminar — the growing interest in protein-maxing has nothing to do with health or science.

No, it's the fault of the "manosphere," podcast bros like Joe Rogan and Dr. Peter Attia, and apparently the ghost of Donald Trump lurking in your protein powder.

Who's to blame for this "obsession"? MAGA, of course.

Feminism strikes again

Tackling every serious topic from 19th-century meat supplements to Rogan's tequila-fueled pizza fantasies, the article strings together a bizarre thesis: that American men are obsessed with protein at the expense of women.

The article quotes Harvard Medical School professor Peter Cohen, who asserts that the obsession with protein is about the "manosphere," "manomania," and testosterone. The writer, Keziah Weir, even claims that the "intertwinement of masculinity and red meat ... is strong and deep-seated," arguing that red meat consumption is associated with perceptions of masculinity. The obsession, she claims, "affords a masculine-coded cover on the feminine-coded world of body image and dieting."

Somehow, Weir even connects protein consumption to eating disorders — and the rise of Donald Trump.

“By 2015,” Weir writes, “psychologists were finding that the overconsumption of protein among men could constitute an eating disorder. Was it correlation, coincidence, or some lean-meat canary in the proverbial coal mine that it was into this proteinous landscape that Donald Trump — burger loving, locker room talking, and all — announced his bid for the presidency?”

It's not bro science

If you waste five minutes of your life reading Weir’s article (like I did), you would conclude that eating protein is now a political act — a meat-powered microaggression.

Of course, this is absurd.

In an act of defiant journalistic malpractice, Weir never seriously considers why people are "obsessed" with protein-maxing, but the answer is obvious: because they want to be healthy.

Protein is not only essential for life, but we need to eat a lot of it to optimize our health and vitality. Protein is critical for immune function, hormone production, and building and repairing lean body tissue. High protein consumption aids in burning fat and preserving lean muscle mass, which is especially important for older people.

That's not “bro science” — it's just science.

The rise of MAHA

Weir, moreover, doesn't ask or answer a key question: Why are more Americans concerned about their health, as the protein craze suggests?

The United States is, after all, undergoing a renaissance of health consciousness, which the Make America Healthy Again movement underscores. I believe this is happening for two reasons.

First, despite being the wealthiest nation in the existence of creation, Americans are fatter and sicker than ever before, increasing our dependence on Big Pharma and the health care industrial complex. We spend more on health care than other developed nations, we have the best quality of care of any country, and yet our health outcomes are worse. Second, the failures of the "experts" during the COVID-19 pandemic woke up millions of Americans to the importance of becoming healthy, maintaining a healthy lifestyle, and not depending on the "experts" to ensure their health.

Protein-maxing, then, is about Americans finally taking their health into their own hands. Good.

In my own life, I entered my 20s extremely unhealthy. I didn't exercise and I ate the standard American diet. I was 60-70 pounds overweight and taking medication for high blood pressure at age 22.

But then I took my health into my own hands.

I'm now 29 and not overweight. I maintain a strict training regime that includes resistance and cardiovascular training. I try to eat as much protein as possible: 170-200 grams from high-quality sources every day. I don't do this because of my political views, but because I know from experience that it's critical to my health, both in keeping off fat and maintaining the lean muscle mass that I have worked hard to accumulate.

Millions of other Americans could recite this same story about their lives, and it's telling that Weir doesn't interact with this perspective or, for that matter, any idea that contradicts her thesis.

What's really going on

The goal of Vanity Fair’s absurd article is not to promote health. Its real aim is to pathologize men who prioritize their health, listen to podcasts, and — God forbid — lift weights.

But here's the truth: Eating protein isn't a political statement, nor is protein the idol of toxic masculinity, nor is it a gateway drug to the "manosphere." Protein is food, and it helps everyone — men and women — build stronger, healthier bodies.

Don't be like Vanity Fair. Eat more protein.

Dem lawmaker says minority group voted for Trump because of 'slave mentality'



Democratic Rep. Jasmine Crockett of Texas suggested that Hispanic Americans who voted for President-elect Donald Trump did so because they have a "slave mentality."

Trump's landslide victory was aided by the historic turnout for the Republican candidate from minority voters who have historically voted blue. Although voters across the board said they preferred Trump over Vice President Kamala Harris because of economic and immigration policy, Crockett chalked it up to minorities' "slave mentality" and "misogyny."

'It almost reminds me of what people would talk about when they would talk about kind of like "slave mentality" and the hate that some slaves would have for themselves.'

In 2016, former Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton won by 50 points among college-educated minority voters and by 56 points among minorities without a college degree. President Joe Biden's numbers were slightly worse in 2020, winning among college-educated minorities by 43 points and non-college-educated minorities by 46 points. This trend came to a head in 2024 with Harris, who managed to secure the college-educated minority vote by only 35 points and the non-college-educated minority vote by only 32 points.

"That is my distilled summary of what happens within the Latino community," Crockett said in a Friday interview with Vanity Fair. "I've not run into that with the Asian community. I've not run into that with the African community. I've not run into that with the Caribbean community. I've only run into it with Hispanics."

"It almost reminds me of what people would talk about when they would talk about kind of like 'slave mentality' and the hate that some slaves would have for themselves," Crockett continued. "It's almost like a slave mentality that they have. It is wild to me when I hear how anti-immigrant they are as immigrants, many of them. I'm talking about people that literally just got here and can barely vote that are having this kind of attitude."

Crockett also attributed Harris' loss among black male voters to misogyny, not policy.

“I will tell you that black people historically have been fiercely loyal," Crockett said. "That’s why you still see the [turnout] numbers that you see coming out for black folks, even though there was a bit of flaking. And that bit of flaking came from black men, which I’m going to chalk up to misogyny."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Unsealed docs seem to include claim that Clinton 'threatened' Vanity Fair not to write Epstein sex-trafficking articles



After some Jeffrey Epstein-related documents were unsealed on Wednesday, a new batch of documents was unsealed on Thursday, including an email — which appears to be from Epstein accuser Virginia Giuffre — that seems to claim former President Bill Clinton "threatened" Vanity Fair not to do sex-trafficking pieces regarding Epstein.

"When i was doing some research into VF yesterday, it does concern me what they could want to write about me considering that B.Clinton walked into VF and threatened them not to write sex-trafficing articles about his good friend J.E.," the email reads. While the email's "From" line indicates that it is from "Virginia Giuffre," the note appears to be signed "xoxoxoxo Jenna."

Former Vanity Fair editor Graydon Carter told the Telegraph, "This categorically did not happen."

The unsealed documents stem from a 2015 lawsuit lodged by Giuffre, which Giuffre and Ghislaine Maxwell settled in 2017, according to CNN. The outlet noted that Maxwell was found guilty of sex trafficking in 2021 but that her attorneys had said in a statement, "She has consistently and vehemently maintained her innocence."

Epstein died in jail in 2019 in what was ruled a suicide. He had been facing sex-trafficking charges.

Among the materials unsealed on Wednesday was a 2016 deposition in which Epstein accuser Johanna Sjoberg had been asked whether Epstein ever spoke to her about Bill Clinton. "He said one time that Clinton likes them young, referring to girls," Sjoberg responded.

A Clinton spokesperson claimed in a 2019 statement that the former president "knows nothing about the terrible crimes Jeffrey Epstein pleaded guilty to in Florida some years ago, or those with which he has been recently charged in New York."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!