The Hottest Thing About J.D. Vance Is His Expression Of Masculinity
What women are cognitively reducing to Vance being hot is his ability to be not only strong and decisive but also benevolent and reasonable.
Tuesday’s debate was undoubtedly one of the best vice presidential performances America's ever seen — but not on the Democrats' end.
“Defending Donald Trump’s policy proposals better than Donald Trump himself,” Allie Beth Stuckey says of Republican vice presidential candidate JD Vance, adding, “It was a master class. It was honestly beautiful.”
While Stuckey notes that Walz “didn’t do bad,” he revealed some “serious weaknesses” in the debate.
“The first weakness that I saw was actually at the very top of the debate in just his demeanor,” she says. “I immediately noticed how nervous he looked.”
“This is going to be gross, and I don’t like to be gross, but he had this dry mouth spit thing going on, and I know this sounds superficial,” she continues, “This kind of thing actually, it matters. The optics matter. How someone looks actually matters onscreen. And I was like, 'If he’s got that spit thing going on the whole time, they’re going to lose the election.' No joke.”
Walz also called himself a “knucklehead” who “talks a lot” when he was pressed on his lie that he attended the violent Tiananmen Square protests of 1989.
And he then repeated another lie regarding immigration.
“Walz repeated this lie that the Senate border bill that was put forward last year would have secured the border, and Donald Trump called up some friends in Congress and told them to vote against it,” Stuckey says.
“That’s because it was an awful bill. That’s why Republicans voted against it. It didn’t actually secure the border,” she continues, noting that the bill “allowed 5,000 illegal crossings per day before closing the border.”
“So, it basically said, you had to hit that threshold of 5,000 illegal crossings before they would secure the border at all,” Stuckey explains before recalling Walz’s claim that Jesus would have been pro-immigration.
“I don’t talk about my faith a lot, but Matthew 25:40 talks about ‘to the least amongst us, you do unto me.’ I think that’s true of most Americans. They simply want order to it. This bill does it. It’s funded, it’s supported by the people who do it, and it lets us keep our dignity about how we treat other people,” Walz claimed on the debate stage.
Stuckey couldn’t disagree more.
“The bill doesn’t do that at all,” she says. “Also, that’s not what Jesus is talking about there, I promise you that when Jesus is referencing ‘the least of these,’ he’s not talking about the illegal aliens that were just arrested for raping minors in Nantucket.”
“He’s not even talking about the world’s poor. He is talking about persecuted Christians,” she adds.
To enjoy more of Allie’s upbeat and in-depth coverage of culture, news, and theology from a Christian, conservative perspective, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.
The one and only vice presidential debate on Tuesday went better than conservatives expected — and JD Vance walked away with their utmost respect.
Dinesh D’Souza is one of those conservatives, and in his eyes, it’s a no-brainer which of the two VP picks can claim victory.
“The problem with Walz, you know, to some degree, there are elements of him that are charming, and that have a certain folksy quality, but he’s so over the top that at least from my sensibility, he borders on the ridiculous. And there’s an element of insincerity, fakery, putting it on, and Kamala is like that, too,” D’Souza tells Jill Savage and Matthew Peterson of “Blaze News Tonight.”
Meanwhile, Trump and Vance appear “both real and authentic.”
Savage agrees, and points out that in addition, Walz has made pro-censorship comments in the past.
“We know from a comment that he made back in 2022, he said, ‘There’s no guarantee for free speech when it comes to misinformation.’ Now, you combine that with an apology from Mark Zuckerberg saying, ‘Oh, I’m sorry that we worked with the White House in censoring so many Americans,’” Savage says.
Walz “tried to get out of it” when it was brought up in Tuesday’s debate by invoking the “shouting fire in a crowded theater” line.
“The truth of it is that the stuff they censor has nothing to do with shouting fire in a crowded theater. It has to do with people pushing back against the CDC,” D’Souza says. “They’re censoring people who are fighting back against government-sponsored misinformation, and at no point did Walz even begin to defend that.”
To enjoy more provocative opinions, expert analysis, and breaking stories you won’t see anywhere else, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.
Tim Walz may have lied about going to war — but after JD Vance’s performance at the vice presidential debate, he finally has a true combat story to tell.
“Tim Walz was fidgeting and a little confused about things; he was extremely nervous right up front. Did kind of hit his stride, I would say, a bit after that,” Dave Rubin of “The Rubin Report” comments.
While Rubin notes that “the moderators were not horrific” and the debate wasn’t as bad as “the last three-on-one that we saw,” it “was clear that they’re just Democrat activists.”
But that didn’t stop moderator Margaret Brennan from calling out Walz’s absurd lie about attending the famous Tiananmen Square protest in Hong Kong, China.
“You said you were in Hong Kong during the deadly Tiananmen Square protest in the spring of 1989, but Minnesota Public Radio and other media outlets are reporting that you actually didn’t travel to Asia until August of that year. Can you explain that discrepancy?” Brennan asked Walz.
Walz’s answer did not help his case.
“I grew up in small rural Nebraska,” he began, before explaining that he was passionate about teaching and got “the opportunity in the summer of ‘89 to travel to China.”
“I’ve not been perfect, and I’m a knucklehead at times, but it’s always been about that,” Walz continued. “I will talk a lot, I will get caught up in the rhetoric, but being there, the impact it made, the difference in my life. I learned a lot about China.”
“Governor, just to follow up on that, the question was ‘Can you explain the discrepancy?’” Brennan asked again, interrupting Walz’s rant.
“All's I said on that was, is, I got there that summer and misspoke on this, so, I will just, that’s what I’ve said. So I was in Hong Kong and China during the democracy protest, went in, and from that I learned a lot of what needed to be in governance,” Walz answered.
Rubin can’t believe it.
“It’s like why do these people lie about everything? Why do they lie about things that are so easily debunked?” he asks.
To enjoy more honest conversations, free speech, and big ideas with Dave Rubin, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.
The one and only vice presidential debate was one for the books — and JD Vance was clearly in peak form.
“I think I just officially met the best vice presidential candidate of my lifetime,” Glenn Beck of “The Glenn Beck Program” gushes to the BlazeTV panel. “I can’t think of a vice president that has impressed me in a debate more than him.”
“This guy is, I believe, ready to be president. He shows that Donald Trump is not planning on staying king forever, because Donald Trump didn’t pick a sycophant,” he continues. “He picked a successor.”
And since the Democrat Party went all out telling voters that Vance is a “weird” guy, voters were likely shocked to see that he isn’t the caricature they’ve been sold.
“I kept coming back to the idea of putting myself in the mold of an MSNBC viewer who has just heard this guy’s like humping couches and some weirdo,” Stu Burguiere says. “Imagine seeing that guy, like, that is totally not the impression you’d get at all. If you have an open mind at all, I don’t think there’s any way you can think Tim Walz won that debate.”
Sara Gonzales was also astounded at Vance’s incredible performance.
“It’s going to be very hard for them to continue with this rhetoric that he is some far-right-wing radical, that he is ‘Oh, Project 2025, he’s a part of it, him and Donald Trump are going to destroy the country.’ He was a very reasonable person,” she tells the panel, who are all in agreement.
“I thought that was the best apologetic for Donald Trump’s candidacy, record, policies, ideas, the American people have ever heard from anybody,” Steve Deace says. “If the former president is smart, that will be the last word, and he will not attempt to finish the job.”
“Let that be the last word the American people hear,” he adds.
To enjoy more of Glenn’s masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis, and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.