Alex Jones tells Tucker Carlson who the real culprit behind anti-white racism is



Alex Jones, who was just reinstated on X after being censored, recently joined Tucker Carlson on “Tucker on X” to discuss the neo-racism that’s become such a culture war in our modern day.

Dave Rubin plays the clip of their brutally honest conversation.

The race-based system “is a very effective system,” Jones told Tucker.

“But why do people put up with that?” asked Tucker, referencing the way only white people are expected to dismiss racism when it’s targeted at them.

“I mean, like, if they were doing that to Malaysians or Filipinos or Hondourans, I would say you can’t do that; you’re not allowed to attack people on the basis of their race … not in a country like this because the country will fall apart and it’s immoral,” he continued.

“The reason they’ve done it is most of the enforcers of this” (anti-white racism) “are white, liberal women … and their cucked husbands,” Jones explained.

“Fair!” laughed Tucker.

“So if you get around these white liberals, they live in the whitest areas” that are “totally scary to anyone with brown skin,” but “they virtue-signal constantly and then say, ‘Yes, the white people are bad,”’ Jones continued.

To hear Dave’s thorough breakdown of what a “cucked” husband is and why Jones’ position on anti-white racism has merit, watch the clip below.


Want more from Dave Rubin?

To enjoy more honest conversations, free speech, and big ideas with Dave Rubin, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Fowl play: American Ornithological Society announces it’s renaming birds to avoid being racist



What’s considered “racist” seems to be an ever-expanding list. Apparently, that list now includes birds. Yes, birds – the avian creatures with beaks and feathered wings.

Citing an NPR article titled, “These American birds and dozens more will be renamed to remove human monikers,” Stu Burguiere reads:

“Get ready to say goodbye to a lot of familiar bird names, like Anna’s hummingbird, Gambel’s quail, Lewis’s woodpecker, Bewick’s wren, Bullock’s oriole, and more. That’s because the American Ornithological Society has vowed to change the English names of all bird species currently named after people, along with any other bird names deemed offensive or exclusionary. The move comes as part of a broader effort to diversify birding and make it more welcoming to people of all races and backgrounds.”

It’s one thing to reconsider bird names that were coined by John James Audubon, for example, who admittedly “said some bad things,” says Stu.

However, they’re renaming “birds that were named after people that they don't think said anything wrong” because “they're worried that at some point, someone might say that something bad came from these people, so they're wiping out all the names right now,” he explains.

Additionally, “they don’t want the names to sound … too European because that’s exclusionary to other people, who might be like, ‘I was going to get into birding because I've always wanted to take binoculars and look around for birds, but then I heard a European name, so I stopped myself,’” mocks Stu. “There's so many people going through that mental process right now.”

The article also references biologist Erica Nol, who was apparently visiting some salt marshes when she came across a bird called a Wilson’s snipe.

Nol thought to herself, “What a terrible name. … Wilson was the father of modern ornithology in North America, but this bird has so many other evocative characteristics.”

Translation: “That’s a crappy name because … his name sounds too European,” says Stu.

“You’d think you’d want the bird named after the guy who's the founding father of modern ornithology, but apparently no, because he was too white. Whitey does not get a name for a bird,” laughs Stu at the utter absurdity of what’s clearly just another example of virtue-signaling.


Want more from Stu?

To enjoy more of Stu's lethal wit, wisdom, and mockery, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

How Wokeness Puts Its Defenders In A Chokehold — And How To Help Them Out

Since Oct. 7, leftists are finally waking up to see how their cause discards allies so easily and abandons moral axioms so callously.

Drew Barrymore's now-deleted, crying apology video is just more virtue signaling



Hollywood sweetheart Drew Barrymore has joined the ranks of the canceled.

Despite the ongoing Writers Guild of America strike, which began in May, the actress and talk show host was planning to return to screening her show, “The Drew Barrymore Show.”

While she initially claimed her show complied with strike rules, she was met with huge backlash from social media users who suggested she was not standing in solidarity with the cause.

Now, Barrymore has issued a tearful, selfie apology.

“This is bigger than me, and there are other people’s jobs on the line,” Barrymore told the camera through tears. “I deeply apologize to writers. I deeply apologize to unions. I deeply apologize.”

“I wanted to own a decision so that it wasn’t a PR protected situation and I would just take full responsibility for my actions,” she said. “I know there’s just nothing I can do that will make this okay for those it is not okay with.”

Dave Rubin thinks it’s completely ridiculous.

“Do you see how insane this is? She did what she thought was right, right? She did what she thought was right for herself or the other people on her shows,” Rubin says.

“It’s all these other people who want to go back to work, but then, ‘I have to deeply apologize.’ It’s one thing to say, 'I deeply apologize to the writers,' right?” he continues, noting that her apology to the unions sounds like something a sellout would say.

“All right, lady, they’re gonna hate you no matter what you do,” he adds.


Want more from Dave Rubin?

To enjoy more honest conversations, free speech, and big ideas with Dave Rubin, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

Skittles Panders To Black Americans While Selling Them Prepackaged Diabetes

Corporations selling harmful food products have chimed in to demonstrate their faux morality and obsession with the plight of black America.

I’ve Had It With The Compulsive Virtue Signaling On The ‘I’ve Had It’ Podcast

The 'I've Had It' podcast went from airing petty, lighthearted grievances to venting a seething hatred of conservatives.

Wayne Brady from 'Whose Line Is It Anyway?' comes out as PANSEXUAL



Many will fondly recall the improvisational comedy series “Whose Line Is It Anyway?” featuring Ryan Stiles, Colin Mochrie, Drew Carey, and Wayne Brady, who recently came out as pansexual.

We’ll give credit where credit is due – Brady is a very talented improv comedian. However, this sudden pledgeship to the Alphabet Mafia reeks of virtue-signaling.

“I advocate mental health for all, and a part of that is self-transparency,” Brady said. “I want to be free to love whomever I want; this truth makes me pan and part of the LGBTQ+ family.”

“You don’t have to make some statement about what you are,” says Stu Burguiere. “You are free to love whoever you want, like it’s 2023.”

“We’d like to just yawn when you tell us this crap. Instead we’re supposed to cherish it or something,” he adds.

For those who have a hard time wrapping their heads around what pansexual even means, Stu has a great explanation: “It’s like a bisexual plus – you like men, women, or whatever else is in the LGBTQ+ community.”


Join Stu Burguiere as he offers a humorous conservative perspective on Wayne Brady's recent pansexual coming out announcement. Stu questions the necessity of...

Want more from Stu?

To enjoy more of Stu's lethal wit, wisdom, and mockery, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Why Tyler Childers' "In Your Love" Video is Just VIRTUE Signaling | The Chad Prather Show

Why Tyler Childers' "In Your Love" Video is Just VIRTUE Signaling | The Chad Prather Show

Don't Let the Virtue Signal World Pressure You | @AllieBethStuckey

Don't Let the Virtue Signal World Pressure You | @AllieBethStuckey

Classic video clip of Rush Limbaugh obliterating woke virtue-signaling in 1993 is still as relevant as ever



In a video clip from nearly three decades ago, the legendary Rush Limbaugh was able to obliterate the concept of virtue-signaling, and did so in 45 seconds.

The Merriam-Webster dictionary defines virtue-signaling as: "The act or practice of conspicuously displaying one's awareness of and attentiveness to political issues, matters of social and racial justice, etc., especially instead of taking effective action."

According to an article in the Boston Globe, the word "virtue-signaling" first surfaced in online message boards in 2004. In 2015, The Spectator published an article titled: "The awful rise of virtue signaling." Google Trends shows the term "virtue signaling" was not really used until the summer of 2017, and the term exploded in June 2020.

Rush Limbaugh categorically understood the concept of the virtue-signaling way back in 1993. He not only grasped the dangerous flaws of virtue-signaling, but he could effectively lampoon the concept before anyone had a name for it.

In the 1990s, there was no Facebook to put a filter on your profile photo or Twitter to put pronouns in your bio to show you support the "current thing." So people would wear ribbons to flaunt their moral high ground on a myriad of different causes.

For instance, orange ribbons are associated with leukemia, yellow to raise awareness for missing children, lavender to stand against urban violence, and blue ribbons are often worn to protest bullying. In the 1990s, a red ribbon was worn to raise awareness for HIV/AIDS.

In 1993 near the height of the AIDS epidemic, some people felt pressured to show their support for those suffering from HIV and AIDS by wearing a red ribbon on their clothes.

The Hollywood actors wanted to show the world how much they care about AIDS by wearing red ribbons. In 1993, the New York Times described the 65th Academy Awards audience of actors as a "sea of red AIDS ribbons."

The Los Angeles Times noted, "When Billy Crystal emceed the Academy Awards on Monday night, we were surprised to see that he wasn’t wearing the red ribbon that symbolizes AIDS awareness."

"The next morning we heard several radio shows abuzz with the to-wear or not to-wear (an AIDS ribbon) controversy," the Los Angeles Times remarked, and added, "Radio talk-show host Rush Limbaugh, for one, called Crystal 'the bravest man in Hollywood' for not feeling like he had to follow the herd."

Limbaugh set out to use the ribbon controversy to expose how feckless and shallow virtue signaling is.

During an episode of his syndicated television show in 1993, "America's Anchorman" obliterated woke virtue-signaling.

Limbaugh pinned six different-colored ribbons on his suit, and satirically boasted to the studio audience, "Because I’m wearing these ribbons, I care more than any of you about anything. And these ribbons say so."

The iconic radio host instructed his viewers to look at their own lapels, and then asked, "When you look down, what do you see?"

He answered his own question, "You don’t see anything, because you’re not wearing any ribbons."

El Rushbo then explained how not wearing the ribbon meant that you were not as virtuous as those who did.

"It means you’re a bigot, it means you’re a racist, it means you’re a sexist, it means you’re a homophobe," Limbaugh rattled off. "It probably means you’re a white guy, it probably means you’re a European, and you and you alone are responsible for all the ills of America."

He then triumphantly proclaimed, "But I’m not, because I’m wearing these ribbons. I care more than you."

The audience erupts into laughter over the absurd premise.

The classic video clip of Limbaugh destroying liberals for virtue-signaling resurfaced on Sunday. The old clip from 1993 went viral and racked up more than 700,000 views on Twitter in less than two days.

Nearly 30 years later, Limbaugh's lesson on virtue signaling still holds true.

\u201cRush Limbaugh nails woke virtue-signaling all the way back in 1993:\u201d
— End Wokeness (@End Wokeness) 1667717996