Feminism is gender dysphoria?



Feminism has drastically changed our society, and Gabriel Finochio, cofounder of TheosU and host of “The Reactionary Christian,” does not think it’s been a good thing.

“The fundamental issue with feminism is that it is gender dysphoria and it’s rooted in a misunderstanding of what it means to be gendered,” Finochio tells Allie Beth Stuckey, who calls it “such an interesting way to say it.”

Finochio believes that all the confusion our society is facing with children claiming to be transgender or non-binary is “the children of feminism.”

“This goes all the way back to first-wave feminism,” he adds, noting that the initial goals of first-wave feminism were a desire to be equal to men in all things and to attack the understanding of what it was to be a woman up until that point.

While many conservatives might disagree, he calls it “gender dysphoric” and “an attempt to confuse the natures of both men and women.”

Stuckey sees her chance to play devil's advocate.

“Couldn’t it have been true that women, say, in marriages, didn’t have as many rights as men?” Stuckey asks.

“For example, in some cases women weren’t allowed to file charges against their husband for rape; abuse might have been swept under the rug.”

“Couldn’t you see how maybe some of that oppression and marginalization was actually true in that time?” she adds.

“I could see how there was more of a questioning of well, do women get to be represented as citizens, do women get to be citizens, do women get to have the vote?” he concedes.

“I can understand that there can be exceptions to a rule, but in general, no, I don’t think that women needed the vote,” he continues.

“I think what we’ve seen in a lot of cases is women being forced to go along with an agenda that is actually against their nature.”

“The child of feminism is transgenderism. Where, you know, if there’s really no difference between men and women, then really what’s the difference at all in gender?”


Want more from Allie Beth Stuckey?

To enjoy more of Allie’s upbeat and in-depth coverage of culture, news, and theology from a Christian, conservative perspective, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Mark Levin says this speech is essential for every conservative to hear before 2024



In this clip, LevinTV host Mark Levin showcased a speech delivered by Thomas Klingenstein, Chairman of the Claremont Institute. The address established an argument supporting everything former President Donald J. Trump stands for — Trump's virtue. He also urged Americans to make sure they give Trump the proper consideration before writing him off for a more politically correct Republican candidate in 2024.

Klingenstein expressed that Trump was born for the current crisis he identified as being led by woke communism. These woke comms, Klingenstein explained his belief that America is systemically racist, control cultural and economic institutions in America, and their goal is to end America.

According to Klingenstein, Trump's critics wrongly accuse Trump of ripping America apart. But Klingentstein argued that Trump pulled apart the weak and shined a bright light in the dark crevices of society, and Trump is merely politically incorrect.

Donald Trump stunned the world six years ago with his landmark presidential win. He began a war against the entrenched government bureaucracy, American Marxists, and the progressive left; he exposed their hidden agenda to indoctrinate our kids and remake American society.

"Trump treated the woke media with the same contempt as he treated political correctness," Klingenstein said.


Want more from Mark Levin?

To enjoy more of "the Great One" — Mark Levin as you've never seen him before — subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

What Benjamin Franklin’s ‘Autobiography’ Can Teach Us About Humility

Who knows what a little experiment in self-imposed humility could teach those who seem so confident of their right to judge and control others?