Trump defends Zelenskyy against Russian official: 'It's all bulls**t'
President Donald Trump dismissed the claim of a Russian official as the commander in chief continues to negotiate peace talks with Ukraine.
Sergey Lavrov, Russia's minister of foreign affairs, recently said that Russian President Vladimir Putin would not sign a peace deal with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy because he is viewed as an "illegitimate" leader. Trump shot down Lavrov's comments during Tuesday's Cabinet meeting, saying, "Everybody is posturing."
'The issue of who is going to sign the deal on Ukrainian side is a very serious issue.'
"It doesn't matter what they say," Trump told reporters. "Everybody is posturing. It's all bullsh**t."
Trump also offered United States Special Envoy Steve Witkoff the opportunity to chime in, to which he simply said, "I agree with you, sir." The room filled with reporters and government officials promptly erupted with laughter.
Notably, Zelenskyy's five-year presidential term was set to end in May 2024, but no elections have been called due to the ongoing conflict with Russia.
RELATED: Trump demands death penalty for DC murderers
Reporter: "This weekend Sergey Lavrov was saying Putin will not sign a peace deal with Zelenskyy because Russia views him as illegitimate..."
President Trump: "It doesn't matter what they say. Everybody is posturing. It's all bullshit." pic.twitter.com/8H8AeKNqAC
— TheBlaze (@theblaze) August 26, 2025
Although the Trump administration has held separate summits with both Zelenskyy and Putin in recent weeks, Lavrov said there is "no planned meeting" between the two leaders.
In addition to challenging Zelenskyy's leadership, Lavrov reiterated the slew of preconditions Russia is demanding from Ukraine. Some of these preconditions include Ukraine agreeing not to join NATO, "the discussion of territorial issues," and for Zelenskyy to cancel any legislation "prohibiting the Russian language."
RELATED: Trump makes a bold push for global competitors to abandon nukes: 'The power is too great'
Photo by Andrew Harnik/Getty Images
"Irrespective of when this meeting might take place, and that must be very well prepared, the issue of who is going to sign the deal on Ukrainian side is a very serious issue," Lavrov said over the weekend.
Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!
Survival over pride: The true test for Ukraine and Russia
When has any country been asked to give up land it won in a war? Even if a nation is at fault, the punishment must be measured.
After World War I, Germany, the main aggressor, faced harsh penalties under the Treaty of Versailles. Germans resented the restrictions, and that resentment fueled the rise of Adolf Hitler, ultimately leading to World War II. History teaches that justice for transgressions must avoid creating conditions for future conflict.
Ukraine and Russia must choose to either continue the cycle of bloodshed or make difficult compromises in pursuit of survival and stability.
Russia and Ukraine now stand at a similar crossroads. They can cling to disputed land and prolong a devastating war, or they can make concessions that might secure a lasting peace. The stakes could not be higher: Tens of thousands die each month, and the choice between endless bloodshed and negotiated stability hinges on each side’s willingness to yield.
History offers a guide. In 1967, Israel faced annihilation. Surrounded by hostile armies, the nation fought back and seized large swaths of territory from Jordan, Egypt, and Syria. Yet Israel did not seek an empire. It held only the buffer zones needed for survival and returned most of the land. Security and peace, not conquest, drove its decisions.
Peace requires concessions
Secretary of State Marco Rubio says both Russia and Ukraine will need to “get something” from a peace deal. He’s right. Israel proved that survival outweighs pride. By giving up land in exchange for recognition and an end to hostilities, it stopped the cycle of war. Egypt and Israel have not fought in more than 50 years.
Russia and Ukraine now press opposing security demands. Moscow wants a buffer to block NATO. Kyiv, scarred by invasion, seeks NATO membership — a pledge that any attack would trigger collective defense by the United States and Europe.
President Donald Trump and his allies have floated a middle path: an Article 5-style guarantee without full NATO membership. Article 5, the core of NATO’s charter, declares that an attack on one is an attack on all. For Ukraine, such a pledge would act as a powerful deterrent. For Russia, it might be more palatable than NATO expansion to its border.
RELATED: Trump says he knows exactly why Putin wouldn’t have invaded Ukraine if he was president
Photo by Andrew Harnik/Getty Images
Peace requires concessions. The human cost is staggering: U.S. estimates indicate 20,000 Russian soldiers died in a single month — nearly half the total U.S. casualties in Vietnam — and the toll on Ukrainians is also severe. To stop this bloodshed, both sides need to recognize reality on the ground, make difficult choices, and anchor negotiations in security and peace rather than pride.
Peace or bloodshed?
Both Russia and Ukraine claim deep historical grievances. Ukraine arguably has a stronger claim of injustice. But the question is not whose parchment is older or whose deed is more valid. The question is whether either side is willing to trade some land for the lives of thousands of innocent people. True security, not historical vindication, must guide the path forward.
History shows that punitive measures or rigid insistence on territorial claims can perpetuate cycles of war. Germany’s punishment after World War I contributed directly to World War II. By contrast, Israel’s willingness to cede land for security and recognition created enduring peace. Ukraine and Russia now face the same choice: Continue the cycle of bloodshed or make difficult compromises in pursuit of survival and stability.
Want more from Glenn Beck? Get Glenn's FREE email newsletter with his latest insights, top stories, show prep, and more delivered to your inbox.
Karoline Leavitt brutally torches New York Times reporter: 'With all due respect'
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt has once again stopped the fake news media in their tracks.
During Tuesday's press briefing, Leavitt defended President Donald Trump's ongoing peace talks to resolve the Russia-Ukraine conflict after a New York Times reporter pressed her on the issue. A reporter named Shawn McCreesh asked Leavitt about a comment Trump made during Monday's monumental summit, when he decided to take Russian President Vladimir Putin's call privately out of respect.
'The left-wing media has been actively rooting against the president.'
"If the point is to get everybody on the same page, why wouldn't Trump just take the call from Putin while the other leaders were in the room?" McCreesh asked Leavitt. "You said it would be disrespectful to do that, but why is it disrespectful?"
"With all due respect, only a reporter from the New York Times would ask a question like that," Leavitt replied.
RELATED: Republican senator relishes 'cray-cray' Mamdani's success: 'We've gotten lucky'
"The president met with all of these European leaders at the White House 48 hours after sitting down with President Putin on American soil," Leavitt said.
"In fact, there was so much progress, and the readout that was given to these European leaders immediately following his meeting with President Putin, that every single one of them got on a plane 48 hours later and flew to the United States of America," Leavitt added.
Leavitt also set her sights on the "left-wing" media more broadly, accusing various outlets of "actively rooting against" Trump's ongoing attempts to broker peace in the region.
RELATED: Defeated Democrat senator attempts a long-shot political comeback: 'Voters will reject him again'
Photo by MANDEL NGAN/AFP via Getty Images
"One thing that has absolutely not changed is the media's negative and downright false coverage of President Trump and his foreign policy accomplishments," Leavitt said.
"From the beginning of this entire process, much of the left-wing media has been actively rooting against the president of the United States in the pursuit of peace."
Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!
Trump Says US May Give Ukraine Air Support As Part Of Peace Deal
'We're willing to help them with things'
Bitter rival Hillary Clinton admits Trump would deserve glory if he ends Russia-Ukraine war
Failed presidential candidate Hillary Clinton (D) admitted that rival President Donald Trump would deserve high praise and acknowledgement if he succeeds in ending the war between Russia and Ukraine.
During a "Raging Moderates" podcast interview released on Friday, Clinton told host Jessica Tarlov that she would consider nominating Trump for a Nobel Peace Prize herself if he ends the war without requiring Ukraine to give up territory.
'Hillary is not serious.'
Trump is scheduled to meet with Russian President Vladimir Putin on Friday around 3:00 p.m. Eastern at Alaska's Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson.
He has referred to the upcoming summit as a "feel-out meeting" to determine whether Putin is willing to reach a ceasefire agreement and initiate peace talks. Trump seemed optimistic about the discussion with Putin, estimating that it has a 25% chance of failure.
Clinton told Tarlov, "Honestly, if he could bring about the end to this terrible war, if he could end it without putting Ukraine in a position where it had to concede its territory to the aggressor, could really stand up to Putin — something we haven't seen, but maybe this is the opportunity — if President Trump were the architect of that, I'd nominate him for a Nobel Peace Prize."
She added, "Because my goal here is to not allow capitulation to Putin, aided and abetted by the United States."
RELATED: Trump is optimistic ahead of Putin meeting — predicts 25% chance of failure
Photo by BRENDAN SMIALOWSKI/AFP via Getty Images
Clinton stated that she believes Trump "would very much like to receive a Nobel Peace Prize."
Trump has already indicated that an end to the war will likely require some "land swapping" that would be "good" and "bad" for both countries.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has rejected the idea, insisting that Ukraine "will not give land to the occupier."
RELATED: Trump 'bothered' after Zelenskyy shoots down compromises ahead of peace summit
Photo by MIKHAIL KLIMENTYEV/SPUTNIK/AFP via Getty Images
David J. Harris Jr., a conservative political commentator, reacted to Clinton's nomination statement.
"Did not have this on my 2025 bingo card!" he stated in a post on social media.
Paul Szypula, another commentator, wrote, "Of course, she sets conditions that'll never happen like Ukraine not having to give up territory. Hillary is not serious."
Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!
Trump is optimistic ahead of Putin meeting — predicts 25% chance of failure
U.S. President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin are slated to meet Friday in Alaska. Trump has referred to the upcoming summit as a "feel-out meeting" to determine the likelihood of reaching a ceasefire agreement and ultimately an end to the conflict with Ukraine.
Trump stated in the days leading up to the summit that if the talks are successful, there is a chance they will remain in Alaska longer than initially planned to host a second meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy.
'Trump is not likely to suffer another Putin ploy to string him along, making this meeting more consequential and high-risk for Moscow, with secondary sanctions and tariffs already placing a cost on those still supporting or doing business with Russia.'
Trump is optimistic that Putin "wants to get it done," though he noted that there is a 25% chance the meeting will be a failure.
"I believe now he's convinced that he's going to make a deal," Trump said. "I'm going to know very quickly."
Secretary of State Marco Rubio made similar remarks ahead of Friday's summit, stating that the administration will know "very early" in the meeting "whether something is possible or not."
Trump has vowed to implement "very severe consequences," including sanctions, if Putin refuses to advance peace talks.
RELATED: Trump 'bothered' after Zelenskyy shoots down compromises ahead of peace summit
Photo by Christopher Furlong/Getty Images
He indicated that negotiations between Putin and Zelenskyy would likely require some "land swapping" that would be "good" and "bad" for both countries.
"Russia has occupied a big portion of Ukraine," Trump stated. "They've occupied some very prime territory. We're going to try and get some of that territory back for Ukraine."
Zelenskyy rejected Trump's land swapping idea, stating that Ukraine "will not give land to the occupier."
On Thursday, Putin said that the Trump administration was "making, in my opinion, quite energetic and sincere efforts to stop the hostilities, stop the crisis and reach agreements that are of interest to all parties involved in this conflict."
Zelenskyy is less optimistic about the upcoming meeting, claiming that Russia has shown "no sign" that it is preparing to end the war.
"Our coordinated efforts and joint actions — of Ukraine, the United States, Europe, and all countries that seek peace — can definitely compel Russia to make peace," Zelenskyy said.
He has accused Russia of “dragging out the war,” insisting that “it deserves stronger global pressure.”
“Russia refuses to stop the killings, and therefore must not receive any rewards or benefits. And this is not just a moral position — it is a rational one. Concessions do not persuade a killer. But truly strong protection of life stops the killers,” he wrote in a post on social media.
RELATED: Vance makes one thing abundantly clear ahead of Trump's big ceasefire meeting with Putin
Photo by Andrew Harnik/Getty Images
Regardless of the outcome of Friday's meeting with Putin, Trump intends to speak with the press afterward. However, it remains undecided whether the press conference will be addressed jointly.
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt previously indicated that Trump and Putin would hold a press conference together, but Trump later appeared to walk back those plans.
"If it's negative, I'll have a press conference to say that the war is going to go on and these people are horribly going to continue to shoot each other and kill each other, and I think it's a disgrace, and I'll head back to Washington," Trump said. "Or I'll have a press conference that's positive."
Trump plans to call European leaders and Zelenskyy after his meeting with Putin to discuss next steps. He promised that the next meeting would involve both Putin and Zelenskyy.
"I will put the two of them in a room," he said. "I think it will get solved."
Trump is scheduled to meet with Putin at Alaska’s Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson around 3:00 p.m. Eastern.
Brent Sadler, a national security senior research fellow with the Heritage Foundation, told Blaze News, “The best outcome is Putin beginning to talk and giving up his maximalist approach to negotiations. Trump is not likely to suffer another Putin ploy to string him along, making this meeting more consequential and high-risk for Moscow, with secondary sanctions and tariffs already placing a cost on those still supporting or doing business with Russia.”
When contacted for a comment, the White House directed Blaze News to the statements made by Trump and Leavitt ahead of the summit.
Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!
Trump 'bothered' after Zelenskyy shoots down compromises ahead of peace summit
Within hours of brokering a historic peace between Armenia and Azerbaijan, President Donald Trump announced on Friday that he would meet with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Aug. 15 to discuss similarly resolving the war in Ukraine, which is now five months into its third year.
Trump's plan is to join Putin for a "feel-out meeting," confer afterward with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and European leaders, and then at a later date, meet with both Putin and Zelenskyy in hopes of ironing out the details and ultimately sealing the deal.
'He's got approval to go to war and kill everybody, but he needs approval to do a land swap.'
Zelenskyy was evidently peeved that the initial summit would take place without him as well as by Trump's suggestion to reporters that the peace deal would likely involve "some swapping of territories to the betterment of both."
Following Trump's announcement, Zelenskyy said in a video statement that "Ukrainians will not gift their land to the occupier" and that "any decisions that are against us, any decisions that are made without Ukraine, are at the same time decisions against peace. They will not achieve anything. These are unworkable decisions."
Trump, who has made no secret of his frustration with Zelenskyy and who in February accused the foreign leader of "gambling with the lives of millions of people," did not respond well to this apparent effort to sabotage the upcoming summit.
"I get along with Zelenskyy, but, you know, I disagree with what he's done — very, very severely disagree," Trump told reporters at the White House on Monday.
RELATED: Vance makes one thing abundantly clear ahead of Trump's big ceasefire meeting with Putin
Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images
"I was a little bothered by the fact that Zelenskyy was saying that 'well, I have to get constitutional approval.' I mean, he's got approval to go to war and kill everybody, but he needs approval to do a land swap," said Trump. "There will be some land swapping going on. I know that through Russia and through conversations with everybody."
European officials who have spoken to U.S. officials about their talks with Putin claim that Moscow wants Ukraine to cede the eastern portion of the country known as the Donbas, reported the New York Times.
'The money that's been spent and the death is incredible.'
Russia occupies around 20% of the entire country and most of the Donbas — including all of the Luhansk region, most of the Donetsk region, much of the Kherson and Zaporizhzhia regions, and parts of the Sumy and Kharkiv regions.
Trump noted that "Russia's occupied a big portion of Ukraine. They've occupied some very prime territory. We're going to try to get some of that territory back for Ukraine."
According to the Institute for the Study of War's latest assessment of the Russian offensive campaign, the "prime territory" that Trump was referencing was likely the Zaporizhzhia and Kherson regions.
"The money that's been spent and the death is incredible. It's the worst thing that's happened — by far the worst that's happened — since World War II. So I'm going in to speak to Vladimir Putin, and I'm going to be telling him, 'You gotta end this war.'"
Antonio Masiello/Getty Images
The Center for Strategic and International Studies estimated in June that upwards of 250,000 Russian soldiers have died in Ukraine and hundreds of thousands more have been wounded — leaving Moscow with a potential fatality rate five times the number of all Russian and Soviet wars combined since World War II. Ukraine has seen upwards of 100,000 soldiers killed with a total of 400,000 casualties.
The war, which the U.S. has sunk hundreds of billions of dollars into, has also resulted in the displacement of over 3.7 million people and an exodus of around seven million Ukrainians.
"I'd like to see a ceasefire. I'd like to see the best deal that could be made for both parties," continued Trump. "It takes two to tango, all right."
When asked whether Zelenskyy is expected to soften his position on this matter, the State Department referred Blaze News to the White House for comment. Blaze News has reached out to the White House.
Zelenskyy may not presently want to make any concessions, but recent polling suggests Ukrainians are growing increasingly desperate to negotiate an end to the conflict.
According to a Gallup poll conducted last month, 69% of Ukrainians said that they favor a negotiated end to the war as soon as possible. Only 24% said they support continuing to fight until victory.
'I believe he wants to get it over with.'
This is nearly a total reversal of the responses to a 2022 poll, where 73% of Ukrainian respondents said they favored fighting until victory and 22% said they wanted to see a negotiated end as soon as possible — a peace that was spiked during negotiations in Turkey.
Despite the U.S. propping up Kyiv and Trump's efforts to broker a peace, pollsters found that 73% of Ukrainians signaled disapproval of "the job performance of the leadership of the United States." Only 16% of respondents signaled approval, which spiked in 2022 then began to plummet during former President Joe Biden's term.
A trend that might make negotiations simpler is the Ukrainian sense that NATO membership is a bridge too far.
Whereas 64% of respondents said in 2022 that they expected Ukrainian NATO membership within 10 years, that optimism has dissipated such that now only 32% of Ukrainians expect acceptance into the organization, which Moscow has indicated would be intolerable.
Although Trump indicated Putin has disappointed him before, he said that this time around, "I believe he wants to get it over with."
Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!
Trump threatens Putin with 'very severe' tariffs as peace talks take a turn
President Donald Trump is becoming increasingly fed up with the ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine, and he's not afraid to show it.
On Monday, Trump threatened President Vladimir Putin of Russia with 100% tariffs if he continues to engage and drag out the conflict. Trump, who campaigned on peace through strength, said the drastic tariffs would go into effect within 50 days if Putin fails to finalize a peace deal with President Volodymyr Zelenskyy of Ukraine.
'We're very, very unhappy with them.'
"We want to see it end," Trump said in the Oval Office Monday. "And I'm disappointed in President Putin because I thought we would've had a deal two months ago."
"We're very, very unhappy with them, and we're going to be doing very severe tariffs if we don't have a deal in 50 days," Trump said. "Tariffs at about 100%."
RELATED: Bongino and Bondi clash over botched handling of Epstein files
President Trump announces that he will be placing 100% Secondary Tariffs on Russia if they don't make a deal on the Ukraine War within 50 days: "We want to see it end. I'm disappointed in President Putin. I thought we would've had a deal two months ago." pic.twitter.com/d4OSr2BcNW
— TheBlaze (@theblaze) July 14, 2025
Trump's announcement comes as Russia ramps up its offensive attacks on Ukraine. In response to this aggression, Trump said the United States will continue to fortify Ukrainian defense by supplying them with American weapons and munitions.
Notably, the Department of Defense initially announced it would be pausing aid to Ukraine. This policy was in line with the administration's more hostile attitude toward Ukraine in the earlier stages of the administration, most notably marked by the infamous Oval Office spat between Trump and Zelenskyy.
RELATED: FBI, DOJ Epstein memo sparks right-wing outrage: 'Nobody is believing this':
Photo by Andrew Harnik/Getty Images
Trump told reporters Sunday that the U.S. would be sending Ukraine "various pieces of very sophisticated military" equipment and that Europe would pay for it.
"That's the way we want it."
Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!
Get the Conservative Review delivered right to your inbox.
We’ll keep you informed with top stories for conservatives who want to become informed decision makers.
Today's top stories