The vindication of Booker T. Washington



Christopher Wolfe’s thoughtful essay at the American Mind on Booker T. Washington, leisure, and work stirred some fond memories from years ago of making a friend by reading a book.

He was an old black man, and I was an old white man. We were both native Angelenos and had been just about old enough to drive when the Watts riots broke out in 1965. But that was half a century and a lifetime ago, and we hadn’t known each another.

If you read ‘Up from Slavery,’ you will be reading an American classic and will be getting to know a man who ranks among the greatest Americans of all time.

Los Angeles is a big place, a home to many worlds. Now we were white-haired professors, reading a book together, and we became friends. His name was Kimasi, and he has since gone to a better world.

We were spending a week with a dozen other academics reading Booker T. Washington’s autobiography, “Up from Slavery.” Washington was born a slave in Franklin County, Virginia, just a few years before the Civil War began. He gained his freedom through Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation and the Union victory in the war. With heroic determination, he got himself an education and went on to found the Tuskegee Normal and Industrial Institute in Alabama, where he remained principal for the rest of his life.

After Frederick Douglass died in 1895, Washington became, without comparison, the most well-known and influential black American living. By the beginning of the 20th century, as John Hope Franklin would write, he was “one of the most powerful men in the United States.” “Up from Slavery,” published in 1901, sold 100,000 copies before Washington died in 1915.

It is a great American book. Modern Library ranks it third on its list of the best nonfiction books in the English language of the 20th century. But there was a reason why Kimasi and I were reading this great book when we were old men rather than when we were young men back in the riotous 1960s.

Even before Washington died, and while he was still the most famous and influential black man in America, other black leaders began to discredit him and question his way of dealing with the plight and aspirations of black Americans. These critics, whom Washington sometimes called “the intellectuals,” were led by W.E.B. Du Bois, the first black American to receive a Ph.D. from Harvard and one of the founders of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People.

So successful was this criticism that by the time Kimasi and I were in high school or heading off to college, the most fashionable opinion among intellectuals — black or white — was that Booker T. Washington was the worst of things for a black man. He was an “Uncle Tom.” (How “Uncle Tom” became a term of derision rather than the name of a heroic character is a story for another time.) And so, if Washington’s great book was mentioned at all to young Kimasi or me, it was mentioned in this negative light.

But fashions change, and, as Washington himself taught, merit is hard to resist. Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address and his Second Inaugural Address were dismissed and scoffed at by some “intellectuals” in his day; they are now generally recognized by informed and intelligent people around the world as the great speeches they are.

“Huckleberry Finn” scandalized polite opinion when it came out, because it was about an illiterate vagrant and other lowlifes and contained a lot of ungrammatical talk and bad spelling. A couple of generations later, Ernest Hemingway himself declared that “all modern American literature comes from one book” — Huckleberry Finn.

A couple of generations later still, in our own times, skittish librarians started removing the book from their shelves because it used language too dangerous for children.

The study of the past should shed light on what deserves praise, what deserves blame, and the grounds on which such judgments should be made. Americans being as fallible as the rest of mankind, as long as we are free to air opinions, there will be different opinions among us. Some of them may actually be true. And they will change from time to time, sometimes for good reasons, sometimes for no reason at all.

RELATED: Why can't Americans talk honestly about race? Blame the 'Civil Rights Baby Boomers'

Photo by Graphic House/Getty Images

In recent years, several scholars have helped bring back to light the greatness and goodness of Booker T. Washington. Even fashionable opinion is capable of justice, and no one wants to be deceived about what is truly good and great, so I hazard to predict that it will sometime become fashionable again to recognize Booker T. Washington as one of the greatest Americans ever.

Washington never held political office. But his life and work demonstrated that you don’t have to hold political office to be a statesman and that the noblest work of the statesman is to teach. The soul of what Washington sought to teach was that we, too, can rise up from slavery. It is an eternal possibility.

This was the central purpose of Booker T. Washington’s life and work: to liberate souls from enslavement to ignorance, prejudice, and degrading passions, the kind of slavery that makes us tyrants to those around us in the world we live in.

Washington saw that this freedom of the soul cannot be given to us by others. Good teachers and good parents and friends, through precept and example, can help us see this freedom and understand it, but we have to achieve it for ourselves. When we do, our souls are liberated to rule themselves by reflection and choice, with malice toward none, with charity for all.

If you read “Up from Slavery,” you will be reading an American classic. You will be getting to know a man who, in the quality of his mind and character, and in the significance of what he did in and with his life, ranks among the greatest Americans of all time — even with the man whose name he chose for himself. When we read this great book together in the ripeness of our years, Kimasi, who always winningly wore his heart on his sleeve, wept frequently and repeated, shaking his head, “I lived a life not knowing this man.”

Editor’s Note: This article was originally published at the American Mind.

Memo to Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson: Sterilizing children is not ‘loving’



It seems that in addition to being a U.S. senator, Tennessee Republican Marsha Blackburn is also a prophet. The conservative from the Volunteer State asked Supreme Court nominee Ketanji Brown Jackson to define the word “woman” during her confirmation hearing in 2022, but the judge who was celebrated as the first black woman to be nominated to the nation’s highest court said she couldn’t define her sex because she is not a biologist.

Skip ahead two years, and Justice Jackson is hearing arguments in United States v. Skrmetti, a case that will determine whether states can prohibit “gender-affirming care” for minors, the progressive euphemism for puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, and surgical procedures for children who “identify” as the opposite sex. At one point, Jackson drew a comparison between Tennessee banning medical treatments that can sterilize children to the ban on interracial marriage that was eventually overturned in Loving v. Virginia.

The color line determined the society our ancestors endured. The gender binary will determine the society our descendants inherit.

Tennessee’s solicitor general had to inform the justice that giving “testosterone to a boy with a deficiency is not the same treatment as giving it to a girl who has psychological distress with her body.” He correctly noted that the former helps a boy develop according to his sex while the latter renders a girl infertile.

The entire exchange should be the stake in the heart of superficial identity politics. Joe Biden appointed Jackson to the Supreme Court because he pledged to make history by putting a black woman on the bench. His black supporters — especially women — celebrated her nomination at the time. To them, her appointment was another milestone in America’s quest to become a more inclusive and tolerant nation.

W.E.B. DuBois famously said that the problem of the 20th century was “the problem of the color line.” To the people who think in superficial identity categories, putting a black woman on the highest court in the land was another step in destroying that barrier. But the fight of the 21st century will be preserving the sex binary, and only a racial idolater would consider legalizing child sterilization progress if a black woman casts the deciding vote.

The color line determined the society our ancestors endured. The gender binary will determine the society our descendants inherit.

The future will be painful for the children failed by parents, doctors, journalists, activists, and politicians who refuse to tell them the truth about who they are. The Biden administration and its progressive allies believe that counseling gender-confused children to accept their bodies as they were created is “conversion therapy” but puberty-blocking drugs, mastectomies, and hysterectomies constitute “gender-affirming care.” Denying basic biology is now required to be in good standing on the left, which is precisely why Ketanji Brown Jackson’s refusal to define “woman” during her hearing was so telling.

Unfortunately, the politics of racial allegiance blinded even the black Christians who otherwise hold to biblical sexual ethics. One pastor in Chicago whose church was formerly part of the Southern Baptist Convention said Justice Brown Jackson’s confirmation was a moment to be “celebrated” and a “gift of grace.” But I’m not sure how any preacher can attribute God’s goodness to a judge who refuses to affirm Genesis 1:27 or gives legal support to child sterilizations done in the name of civil rights.

In a sane world, the Tennessee case would result in a unanimous decision with a short summary clearly stating that men cannot become women (or vice versa), therefore, any hormonal and surgical treatments done under the guise of “transitioning” a person promises a medical outcome that can never be achieved.

Every man who has ever purchased an engagement ring knows that calling a cubic zirconia a diamond — regardless of its cut, clarity, or color — doesn’t change it into one. Composition and presentation are not the same thing.

This same principle applies to sex. A cross-dressing male doesn’t switch sexes by taking pills and putting on makeup. The reason why is quite simple: Women are born, not worn. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson needs to know that mutilating and sterilizing children in the name of civil rights is not loving.

Clueless Classical Ed Critics Accidentally Make A Killer Case For It

If you think classical education is racist, tell that to W.E.B. Du Bois.

‘Uncle Tom II’ Shows How Marxism Decimated Black Communities

Historical setbacks and the proliferation of broken homes hurt black Americans, but there’s also something else: Marxism.

Whitlock: Here’s what professional athletes need to know about the NAACP and its fight to protect abortion in Texas



I used to be a dues-paying, card-carrying member of the NAACP, and then I realized the organization used the struggle of working-class black people to advocate for elites and other made members of the Alphabet Mafia.

I have an instinctive disdain for elites. It's why I can't stand William Edward Burghardt Du Bois, better known as W.E.B. Du Bois, the elitist Harvard University clown who, at the behest of his white liberal handlers, argued that a special "talented tenth" of black people could lead black America.

Northern white liberals decided they could identify an elite group of black people (a talented 10%) and use them to manipulate and control the black race. In 1903, these white overseers commissioned Du Bois to write his infamous "Talented Tenth" essay. Six years later, this same flock of overseers founded the NAACP and made Du Bois the blackface of the organization.

The NAACP is a blackface organization. It was founded by and has been funded by white liberals since day one. Its highest honor is the Spingarn Medal, an outstanding achievement award. It's named after Joel Spingarn, a white Jew who served as either chairman of the board, treasurer, or president of the NAACP until his death in 1939.

The NAACP is an organization run by and for elites. It was allegedly founded as a biracial movement to advance black people.

Advancing black people now includes objecting to a Texas law that prohibits abortion after six weeks of pregnancy. On Thursday, the NAACP issued an open letter to the players associations of the NFL, NBA, MLB, NHL, and WNBA urging players to not sign with teams in the state of Texas.

"As we watch an incomprehensible assault on basic human rights unfold in Texas, we are simultaneously witnessing a threat to constitutional guarantees for women, children, and marginalized communities," the NAACP stated in the letter.

Abortion is a basic human right? Abortion after six weeks is a basic human right? The advancement of black people is contingent on the right to abort a baby?

The NAACP is putting a blackface on wickedness. Abortion is a black issue now. It's the same tactic white liberals used to define LGBTQ issues as black. We, black people, are the faces of the BLM-LGBTQ-CRT Alphabet Mafia. Liberal elites — both white and black — use black people as pawns to execute an agenda that doesn't serve black people.

The NAACP fronted the assault on former President Trump's initiatives to slow immigration at our southern border. In June of last year, the NAACP won a Supreme Court case, Trump v. NAACP, that stopped the Trump administration from dismantling the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program. DACA is an immigration policy that allows exemptions for minors brought to America unlawfully.

DACA isn't a black issue. It's a policy supported by white liberals to increase their political power. We foolishly believe enhanced political power for white liberals improves the lives of black people. It helps the so-called "talented tenth" of black people. It helps elites.

By bank account, I'm considered elite. By birth, mentality, and education, I'm working-class. My father did not graduate high school. He started out as a factory worker and eventually opened a small tavern in the inner city. My mother was a lifelong factory worker. I went to college on a football scholarship, not because my family could afford to pay, and not because of any great academic achievements in high school.

I graduated from Ball State University with a 2.3 grade point average. I wasn't interested in joining the Greek boule fraternal organizations. Many of them make great contributions to their respective communities. My best friends are members of Kappa Alpha Psi and Omega Psi Phi.

But Greek fraternities don't fit my personality. There's often an elitist mentality that comes along with membership. There's certainly pressure to conform to a group mentality. I embrace that pressure when it comes to religious faith. I reject it in all other spaces.

The NAACP supports unrestricted abortion rights. I don't. I don't want to be a part of any group that does.

Further, the NAACP wants to pretend that Texas' new voting laws restrict black Americans from voting. It's a lie. The laws attempt to restrict cheating and prevent illegal immigrants from voting. The NAACP's agenda in Texas is to push against the abortion restrictions. The organization included comments about the voting laws so its real agenda could be slightly cloaked as an effort to protect black people.

The Talented Tenth are in cahoots with the satanic agenda of the far left. The far left wants a "Do What Thou Wilt" society. Do what thou wilt is the philosophy of the satanic cult established by Aleister Crowley in the early 1900s. Do what thou wilt justifies humanity giving in to and legitimizing every human desire.

If you're born a man and feel like a woman, go for it. If you're a grown man attracted to young children, go for it. If you're too undisciplined to practice safe sex or abstinence and you create a child, kill it while it remains in the womb.

Do what thou wilt.

Christianity is about acknowledging, taming, and combating our sinful nature and desires.

The NAACP's position on abortion lets you know where the organization stands on God.

I'm asking all professional athletes to examine where they stand on God and re-examine where they stand on the NAACP.

Don't fall for the blackface. W.E.B. Du Bois painted that on to conceal the wickedness of his handlers.