South Africans deny 'white genocide' despite evidence: 'We call ourselves the rainbow nation'



A sampling of South Africans said that their country does not persecute white farmers after President Trump forced South African President Cyril Ramaphosa to watch evidence of the contrary at the White House.

Trump had his team turn down the lights and play a video that showed the gravesites of white South African farmers, known as Afrikaners, and other evidence of anti-white sentiments while the South African president looked on for more than four minutes.

'We don't have no separation in this country.'

The media was quick to play damage control over the fact that 10% of the South African government is occupied by the Economic Freedom Fighters, politicians who have explicitly called for the murder of whites.

A Reuters report spoke to South African residents in Johannesburg and promptly showcased individuals who rejected the claims of violence in response to Trump.

"I don't think we need to explain ourselves to USA," a 40-year-old trade union member said. "We know there's no white genocide. So for me, it was pointless exercise."

RELATED: South African president denies white genocide — then Trump shoves proof in his face

Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

Another man told the outlet that violent crime "in its entirety" needed to be looked at in South Africa but noted the statements surrounding "white genocide claims" have all been "taken out of a context."

"I don't think [it] should be the focus," the man added.

One local pointed to South Africa's multiculturalism as evidence that no racial divide exists.

"I think Donald Trump, he thinks he is leader of the whole world. ... We don't have no separation in this country."

The man continued, "We believe [this] as South Africans. That's why we call ourselves the 'rainbow nation.'"

RELATED: Episcopal Church kills government partnership over request to resettle white Afrikaner refugees

White South Africans supporting President Trump and Elon Musk gather at the US Embassy in Pretoria, South Africa, February 15, 2025. Photo by MARCO LONGARI / AFP) (Photo by MARCO LONGARI/AFP via Getty Images)

Afrikaners have faced issues regarding the confiscation of their land for some time, culminating in a new law that allows compulsory acquisition of private property by government for public purposes or that which is in the public interest.

This is coupled with the government's national development plan that allows for "rapid transfer of agricultural land to black beneficiaries."

These policies, drawn down racial lines, fly in the face of the idea that there is not a national threat facing the farmers.

With the South African president telling Trump that anti-white sentiments represented just a small segment of his population, it seemingly depends on what one's definition of small is.

Trump showed footage of a South African political party singing a song called "Shoot the Boer," or "Dubul' ibhunu," to a stadium full of supporters. The overall support of the EFF, the party pushing the sentiments of land seizure and outright murder, represents about 10% of the government and popular vote.

The EFF holds 39 seats in South Africa's 400-seat parliament and had 9.5% of the popular vote in 2024, becoming one of the fastest-growing parties in the country. It is currently the fourth-largest party in the nation, and the party symbol includes a black-power fist.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

South African president denies white genocide — then Trump shoves proof in his face



South African President Cyril Ramaphosa met Wednesday with President Donald Trump and discussed various matters in the Oval Office. While the socialist leader sought to steer the conversation to other issues, including trade, Trump pressed him about the mistreatment and murder of white Afrikaner farmers, who are also known as Boers.

Ramaphosa, who recently ratified a land-confiscation law that could easily be weaponized against white farmers, suggested that if there were a genocide of Afrikaners under way, his ministers present with him in the Oval Office would have left their posts. He suggested further that Trump could benefit from hearing his ministers' perspectives on the matter.

"We have thousands of stories talking about it, and we have documentaries. We have news stories," said Trump, evidently not buying what Ramaphosa was selling. "It has to be responded to."

Trump then had his team dim the lights and roll footage of the reality the South African president and elements of the Western liberal media are apparently keen to gloss over.

RELATED: Episcopal Church kills government partnership over request to resettle white Afrikaner refugees

With the South African president grinning uncomfortably beside him, Trump pointed at video showing thousands of white crosses stretching for miles along a roadside between Mokopane and Polokwane, South Africa, each commemorating farmers slain in recent years.

"It's a terrible sight," said Trump. "I've never seen anything like it."

— (@)

In another clip Trump played for the benefit of Ramaphosa and the doubting journalists in the room, South Africa's Marxist-Leninist political party, the Economic Freedom Fighters, could be seen chanting with a stadium full of people about butchering the ethnic Afrikaner minority. In the video, EFF leader Julius Malema sings, "Kill the Boer, [kill] the farmer."

While Ramaphosa conceded that "there is criminality" in his country, he pushed back against Trump's suggestion that he allows hateful groups to seize land from the Afrikaner famers.

"They kill the white farmer. And when they kill the white farmer, nothing happens to them," said Trump.

— (@)

"You're taking people's land away from them, and those people in many cases are being executed," said Trump. "They happen to be white, and most of them happen to be farmers. How do you explain that?"

This is a developing story.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Liberals rage after Trump welcomes white refugees to US: 'Farce and a sham'



Liberal activists and media personalities have long championed America's acceptance of refugees, especially from terrorist hotbeds like Afghanistan and Syria. They characterized criticism of this acceptance — particularly that born of concerns about national security threats — as racist, xenophobic, and un-Christian, and framed the Trump administration's targeting of the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program earlier this year as immoral.

Support for bringing in persecuted people from afar suddenly crumbled Monday after the Trump administration welcomed 59 white Afrikaners at Dulles International Airport under the URAP.

MSNBC's "Deadline White House," for instance, was abuzz with condemnations, ascriptions of collective guilt, and racially charged commentary.

Rick Stengel, a former official in the Obama administration, told a sullen Nicolle Wallace that the admission of a handful of South African farmers — whom major political parties in Pretoria gleefully sing about butchering in packed stadiums — was "deeply and morally wrongheaded and repulsive. These are the descendants of the people who created the most diabolical system of white supremacy in human history, apartheid."

'It's taking places away from refugees who are really being crushed.'

While acknowledging that the landed Afrikaner families, which include numerous young children, were not directly responsible for apartheid, Stengel suggested they were nevertheless beneficiaries of racism and themselves racists. Meanwhile, over at NBC News, talking head Andrea Mitchell alternatively suggested that young children also bore responsibility for apartheid.

— (@)

After intimating the white farmers own too much land — a perceived issue South Africa's socialist-run regime appears keen to rectify with its new land-confiscation law — Stengel stated, "There's no injustice here. As you mentioned, it's taking places away from refugees who are really being crushed by authoritarian governments and military governments."

RELATED: Episcopal Church kills government partnership over request to resettle white Afrikaner refugees

"It's just a farce and a sham," continued Stengel. "It's like a Batman movie or something where all the bad guys get collected under one roof."

African American studies professor Eddie Glaude, another one of Wallace's apoplectic guests, suggested the administration's supposed white nationalism was evidenced by the admission of a football-team's worth of South African farmers.

Former and current Democrats similarly rent their garments and ran with this narrative.

Former Rep. Donna Edwards (D-Md.) suggested to MSNBC that the problem is the Afrikaners' race, noting that their admission demonstrates the Trump administration's "disdain for people of color."

— (@)

Democratic Sen. Chris Van Hollen (Md.), fresh off trying to bring a Salvadoran MS-13 affiliate accused of domestic abuse and human trafficking back into the U.S., similarly condemned the acceptance of the Afrikaners, claiming they do not need refugee status and their acceptance was part of a "sick global apartheid policy."

The aversion to bringing in white refugees does not appear to be limited to Democrats and their friends in the media.

'Afrikaners fleeing persecution are welcome in the United States.'

Blaze News previously reported that the Episcopal Migration Ministries, an arm of the Episcopal Church that has served as one of 10 agencies the U.S. government contracts to resettle refugees, announced Monday that it will not help white Afrikaners on account of the church's "steadfast commitment to racial justice."

The presiding bishop of the Episcopal Church, Sam Rowe, revealed in a letter to fellow Episcopalians that rather than resettle farmers from South Africa classified by the U.S. government as refugees, the EMM will end its contract with the federal government by the end of this fiscal year.

Photo by SAUL LOEB/AFP via Getty Images

"Any religious group should support the plight of Afrikaners, who have been terrorized, brutalized, and persecuted by the South African government," White House deputy press secretary Anna Kelly told Blaze News. "The Afrikaners have faced unspeakable horrors and are no less deserving of refugee resettlement than the hundreds of thousands of others who were allowed into the United States during the past administration. President Trump has made it clear: refugee resettlement should be about need, not politics."

RELATED: No one is coming to save you

President Donald Trump told reporters Monday, "It's a genocide that's taking place that you people don't want to write about, but it's a terrible thing that's taking place."

"Farmers are being killed. They happen to be white," continued Trump. "Whether they're white or black, makes no difference to me, but white farmers are being brutally killed and their land is being confiscated in South Africa."

— (@)

Secretary of State Marco Rubio said Monday afternoon, "Afrikaners fleeing persecution are welcome in the United States. The South African government has treated these people terribly — threatening to steal their private land and subjected them to vile racial discrimination. The Trump Administration is proud to offer them refuge in our great country."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Conservatives Aren’t ‘Christian Nationalists,’ They’re Just Homesick For America

Homesickness is what Americans have been feeling. It’s far from the corporate media’s misuse of the term 'Christian nationalism.'

Texan Allegedly Bullied By School Over His Skin Color, Trump Support Asks Supreme Court To Take His Case

[rebelmouse-proxy-image https://thefederalist.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/Screenshot-2025-02-10-at-7.10.43 PM-e1739236720764-1200x675.png crop_info="%7B%22image%22%3A%20%22https%3A//thefederalist.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/Screenshot-2025-02-10-at-7.10.43%5Cu202fPM-e1739236720764-1200x675.png%22%7D" expand=1]In the spirit of San Jacinto, Warden’s case represents a key battle over a new frontier: racism against white people.

2020 census showed massive spike in 'multiracial' population. Turns out that was likely bogus.



The 2020 U.S. census results indicated not only a decline in the white population but a massive spike in the multiracial population over the previous 10 years, stating that Americans identifying as more than one race accounted for 10.2% of the population, up from 2.9% in 2010.

While bureaucrats patted themselves on the back, expressing confidence in their findings and methodology, various academics, pundits, and liberal publications made hay of the results, sounding off about the "multiracial boom" and the "nation's changing mosaic." In some cases, there was outright celebration of the decline in the white population, euphemistically referred to as an increase in diversity — 24% of Democrats and Democratic leaners told Pew Research pollsters that this alleged demographic shift was a good thing.

It turns out the boom, still a crutch for liberal arguments years later, was likely bogus.

A pair of Princeton University sociologists noted in a December paper in the journal Sociological Science that "the boom was largely a statistical illusion resulting from methodological changes that confounded ancestry with identity and mistakenly equated national origin with race."

Original claims

Several months after releasing race-ethnic population estimates, the U.S. Census Bureau announced in August 2021:

  • The white population remained the largest race or ethnicity group in the country, with 204.3 million solely identifying on the census as white; however, that cohort had decreased by 8.6% since 2010.
  • Another 31.1 million people identified as white in combination with another race group.
  • The Hispanic or Latino population grew from 50.5 million or 16.3% of the population in 2010 to 62.1 million, 18.7%, in 2020.
  • The population of Americans solely identifying as American Indian or Alaska Native increased from 2.9 million in 2010 to 3.7 million in 2020.
  • The population of Americans solely identifying as Asian increased from 14.7 million to 19.9 people over the 10-year period.
  • The population of Americans solely identifying as black grew from 38.9 million in 2010 to 41.1 million in 2020.
  • The multiracial population shot up from 9 million people in 2010 to 33.8 million people in 2020, representing a 276% increase.

The bureaucrats concluded that "nearly all groups saw population gains this decade and the increase in the Two or More Races population was especially large. The white alone population declined."

'Thus, many Hispanics who would have checked off white alone in 2010 may have checked "white" and "some other race" in 2020.'

The bureau reached these conclusions on the basis of a modified questionnaire that asked respondents who checked off white or black to also list their "origins." Based on their stated origins, respondents were frequently and automatically flagged as multiracial.

Early doubts

There were a handful of critics who indicated at the outset that this supposed boom was the result of a statistical sleight of hand.

John Judis, editor at large at Talking Points Memo, noted in the Wall Street Journal, for instance, that "contrary to Democratic hopes and right-wing anxieties, America’s white population didn’t shrink much between 2010 and 2020 and might actually have grown."

Judis pointed out:

The census asked respondents who checked off "white" to specify their nationality: "Print, for example, German, Irish, Italian, Lebanese, Egyptian, etc." No Spanish-speaking nationality was listed. That likely created the impression that Hispanic was another race, notwithstanding the previous question's disclaimer that "Hispanic origins are not races." Thus, many Hispanics who would have checked off white alone in 2010 may have checked "white" and "some other race" in 2020. The number of Hispanics checking two or more boxes increased by 567% from 2010 and make up about two-thirds of those who checked both boxes.

"One takeaway that we saw in the media a lot was about the alleged decline of the white population and certain rises in the 'mark one or more' [races] multiracial or biracial population," Ellis Monk, a sociology professor at Harvard University, told the campus paper in September 2021. "My main reaction is really to the way that the questions, the forms on the census itself are actually produced."

'Population size determines, to some degree, the power you wield.'

Monk also suggested that the way the questions were worded "could have played into the rise of the number of people who feel compelled to mark one or more categories on the census."

Others who were content with the bureau's final figures proved willing to dismiss or ignore such doubts about the accuracy or meaning of the census findings.

True believers

MSNBC political analyst Charles Blow noted in an August 2021 piece for the New York Times titled "It was a terrifying census for white nationalists" that "white power acolytes saw this train approaching from a distance — the browning of America, the shrinking of the white population and the explosion of the nonwhite — and they did everything they could to head it off."

Blow suggested that pro-life activism, protections for the Second Amendment, and efforts to clamp down on illegal immigration were part of a grand white supremacist campaign that apparently failed and that a comeuppance was on the horizon.

"Population size determines, to some degree, the power you wield," wrote Blow. "The passage of power is not a polite and gentle affair like passing the salt at a dinner table. People with power fight — sometimes to the end — to maintain it. There's going to be a shift, but not without strife."

Others were more delicate when insinuating that American citizens were competing along racial lines or when suggesting that ascendant racial groups should be assigned greater priority and care.

"The unanticipated decline in the country's white population means that other racial and ethnic groups are responsible for generating overall growth," William Frey, senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, said of the Census Bureau's early estimates. "One fact is already clear: As the nation becomes even more racially diverse from the 'bottom up' of the age structure, more attention needs to be given to the needs and opportunities for America's highly diverse younger generations."

"The mixing of all sorts [of races] is really a new force in 21st-century America," Richard Alba, a demographer and professor emeritus at the City University of New York, told the Washington Post. "We're talking about a big, powerful phenomenon."

While some leftists and race obsessives salivated over the prospect of fewer white Americans and the supposed power shift that would entail, others complained about the pace of the alleged change.

Sarah Gaither, an associate professor at Duke University, told CNN, "Even if the white individuals in our country are decreasing numerically, it doesn't necessarily suggest that they're losing any of their power. These power structures are built into our systems, historically, and will still be built pretty strongly going forward."

While it's unclear whether anyone stands to lose power, the U.S. Census Bureau has certainly lost credibility.

Bureaucratic bogus

In their paper, recently highlighted by the Associated Press, Princeton sociologists Paul Starr and Christina Pao suggested that the new question design and recoding algorithm used in the 2020 census were "largely responsible for the multiracial increase."

"The example of the individual from Argentina who checked only 'white' but was coded as multiracial is typical of what happened with both whites and blacks with any Latin American heritage," wrote the researchers. "The census algorithm did not recognize Latin American national origins or ethnicities as a race. When anyone who checked off 'white' or 'black' alone indicated a Latin American origin, they were reclassified as multiracial."

Apparently the illusion of a multiracial boom was driven also by Americans going the route taken by Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and Berkeley professor Elizabeth Hoover.

"The reclassification of whites as multiracial was not limited to self-identified whites with Latin American origins," continued the paper. "Among non-Hispanics, the biggest jump in the multiracial population was in the 'white and American Indian' category — an increase of 2.3 million."

The researchers concluded that while there has been an upward trend in multiracial identity, "it has been a much more slowly growing trend than recent data and the [New York] Times suggest."

"In short, the various steps the Census Bureau has already undertaken (using 'origins' for recoding) or has used in its tests (displaying racial data without the two-or-more category) raise the multiracial complication to a new level of perplexity," added the sociologists.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Is 'white women for Kamala' Zoom call an example of REAL white supremacy?



Kamala Harris’ campaign is attempting to target every group – the youth, the LGBTQ+ crowd (obviously), white men, and now also white women.

In a Zoom call of nearly 170,000 people, including certain celebrities, Kamala Harris hosted a discussion about how white women could best support the vice president in her 2024 presidential campaign.

The call was as cringey as it was glitchy.

Try Not to Cringe! | Liberal "White Women" have 'Pro-Kamala Zoom Call'www.youtube.com

As the online discussion cut in and out, white women checked all the woke boxes: They owned their inherent white privilege, they paid homage to the feminist movement, they pointed to the white men who instilled their privilege, and they thanked women of color for their courage to strive for equality.

“As white women, we are the ones that have the privilege, of course, and we too have had to fight and continue to fight for our equality, our selfhood, our freedom, but we have whatever privileges our male white male counterparts have had the mercy and good sense to bestow on us and then whatever else of it we have managed to take for ourselves, often being led by … our sisters of color, who have fought and fought and continue to fight for their righteous place on God's green earth,” actress Connie Britton said, ticking off every leftist talking point.

An influencer by the name of Arielle Fodor also made sure that the right precedent was set prior to opening the floor for speakers: “If you find yourself talking over or speaking for BIPOC [black, indigenous, and people of color] individuals or, God forbid, correcting them – just take a beat and instead we can put our listening ears on. So do learn from and amplify the voices of those who have been historically marginalized and use the privilege you have in order to push for systemic change. As white people we have a lot to learn and unlearn, so do check your blind spots.”

Are you cringing yet?

Glenn Beck and guest Bridget Phetasy certainly are.

“It is actually white supremacy,” Phetasy says of the white women on Kamala’s call. “You have to believe you are better than everyone else and that it is up to you to lift up all of these people – these poor people who can't help themselves – and speak to everybody like they’re toddlers.”

However contradictory the idea is, Phetasy can’t deny that it’s an effective way to rally the people.

“What is more important than saving the world while also somehow humbling yourself and recognizing your privilege?” she asks.

“Is this going to work?” asks Glenn.

To hear Phetasy’s response, watch the clip above.

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn’s masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis, and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Microsoft under fire over revelation its white employees earn less than their black, Asian, and Hispanic counterparts



Critics of DEI have highlighted an apparent celebration of race- and sex-based discrimination in Microsoft's annual "Diversity and Inclusion Report."

Microsoft proudly noted in the document that its black, Asian, and Hispanic employees earn more than their white counterparts. Additionally, it revealed that female employees earn more than male coworkers operating at the same level and in the same roles.

The possibility that the tech giant is openly engaging in pay discrimination against employees on the basis of their immutable characteristics has prompted condemnation along with calls for legal action.

Lindsay-Rae McIntyre, Microsoft's chief diversity officer, released the company's DEI report on Nov. 1, 2023, stating, "This year's report shows that we continue to be a more diverse Microsoft today than we have ever been. Looking at this year's data as well as our cumulative efforts, it's clear that we are driving positive change."

In the "pay equity" section of the DEI document, Microsoft noted it is "committed to the principle of pay equity. Pay equity accounts for factors that legitimately influence total pay, including things like job title, level, and tenure. Our pay equity analysis adjusts for these factors in support of our commitment to pay employees equitably for substantially similar work."

According to the document, as of September 2023, all American "racial and ethnic minority groups who are rewards eligible combined earned $1.007 total pay for every $1.000 earned by US rewards-eligible white employees with the same job title and level and considering tenure."

Employees are "rewards-eligible" if they have worked for more than 90 days in the fiscal year. Such employees account for roughly 94% of Microsoft's workforce.

The document specifically states that black, Hispanic, and so-called "Latinx" employees working in the U.S. earn $1.004 for every dollar alternatively earned by a "rewards-eligible" white employee.

Asian employees, meanwhile, "earn $1.012 for every $1.000 earned by US rewards-eligible white employees with the same job title and level and considering enure."

This apparent trend of systemic discrimination is not limited to race.

The document indicates that "as of September 2023, inside the US, women who are rewards eligible earn $1.007 total pay for every $1.000 earned by rewards-eligible employees who are men" operating at the same level with the same job title.

Microsoft appears to have been championing these pay deltas for several years. In its 2019 DEI report DEI report, the company noted, "As of September 2019, all racial and ethnic minority employees in the US combined earn $1.006 for every $1.000 earned by their white counterparts."

Blaze News reached out to Microsoft for comment but did not receive a response by deadline.

Libs of TikTok, who drew massive attention to the DEI document Thursday, wrote in response to the report, "HOLY SHLIT. In Microsoft's official 2023 Diversity & Inclusion report, they openly admit that they are paying white people LESS than other ethnic groups in the name of 'pay equity.'"

— (@)

South African billionaire Elon Musk posed the question of whether the practice was legal, to which Libs of TikTok definitively responded: "No."

The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission makes expressly clear on its website that "race discrimination involves treating someone (an applicant or employee) unfavorably because he/she is of a certain race or because of personal characteristics associated with race (such as hair texture, skin color, or certain facial features).

The EEOC notes that federal law prohibits discrimination "when it comes to any aspect of employment, including hiring, firing, pay, job assignments, promotions, layoff, training, fringe benefits, and any other term or condition of employment."

America First Legal, former Trump adviser Stephen Miller's nonprofit, said, "This is evidence of blatantly illegal discrimination, if true. If you are a Microsoft employee who is getting paid less because you are white or male, please contact us today."

Michael Seifert, the founder and CEO of the unwoke Amazon alternative Public Square, wrote, "The only 'systemic racism' happening today is against white people."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Army officials puzzle over significant drop in white recruits



Military officials and leftists in Washington have long bemoaned the overwhelming presence of white people in the U.S. military. Now that race obsessives have gotten their way and far fewer recruits from the disfavored group are enlisting, officials are beginning to fret.

According to Military.com, the U.S. Army fell 10,000 short of its 65,000 enlistment target in 2023. This drop was largely driven by a significant drop in the number of white recruits.

In 2018, 44,042 new Army recruits — 56.4% of the total — were white. Over the years, that number has plummeted, hitting 25,070 or 44% of the overall recruits in 2023, down 6% from the previous year. This demographic group has seen a uniquely dramatic decline when compared to other racial groups.

Overall recruiting totals have remained relatively flat for black and Hispanic recruits, but as white recruits have turned out in smaller numbers, the proportions of black and Hispanic recruits in the pool have increased from 20% to 24% and from 17% to 24%, respectively.

Military.com indicated it encountered even more damning data speaking to a dramatic "shift in demographics" but that Army officials wrote it off as a "system coding error."

Army officials told Military.com that there is not one single cause for this decline but indicated obesity and the poor quality of the public education system might have been factors. While these factors might explain a drop in recruitment across the board, they wouldn't explain a racially specific drop in proportion of 12.4 points over a five-year period.

An Army official suggested the decline may have also been political, driven by conservatives' critiques of the Biden administration and its politicization of the military. The official, paraphrased by Military.com, credited conservative lawmakers and right-wing media in particular with souring their "overwhelmingly white audience" against the military over its identity politics and with prompting would-be recruits in the mix to "abando[n] their warfighting priorities."

"There's a level of prestige in parts of conservative America with service that has degraded. Now, you can say you don't want to join, for whatever reason, or bad-mouth the service without any cultural guilt associated for the first time in those areas," said the official.

Besides taking issue with the Pentagon's radical LGBT activism, abortion promotion, and its sweeping accusations of extremism, the erosion of such guilt among white people and conservatives might also have something to do with the military's apparent animus toward them.

A 2011 report ordered by Congress claimed the military was too white and too male.

The Pentagon released a manual blasting "healthy, white, heterosexual, Christian" men for having "unearned advantages of social privilege."

The former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Army Gen. Mark Milley, complained in 2021 that the military was not diverse enough, stressing, "We must get better." He also defended the Pentagon's embrace of critical race theory, stating, "I want to understand white rage."

A battalion commander reportedly stressed in 2021, "If you're a white male, you are part of the problem."

It appears that in remedying a perceived problem, the Army created a real problem at a time of great international instability.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

FBI, DOJ Refuse To Call Covenant School Shooting An Anti-White Hate Crime Even After Racist Manifesto Is Leaked

The DOJ and FBI refuse to investigate the Nashville shooting as a hate crime against white Christians despite evidence.