Glenn Beck DISMANTLES Whoopi Goldberg’s flawed take on Biden’s hidden decline



On the May 20 episode of ABC’s “The View,” Whoopi Goldberg responded to the release of Jake Tapper and Alex Thompson’s book “Original Sin,” which details allegations of a cover-up by Biden’s staff regarding his physical and cognitive decline during his presidency.

“Why is it important to know now?” she asked the audience, implying that because it’s in the past, it’s not worth looking into.

Glenn Beck compares her question to saying, “So the bank was robbed; they got their money back through insurance. … Why are we still going after these bank robbers?”

“Are you crazy?” he asks, bewildered. “If the truth doesn't matter on this, then neither does your vote, and if that is true, we do not have a republic at all.”

In this recent episode of “The Glenn Beck Program,” Glenn passionately dismantles Goldberg’s flawed logic in three compelling points.

1. Empowering criminals

By not investigating who covered up Biden’s deteriorating health, we’re telling criminals they are “above the law.”

Glenn points to the arrest of Newark Mayor Ras Baraka (D) and the assault charges against Rep. LaMonica McIver (D-N.J.) for their roles in an ICE protest as an example of what happens when protesters believe they can get away with anything.

“If we would have put people behind bars who were looting Macy's and burning cities down [during the 2020 BLM riots] … we wouldn't be sitting in this situation,” he says. “Once you ignore something, you teach bad people or even people who are just frustrated with the system ‘oh well, they can do it, I can do it too.”’

2. Guaranteeing future scandals

Second, refusing to investigate Biden’s health cover-up makes it far more likely that a massive scandal of the same nature will happen again. Glenn points to what just occurred at the National Institutes of Health earlier this week as an example.

On Monday, during a town hall meeting, NIH Director Dr. Jay Bhattacharya said, “It’s possible that the pandemic was caused by research conducted by human beings, and it’s also possible that the NIH partly sponsored that research.”

“If it’s true that we sponsored research that caused the pandemic — and if you look at the polls of the American people, that’s what most people believe, and I’ve looked at the scientific evidence and I believe it — [then] what we have to do is make sure that we don’t engage in research that is any risk … to human populations,” he continued, despite several NIH employees storming out of the meeting.

“That’s why [Biden’s health cover-up] matters!” says Glenn.

We can’t restore the NIH’s credibility “if we ignore the truth that the NIH most likely … [was] involved in a cover-up because they were funding things they weren't supposed to be funding,” and we “can't save the republic by ignoring that the president wasn't in control of his faculties or the government,” he explains.

3. Protecting people

The most important reason that Biden’s health cover-up must be investigated, however, is simply because people matter.

Glenn highlights the investigation of former New York Governor Andrew Cuomo (D) for his handling of nursing home deaths during COVID-19.

“It needs to be investigated; it needs to be tried in open and fair court, and if he's guilty, he needs to go to jail. Why? ... Because you hate the Cuomos?” Glenn asks. “No, because I love people more, and I don't want people to be able to be killed in a nursing home because they're expendable.”

But “you can't solve that unless you put the people behind bars that encouraged that, because they'll just do it again, and if they don't, somebody else will do it,” he warns.

The same applies to the people who hid Biden’s deteriorating health, putting all the people in this country at risk by allowing an impaired leader to make critical decisions unchecked, either by his own compromised judgment or under the influence of unelected controllers.

“There's two reasons why we're in the situation we're in,” says Glenn. “One: Nobody knows the Constitution; nobody's following it. Two: Nobody's listening to the sage advice of three presidents.”

To find out who they are, watch the clip above.

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn’s masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis, and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Congress Must Use Every Tool At Its Disposal To Uncover Biden DementiaGate Cover-Up

A constitutional law expert says Trump should do what Biden did: waive executive privilege to release Biden White House records.

Levin: The left wants to SMASH the Constitution — here’s the proof



The Democrats might claim they want to preserve the Constitution, but the radical leftists they platform clearly couldn’t be less interested.

One of those radical leftists is Elie Mystal, an American political commentator, who reveals his own rewriting of the Constitution in a recent segment on “The View.”

“When Democrats come into office, they come in with, like, super glue and tape, and so they try to put things back together. So I thought about writing 10 constitutional amendments that would be super cool if we had,” Mystal told the ladies on the panel.

“I was like, ‘No, no, no. We need to smash the things that they like. We need to smash the things that are holding this country back,’” Mystal continued. “And so I came up with 10 laws that we could just be rid of. Not reform, not update for the modern era. Ten things that we can smash if we ever are allowed to get power again that would make this country better tomorrow.”


“So this guy’s saying that we need to smash everything that you and I stand for,” Mark Levin of “LevinTV” says, disturbed. “It’s just this hate America stuff, it’s just incredible.”

In his segment on “The View,” Mystal claimed that everything put into law before the 1965 Voting Rights Act was passed should be ignored.

“Even the 1964 Civil Rights Act? We should ignore that, too?” Levin asks. “See, the 1964 Civil Rights Act preceded the 1965 Voting Rights Act, because that was actually called the 1965 Civil Rights Act, and they were subsequent to the 1866 Civil Rights Act. And they were also subsequent to the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments to the Constitution of the United States.”

“The 13th Amendment officially abolishing slavery, the 14th Amendment ensuring that all freed slaves, black people, would be treated like citizens. The equal protection clause and due process clause of the Fifth Amendment applied to every single state through the 14th Amendment,” he continues.

“Should we ignore those, too? Well, who voted for them? Mostly white people and mostly white legislatures. You get my drift? In fact, who fought the Civil War? Obviously blacks fought, too. The overwhelming majority of the soldiers in the North were white. See, this race game doesn’t exactly play out like they hope, wish that it would.”

“Think about this idiot,” he continues, adding, “He thinks he’s clever. It’s because he doesn’t have anybody with an IQ over a pickle in order to respond to him.”

Want more from Mark Levin?

To enjoy more of "the Great One" — Mark Levin as you've never seen him before — subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Celebs under siege! Whoopi muzzled, Young fears gulag as Trump reign of terror continues



Whoopi Goldberg is suddenly super concerned about free speech.

The batty co-host of “The View” said nothing as conservatives were silenced in Hollywood ... the Twitter Files erased right-leaning voices – scientists got punished during the COVID-19 outbreak ... the Biden administration attempted to set up a Ministry of Speech (and we could go on).

'If I talk about Donald J. Trump, I may be one of those returning to America who is barred or put in jail to sleep on a cement floor with an aluminum blanket.'

Now, she thinks President Donald Trump is attacking speech. And she’s hella angry and, apparently, confused.

What I really want, what I want more than anything, is I want them to stop fooling around with my right to say what I feel ... I don’t like being threatened. I don’t like being — I don’t like people running up on me. You don’t like what I say. This is America. I grew up here, and the one thing I always knew is I had freedom of speech, and every time, every time somebody says, "You know, I don’t like what they said, so I’m shutting down PBS."

Because removing public funding from PBS is akin to squashing speech.

It’s exhausting to cite Goldberg’s brain drain, but we’ll never tire of pointing out her hypocrisy ...

Old man

Neil Young once headlined a Freedom of Speech Tour in the Bush era. Years later, the faux hippie tried to get Joe Rogan booted off Spotify for sharing the “wrong” information on COVID-19. Never mind that Rogan was more right than wrong, and legacy media got plenty dead wrong.

It looked like Young had shredded his hippie bona fides. He couldn’t sink any lower. Inconceivable!

Oh, yes he could.

Now, Young is complaining that he’d like to tour the U.S., but President Donald Trump may not allow it.

“If I talk about Donald J. Trump, I may be one of those returning to America who is barred or put in jail to sleep on a cement floor with an aluminum blanket. ... That is happening all the time now. ... If I come back from Europe and am barred, can’t play my USA tour, all of the folks who bought tickets will not be able to come to a concert by me.”

Funny he should mention Europe. In Germany, police will knock on your door if you post the “wrong” social media meme. “60 Minutes” did a whole segment on that dystopian reality.

And that’s currently happening in England, too. Why, it’s the kind of situation a free speech warrior might rage against.

Not Young.

This hippie hack better lay low before he decimates the rest of his once-sterling brand ...

Fifth 'Wick' flick sticks

Even Keanu Reeves can’t say no to John Wick.

The now-60-year-old star had publicly suggested his days as the fearless hit man were over. After all, his title character died in the fourth installment. That seems pretty permanent. Plus, the actor admitted his age is starting to creep up on him.

Then again, if Tom Cruise can do his own stunts at 62, surely an "active senior" like Reeves can keep his signature franchise going.

Yeah, we're thinking he's back.

Get ready for a fifth “John Wick” installment. It’s official. Hollywood is desperate for as many sure things as it can muster. If that means Reeves must keep his Wickian beard into his 70s, so be it ...

Hate-night TV

Satirists get away with rhetorical murder these days. Remember when Stephen Colbert said, during the height of the Russian collusion hoax, that the “only thing [Trump’s] mouth is good for is being Vladimir Putin’s BLEEP holster.”

Bet he’d like to take that vulgar joke back. Or maybe not. Colbert isn’t too worried about truthful gags.

Now, far-left “funnyman” John Oliver may be wishing he wasn’t so loose with his tongue. A health care insurance executive is suing the HBO star for comments he made on “Last Week Tonight with John Oliver.”

Dr. Brian Morley says Oliver “knowingly and falsely” defamed him. The comments in question came last April when Oliver launched into yet another profane rant that seemed disconnected from comedy.

“F*** that doctor with a rusty canoe,” and “I hope he gets tetanus of the balls.” He later added that Morley “thinks it’s OK if people have s*** on them for days.”

Morley wants the episode in question to be removed from all platforms. He also seeks financial restitution.

We’ll leave the matter to the lawyers, and it’s likely given Oliver’s satirical status he’ll survive the suit. If Dr. Morley is successful, the face of today’s hate-night TV might look very different.

Dylan Mulvaney, 'The View' try doing theology — but it goes comically wrong



It should go without saying: Don't tune into "The View" for lessons on God and theology.

But that didn't stop the progressive talk show from recently veering into theology while interviewing transgender influencer Dylan Mulvaney, using the assertion that "God doesn't make mistakes" to defend and promote transgender ideology.

First, Mulvaney claimed "God doesn't make mistakes" while explaining that his "conservative Catholic" family has come to terms with his decision to be transgender after he allegedly discovered his transgender identity at age 4. Later, while discussing transgender athletes, Whoopi Goldberg doubled down on the astounding theological claim.

  • Mulvaney: "I think my mom said something along the lines of, ‘God doesn’t make mistakes.’ ... I don’t think God sees me as a mistake, and I actually am still really trying to keep a relationship with the higher power because I think that, you know, trans and queer people are entitled to that if that’s what they’re looking for."
  • Goldberg: "I'm not sure what's going on or why this is an issue. The same for me as when people say, 'Oh, you know, I don’t know how I feel about you.' You do. God doesn’t make mistakes. And the challenge is not to the trans people. It’s to the people who are not trans. That’s what God is looking to see, how you treat people."

Not so fast

On the surface, their claim about God is true.

Make no mistake about it: God doesn't make "mistakes." God creates every human being in His image with inherent worth, dignity, and purpose. This is an elementary understanding of Christian theology in general, and with regard to human bodies specifically, the basic claim of Christian anthropology.

Instead of defending trans ideology, they showed how God's perfect design and the trans agenda cannot coexist.

But a closer examination of their assertion reveals a blinding contradiction: affirming trans ideology stipulates that God does make mistakes. That's because the framework of trans ideology is built on the idea that a trans-identifying person is "born in the wrong body" and that their "true" self is distinct (and different) from the truth of their biological body.

Not only does trans ideology assume that God makes mistakes, but the ideology necessarily affirms the idea that human intervention is required to remedy God's "mistakes."

Trans ideology attempts to overturn divine sovereignty and replace it with the secular god of human self-perception, a principle of our post-truth age.

But here is the truth: Our biological sex is not an accident, and our bodies are not mistakes that require human intervention to "correct." And because God is sovereign and because He doesn't make mistakes, it is our responsibility and duty to trust Him — especially when we don't understand or when our internal perception about our identity (and biological sex) is confused.

Every human is fearfully and wonderfully made, crafted by the hand of a loving God.

Commandment, broken

What Mulvaney and Goldberg claimed about God, when analyzed in its context, is a clear violation of the second law of the Ten Commandments.

"You shall not bear the name of the Lord your God in a vain and empty manner," Exodus 20:7 declares.

The command is not limited to our speech acts about God but certainly includes them. To use God's authority, as Mulvaney and Goldberg did, to defend an ideology contrary to God's design is a clear violation of the commandment because they are promoting a lie about God Himself (i.e., that transgenderism is congruent with His will and His plan for humanity).

Saying that "God doesn't make mistakes" in defense of trans ideology is a clear misrepresentation of God. They twisted a divine truth for their own means, ultimately using God as a rhetorical prop for the pro-trans agenda.

In other words, they bore the Lord's name in a vain and empty manner.

Irony alert

Claiming that "God doesn't make mistakes" to defend and promote trans ideology actually undermines the trans agenda.

If God's creation is without mistake, then the core idea of trans ideology — that a trans-identifying person was "born in the wrong body" and requires human intervention to correct the "mistake" — is wrong. If God doesn't make mistakes, then He did not mistakingly put anyone in the "wrong body."

The irony is strong.

Mulvaney and Goldberg want to use God's authority and His perfection to defend trans ideology, but they instead expose a flaw in their own worldview: If God's design of each human is intentional and without mistake, then the idea that a trans-identifying person needs to "correct" their body is an admission that trans ideology is built on a false premise, a lie. If God doesn't make mistakes, then there is no need for trans "corrective" measures.

The weight of the contradiction dismantles their argument.

In the end, their attempt at theology failed and backfired. Instead of defending trans ideology, they showed how God's perfect design and the trans agenda cannot coexist.

The only mistake here is the ideology that demands humans "correct" God's mistake-free design.

'I can only shake my head': Whoopi Goldberg leaves Brett Favre speechless after saying women should compete against men



Hall of Fame NFL quarterback Brett Favre was left dumbfounded after hearing actress Whoopi Goldberg justify why men should play in women's sports.

Goldberg was speaking to transgender activist Dylan Mulvaney, a male who portrays himself as a female caricature, when she referenced California Governor Gavin Newsom's (D) recent comments surrounding men playing in women's sports.

Goldberg explained that Newsom described men competing against women as "deeply unfair," which the 69-year-old actress took offense to.

"When you come in and you say, 'Oh, these men are — these are men competing against women.' You're assuming that the women are weak and just can't do anything [in sports]," Goldberg said on "The View."

After Fox News host Will Cain showed Favre the soundbite, the former quarterback was nearly unable to get any words out.

"There's nothing I can say that's going to change her mind — I can only shake my head at this," Favre said about Goldberg. "It's common sense at its best. Oh well, what can I say? Speechless."

After Cain revealed a New York Times/Ipsos poll that had 79% of respondents say men should not be in women's sports, Favre quickly agreed.

"Yeah. You don't have to be a rocket scientist to figure that out."

'It's the same problem that women face.'

Goldberg added some strange sentiments during her discussion about transgenderism, including a claim that the general public does not know how the bodies of transgender people work.

"I think part of the problem that the trans community is facing, and it's the same problem that women face, is if you don't know anything about our bodies, you don't know how it works."

At the same time, Goldberg attempted to pull Mulvaney into the conversation, but the activist quickly admitted he has never been an athlete.

"The last time I played a sport, I was 6 years old, and I was on a soccer team, but I assigned myself as the nurse," Mulvaney joked, attempting to imitate feminine behavior.

In addition to referring to himself as a "baby trans" because he has only believed himself to be female for three years, the activist said he typically defers to a female-to-male transgender athlete, and personal friend, for "guidance" on the matter.

Goldberg went on to say that since "God doesn't make mistakes," it was the responsibility of the general public to treat transgender people with respect.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Marco Rubio Destroys CNN Host’s Narrative with Facts in Only 1 Minute
play icon

Marco Rubio Destroys CNN Host’s Narrative with Facts in Only 1 Minute

‘The View’ hosts mock Elon Musk’s toddler



Elon Musk and the Department of Government Efficiency have upset many on the left, to the point of relentless attacks on Musk — but not all of them have stooped as low as the women of "The View."

While the hosts of the show have a history of being tone-deaf, they took it a step farther for a moment to disparage Elon Musk’s son, X Æ A-Xii, and make fun of the toddler’s name rather than discuss what they actually disagree with Musk on regarding government audits.

“So yesterday Elon Musk took his son, X Æ A-Xii, to a press conference. I did not name the child, and I don’t want to hear anyone mess about our names,” Whoopi Goldberg said.


“He just took little X Æ A-Xii with him to a press conference in the Oval Office to defend himself against critics who say he should not have the power to gut the federal agency,” she added.

While Whoopi asked the audience not to comment on her name, Keith Malinak of “Pat Gray Unleashed” can’t help but do so anyway.

“Her name is Whoopi, I’d like to point out,” Malinak says. “I thought kids were off-limits.”

“Is that not the case any more?” he asks.

“Not with them,” Pat Gray answers. “Not with the coven.”

Want more from Pat Gray?

To enjoy more of Pat's biting analysis and signature wit as he restores common sense to a senseless world, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Joy Behar roasted for saying Karoline Leavitt got WH press secretary job 'because according to Donald Trump she's a 10'



Left-wing co-host of "The View" Joy Behar — rarely one to put the brakes on her mouth — is getting bludgeoned on social media after saying Karoline Leavitt got the nod for White House press secretary "because according to Donald Trump she's a 10."

Behar made the remark on Wednesday's program. You can check out a short clip of her mouth moving here.

Observers on X blasted Behar for her comment. Here are but a few of the reactions:

  • "Seems kinda sexist, 'Joy,'" one commenter said.
  • "Looks like someone is jelly of her hotness!" another user said. "Did Joy not listen to Karoline speak?! She speaks with authority! She kicked a$ up there at the podium!"
  • "No, because she is qualified, tough, and has a brain!" another commenter said. "Unlike Behar!"
  • "The comparison could not be more stark," another user said. "It's shocking that Joy Behar has a job."
  • "Good Lord, is that the best she’s got? Karoline was brilliant yesterday!" another commenter said.
  • "Another TDS female trashing other females ... shocker," another user said.
  • Then the truth bomb: "It’s not her fault. Republicans are just hotter."

What preceded Behar's remark?

Prior to Behar's remark, fellow left-wing co-host Whoopi Goldberg kicked things off: “I would like this young lady who — this is her first job — I would like her to do a little homework because she said something yesterday that really pissed me off ... she said, ‘There will be no wokeness here.’"

Goldberg then looked at the camera as if she were speaking directly to Leavitt: "Let me explain something to you. Because without that wokeness, you might not have that job. Because women were not invited to that table. Women were not invited to many tables in this nation."

Goldberg then became visibly angry as her voice rose, her mouth sneered, and her finger wagged: "The reason we fought and busted our behinds to make sure that you didn't have to worry about this. ... The wokeness was put into place for a reason. Because black people couldn't get into colleges. Because women could not get into the colleges they wanted to go to. ... It was a man's world, and we busted our asses to make sure that this was a person's world. So please, please stop using [wokeness] ... because you don't understand what you're saying."

With that, Behar stated that Leavitt has "probably been put in there because according to Donald Trump, she's a 10. You know that's what it is!"

Co-host Alyssa Farah Griffin jumped in to correct Goldberg by saying the White House press secretary position isn't Leavitt's first job and that she worked in the previous Trump administration. Leavitt, 27, is the youngest press secretary in history.

Trump's four press secretaries during his first term in the White House were Sean Spicer, now-Arkansas Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders, Stephanie Grisham, and Kayleigh McEnany.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

WATCH: Whoopi Goldberg Suggests Musk and Vance Want to Assassinate Trump, Blames Cat in Apology

The View’s Whoopi Goldberg apologized on-air Thursday after suggesting Vice President-elect J.D. Vance and Elon Musk want to assassinate President-elect Donald Trump by tripping him downstairs. 

The post WATCH: Whoopi Goldberg Suggests Musk and Vance Want to Assassinate Trump, Blames Cat in Apology  appeared first on .